Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add EDAC controller

PATCH In review William A. Kennington III 2 participants 2 messages Apr 15, 2025 – May 7, 2025

Subsystems (2)
Device tree bindings Arm/nuvoton npcm architecture
lore
Share & tools
lore

William A. Kennington III

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add EDAC controller

We have the driver support but need a common node for all the 8xx platforms that contain this device.

Signed-off-by William A. Kennington III <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi +7 -0
index 4da62308b274..ccebcb11c05e 100644
@@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ clk: rstc: reset-controller@f0801000 {
 			#clock-cells = <1>;
 		};
 
+		mc: memory-controller@f0824000 {
+			compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-memory-controller";
+			reg = <0x0 0xf0824000 0x0 0x2000>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
 		apb {
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <1>;
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0.604.gff1f9ca942-goog
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · William A. Kennington III

We have the driver support but need a common node for all the 8xx platforms that contain this device.

Signed-off-by William A. Kennington III <[email protected]>

---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 7 +++++++

 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi +0 -0
index 4da62308b274..ccebcb11c05e 100644
@@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ clk: rstc: reset-controller@f0801000 {
                         #clock-cells = <1>;
                 };
Quoted 8 lines


+               mc: memory-controller@f0824000 {
+                       compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-memory-controller"; +                       reg = <0x0 0xf0824000 0x0 0x2000>;
+                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; +                       status = "disabled";
+               };
+

The patch fails to apply due to fuzz, do you mind rebasing it on nuvoton/arm64/dt from [1]?

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arj/bmc.git

Possibly it's the result of applying other patches of yours as they were sent independently. It might be best to send them as a series even if they are conceptually independent.

Andrew