ASoC: mediatek: Remove unused mtk_memif_set_rate

From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]>

mtk_memif_set_rate() has been unused since it was added in the 2019 commit 9cdf85a19b3a ("ASoC: mediatek: common: add some helpers to control mtk_memif")

Remove it.

(The _substream version is used, and is left in)

---
 sound/soc/mediatek/common/mtk-afe-fe-dai.c | 20 --------------------
 sound/soc/mediatek/common/mtk-afe-fe-dai.h |  2 --
 2 files changed, 22 deletions(-)

index 3044d9ab3d4d..3809068f5620 100644
@@ -500,26 +500,6 @@ static int mtk_memif_set_rate_fs(struct mtk_base_afe *afe,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int mtk_memif_set_rate(struct mtk_base_afe *afe,
-		       int id, unsigned int rate)
-{
-	int fs = 0;
-
-	if (!afe->get_dai_fs) {
-		dev_err(afe->dev, "%s(), error, afe->get_dai_fs == NULL\n",
-			__func__);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	fs = afe->get_dai_fs(afe, id, rate);
-
-	if (fs < 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	return mtk_memif_set_rate_fs(afe, id, fs);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_memif_set_rate);
-
 int mtk_memif_set_rate_substream(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 				 int id, unsigned int rate)
 {

index 8cec90671827..b6d0f2b27e86 100644
@@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ int mtk_memif_set_addr(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, int id,
 		       size_t dma_bytes);
 int mtk_memif_set_channel(struct mtk_base_afe *afe,
 			  int id, unsigned int channel);
-int mtk_memif_set_rate(struct mtk_base_afe *afe,
-		       int id, unsigned int rate);
 int mtk_memif_set_rate_substream(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 				 int id, unsigned int rate);
 int mtk_memif_set_format(struct mtk_base_afe *afe,

2.48.1

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: Remove unused mtk_memif_set_rate

      commit: c9e9aa80022c6db71bc097a621a6145f39aa0ade

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark