Skip to contentSkip to conversation

crypto: deadcode structs from 'comp' removal

PATCH In review [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages Apr 12, 2025 – Apr 16, 2025

Subsystems (2)
Crypto API IBM Power 842 compression accelerator
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 crypto: deadcode structs from 'comp' removal

From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]>

Ard's recent series of patches removing 'comp' implementations left behind a bunch of trivial structs, remove them.

These are:
crypto842_ctx - commit 2d985ff0072f ("crypto: 842 - drop obsolete 'comp'
implementation")
lz4_ctx - commit 33335afe33c9 ("crypto: lz4 - drop obsolete 'comp'
implementation")
lz4hc_ctx - commit dbae96559eef ("crypto: lz4hc - drop obsolete
'comp' implementation")
lzo_ctx - commit a3e43a25bad0 ("crypto: lzo - drop obsolete
'comp' implementation")
lzorle_ctx - commit d32da55c5b0c ("crypto: lzo-rle - drop obsolete
'comp' implementation")

Signed-off-by Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]>
---
 crypto/842.c     | 4 ----
 crypto/lz4.c     | 4 ----
 crypto/lz4hc.c   | 4 ----
 crypto/lzo-rle.c | 4 ----
 crypto/lzo.c     | 4 ----
 5 files changed, 20 deletions(-)
crypto/842.c +0 -4
index 5fb37a925989..881945d44328 100644
@@ -23,10 +23,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/sw842.h>
 
-struct crypto842_ctx {
-	void *wmem;	/* working memory for compress */
-};
-
 static void *crypto842_alloc_ctx(void)
 {
 	void *ctx;
crypto/lz4.c +0 -4
index 82588607fb2e..9661ed01692f 100644
@@ -12,10 +12,6 @@
 #include <linux/lz4.h>
 #include <crypto/internal/scompress.h>
 
-struct lz4_ctx {
-	void *lz4_comp_mem;
-};
-
 static void *lz4_alloc_ctx(void)
 {
 	void *ctx;
crypto/lz4hc.c +0 -4
index 997e76c0183a..a637fddc1ccd 100644
@@ -10,10 +10,6 @@
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/lz4.h>
 
-struct lz4hc_ctx {
-	void *lz4hc_comp_mem;
-};
-
 static void *lz4hc_alloc_ctx(void)
 {
 	void *ctx;
crypto/lzo-rle.c +0 -4
index b1350ae278b8..e7efcf107179 100644
@@ -9,10 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
-struct lzorle_ctx {
-	void *lzorle_comp_mem;
-};
-
 static void *lzorle_alloc_ctx(void)
 {
 	void *ctx;
crypto/lzo.c +0 -4
index dfe5a07ca35f..f1b36a1ca6f6 100644
@@ -9,10 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
-struct lzo_ctx {
-	void *lzo_comp_mem;
-};
-
 static void *lzo_alloc_ctx(void)
 {
 	void *ctx;
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 17 lines · On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 12:32:41AM +0100, [email protected] wrote:

From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]>

Ard's recent series of patches removing 'comp' implementations left behind a bunch of trivial structs, remove them.

These are:
crypto842_ctx - commit 2d985ff0072f ("crypto: 842 - drop obsolete 'comp'
implementation")
lz4_ctx - commit 33335afe33c9 ("crypto: lz4 - drop obsolete 'comp'
implementation")
lz4hc_ctx - commit dbae96559eef ("crypto: lz4hc - drop obsolete
'comp' implementation")
lzo_ctx - commit a3e43a25bad0 ("crypto: lzo - drop obsolete
'comp' implementation")
lzorle_ctx - commit d32da55c5b0c ("crypto: lzo-rle - drop obsolete
'comp' implementation")

Quoted 8 lines
Signed-off-by Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]>
---
 crypto/842.c     | 4 ----
 crypto/lz4.c     | 4 ----
 crypto/lz4hc.c   | 4 ----
 crypto/lzo-rle.c | 4 ----
 crypto/lzo.c     | 4 ----
 5 files changed, 20 deletions(-)

Patch applied. Thanks.

Signature · 3 lines
Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt