Improve simple directory offset wrap behavior
Subsystems (4)
v6 cover Improve simple directory offset wrap behavior
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The purpose of this series is to construct a set of upstream fixes that can be backported to v6.6 to address CVE-2024-46701.
Changes since v5:
- Improve error flow in simple_offset_add()
This series (against v6.13-rc3) has been pushed to:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git/log/?h=tmpfs-fixes
Chuck Lever (5):
libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted Revert "libfs: Add simple_offset_empty()"
Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir"
libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection
libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
fs/libfs.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- include/linux/fs.h | 1 - mm/shmem.c | 4 +- 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
PATCH v6 1/5 libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Testing shows that the EBUSY error return from mtree_alloc_cyclic() leaks into user space. The ERRORS section of "man creat(2)" says:
Quoted 3 lines
EBUSY
O_EXCLwas specified in flags and pathname refers
to a block device that is in use by the system (e.g., it is mounted).
ENOSPC is closer to what applications expect in this situation.
Note that the normal range of simple directory offset values is 2..2^63, so hitting this error is going to be rare to impossible.
--- fs/libfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/libfs.c +2 -2
@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry) ret =mtree_alloc_cyclic (&octx->mt, &offset, dentry,DIR_OFFSET_MIN ,LONG_MAX , &octx->next_offset,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; +if (unlikely (ret <0 )) +return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;offset_set (dentry, offset);return 0 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted
Quoted 10 lines · * [email protected] <[email protected]> [241220 10:33]:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Testing shows that the EBUSY error return from
mtree_alloc_cyclic()leaks into user space. The ERRORS section of "man creat(2)" says:Quoted 3 lines
EBUSY
O_EXCLwas specified in flags and pathname refers
to a block device that is in use by the system (e.g., it is mounted).ENOSPC is closer to what applications expect in this situation.
Should the tree be returning ENOSPC in this case as apposed to translating it here?
Quoted 32 lines
Note that the normal range of simple directory offset values is 2..2^63, so hitting this error is going to be rare to impossible.
Fixes 6faddda69f62 ("libfs: Add directory operations for stable offsets")Cc <[email protected]> # v6.9+Reviewed-by Jeff Layton <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Yang Erkun <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-2@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry) ret =mtree_alloc_cyclic (&octx->mt, &offset, dentry,DIR_OFFSET_MIN ,LONG_MAX , &octx->next_offset,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; +if (unlikely (ret <0 )) +return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;offset_set (dentry, offset);return 0 ;Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted
Quoted 6 lines · Liam R. Howlett
Quoted 5 lines · * [email protected] <[email protected]> [241220 10:33]:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Testing shows that the EBUSY error return from
mtree_alloc_cyclic()leaks into user space. The ERRORS section of "man creat(2)" says:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
EBUSY
O_EXCLwas specified in flags and pathname refers
to a block device that is in use by the system (e.g., it is mounted).ENOSPC is closer to what applications expect in this situation.
Should the tree be returning ENOSPC in this case as apposed to translating it here?
ENOSPC means "No space left on device." which has a certain filesystem-like ring to it. So translation in a filesystem caller seems sensible to me.
If you change mtree_alloc_cyclic() wouldn't you also need to update other mtree and xarray APIs as well, for consistency? That could be a lot of bother.
But if you'd like to change the mtree API, I won't argue. It's not a crazy idea.
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 31 lines
Note that the normal range of simple directory offset values is 2..2^63, so hitting this error is going to be rare to impossible.
Fixes 6faddda69f62 ("libfs: Add directory operations for stable offsets")Cc <[email protected]> # v6.9+Reviewed-by Jeff Layton <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Yang Erkun <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-2@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry) ret =mtree_alloc_cyclic (&octx->mt, &offset, dentry,DIR_OFFSET_MIN ,LONG_MAX , &octx->next_offset,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; +if (unlikely (ret <0 )) +return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;offset_set (dentry, offset);return 0 ;Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Signature · 1 line
Chuck Lever
PATCH v6 2/5 Revert "libfs: Add simple_offset_empty()"
In reply to [email protected]From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
simple_empty() and simple_offset_empty() perform the same task. The latter's use as a canary to find bugs has not found any new issues. A subsequent patch will remove the use of the mtree for iterating directory contents, so revert back to using a similar mechanism for determining whether a directory is indeed empty.
Only one such mechanism is ever needed.
--- fs/libfs.c | 32 -------------------------------- include/linux/fs.h | 1 - mm/shmem.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
fs/libfs.c +0 -32
@@ -329,38 +329,6 @@ void simple_offset_remove(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)offset_set (dentry,0 ); } -/** -* simple_offset_empty - Check if a dentry can be unlinked -* @dentry: dentry to be tested -* -* Returns 0 if @dentry is a non-empty directory; otherwise returns 1. -*/ -int simple_offset_empty (struct dentry *dentry) -{ -struct inode *inode =d_inode (dentry); -struct offset_ctx *octx; -struct dentry *child; -unsigned long index; -int ret =1 ; - -if (!inode || !S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode)) -return ret; - - index =DIR_OFFSET_MIN ; - octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); -mt_for_each (&octx->mt, child, index,LONG_MAX ) { -spin_lock (&child->d_lock); -if (simple_positive (child)) { -spin_unlock (&child->d_lock); - ret =0 ; -break ; - } -spin_unlock (&child->d_lock); - } - -return ret; -} -/** * simple_offset_rename - handle directory offsets for rename * @old_dir: parent directory of source entry
include/linux/fs.h +0 -1
@@ -3468,7 +3468,6 @@ struct offset_ctx {void simple_offset_init (struct offset_ctx *octx);int simple_offset_add (struct offset_ctx *octx,struct dentry *dentry);void simple_offset_remove (struct offset_ctx *octx,struct dentry *dentry); -int simple_offset_empty (struct dentry *dentry);int simple_offset_rename (struct inode *old_dir,struct dentry *old_dentry,struct inode *new_dir,struct dentry *new_dentry); int simple_offset_rename_exchange(struct inode *old_dir,
mm/shmem.c +2 -2
@@ -3818,7 +3818,7 @@ static int shmem_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)static int shmem_rmdir (struct inode *dir,struct dentry *dentry) { -if (!simple_offset_empty (dentry)) +if (!simple_empty (dentry))return -ENOTEMPTY ;drop_nlink (d_inode (dentry));
@@ -3875,7 +3875,7 @@ static int shmem_rename2(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,return simple_offset_rename_exchange (old_dir, old_dentry, new_dir, new_dentry); -if (!simple_offset_empty (new_dentry)) +if (!simple_empty (new_dentry))return -ENOTEMPTY ;if (flags &RENAME_WHITEOUT ) {
Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] Revert "libfs: Add simple_offset_empty()"
LGTM
Quoted 94 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
simple_empty()andsimple_offset_empty()perform the same task. The latter's use as a canary to find bugs has not found any new issues. A subsequent patch will remove the use of the mtree for iterating directory contents, so revert back to using a similar mechanism for determining whether a directory is indeed empty.Only one such mechanism is ever needed.
Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 32 -------------------------------- include/linux/fs.h | 1 - mm/shmem.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +0
-32@@ -329,38 +329,6 @@ void simple_offset_remove(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)offset_set (dentry,0 ); } -/** -* simple_offset_empty - Check if a dentry can be unlinked -* @dentry: dentry to be tested -* -* Returns 0 if @dentry is a non-empty directory; otherwise returns 1. -*/ -int simple_offset_empty (struct dentry *dentry) -{ -struct inode *inode =d_inode (dentry); -struct offset_ctx *octx; -struct dentry *child; -unsigned long index; -int ret =1 ; - -if (!inode || !S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode)) -return ret; - - index =DIR_OFFSET_MIN ; - octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); -mt_for_each (&octx->mt, child, index,LONG_MAX ) { -spin_lock (&child->d_lock); -if (simple_positive (child)) { -spin_unlock (&child->d_lock); - ret =0 ; -break ; - } -spin_unlock (&child->d_lock); - } - -return ret; -} -/** * simple_offset_rename - handle directory offsets for rename * @old_dir: parent directory of source entry include/linux/fs.h +0
-1@@ -3468,7 +3468,6 @@ struct offset_ctx {void simple_offset_init (struct offset_ctx *octx);int simple_offset_add (struct offset_ctx *octx,struct dentry *dentry);void simple_offset_remove (struct offset_ctx *octx,struct dentry *dentry); -int simple_offset_empty (struct dentry *dentry);int simple_offset_rename (struct inode *old_dir,struct dentry *old_dentry,struct inode *new_dir,struct dentry *new_dentry); int simple_offset_rename_exchange(struct inode *old_dir,mm/shmem.c +2
-2@@ -3818,7 +3818,7 @@ static int shmem_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)static int shmem_rmdir (struct inode *dir,struct dentry *dentry) { -if (!simple_offset_empty (dentry)) +if (!simple_empty (dentry))return -ENOTEMPTY ;drop_nlink (d_inode (dentry));@@ -3875,7 +3875,7 @@ static int shmem_rename2(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,return simple_offset_rename_exchange (old_dir, old_dentry, new_dir, new_dentry); -if (!simple_offset_empty (new_dentry)) +if (!simple_empty (new_dentry))return -ENOTEMPTY ;if (flags &RENAME_WHITEOUT ) {
PATCH v6 3/5 Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir"
In reply to [email protected]From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The current directory offset allocator (based on mtree_alloc_cyclic) stores the next offset value to return in octx->next_offset. This mechanism typically returns values that increase monotonically over time. Eventually, though, the newly allocated offset value wraps back to a low number (say, 2) which is smaller than other already- allocated offset values.
Yu Kuai <[email protected]> reports that, after commit 64a7ce76fb90 ("libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir"), if a directory's offset allocator wraps, existing entries are no longer visible via readdir/getdents because offset_readdir() stops listing entries once an entry's offset is larger than octx->next_offset. These entries vanish persistently -- they can be looked up, but will never again appear in readdir(3) output.
The reason for this is that the commit treats directory offsets as monotonically increasing integer values rather than opaque cookies, and introduces this comparison:
if (dentry2offset(dentry) >= last_index) {On 64-bit platforms, the directory offset value upper bound is 2^63 - 1. Directory offsets will monotonically increase for millions of years without wrapping.
On 32-bit platforms, however, LONG_MAX is 2^31 - 1. The allocator can wrap after only a few weeks (at worst).
Revert commit 64a7ce76fb90 ("libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir") to prepare for a fix that can work properly on 32-bit systems and might apply to recent LTS kernels where shmem employs the simple_offset mechanism.
--- fs/libfs.c | 35 +++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
fs/libfs.c +11 -24
@@ -422,14 +422,6 @@ void simple_offset_destroy(struct offset_ctx *octx)mtree_destroy (&octx->mt); } -static int offset_dir_open (struct inode *inode,struct file *file) -{ -struct offset_ctx *ctx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); - - file->private_data = (void *)ctx->next_offset; -return 0 ; -} -/** * offset_dir_llseek - Advance the read position of a directory descriptor * @file: an open directory whose position is to be updated
@@ -443,9 +435,6 @@ static int offset_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)*/ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek (struct file *file,loff_t offset,int whence) { -struct inode *inode = file->f_inode; -struct offset_ctx *ctx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); -switch (whence) {case SEEK_CUR : offset += file->f_pos;
@@ -459,8 +448,7 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) }/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ -if (!offset) - file->private_data = (void *)ctx->next_offset; + file->private_data =NULL ;return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); }
@@ -491,7 +479,7 @@ static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx,long last_index) +static void *offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *dentry;
@@ -499,21 +487,17 @@ static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx, lonwhile (true) { dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos);if (!dentry) -return ; - -if (dentry2offset (dentry) >= last_index) { -dput (dentry); -return ; - } +return ERR_PTR (-ENOENT );if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) {dput (dentry); -return ; +break ; } ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ;dput (dentry); } +return NULL ; }/**
@@ -540,19 +524,22 @@ static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx, lonstatic int offset_readdir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; -long last_index = (long )file->private_data;lockdep_assert_held (&d_inode (dir)->i_rwsem);if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ; -offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx, last_index); +/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ +if (ctx->pos ==DIR_OFFSET_MIN ) + file->private_data =NULL ; +else if (file->private_data ==ERR_PTR (-ENOENT )) +return 0 ; + file->private_data =offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx);return 0 ; }const struct file_operations simple_offset_dir_operations = { - .open = offset_dir_open, .llseek = offset_dir_llseek, .iterate_shared = offset_readdir, .read = generic_read_dir,
Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir"
LGTM
Quoted 140 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The current directory offset allocator (based on
mtree_alloc_cyclic) stores the next offset value to return inoctx->next_offset. This mechanism typically returns values that increase monotonically over time. Eventually, though, the newly allocated offset value wraps back to a low number (say, 2) which is smaller than other already- allocated offset values.Yu Kuai <[email protected]> reports that, after commit
64a7ce76fb90("libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir"), if a directory's offset allocator wraps, existing entries are no longer visible via readdir/getdents becauseoffset_readdir()stops listing entries once an entry's offset is larger thanoctx->next_offset. These entries vanish persistently -- they can be looked up, but will never again appear in readdir(3) output.The reason for this is that the commit treats directory offsets as monotonically increasing integer values rather than opaque cookies, and introduces this comparison:
if (dentry2offset(dentry) >= last_index) {On 64-bit platforms, the directory offset value upper bound is 2^63 - 1. Directory offsets will monotonically increase for millions of years without wrapping.
On 32-bit platforms, however,
LONG_MAXis 2^31 - 1. The allocator can wrap after only a few weeks (at worst).Revert commit
64a7ce76fb90("libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir") to prepare for a fix that can work properly on 32-bit systems and might apply to recent LTS kernels where shmem employs thesimple_offsetmechanism.Reported-by Yu Kuai <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 35 +++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +11
-24@@ -422,14 +422,6 @@ void simple_offset_destroy(struct offset_ctx *octx)mtree_destroy (&octx->mt); } -static int offset_dir_open (struct inode *inode,struct file *file) -{ -struct offset_ctx *ctx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); - - file->private_data = (void *)ctx->next_offset; -return 0 ; -} -/** * offset_dir_llseek - Advance the read position of a directory descriptor * @file: an open directory whose position is to be updated @@ -443,9 +435,6 @@ static int offset_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)*/ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek (struct file *file,loff_t offset,int whence) { -struct inode *inode = file->f_inode; -struct offset_ctx *ctx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); -switch (whence) {case SEEK_CUR : offset += file->f_pos;@@ -459,8 +448,7 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) }/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ -if (!offset) - file->private_data = (void *)ctx->next_offset; + file->private_data =NULL ;return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); }@@ -491,7 +479,7 @@ static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx,long last_index) +static void *offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *dentry;@@ -499,21 +487,17 @@ static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx, lonwhile (true) { dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos);if (!dentry) -return ; - -if (dentry2offset (dentry) >= last_index) { -dput (dentry); -return ; - } +return ERR_PTR (-ENOENT );if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) {dput (dentry); -return ; +break ; } ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ;dput (dentry); } +return NULL ; }/** @@ -540,19 +524,22 @@ static void offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx, lonstatic int offset_readdir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; -long last_index = (long )file->private_data;lockdep_assert_held (&d_inode (dir)->i_rwsem);if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ; -offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx, last_index); +/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ +if (ctx->pos ==DIR_OFFSET_MIN ) + file->private_data =NULL ; +else if (file->private_data ==ERR_PTR (-ENOENT )) +return 0 ; + file->private_data =offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx);return 0 ; }const struct file_operations simple_offset_dir_operations = { - .open = offset_dir_open, .llseek = offset_dir_llseek, .iterate_shared = offset_readdir, .read = generic_read_dir,
PATCH v6 4/5 libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection
In reply to [email protected]From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
According to getdents(3), the d_off field in each returned directory entry points to the next entry in the directory. The d_off field in the last returned entry in the readdir buffer must contain a valid offset value, but if it points to an actual directory entry, then readdir/getdents can loop.
This patch introduces a specific fixed offset value that is placed in the d_off field of the last entry in a directory. Some user space applications assume that the EOD offset value is larger than the offsets of real directory entries, so the largest possible offset value is reserved for this purpose. This new value is never allocated by simple_offset_add().
When ->iterate_dir() returns, getdents{64} inserts the ctx->pos value into the d_off field of the last valid entry in the readdir buffer. When it hits EOD, offset_readdir() sets ctx->pos to the EOD offset value so the last entry is updated to point to the EOD marker.
When trying to read the entry at the EOD offset, offset_readdir() terminates immediately.
It is worth noting that using a Maple tree for directory offset value allocation does not guarantee a 63-bit range of values -- on platforms where "long" is a 32-bit type, the directory offset value range is still 0..(2^31 - 1).
--- fs/libfs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
fs/libfs.c +22 -16
@@ -245,9 +245,16 @@ const struct inode_operations simple_dir_inode_operations = { };EXPORT_SYMBOL (simple_dir_inode_operations); -/* 0 is '.', 1 is '..', so always start with offset 2 or more */ +/* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { -DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MAX =LONG_MAX -1 , +}; + +/* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ +enum { +DIR_OFFSET_EOD =LONG_MAX ,/* Marks EOD */ + };static void offset_set (struct dentry *dentry,long offset)
@@ -291,7 +298,8 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)return -EBUSY ; ret =mtree_alloc_cyclic (&octx->mt, &offset, dentry,DIR_OFFSET_MIN , -LONG_MAX , &octx->next_offset,GFP_KERNEL ); +DIR_OFFSET_MAX , &octx->next_offset, +GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (ret <0 ))return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;
@@ -447,8 +455,6 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)return -EINVAL ; } -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ - file->private_data =NULL ;return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); }
@@ -458,7 +464,7 @@ static struct dentry *offset_find_next(struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset)struct dentry *child, *found =NULL ;rcu_read_lock (); - child =mas_find (&mas,LONG_MAX ); + child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX );if (!child) goto out;spin_lock (&child->d_lock);
@@ -479,7 +485,7 @@ static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void *offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *dentry;
@@ -487,7 +493,7 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)while (true) { dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos);if (!dentry) -return ERR_PTR (-ENOENT ); + goto out_eod;if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) {dput (dentry);
@@ -497,7 +503,10 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx) ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ;dput (dentry); } -return NULL ; +return ; + +out_eod: + ctx->pos =DIR_OFFSET_EOD ; }/**
@@ -517,6 +526,8 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)* * On return, @ctx->pos contains an offset that will read the next entry * in this directory when offset_readdir() is called again with @ctx. +* Caller places this value in the d_off field of the last entry in the +* user's buffer. * * Return values: * %0 - Complete
@@ -529,13 +540,8 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ; - -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ -if (ctx->pos ==DIR_OFFSET_MIN ) - file->private_data =NULL ; -else if (file->private_data ==ERR_PTR (-ENOENT )) -return 0 ; - file->private_data =offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx); +if (ctx->pos !=DIR_OFFSET_EOD ) +offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection
LGTM
Quoted 140 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
According to getdents(3), the
d_offfield in each returned directory entry points to the next entry in the directory. Thed_offfield in the last returned entry in the readdir buffer must contain a valid offset value, but if it points to an actual directory entry, then readdir/getdents can loop.This patch introduces a specific fixed offset value that is placed in the
d_offfield of the last entry in a directory. Some user space applications assume that the EOD offset value is larger than the offsets of real directory entries, so the largest possible offset value is reserved for this purpose. This new value is never allocated bysimple_offset_add().When ->iterate_dir() returns, getdents{64} inserts the
ctx->posvalue into thed_offfield of the last valid entry in the readdir buffer. When it hits EOD,offset_readdir()setsctx->posto the EOD offset value so the last entry is updated to point to the EOD marker.When trying to read the entry at the EOD offset,
offset_readdir()terminates immediately.It is worth noting that using a Maple tree for directory offset value allocation does not guarantee a 63-bit range of values -- on platforms where "long" is a 32-bit type, the directory offset value range is still 0..(2^31 - 1).
Fixes 796432efab1e ("libfs: getdents() should return 0 after reaching EOD")Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +22
-16@@ -245,9 +245,16 @@ const struct inode_operations simple_dir_inode_operations = { };EXPORT_SYMBOL (simple_dir_inode_operations); -/* 0 is '.', 1 is '..', so always start with offset 2 or more */ +/* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { -DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MAX =LONG_MAX -1 , +}; + +/* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ +enum { +DIR_OFFSET_EOD =LONG_MAX ,/* Marks EOD */ + };static void offset_set (struct dentry *dentry,long offset)@@ -291,7 +298,8 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)return -EBUSY ; ret =mtree_alloc_cyclic (&octx->mt, &offset, dentry,DIR_OFFSET_MIN , -LONG_MAX , &octx->next_offset,GFP_KERNEL ); +DIR_OFFSET_MAX , &octx->next_offset, +GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (ret <0 ))return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;@@ -447,8 +455,6 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)return -EINVAL ; } -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ - file->private_data =NULL ;return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); }@@ -458,7 +464,7 @@ static struct dentry *offset_find_next(struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset)struct dentry *child, *found =NULL ;rcu_read_lock (); - child =mas_find (&mas,LONG_MAX ); + child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX );if (!child) goto out;spin_lock (&child->d_lock);@@ -479,7 +485,7 @@ static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void *offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *dentry;@@ -487,7 +493,7 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)while (true) { dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos);if (!dentry) -return ERR_PTR (-ENOENT ); + goto out_eod;if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) {dput (dentry);@@ -497,7 +503,10 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx) ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ;dput (dentry); } -return NULL ; +return ; + +out_eod: + ctx->pos =DIR_OFFSET_EOD ; }/** @@ -517,6 +526,8 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)* * On return, @ctx->pos contains an offset that will read the next entry * in this directory when offset_readdir() is called again with @ctx. +* Caller places this value in the d_off field of the last entry in the +* user's buffer. * * Return values: * %0 - Complete @@ -529,13 +540,8 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ; - -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ -if (ctx->pos ==DIR_OFFSET_MIN ) - file->private_data =NULL ; -else if (file->private_data ==ERR_PTR (-ENOENT )) -return 0 ; - file->private_data =offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx); +if (ctx->pos !=DIR_OFFSET_EOD ) +offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx);return 0 ; }
Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection
In reply to [email protected]Quoted 20 lines · * [email protected] <[email protected]> [241220 10:33]:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
According to getdents(3), the
d_offfield in each returned directory entry points to the next entry in the directory. Thed_offfield in the last returned entry in the readdir buffer must contain a valid offset value, but if it points to an actual directory entry, then readdir/getdents can loop.This patch introduces a specific fixed offset value that is placed in the
d_offfield of the last entry in a directory. Some user space applications assume that the EOD offset value is larger than the offsets of real directory entries, so the largest possible offset value is reserved for this purpose. This new value is never allocated bysimple_offset_add().When ->iterate_dir() returns, getdents{64} inserts the
ctx->posvalue into thed_offfield of the last valid entry in the readdir buffer. When it hits EOD,offset_readdir()setsctx->posto the EOD offset value so the last entry is updated to point to the EOD marker.
Quoted 7 lines
When trying to read the entry at the EOD offset,
offset_readdir()terminates immediately.It is worth noting that using a Maple tree for directory offset value allocation does not guarantee a 63-bit range of values -- on platforms where "long" is a 32-bit type, the directory offset value range is still 0..(2^31 - 1).
I have a standing request to have 32-bit archs return 64-bit values. Is this another 'nice to have' 64 bit values on 32 bit archs?
Quoted 117 lines
Fixes 796432efab1e ("libfs: getdents() should return 0 after reaching EOD")Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +22
-16@@ -245,9 +245,16 @@ const struct inode_operations simple_dir_inode_operations = { };EXPORT_SYMBOL (simple_dir_inode_operations); -/* 0 is '.', 1 is '..', so always start with offset 2 or more */ +/* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { -DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MAX =LONG_MAX -1 , +}; + +/* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ +enum { +DIR_OFFSET_EOD =LONG_MAX ,/* Marks EOD */ + };static void offset_set (struct dentry *dentry,long offset)@@ -291,7 +298,8 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)return -EBUSY ; ret =mtree_alloc_cyclic (&octx->mt, &offset, dentry,DIR_OFFSET_MIN , -LONG_MAX , &octx->next_offset,GFP_KERNEL ); +DIR_OFFSET_MAX , &octx->next_offset, +GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (ret <0 ))return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;@@ -447,8 +455,6 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)return -EINVAL ; } -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ - file->private_data =NULL ;return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); }@@ -458,7 +464,7 @@ static struct dentry *offset_find_next(struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset)struct dentry *child, *found =NULL ;rcu_read_lock (); - child =mas_find (&mas,LONG_MAX ); + child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX );if (!child) goto out;spin_lock (&child->d_lock);@@ -479,7 +485,7 @@ static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void *offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *dentry;@@ -487,7 +493,7 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)while (true) { dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos);if (!dentry) -return ERR_PTR (-ENOENT ); + goto out_eod;if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) {dput (dentry);@@ -497,7 +503,10 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx) ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ;dput (dentry); } -return NULL ; +return ; + +out_eod: + ctx->pos =DIR_OFFSET_EOD ; }/** @@ -517,6 +526,8 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)* * On return, @ctx->pos contains an offset that will read the next entry * in this directory when offset_readdir() is called again with @ctx. +* Caller places this value in the d_off field of the last entry in the +* user's buffer. * * Return values: * %0 - Complete @@ -529,13 +540,8 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ; - -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ -if (ctx->pos ==DIR_OFFSET_MIN ) - file->private_data =NULL ; -else if (file->private_data ==ERR_PTR (-ENOENT )) -return 0 ; - file->private_data =offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx); +if (ctx->pos !=DIR_OFFSET_EOD ) +offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx);return 0 ; }Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection
Quoted 24 lines · Liam R. Howlett
Quoted 23 lines · * [email protected] <[email protected]> [241220 10:33]:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
According to getdents(3), the
d_offfield in each returned directory entry points to the next entry in the directory. Thed_offfield in the last returned entry in the readdir buffer must contain a valid offset value, but if it points to an actual directory entry, then readdir/getdents can loop.This patch introduces a specific fixed offset value that is placed in the
d_offfield of the last entry in a directory. Some user space applications assume that the EOD offset value is larger than the offsets of real directory entries, so the largest possible offset value is reserved for this purpose. This new value is never allocated bysimple_offset_add().When ->iterate_dir() returns, getdents{64} inserts the
ctx->posvalue into thed_offfield of the last valid entry in the readdir buffer. When it hits EOD,offset_readdir()setsctx->posto the EOD offset value so the last entry is updated to point to the EOD marker.When trying to read the entry at the EOD offset,
offset_readdir()terminates immediately.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
It is worth noting that using a Maple tree for directory offset value allocation does not guarantee a 63-bit range of values -- on platforms where "long" is a 32-bit type, the directory offset value range is still 0..(2^31 - 1).
I have a standing request to have 32-bit archs return 64-bit values. Is this another 'nice to have' 64 bit values on 32 bit archs?
It would be nice if the range of values that the mtree API handles were the same on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms. I think that could reduce the defect rate in mtree consumers.
But 32-bit is going away over time. I wonder how much such an effort would pay off in the long run.
Quoted 116 lines
Quoted 116 lines
Fixes 796432efab1e ("libfs: getdents() should return 0 after reaching EOD")Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +22
-16@@ -245,9 +245,16 @@ const struct inode_operations simple_dir_inode_operations = { };EXPORT_SYMBOL (simple_dir_inode_operations); -/* 0 is '.', 1 is '..', so always start with offset 2 or more */ +/* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { -DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MAX =LONG_MAX -1 , +}; + +/* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ +enum { +DIR_OFFSET_EOD =LONG_MAX ,/* Marks EOD */ + };static void offset_set (struct dentry *dentry,long offset)@@ -291,7 +298,8 @@ int simple_offset_add(struct offset_ctx *octx, struct dentry *dentry)return -EBUSY ; ret =mtree_alloc_cyclic (&octx->mt, &offset, dentry,DIR_OFFSET_MIN , -LONG_MAX , &octx->next_offset,GFP_KERNEL ); +DIR_OFFSET_MAX , &octx->next_offset, +GFP_KERNEL );if (unlikely (ret <0 ))return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;@@ -447,8 +455,6 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)return -EINVAL ; } -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ - file->private_data =NULL ;return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); }@@ -458,7 +464,7 @@ static struct dentry *offset_find_next(struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset)struct dentry *child, *found =NULL ;rcu_read_lock (); - child =mas_find (&mas,LONG_MAX ); + child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX );if (!child) goto out;spin_lock (&child->d_lock);@@ -479,7 +485,7 @@ static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void *offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) {struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *dentry;@@ -487,7 +493,7 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)while (true) { dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos);if (!dentry) -return ERR_PTR (-ENOENT ); + goto out_eod;if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) {dput (dentry);@@ -497,7 +503,10 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx) ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ;dput (dentry); } -return NULL ; +return ; + +out_eod: + ctx->pos =DIR_OFFSET_EOD ; }/** @@ -517,6 +526,8 @@ static void *offset_iterate_dir(struct inode *inode, struct dir_context *ctx)* * On return, @ctx->pos contains an offset that will read the next entry * in this directory when offset_readdir() is called again with @ctx. +* Caller places this value in the d_off field of the last entry in the +* user's buffer. * * Return values: * %0 - Complete @@ -529,13 +540,8 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ; - -/* In this case, ->private_data is protected by f_pos_lock */ -if (ctx->pos ==DIR_OFFSET_MIN ) - file->private_data =NULL ; -else if (file->private_data ==ERR_PTR (-ENOENT )) -return 0 ; - file->private_data =offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx); +if (ctx->pos !=DIR_OFFSET_EOD ) +offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx);return 0 ; }Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Signature · 1 line
Chuck Lever
Christian Brauner
maintainerRe: [PATCH v6 4/5] libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection
In reply to Liam R. HowlettQuoted 24 lines · Liam R. Howlett
Quoted 23 lines · * [email protected] <[email protected]> [241220 10:33]:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
According to getdents(3), the
d_offfield in each returned directory entry points to the next entry in the directory. Thed_offfield in the last returned entry in the readdir buffer must contain a valid offset value, but if it points to an actual directory entry, then readdir/getdents can loop.This patch introduces a specific fixed offset value that is placed in the
d_offfield of the last entry in a directory. Some user space applications assume that the EOD offset value is larger than the offsets of real directory entries, so the largest possible offset value is reserved for this purpose. This new value is never allocated bysimple_offset_add().When ->iterate_dir() returns, getdents{64} inserts the
ctx->posvalue into thed_offfield of the last valid entry in the readdir buffer. When it hits EOD,offset_readdir()setsctx->posto the EOD offset value so the last entry is updated to point to the EOD marker.When trying to read the entry at the EOD offset,
offset_readdir()terminates immediately.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
It is worth noting that using a Maple tree for directory offset value allocation does not guarantee a 63-bit range of values -- on platforms where "long" is a 32-bit type, the directory offset value range is still 0..(2^31 - 1).
I have a standing request to have 32-bit archs return 64-bit values. Is
Yes, an allocation mechanism for 64-bit values on 32-bit would be very nice to have.
PATCH v6 5/5 libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
In reply to [email protected]From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming ctx->pos to a starting entry. Then use the directory's d_children list, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.
One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the d_children list, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.
Note also that the readdir() is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head of d_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.
--- fs/libfs.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
fs/libfs.c +58 -26
@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations);/* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { -DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MIN =3 ,DIR_OFFSET_MAX =LONG_MAX -1 , };/* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { +DIR_OFFSET_FIRST =2 ,/* Find first real entry */ DIR_OFFSET_EOD =LONG_MAX ,/* Marks EOD */ };
@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx,loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, +struct dentry *dentry, +bool next) { -MA_STATE (mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); +struct dentry *found =NULL ; + +spin_lock (&parent->d_lock); +if (next) + dentry =d_next_sibling (dentry); +else if (!dentry) + dentry =d_first_child (parent); +hlist_for_each_entry_from (dentry, d_sib) { +if (!simple_positive (dentry)) +continue ; +spin_lock_nested (&dentry->d_lock,DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED ); +if (simple_positive (dentry)) + found =dget_dlock (dentry); +spin_unlock (&dentry->d_lock); +if (likely (found)) +break ; + } +spin_unlock (&parent->d_lock); +return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ +struct inode *inode =d_inode (parent); +struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *child, *found =NULL ; -rcu_read_lock (); - child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX ); -if (!child) - goto out; -spin_lock (&child->d_lock); -if (simple_positive (child)) - found =dget_dlock (child); -spin_unlock (&child->d_lock); -out: -rcu_read_unlock (); +MA_STATE (mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + +if (offset ==DIR_OFFSET_FIRST ) + found =find_positive_dentry (parent,NULL , false); +else { +rcu_read_lock (); + child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX ); + found =find_positive_dentry (parent, child, false); +rcu_read_unlock (); + }return found; }static bool offset_dir_emit (struct dir_context *ctx,struct dentry *dentry) {struct inode *inode =d_inode (dentry); -long offset =dentry2offset (dentry); -return ctx->actor (ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino,fs_umode_to_dtype (inode->i_mode)); +return dir_emit (ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino,fs_umode_to_dtype (inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { -struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); +struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry;struct dentry *dentry; + dentry =offset_dir_lookup (dir, ctx->pos); +if (!dentry) + goto out_eod;while (true) { - dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos); -if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; +struct dentry *next; -if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) { -dput (dentry); + ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry); +if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry))break ; - } - ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ; + next =find_positive_dentry (dir, dentry, true);dput (dentry); + +if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } +dput (dentry);return ; out_eod:
@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ;if (ctx->pos !=DIR_OFFSET_EOD ) -offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx); +offset_iterate_dir (file, ctx);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.47.0
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
Quoted 92 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming
ctx->posto a starting entry. Then use the directory'sd_childrenlist, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the
d_childrenlist, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.Note also that the
readdir()is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head ofd_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>--- fs/libfs.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +31
-10@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations);/* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { -DIR_OFFSET_MIN =2 , +DIR_OFFSET_MIN =3 ,DIR_OFFSET_MAX =LONG_MAX -1 , };/* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { +DIR_OFFSET_FIRST =2 ,/* Find first real entry */ DIR_OFFSET_EOD =LONG_MAX ,/* Marks EOD */ };@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)return vfs_setpos (file, offset,LONG_MAX ); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx,loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, +struct dentry *dentry, +bool next) { -MA_STATE (mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); +struct dentry *found =NULL ; + +spin_lock (&parent->d_lock); +if (next) + dentry =d_next_sibling (dentry); +else if (!dentry) + dentry =d_first_child (parent); +hlist_for_each_entry_from (dentry, d_sib) { +if (!simple_positive (dentry)) +continue ; +spin_lock_nested (&dentry->d_lock,DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED ); +if (simple_positive (dentry)) + found =dget_dlock (dentry); +spin_unlock (&dentry->d_lock); +if (likely (found)) +break ; + } +spin_unlock (&parent->d_lock); +return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ +struct inode *inode =d_inode (parent); +struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode);struct dentry *child, *found =NULL ; -rcu_read_lock (); - child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX ); -if (!child) - goto out; -spin_lock (&child->d_lock); -if (simple_positive (child)) - found =dget_dlock (child);
fs/libfs.c static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) · line 500
Quoted 10 lines
fs/libfs.c +7
-3-spin_unlock (&child->d_lock); -out: -rcu_read_unlock (); +MA_STATE (mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + +if (offset ==DIR_OFFSET_FIRST ) + found =find_positive_dentry (parent,NULL , false); +else { +rcu_read_lock (); + child =mas_find (&mas,DIR_OFFSET_MAX );
Can this child be NULL? Like we delete some file after first readdir, maybe we should break here, or we may rescan all dentry and return them to userspace again?
Quoted 61 lines
fs/libfs.c +20
-13+ found =find_positive_dentry (parent, child, false); +rcu_read_unlock (); + }return found; }static bool offset_dir_emit (struct dir_context *ctx,struct dentry *dentry) {struct inode *inode =d_inode (dentry); -long offset =dentry2offset (dentry); -return ctx->actor (ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino,fs_umode_to_dtype (inode->i_mode)); +return dir_emit (ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino,fs_umode_to_dtype (inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { -struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx (inode); +struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry;struct dentry *dentry; + dentry =offset_dir_lookup (dir, ctx->pos); +if (!dentry) + goto out_eod;while (true) { - dentry =offset_find_next (octx, ctx->pos); -if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; +struct dentry *next; -if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry)) { -dput (dentry); + ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry); +if (!offset_dir_emit (ctx, dentry))break ; - } - ctx->pos =dentry2offset (dentry) +1 ; + next =find_positive_dentry (dir, dentry, true);dput (dentry); + +if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } +dput (dentry);return ; out_eod:@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)if (!dir_emit_dots (file, ctx))return 0 ;if (ctx->pos !=DIR_OFFSET_EOD ) -offset_iterate_dir (d_inode (dir), ctx); +offset_iterate_dir (file, ctx);return 0 ; }
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
Quoted 96 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 93 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming
ctx->posto a starting entry. Then use the directory'sd_childrenlist, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the
d_childrenlist, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.Note also that the
readdir()is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head ofd_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>---
fs/libfs.c| 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-1@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations); /* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { - DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 2, + DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 3, DIR_OFFSET_MAX = LONG_MAX - 1, }; /* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { + DIR_OFFSET_FIRST = 2, /* Find first real entry */DIR_OFFSET_EOD = LONG_MAX, /* Marks EOD */ };
fs/libfs.c +30
-12@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return vfs_setpos(file, offset, LONG_MAX); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, + struct dentry *dentry, + bool next) { - MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + struct dentry *found = NULL; + + spin_lock(&parent->d_lock); + if (next) + dentry = d_next_sibling(dentry); + else if (!dentry) + dentry = d_first_child(parent); + hlist_for_each_entry_from(dentry, d_sib) { + if (!simple_positive(dentry)) + continue; + spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED); + if (simple_positive(dentry)) + found = dget_dlock(dentry); + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); + if (likely(found)) + break; + } + spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock); + return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_inode(parent); + struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); struct dentry *child, *found = NULL; - rcu_read_lock(); - child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX); - if (!child) - goto out; - spin_lock(&child->d_lock); - if (simple_positive(child)) - found = dget_dlock(child); - spin_unlock(&child->d_lock); -out: - rcu_read_unlock(); + MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset);
Quoted 8 lines
fs/libfs.c static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) · line 500
Quoted 6 lines
fs/libfs.c +6
-0+ + if (offset == DIR_OFFSET_FIRST) + found = find_positive_dentry(parent, NULL, false); + else { + rcu_read_lock(); + child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX);Can this child be NULL?
Yes, this mas_find() call can return NULL. find_positive_dentry() should then return NULL. Kind of subtle.
Quoted 1 line
Like we delete some file after first readdir, maybe we should break here, or we may rescan all dentry and return them to userspace again?
You mean to deal with the case where the "next" entry has an offset that is lower than @offset? mas_find() will return the entry in the tree that is "at or after" mas->index.
I'm not sure either "break" or returning repeats is safe. But, now that you point it out, this function probably does need additional logic to deal with the offset wrap case.
But since this logic already exists here, IMO it is reasonable to leave that to be addressed by a subsequent patch. So far there aren't any regression test failures that warn of a user-visible problem the way it is now.
Quoted 58 lines
Quoted 57 lines
fs/libfs.c +19
-12+ found = find_positive_dentry(parent, child, false); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } return found; } static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); - long offset = dentry2offset(dentry); - return ctx->actor(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); + return dir_emit(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { - struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); + struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; struct dentry *dentry; + dentry = offset_dir_lookup(dir, ctx->pos); + if (!dentry) + goto out_eod; while (true) { - dentry = offset_find_next(octx, ctx->pos); - if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; + struct dentry *next; - if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) { - dput(dentry); + ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry); + if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) break; - } - ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry) + 1; + next = find_positive_dentry(dir, dentry, true); dput(dentry); + + if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } + dput(dentry); return;
out_eod:fs/libfs.c +1
-1@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx)) return 0; if (ctx->pos != DIR_OFFSET_EOD) - offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx); + offset_iterate_dir(file, ctx); return 0; }
Signature · 1 line
Chuck Lever
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
Quoted 116 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 96 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 93 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming
ctx->posto a starting entry. Then use the directory'sd_childrenlist, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the
d_childrenlist, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.Note also that the
readdir()is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head ofd_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>---
fs/libfs.c| 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-1@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations); /* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { - DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 2, + DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 3, DIR_OFFSET_MAX = LONG_MAX - 1, }; /* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { + DIR_OFFSET_FIRST = 2, /* Find first real entry */DIR_OFFSET_EOD = LONG_MAX, /* Marks EOD */ };
fs/libfs.c +30
-12@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return vfs_setpos(file, offset, LONG_MAX); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, + struct dentry *dentry, + bool next) { - MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + struct dentry *found = NULL; + + spin_lock(&parent->d_lock); + if (next) + dentry = d_next_sibling(dentry); + else if (!dentry) + dentry = d_first_child(parent); + hlist_for_each_entry_from(dentry, d_sib) { + if (!simple_positive(dentry)) + continue; + spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED); + if (simple_positive(dentry)) + found = dget_dlock(dentry); + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); + if (likely(found)) + break; + } + spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock); + return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_inode(parent); + struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); struct dentry *child, *found = NULL; - rcu_read_lock(); - child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX); - if (!child) - goto out; - spin_lock(&child->d_lock); - if (simple_positive(child)) - found = dget_dlock(child); - spin_unlock(&child->d_lock); -out: - rcu_read_unlock(); + MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset);Quoted 8 lines
fs/libfs.c static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) · line 500
Quoted 6 lines
fs/libfs.c +6
-0+ + if (offset == DIR_OFFSET_FIRST) + found = find_positive_dentry(parent, NULL, false); + else { + rcu_read_lock(); + child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX);Can this child be NULL?
Yes, this
mas_find()call can return NULL.find_positive_dentry()should then return NULL. Kind of subtle.Quoted 1 line
Like we delete some file after first readdir, maybe we should break here, or we may rescan all dentry and return them to userspace again?
You mean to deal with the case where the "next" entry has an offset that is lower than @offset?
mas_find()will return the entry in the tree that is "at or after"mas->index.
Quoted 8 lines
I'm not sure either "break" or returning repeats is safe. But, now that you point it out, this function probably does need additional logic to deal with the offset wrap case.
But since this logic already exists here, IMO it is reasonable to leave that to be addressed by a subsequent patch. So far there aren't any regression test failures that warn of a user-visible problem the way it is now.
Sorry for the confusing, the case I am talking is something like below:
mkdir /tmp/dir && cd /tmp/dir
touch file1 # offset is 3
touch file2 # offset is 4
touch file3 # offset is 5
touch file4 # offset is 6
touch file5 # offset is 7
first readdir and get file5 file4 file3 file2 #ctx->pos is 3, which means we will get file1 for second readdir
unlink file1 # can not get entry for ctx->pos == 3
second readdir # offset_dir_lookup will use mas_find but return NULL, and we will get file5 file4 file3 file2 again?
And for the offset wrap case, I prefer it's safe with your patch if we won't unlink file between two readdir. The second readdir will use an active ctx->pos which means there is a active dentry attach to thisctx->pos. find_positive_dentry will stop once we meet the last child.
I am not sure if I understand correctly, if not, please point out!
Thanks!
Quoted 62 lines
Quoted 60 lines
Quoted 59 lines
fs/libfs.c +19
-12+ found = find_positive_dentry(parent, child, false); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } return found; } static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); - long offset = dentry2offset(dentry); - return ctx->actor(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); + return dir_emit(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { - struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); + struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; struct dentry *dentry; + dentry = offset_dir_lookup(dir, ctx->pos); + if (!dentry) + goto out_eod; while (true) { - dentry = offset_find_next(octx, ctx->pos); - if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; + struct dentry *next; - if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) { - dput(dentry); + ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry); + if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) break; - } - ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry) + 1; + next = find_positive_dentry(dir, dentry, true); dput(dentry); + + if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } + dput(dentry); return;
out_eod:fs/libfs.c +1
-1@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx)) return 0; if (ctx->pos != DIR_OFFSET_EOD) - offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx); + offset_iterate_dir(file, ctx); return 0; }
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
Quoted 140 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 117 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 97 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 94 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming
ctx->posto a starting entry. Then use the directory'sd_childrenlist, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the
d_childrenlist, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.Note also that the
readdir()is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head ofd_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>---
fs/libfs.c| 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+-----------------1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-1@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations); /* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { - DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 2, + DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 3, DIR_OFFSET_MAX = LONG_MAX - 1, }; /* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { + DIR_OFFSET_FIRST = 2, /* Find first real entry */DIR_OFFSET_EOD = LONG_MAX, /* Marks EOD */ };
fs/libfs.c +30
-12@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return vfs_setpos(file, offset, LONG_MAX); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, + struct dentry *dentry, + bool next) { - MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + struct dentry *found = NULL; + + spin_lock(&parent->d_lock); + if (next) + dentry = d_next_sibling(dentry); + else if (!dentry) + dentry = d_first_child(parent); + hlist_for_each_entry_from(dentry, d_sib) { + if (!simple_positive(dentry)) + continue; + spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED); + if (simple_positive(dentry)) + found = dget_dlock(dentry); + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); + if (likely(found)) + break; + } + spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock); + return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_inode(parent); + struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); struct dentry *child, *found = NULL; - rcu_read_lock(); - child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX); - if (!child) - goto out; - spin_lock(&child->d_lock); - if (simple_positive(child)) - found = dget_dlock(child); - spin_unlock(&child->d_lock); -out: - rcu_read_unlock(); + MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset);Quoted 8 lines
fs/libfs.c static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) · line 500
Quoted 6 lines
fs/libfs.c +6
-0+ + if (offset == DIR_OFFSET_FIRST) + found = find_positive_dentry(parent, NULL, false); + else { + rcu_read_lock(); + child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX);Can this child be NULL?
Yes, this
mas_find()call can return NULL.find_positive_dentry()should then return NULL. Kind of subtle.Quoted 1 line
Like we delete some file after first readdir, maybe we should break here, or we may rescan all dentry and return them to userspace again?
You mean to deal with the case where the "next" entry has an offset that is lower than @offset?
mas_find()will return the entry in the tree that is "at or after"mas->index.Quoted 8 lines
I'm not sure either "break" or returning repeats is safe. But, now that you point it out, this function probably does need additional logic to deal with the offset wrap case.
But since this logic already exists here, IMO it is reasonable to leave that to be addressed by a subsequent patch. So far there aren't any regression test failures that warn of a user-visible problem the way it is now.
Sorry for the confusing, the case I am talking is something like below:
mkdir
/tmp/dir&& cd/tmp/dir
touch file1 # offset is 3
touch file2 # offset is 4
touch file3 # offset is 5
touch file4 # offset is 6
touch file5 # offset is 7
first readdir and get file5 file4 file3 file2 #ctx->pos is 3, which means we will get file1 for second readdir
Quoted 4 lines
unlink file1 # can not get entry for
ctx->pos== 3second readdir #
offset_dir_lookupwill usemas_findbut return NULL, and we will get file5 file4 file3 file2 again?
After this patch, directory entries are reported in descending cookie order. Therefore, should this patch replace the mas_find() call with mas_find_rev() ?
Quoted 72 lines
And for the offset wrap case, I prefer it's safe with your patch if we won't unlink file between two readdir. The second readdir will use an active
ctx->poswhich means there is a active dentry attach to thisctx->pos.find_positive_dentrywill stop once we meet the last child.I am not sure if I understand correctly, if not, please point out!
Thanks!
Quoted 62 lines
Quoted 60 lines
Quoted 59 lines
fs/libfs.c +19
-12+ found = find_positive_dentry(parent, child, false); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } return found; } static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); - long offset = dentry2offset(dentry); - return ctx->actor(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); + return dir_emit(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { - struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); + struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; struct dentry *dentry; + dentry = offset_dir_lookup(dir, ctx->pos); + if (!dentry) + goto out_eod; while (true) { - dentry = offset_find_next(octx, ctx->pos); - if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; + struct dentry *next; - if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) { - dput(dentry); + ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry); + if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) break; - } - ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry) + 1; + next = find_positive_dentry(dir, dentry, true); dput(dentry); + + if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } + dput(dentry); return;
out_eod:fs/libfs.c +1
-1@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx)) return 0; if (ctx->pos != DIR_OFFSET_EOD) - offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx); + offset_iterate_dir(file, ctx); return 0; }
Signature · 1 line
Chuck Lever
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
Quoted 141 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 140 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 117 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 97 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 94 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming
ctx->posto a starting entry. Then use the directory'sd_childrenlist, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the
d_childrenlist, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.Note also that the
readdir()is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head ofd_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>---
fs/libfs.c| 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+-----------------1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-1@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations); /* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { - DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 2, + DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 3, DIR_OFFSET_MAX = LONG_MAX - 1, }; /* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { + DIR_OFFSET_FIRST = 2, /* Find first real entry */DIR_OFFSET_EOD = LONG_MAX, /* Marks EOD */ };
fs/libfs.c +30
-12@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return vfs_setpos(file, offset, LONG_MAX); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, + struct dentry *dentry, + bool next) { - MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + struct dentry *found = NULL; + + spin_lock(&parent->d_lock); + if (next) + dentry = d_next_sibling(dentry); + else if (!dentry) + dentry = d_first_child(parent); + hlist_for_each_entry_from(dentry, d_sib) { + if (!simple_positive(dentry)) + continue; + spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED); + if (simple_positive(dentry)) + found = dget_dlock(dentry); + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); + if (likely(found)) + break; + } + spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock); + return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_inode(parent); + struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); struct dentry *child, *found = NULL; - rcu_read_lock(); - child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX); - if (!child) - goto out; - spin_lock(&child->d_lock); - if (simple_positive(child)) - found = dget_dlock(child); - spin_unlock(&child->d_lock); -out: - rcu_read_unlock(); + MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset);Quoted 8 lines
fs/libfs.c static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) · line 500
Quoted 6 lines
fs/libfs.c +6
-0+ + if (offset == DIR_OFFSET_FIRST) + found = find_positive_dentry(parent, NULL, false); + else { + rcu_read_lock(); + child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX);Can this child be NULL?
Yes, this
mas_find()call can return NULL.find_positive_dentry()should then return NULL. Kind of subtle.Quoted 1 line
Like we delete some file after first readdir, maybe we should break here, or we may rescan all dentry and return them to userspace again?
You mean to deal with the case where the "next" entry has an offset that is lower than @offset?
mas_find()will return the entry in the tree that is "at or after"mas->index.Quoted 8 lines
I'm not sure either "break" or returning repeats is safe. But, now that you point it out, this function probably does need additional logic to deal with the offset wrap case.
But since this logic already exists here, IMO it is reasonable to leave that to be addressed by a subsequent patch. So far there aren't any regression test failures that warn of a user-visible problem the way it is now.
Sorry for the confusing, the case I am talking is something like below:
mkdir
/tmp/dir&& cd/tmp/dir
touch file1 # offset is 3
touch file2 # offset is 4
touch file3 # offset is 5
touch file4 # offset is 6
touch file5 # offset is 7
first readdir and get file5 file4 file3 file2 #ctx->pos is 3, which means we will get file1 for second readdir
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
unlink file1 # can not get entry for
ctx->pos== 3second readdir #
offset_dir_lookupwill usemas_findbut return NULL, and we will get file5 file4 file3 file2 again?After this patch, directory entries are reported in descending cookie order. Therefore, should this patch replace the
mas_find()call withmas_find_rev()?
Emm... The reason that why readdir report file with descending cookie order is d_alloc will insert child dentry to the list head of &parent->d_subdirs, and find_positive_dentry will get child in order. So it seems this won't work?
Quoted 76 lines
Quoted 74 lines
And for the offset wrap case, I prefer it's safe with your patch if we won't unlink file between two readdir. The second readdir will use an active
ctx->poswhich means there is a active dentry attach to thisctx->pos.find_positive_dentrywill stop once we meet the last child.I am not sure if I understand correctly, if not, please point out!
Thanks!
Quoted 62 lines
Quoted 60 lines
Quoted 59 lines
fs/libfs.c +19
-12+ found = find_positive_dentry(parent, child, false); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } return found; } static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); - long offset = dentry2offset(dentry); - return ctx->actor(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); + return dir_emit(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { - struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); + struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; struct dentry *dentry; + dentry = offset_dir_lookup(dir, ctx->pos); + if (!dentry) + goto out_eod; while (true) { - dentry = offset_find_next(octx, ctx->pos); - if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; + struct dentry *next; - if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) { - dput(dentry); + ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry); + if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) break; - } - ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry) + 1; + next = find_positive_dentry(dir, dentry, true); dput(dentry); + + if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } + dput(dentry); return;
out_eod:fs/libfs.c +1
-1@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx)) return 0; if (ctx->pos != DIR_OFFSET_EOD) - offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx); + offset_iterate_dir(file, ctx); return 0; }
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
Quoted 149 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 146 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 144 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 117 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 97 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 94 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming
ctx->posto a starting entry. Then use the directory'sd_childrenlist, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the
d_childrenlist, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.Note also that the
readdir()is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head ofd_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>---
fs/libfs.c| 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+-----------------1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-1@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations); /* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { - DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 2, + DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 3, DIR_OFFSET_MAX = LONG_MAX - 1, }; /* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { + DIR_OFFSET_FIRST = 2, /* Find first real entry */DIR_OFFSET_EOD = LONG_MAX, /* Marks EOD */ };
fs/libfs.c +30
-12@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return vfs_setpos(file, offset, LONG_MAX); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, + struct dentry *dentry, + bool next) { - MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + struct dentry *found = NULL; + + spin_lock(&parent->d_lock); + if (next) + dentry = d_next_sibling(dentry); + else if (!dentry) + dentry = d_first_child(parent); + hlist_for_each_entry_from(dentry, d_sib) { + if (!simple_positive(dentry)) + continue; + spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED); + if (simple_positive(dentry)) + found = dget_dlock(dentry); + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); + if (likely(found)) + break; + } + spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock); + return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_inode(parent); + struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); struct dentry *child, *found = NULL; - rcu_read_lock(); - child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX); - if (!child) - goto out; - spin_lock(&child->d_lock); - if (simple_positive(child)) - found = dget_dlock(child); - spin_unlock(&child->d_lock); -out: - rcu_read_unlock(); + MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset);Quoted 8 lines
fs/libfs.c static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) · line 500
Quoted 6 lines
fs/libfs.c +6
-0+ + if (offset == DIR_OFFSET_FIRST) + found = find_positive_dentry(parent, NULL, false); + else { + rcu_read_lock(); + child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX);Can this child be NULL?
Yes, this
mas_find()call can return NULL.find_positive_dentry()should then return NULL. Kind of subtle.Quoted 1 line
Like we delete some file after first readdir, maybe we should break here, or we may rescan all dentry and return them to userspace again?
You mean to deal with the case where the "next" entry has an offset that is lower than @offset?
mas_find()will return the entry in the tree that is "at or after"mas->index.Quoted 8 lines
I'm not sure either "break" or returning repeats is safe. But, now that you point it out, this function probably does need additional logic to deal with the offset wrap case.
But since this logic already exists here, IMO it is reasonable to leave that to be addressed by a subsequent patch. So far there aren't any regression test failures that warn of a user-visible problem the way it is now.
Sorry for the confusing, the case I am talking is something like below:
mkdir
/tmp/dir&& cd/tmp/dir
touch file1 # offset is 3
touch file2 # offset is 4
touch file3 # offset is 5
touch file4 # offset is 6
touch file5 # offset is 7
first readdir and get file5 file4 file3 file2 #ctx->pos is 3, which means we will get file1 for second readdirunlink file1 # can not get entry for
ctx->pos== 3second readdir #
offset_dir_lookupwill usemas_findbut return NULL, and we will get file5 file4 file3 file2 again?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
After this patch, directory entries are reported in descending cookie order. Therefore, should this patch replace the
mas_find()call withmas_find_rev()?Emm... The reason that why readdir report file with descending cookie order is
d_allocwill insert child dentry to the list head of&parent->d_subdirs, andfind_positive_dentrywill get child in order. So it seems this won't work?
I prefer this is not a problem since dcache_readdir already report dir with this order.
Quoted 79 lines
Quoted 77 lines
Quoted 75 lines
And for the offset wrap case, I prefer it's safe with your patch if we won't unlink file between two readdir. The second readdir will use an active
ctx->poswhich means there is a active dentry attach to thisctx->pos.find_positive_dentrywill stop once we meet the last child.I am not sure if I understand correctly, if not, please point out!
Thanks!
Quoted 62 lines
Quoted 60 lines
Quoted 59 lines
fs/libfs.c +19
-12+ found = find_positive_dentry(parent, child, false); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } return found; } static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); - long offset = dentry2offset(dentry); - return ctx->actor(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); + return dir_emit(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { - struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); + struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; struct dentry *dentry; + dentry = offset_dir_lookup(dir, ctx->pos); + if (!dentry) + goto out_eod; while (true) { - dentry = offset_find_next(octx, ctx->pos); - if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; + struct dentry *next; - if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) { - dput(dentry); + ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry); + if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) break; - } - ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry) + 1; + next = find_positive_dentry(dir, dentry, true); dput(dentry); + + if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } + dput(dentry); return;
out_eod:fs/libfs.c +1
-1@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx)) return 0; if (ctx->pos != DIR_OFFSET_EOD) - offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx); + offset_iterate_dir(file, ctx); return 0; }
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories
Quoted 156 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 153 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 149 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 140 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 117 lines · Chuck Lever
Quoted 97 lines · yangerkun
Quoted 94 lines · 在 2024/12/20 23:33, [email protected] 写道:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The mtree mechanism has been effective at creating directory offsets that are stable over multiple opendir instances. However, it has not been able to handle the subtleties of renames that are concurrent with readdir.
Instead of using the mtree to emit entries in the order of their offset values, use it only to map incoming
ctx->posto a starting entry. Then use the directory'sd_childrenlist, which is already maintained properly by the dcache, to find the next child to emit.One of the sneaky things about this is that when the mtree-allocated offset value wraps (which is very rare), looking up ctx->pos++ is not going to find the next entry; it will return NULL. Instead, by following the
d_childrenlist, the offset values can appear in any order but all of the entries in the directory will be visited eventually.Note also that the
readdir()is guaranteed to reach the tail of this list. Entries are added only at the head ofd_children, and readdir walks from its current position in that list towards its tail.Signed-off-by Chuck Lever <[email protected]>---
fs/libfs.c| 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+-----------------1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/libfs.c +2
-1@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_dir_inode_operations); /* simple_offset_add() allocation range */ enum { - DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 2, + DIR_OFFSET_MIN = 3, DIR_OFFSET_MAX = LONG_MAX - 1, }; /* simple_offset_add() never assigns these to a dentry */ enum { + DIR_OFFSET_FIRST = 2, /* Find first real entry */DIR_OFFSET_EOD = LONG_MAX, /* Marks EOD */ };
fs/libfs.c +30
-12@@ -458,51 +459,82 @@ static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return vfs_setpos(file, offset, LONG_MAX); } -static struct dentry *offset_find_next (struct offset_ctx *octx, loff_t offset) +static struct dentry *find_positive_dentry (struct dentry *parent, + struct dentry *dentry, + bool next) { - MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset); + struct dentry *found = NULL; + + spin_lock(&parent->d_lock); + if (next) + dentry = d_next_sibling(dentry); + else if (!dentry) + dentry = d_first_child(parent); + hlist_for_each_entry_from(dentry, d_sib) { + if (!simple_positive(dentry)) + continue; + spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED); + if (simple_positive(dentry)) + found = dget_dlock(dentry); + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); + if (likely(found)) + break; + } + spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock); + return found; +} + +static noinline_for_stack struct dentry * +offset_dir_lookup (struct dentry *parent,loff_t offset) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_inode(parent); + struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); struct dentry *child, *found = NULL; - rcu_read_lock(); - child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX); - if (!child) - goto out; - spin_lock(&child->d_lock); - if (simple_positive(child)) - found = dget_dlock(child); - spin_unlock(&child->d_lock); -out: - rcu_read_unlock(); + MA_STATE(mas, &octx->mt, offset, offset);Quoted 8 lines
fs/libfs.c static loff_t offset_dir_llseek(struct file · line 500
Quoted 6 lines
fs/libfs.c +6
-0+ + if (offset == DIR_OFFSET_FIRST) + found = find_positive_dentry(parent, NULL, false); + else { + rcu_read_lock(); + child = mas_find(&mas, DIR_OFFSET_MAX);Can this child be NULL?
Yes, this
mas_find()call can return NULL.find_positive_dentry()should then return NULL. Kind of subtle.Quoted 1 line
Like we delete some file after first readdir, maybe we should break here, or we may rescan all dentry and return them to userspace again?
You mean to deal with the case where the "next" entry has an offset that is lower than @offset?
mas_find()will return the entry in the tree that is "at or after"mas->index.Quoted 8 lines
I'm not sure either "break" or returning repeats is safe. But, now that you point it out, this function probably does need additional logic to deal with the offset wrap case.
But since this logic already exists here, IMO it is reasonable to leave that to be addressed by a subsequent patch. So far there aren't any regression test failures that warn of a user-visible problem the way it is now.
Sorry for the confusing, the case I am talking is something like below:
mkdir
/tmp/dir&& cd/tmp/dir
touch file1 # offset is 3
touch file2 # offset is 4
touch file3 # offset is 5
touch file4 # offset is 6
touch file5 # offset is 7
first readdir and get file5 file4 file3 file2 #ctx->pos is 3, which means we will get file1 for second readdirQuoted 4 lines
unlink file1 # can not get entry for
ctx->pos== 3second readdir #
offset_dir_lookupwill usemas_findbut return NULL, and we will get file5 file4 file3 file2 again?After this patch, directory entries are reported in descending cookie order. Therefore, should this patch replace the
mas_find()call withmas_find_rev()?
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Emm... The reason that why readdir report file with descending cookie order is
d_allocwill insert child dentry to the list head of&parent->d_subdirs, andfind_positive_dentrywill get child in order. So it seems this won't work?I prefer this is not a problem since
dcache_readdiralready report dir with this order.
I'm experimenting with replacing "mas_find()" with "mas_find_rev()" and it seems to behave. It needs more extensive testing.
What strikes me, though, is that readdir(3) probably has some caching in user space. You might not ever get perfect readdir/unlink/readdir behavior from this particular library API, IIUC.
Quoted 77 lines
Quoted 76 lines
Quoted 74 lines
Quoted 72 lines
And for the offset wrap case, I prefer it's safe with your patch if we won't unlink file between two readdir. The second readdir will use an active
ctx->poswhich means there is a active dentry attach to thisctx->pos.find_positive_dentrywill stop once we meet the last child.I am not sure if I understand correctly, if not, please point out!
Thanks!
Quoted 62 lines
Quoted 60 lines
Quoted 59 lines
fs/libfs.c +19
-12+ found = find_positive_dentry(parent, child, false); + rcu_read_unlock(); + } return found; } static bool offset_dir_emit(struct dir_context *ctx, struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry); - long offset = dentry2offset(dentry); - return ctx->actor(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry- >d_name.len, offset, - inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); + return dir_emit(ctx, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len, + inode->i_ino, fs_umode_to_dtype(inode->i_mode)); } -static void offset_iterate_dir (struct inode *inode,struct dir_context *ctx) +static void offset_iterate_dir (struct file *file,struct dir_context *ctx) { - struct offset_ctx *octx = inode->i_op->get_offset_ctx(inode); + struct dentry *dir = file->f_path.dentry; struct dentry *dentry; + dentry = offset_dir_lookup(dir, ctx->pos); + if (!dentry) + goto out_eod; while (true) { - dentry = offset_find_next(octx, ctx->pos); - if (!dentry) - goto out_eod; + struct dentry *next; - if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) { - dput(dentry); + ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry); + if (!offset_dir_emit(ctx, dentry)) break; - } - ctx->pos = dentry2offset(dentry) + 1; + next = find_positive_dentry(dir, dentry, true); dput(dentry); + + if (!next) + goto out_eod; + dentry = next; } + dput(dentry); return;
out_eod:fs/libfs.c +1
-1@@ -541,7 +573,7 @@ static int offset_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx)) return 0; if (ctx->pos != DIR_OFFSET_EOD) - offset_iterate_dir(d_inode(dir), ctx); + offset_iterate_dir(file, ctx); return 0; }
Signature · 1 line
Chuck Lever
Quoted 9 lines · On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:33:09 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
The purpose of this series is to construct a set of upstream fixes that can be backported to v6.6 to address CVE-2024-46701.
Changes since v5:
- Improve error flow insimple_offset_add()[...]
Applied to the vfs-6.14.misc branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. Patches in the vfs-6.14.misc branch should appear in linux-next soon.
Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.
It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.
Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase, trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git branch: vfs-6.14.misc
[1/5] libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted
https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/a644104d9168 [2/5] Revert "libfs: Add simple_offset_empty()" https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/fa9c3b906334 [3/5] Revert "libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir" https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/41480e28a4e0 [4/5] libfs: Replace simple_offset end-of-directory detection https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/4ea4beb53d0f [5/5] libfs: Use d_children list to iterate simple_offset directories https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/02a3d7715c3e