Skip to contentSkip to conversation

rust: DebugFS Bindings

PATCH Superseded Matthew Maurer 3 participants 11 messages May 2, 2025 – May 5, 2025

Subsystems (2)

v4 of 11 Superseded Latest is v11 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v4 cover rust: DebugFS Bindings

This series provides safe DebugFS bindings for Rust, with a sample driver using them.

This series currently only supports referencing 'static lifetime objects, because we need to know the objects outlive the DebugFS files. A subsequent series may be able to relax this.

* Directories created in the root of debugfs are assumed to be owning, and will clean up after themselves when dropped.
* Subdirectories are assumed non-owning, remaining alive until their containing directory is cleaned up. They can be promoted to owning variants if needed.
* Files are non-owning, but can be manually removed by handle if needed.

---
Changes in v4:
- Remove SubDir, replace with type-level constant.
- Add lifetime to Dir to prevent subdirectories and files from outliving their parents and triggering an Oops when accessed.
- Split unsafe blocks with two calls into two blocks
- Access private field through direct pointer dereference, avoiding creation of a reference to it.
- Notably not changed - owning/non-owning handle defaults. The best read
I had from the thread was to continue with this mode, but I'm willing
to change if need be.
- Comment changes
- More comment markdown
- Remove scopes from examples
- Put as_ptr properties into a # Guarantees section.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v3:
- Split Dir into Dir/SubDir/File to improve API.
- Add "." to end of all comments.
- Convert INVARIANT to # Invariants on types.
- Add backticks everywhere I found variables/types in my comments.
- Promoted invariant comment to doc comment.
- Extended sample commenting to make it clearer what is happening.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v2:
- Drop support for builder / pinned bindings in initial series
- Remove ARef usage to abstract the dentry nature of handles
- Remove error handling to discourage users from caring whether DebugFS
is enabled.
- Support CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n while leaving the API available
- Fixed mistaken decimal/octal mixup
- Doc/comment cleanup
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

---
Matthew Maurer (4):
rust: debugfs: Bind DebugFS directory creation
rust: debugfs: Bind file creation for long-lived Display
rust: debugfs: Support format hooks
rust: samples: Add debugfs sample

 MAINTAINERS                     |   2 +
 rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |   1 +
 rust/kernel/debugfs.rs          | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 rust/kernel/lib.rs              |   1 +
 samples/rust/Kconfig            |  11 ++
 samples/rust/Makefile           |   1 +
 samples/rust/rust_debugfs.rs    |  56 ++++++
 7 files changed, 490 insertions(+)

---
base-commit: b6a7783d306baf3150ac54cd5124f6e85dd375b0
change-id: 20250428-debugfs-rust-3cd5c97eb7d1

Best regards,

Signature · 1 line
Matthew Maurer <[email protected]>
#1 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/4 rust: debugfs: Bind DebugFS directory creation

Support creating DebugFS directories and subdirectories. Similar to the original DebugFS API, errors are hidden.

By default, when a root directory handle leaves scope, it will be cleaned up.

Subdirectories will by default persist until their root directory is cleaned up, but can be converted into a root directory if a scoped lifecycle is desired.

---
 MAINTAINERS                     |   1 +
 rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |   1 +
 rust/kernel/debugfs.rs          | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 rust/kernel/lib.rs              |   1 +
 4 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
MAINTAINERS +1 -0
index 906881b6c5cb6ff743e13b251873b89138c69a1c..a3b835e427b083a4ddd690d9e7739851f0af47ae 100644
@@ -7271,6 +7271,7 @@ F:	include/linux/kobj*
 F:	include/linux/property.h
 F:	include/linux/sysfs.h
 F:	lib/kobj*
+F:	rust/kernel/debugfs.rs
 F:	rust/kernel/device.rs
 F:	rust/kernel/device_id.rs
 F:	rust/kernel/devres.rs
rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h +1 -0
index 8a2add69e5d66d1c2ebed9d2c950380e61c48842..787f928467faabd02a7f3cf041378fac856c4f89 100644
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/cred.h>
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <linux/device/faux.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/errname.h>
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +159 -0

159 lines not on this page · raw message

rust/kernel/lib.rs +1 -0
index c3762e80b314316b4b0cee3bfd9442f8f0510b91..86f6055b828d5f711578293d8916a517f2436977 100644
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #[doc(hidden)]
 pub mod build_assert;
 pub mod cred;
+pub mod debugfs;
 pub mod device;
 pub mod device_id;
 pub mod devres;
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0.906.g1f30a19c02-goog
maintainer
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] rust: debugfs: Bind DebugFS directory creation

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 20

Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Maurer
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +9 -0
+/// Owning handle to a DebugFS directory.
+///
+/// This directory will be cleaned up when it goes out of scope.
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// The wrapped pointer will always be `NULL`, an error, or an owned DebugFS `dentry`.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct Dir<'a, const KEEP: bool = false> {

Why did you move to a const generic, rather than a new type? What's the advantage? AFAICS, it just makes it less obvious to see from the type itself how it will behave. Reading Dir<true> doesn't make it obvious what it does.

While I prefer a new type over the const generic, I'm fine with it. But I think we should use something more descriptive than a bool. Please see device::DeviceContext for reference.

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    /// Create a DebugFS subdirectory.
+    ///
+    /// This returns a [`Dir<'_, true>`], which will not be automatically cleaned up when it
+    /// leaves scope.
+    /// To convert this to a handle governing the lifetime of the directory, use [`Dir::owning`].
+    ///
+    /// Regardless of conversion, subdirectory handles cannot outlive the directory handle they
+    /// were created from.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 110

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let parent = Dir::new(c_str!("parent"));
+    /// let child = parent.subdir(c_str!("child"));
+    /// ```
+    pub fn subdir<'b>(&'b self, name: &CStr) -> Dir<'b, true> {
+        Dir::create(name, Some(self))
+    }

The default should be that the directory is removed when the Dir instance is dropped.

The common case (which people expect) is that an object is cleaned up on drop().

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+impl<'a> Dir<'a, true> {
+    /// Upgrade a non-owning directory to one which will be removed on drop.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let debugfs = Dir::new(c_str!("parent"));
+    /// let subdir = debugfs.subdir(c_str!("child"));

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 147

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    /// // If subdir were dropped, the directory would not be removed.
+    /// let owned_subdir = subdir.owning();
+    /// // If owned_subdir is dropped, "child" will be removed.
+    /// ```
+    pub fn owning(self) -> Dir<'a, false> {
+        Dir {
+            dir: self.dir,
+            _phantom: self._phantom,
+        }
+    }

As mentioned above, please make it the other way around.

#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] rust: debugfs: Bind DebugFS directory creation

Quoted 16 lines · Danilo Krummrich

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 20

Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Maurer
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +9 -0
+/// Owning handle to a DebugFS directory.
+///
+/// This directory will be cleaned up when it goes out of scope.
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// The wrapped pointer will always be `NULL`, an error, or an owned DebugFS `dentry`.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct Dir<'a, const KEEP: bool = false> {

Why did you move to a const generic, rather than a new type? What's the advantage? AFAICS, it just makes it less obvious to see from the type itself how it will behave. Reading Dir<true> doesn't make it obvious what it does.

Quoted 3 lines

While I prefer a new type over the const generic, I'm fine with it. But I think we should use something more descriptive than a bool. Please see device::DeviceContext for reference.

I'm fine with a new type or a using a more descriptive const generic - I did the const-generic to avoid the need to make one variant the derefee, which can sometimes complicate structure. I'll default to a more descriptive const-generic.

Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 11 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    /// Create a DebugFS subdirectory.
+    ///
+    /// This returns a [`Dir<'_, true>`], which will not be automatically cleaned up when it
+    /// leaves scope.
+    /// To convert this to a handle governing the lifetime of the directory, use [`Dir::owning`].
+    ///
+    /// Regardless of conversion, subdirectory handles cannot outlive the directory handle they
+    /// were created from.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 110

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let parent = Dir::new(c_str!("parent"));
+    /// let child = parent.subdir(c_str!("child"));
+    /// ```
+    pub fn subdir<'b>(&'b self, name: &CStr) -> Dir<'b, true> {
+        Dir::create(name, Some(self))
+    }
Quoted 4 lines

The default should be that the directory is removed when the Dir instance is dropped.

The common case (which people expect) is that an object is cleaned up on drop().

In general for Rust, I agree with you. For this particular case, I have a strong disagreement - take a look at calls to debugfs_create_dir in existing C code - new code chooses to discard subdirectory handles when done and rely on the recursive remove of the root directory to clean up subdirectories. If you and Greg K-H both agree that I should make them drop by default, I'll switch it, but I think this is me following the subsystem maintainer's intentions here.

Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 11 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+impl<'a> Dir<'a, true> {
+    /// Upgrade a non-owning directory to one which will be removed on drop.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let debugfs = Dir::new(c_str!("parent"));
+    /// let subdir = debugfs.subdir(c_str!("child"));

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 147

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    /// // If subdir were dropped, the directory would not be removed.
+    /// let owned_subdir = subdir.owning();
+    /// // If owned_subdir is dropped, "child" will be removed.
+    /// ```
+    pub fn owning(self) -> Dir<'a, false> {
+        Dir {
+            dir: self.dir,
+            _phantom: self._phantom,
+        }
+    }

As mentioned above, please make it the other way around.

#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] rust: debugfs: Bind DebugFS directory creation

Quoted 53 lines · Matthew Maurer
Quoted 16 lines · Danilo Krummrich

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 20

Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Maurer
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +9 -0
+/// Owning handle to a DebugFS directory.
+///
+/// This directory will be cleaned up when it goes out of scope.
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// The wrapped pointer will always be `NULL`, an error, or an owned DebugFS `dentry`.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct Dir<'a, const KEEP: bool = false> {

Why did you move to a const generic, rather than a new type? What's the advantage? AFAICS, it just makes it less obvious to see from the type itself how it will behave. Reading Dir<true> doesn't make it obvious what it does.

Quoted 3 lines

While I prefer a new type over the const generic, I'm fine with it. But I think we should use something more descriptive than a bool. Please see device::DeviceContext for reference.

I'm fine with a new type or a using a more descriptive const generic - I did the const-generic to avoid the need to make one variant the derefee, which can sometimes complicate structure. I'll default to a more descriptive const-generic.

Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 11 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    /// Create a DebugFS subdirectory.
+    ///
+    /// This returns a [`Dir<'_, true>`], which will not be automatically cleaned up when it
+    /// leaves scope.
+    /// To convert this to a handle governing the lifetime of the directory, use [`Dir::owning`].
+    ///
+    /// Regardless of conversion, subdirectory handles cannot outlive the directory handle they
+    /// were created from.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 110

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let parent = Dir::new(c_str!("parent"));
+    /// let child = parent.subdir(c_str!("child"));
+    /// ```
+    pub fn subdir<'b>(&'b self, name: &CStr) -> Dir<'b, true> {
+        Dir::create(name, Some(self))
+    }
Quoted 4 lines

The default should be that the directory is removed when the Dir instance is dropped.

The common case (which people expect) is that an object is cleaned up on drop().

Quoted 7 lines

In general for Rust, I agree with you. For this particular case, I have a strong disagreement - take a look at calls to debugfs_create_dir in existing C code - new code chooses to discard subdirectory handles when done and rely on the recursive remove of the root directory to clean up subdirectories. If you and Greg K-H both agree that I should make them drop by default, I'll switch it, but I think this is me following the subsystem maintainer's intentions here.

I'm ok with the directory being cleaned up when it goes out of scope. That makes way more sense overall, and will prevent leaks and other messes.

For the C api, what I really don't like is when we were returning a dentry to the caller, as then they had to manage it. Ideally I didn't want them to have to manage anything, hence the "lookup_and_remove" function I added, all that was needed to remember is the name of the directory, which the driver almost always already knew.

With Rust it's simpler, you can save off a reference and when it goes away, it gets cleaned up. You don't have access to the raw dentry, which takes away my original objection, and if debugfs is not enabled, there's no additional storage requirements.

So let's keep it simple here, and rely on lifetime rules when we can.

thanks,

greg k-h

#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] rust: debugfs: Bind DebugFS directory creation

Quoted 63 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 53 lines · Matthew Maurer
Quoted 16 lines · Danilo Krummrich

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 20

Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Maurer
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +9 -0
+/// Owning handle to a DebugFS directory.
+///
+/// This directory will be cleaned up when it goes out of scope.
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// The wrapped pointer will always be `NULL`, an error, or an owned DebugFS `dentry`.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct Dir<'a, const KEEP: bool = false> {

Why did you move to a const generic, rather than a new type? What's the advantage? AFAICS, it just makes it less obvious to see from the type itself how it will behave. Reading Dir<true> doesn't make it obvious what it does.

Quoted 3 lines

While I prefer a new type over the const generic, I'm fine with it. But I think we should use something more descriptive than a bool. Please see device::DeviceContext for reference.

I'm fine with a new type or a using a more descriptive const generic - I did the const-generic to avoid the need to make one variant the derefee, which can sometimes complicate structure. I'll default to a more descriptive const-generic.

Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 11 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    /// Create a DebugFS subdirectory.
+    ///
+    /// This returns a [`Dir<'_, true>`], which will not be automatically cleaned up when it
+    /// leaves scope.
+    /// To convert this to a handle governing the lifetime of the directory, use [`Dir::owning`].
+    ///
+    /// Regardless of conversion, subdirectory handles cannot outlive the directory handle they
+    /// were created from.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 110

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +10 -0
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let parent = Dir::new(c_str!("parent"));
+    /// let child = parent.subdir(c_str!("child"));
+    /// ```
+    pub fn subdir<'b>(&'b self, name: &CStr) -> Dir<'b, true> {
+        Dir::create(name, Some(self))
+    }
Quoted 4 lines

The default should be that the directory is removed when the Dir instance is dropped.

The common case (which people expect) is that an object is cleaned up on drop().

Quoted 7 lines

In general for Rust, I agree with you. For this particular case, I have a strong disagreement - take a look at calls to debugfs_create_dir in existing C code - new code chooses to discard subdirectory handles when done and rely on the recursive remove of the root directory to clean up subdirectories. If you and Greg K-H both agree that I should make them drop by default, I'll switch it, but I think this is me following the subsystem maintainer's intentions here.

Quoted 3 lines

I'm ok with the directory being cleaned up when it goes out of scope. That makes way more sense overall, and will prevent leaks and other messes.

OK, I'll switch to defaulting to cleanups.

Quoted 6 lines

For the C api, what I really don't like is when we were returning a dentry to the caller, as then they had to manage it. Ideally I didn't want them to have to manage anything, hence the "lookup_and_remove" function I added, all that was needed to remember is the name of the directory, which the driver almost always already knew.

Yeah, lookup_and_remove actually kind of complicates things for the Rust model if we ever bind it, as it can be used to invalidate the object we're holding in a way that has no lifetime constraints.

Quoted 11 lines

With Rust it's simpler, you can save off a reference and when it goes away, it gets cleaned up. You don't have access to the raw dentry, which takes away my original objection, and if debugfs is not enabled, there's no additional storage requirements.

So let's keep it simple here, and rely on lifetime rules when we can.

thanks,

greg k-h

maintainer
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] rust: debugfs: Bind DebugFS directory creation

In reply to Matthew Maurer
Quoted 16 lines · Matthew Maurer
Quoted 15 lines · Danilo Krummrich

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 20

Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Maurer
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +9 -0
+/// Owning handle to a DebugFS directory.
+///
+/// This directory will be cleaned up when it goes out of scope.
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// The wrapped pointer will always be `NULL`, an error, or an owned DebugFS `dentry`.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct Dir<'a, const KEEP: bool = false> {

Why did you move to a const generic, rather than a new type? What's the advantage? AFAICS, it just makes it less obvious to see from the type itself how it will behave. Reading Dir<true> doesn't make it obvious what it does.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

While I prefer a new type over the const generic, I'm fine with it. But I think we should use something more descriptive than a bool. Please see device::DeviceContext for reference.

I'm fine with a new type or a using a more descriptive const generic - I did the const-generic to avoid the need to make one variant the derefee, which can sometimes complicate structure. I'll default to a more descriptive const-generic.

Sounds good to me.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs line 110

Quoted 3 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs new file +3 -0
+    pub fn subdir<'b>(&'b self, name: &CStr) -> Dir<'b, true> {
+        Dir::create(name, Some(self))
+    }

The default should be that the directory is removed when the Dir instance is dropped.

The common case (which people expect) is that an object is cleaned up on drop().

Quoted 7 lines

In general for Rust, I agree with you. For this particular case, I have a strong disagreement - take a look at calls to debugfs_create_dir in existing C code - new code chooses to discard subdirectory handles when done and rely on the recursive remove of the root directory to clean up subdirectories. If you and Greg K-H both agree that I should make them drop by default, I'll switch it, but I think this is me following the subsystem maintainer's intentions here.

I don't see how picking a (Rust) consitent default is contrary to relying on recursive remove of directories.

I don't want this API to have "inverse drop semantics"; it's gonna confuse people and, AFAIK, it'd be the only API doing that.

Your original code with Dir::keep() was perfectly fine and it was still supporting the "recursive remove case" properly.

So, again this *not* an either-or case, we can have both.

#7 lore raw

PATCH v4 2/4 rust: debugfs: Bind file creation for long-lived Display

In reply to Matthew Maurer

Allows creation of files for references that live forever and lack metadata through the Display implementation.

The reference must live forever because we do not have a maximum lifetime for the file we are creating.

The Display implementation is used because seq_printf needs to route through %pA, which in turn routes through Arguments. A more generic API is provided later in the series, implemented in terms of this one.

---
 rust/kernel/debugfs.rs | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs +139 -0
index 41ac1711e9c0e66de1a434217c363176f806f434..21b116abad864d303f11cc515fe6f86ce5d51cbf 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 //! C header: [`include/linux/debugfs.h`](srctree/include/linux/debugfs.h)
 
 use crate::str::CStr;
+use core::fmt::Display;
 use core::marker::PhantomData;
 
 /// Owning handle to a DebugFS directory.
@@ -108,6 +109,57 @@ fn as_ptr(&self) -> *mut bindings::dentry {
     pub fn subdir<'b>(&'b self, name: &CStr) -> Dir<'b, true> {
         Dir::create(name, Some(self))
     }
+
+    /// Create a file in a DebugFS directory with the provided name, and contents from invoking
+    /// [`Display::fmt`] on the provided reference.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let dir = Dir::new(c_str!("my_debugfs_dir"));
+    /// dir.display_file(c_str!("foo"), &200);
+    /// // "my_debugfs_dir/foo" now contains the number 200.
+    /// ```
+    pub fn display_file<'b, T: Display + Sized>(
+        &'a self,
+        name: &CStr,
+        data: &'static T,
+    ) -> File<'b> {
+        // SAFETY:
+        // * `name` is a NUL-terminated C string, living across the call, by `CStr` invariant.
+        // * `parent` is a live `dentry` since we have a reference to it.
+        // * `vtable` is all stock `seq_file` implementations except for `open`.
+        //   `open`'s only requirement beyond what is provided to all open functions is that the
+        //   inode's data pointer must point to a `T` that will outlive it, which we know because
+        //   we have a static reference.
+        #[cfg(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)]
+        let ptr = unsafe {
+            bindings::debugfs_create_file_full(
+                name.as_char_ptr(),
+                0o444,
+                self.as_ptr(),
+                data as *const _ as *mut _,
+                core::ptr::null(),
+                &<T as DisplayFile>::VTABLE,
+            )
+        };
+
+        #[cfg(not(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS))]
+        let ptr = {
+            // Mark parameters used
+            let (_, _) = (name, data);
+            ERR_PTR(ENODEV)
+        };
+
+        // SAFETY: `debugfs_create_file_full` either returns an error code or a legal
+        // dentry pointer, and without `CONFIG_DEBUGFS` we return an error pointer, so
+        // `Dir::from_ptr` is safe to call here.
+        let dir = unsafe { Dir::from_ptr(ptr) };
+
+        File(dir)
+    }
 }
 
 impl<'a> Dir<'a, false> {
@@ -157,3 +209,90 @@ fn drop(&mut self) {
         }
     }
 }
+/// Handle to a DebugFS file.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct File<'a>(Dir<'a, true>);
+
+impl<'a> File<'a> {
+    /// Remove the file from DebugFS.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples
+    /// ```
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let dir = Dir::new(c_str!("foo"));
+    /// let file = dir.display_file(c_str!("bar"), &0);
+    /// // "foo/bar" is created.
+    /// file.remove()
+    /// // "foo/bar" is removed"
+    pub fn remove(self) {
+        drop(self.0.owning())
+    }
+}
+
+#[cfg(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)]
+mod helpers {
+    use crate::seq_file::SeqFile;
+    use crate::seq_print;
+    use core::fmt::Display;
+    use core::ptr::addr_of;
+
+    /// Implements `open` for `file_operations` via `single_open` to fill out a `seq_file`.
+    ///
+    /// # Safety
+    ///
+    /// * `inode`'s private pointer must point to a value of type `T` which will outlive the `inode`
+    ///   and will not be mutated during this call.
+    /// * `file` must point to a live, not-yet-initialized file object.
+    pub(crate) unsafe extern "C" fn display_open<T: Display>(
+        inode: *mut bindings::inode,
+        file: *mut bindings::file,
+    ) -> i32 {
+        // SAFETY:
+        // * `file` is acceptable by caller precondition.
+        // * `print_act` will be called on a `seq_file` with private data set to the third argument,
+        //   so we meet its safety requirements.
+        // * The `data` pointer passed in the third argument is a valid `T` pointer that outlives
+        //   this call by caller preconditions.
+        unsafe { bindings::single_open(file, Some(display_act::<T>), (*inode).i_private) }
+    }
+
+    /// Prints private data stashed in a seq_file to that seq file.
+    ///
+    /// # Safety
+    ///
+    /// `seq` must point to a live `seq_file` whose private data is a live pointer to a `T` which is
+    /// not being mutated.
+    pub(crate) unsafe extern "C" fn display_act<T: Display>(
+        seq: *mut bindings::seq_file,
+        _: *mut core::ffi::c_void,
+    ) -> i32 {
+        // SAFETY: By caller precondition, seq points to a live seq_file.
+        let private_addr = unsafe { addr_of!((*seq).private) };
+        // SAFETY: By caller precondition, this pointer is live, points to a value of type `T`, and
+        // is not being mutated.
+        let data = unsafe { &*(*private_addr as *mut T) };
+        // SAFETY: By caller precondition, `seq_file` points to a live `seq_file`, so we can lift
+        // it.
+        let seq_file = unsafe { SeqFile::from_raw(seq) };
+        seq_print!(seq_file, "{}", data);
+        0
+    }
+
+    // Work around lack of generic const items.
+    pub(crate) trait DisplayFile: Display + Sized {
+        const VTABLE: bindings::file_operations = bindings::file_operations {
+            read: Some(bindings::seq_read),
+            llseek: Some(bindings::seq_lseek),
+            release: Some(bindings::single_release),
+            open: Some(display_open::<Self> as _),
+            // SAFETY: `file_operations` supports zeroes in all fields.
+            ..unsafe { core::mem::zeroed() }
+        };
+    }
+
+    impl<T: Display + Sized> DisplayFile for T {}
+}
+
+#[cfg(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)]
+use helpers::*;
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0.906.g1f30a19c02-goog
maintainer
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] rust: debugfs: Bind file creation for long-lived Display

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs fn drop(&mut self) { · line 214

Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Maurer
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs +3 -0
+/// Handle to a DebugFS file.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct File<'a>(Dir<'a, true>);

As mentioned in [1], please create a base type Entry. While it's an improvement to not expose things like subdir() from File directly, it's still odd to base File on a type that has invalid methods its purpose.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aBRrniLfCzWX7nbR@pollux/

Quoted 5 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs +5 -0
+impl<'a> File<'a> {
+    /// Remove the file from DebugFS.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples
+    /// ```

rust/kernel/debugfs.rs fn drop(&mut self) { · line 230

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs +10 -0
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let dir = Dir::new(c_str!("foo"));
+    /// let file = dir.display_file(c_str!("bar"), &0);
+    /// // "foo/bar" is created.
+    /// file.remove()
+    /// // "foo/bar" is removed"
+    pub fn remove(self) {
+        drop(self.0.owning())
+    }

Same as with Dir, please make it the other way around.

#9 lore raw

PATCH v4 3/4 rust: debugfs: Support format hooks

In reply to Matthew Maurer

Rather than always using Display, allow hooking arbitrary functions to arbitrary files. Display technically has the expressiveness to do this, but requires a new type be declared for every different way to render things, which can be very clumsy.

---
 rust/kernel/debugfs.rs | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rust/kernel/debugfs.rs +122 -2
index 21b116abad864d303f11cc515fe6f86ce5d51cbf..cfdff63c10517f1aebf757c965289a49fed6ae85 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 //! C header: [`include/linux/debugfs.h`](srctree/include/linux/debugfs.h)
 
 use crate::str::CStr;
+use core::fmt;
 use core::fmt::Display;
 use core::marker::PhantomData;
 
@@ -123,9 +124,55 @@ pub fn subdir<'b>(&'b self, name: &CStr) -> Dir<'b, true> {
     /// // "my_debugfs_dir/foo" now contains the number 200.
     /// ```
     pub fn display_file<'b, T: Display + Sized>(
-        &'a self,
+        &'b self,
         name: &CStr,
         data: &'static T,
+    ) -> File<'b> {
+        // SAFETY: As `data` lives for the static lifetime, it outlives the file.
+        unsafe { self.display_file_raw(name, data) }
+    }
+
+    /// Create a file in a DebugFS directory with the provided name, and contents from invoking `f`
+    /// on the provided reference.
+    ///
+    /// `f` must be a function item or a non-capturing closure, or this will fail to compile.
+    ///
+    /// # Examples
+    ///
+    /// ```
+    /// # use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicU32, Ordering};
+    /// # use kernel::c_str;
+    /// # use kernel::debugfs::Dir;
+    /// let dir = Dir::new(c_str!("foo"));
+    /// static MY_ATOMIC: AtomicU32 = AtomicU32::new(3);
+    /// let file = dir.fmt_file(c_str!("bar"), &MY_ATOMIC, &|val, f| {
+    ///   let out = val.load(Ordering::Relaxed);
+    ///   writeln!(f, "{out:#010x}")
+    /// });
+    /// MY_ATOMIC.store(10, Ordering::Relaxed);
+    /// ```
+    pub fn fmt_file<'b, T, F: Fn(&T, &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result>(
+        &'b self,
+        name: &CStr,
+        data: &'static T,
+        f: &'static F,
+    ) -> File<'b> {
+        // SAFETY: As `data` lives for the static lifetime, it outlives the file
+        unsafe { self.fmt_file_raw(name, data, f) }
+    }
+
+    /// Creates a DebugFS file backed by the display implementation of the provided pointer.
+    ///
+    /// # Safety
+    ///
+    /// The pointee of `data` must outlive the accessibility of the `Dir` returned by this function.
+    /// This means that before `data` may become invalid, either:
+    /// * The refcount must go to zero.
+    /// * The file must be rendered inaccessible, e.g. via `debugfs_remove`.
+    unsafe fn display_file_raw<'b, T: Display + Sized>(
+        &'b self,
+        name: &CStr,
+        data: *const T,
     ) -> File<'b> {
         // SAFETY:
         // * `name` is a NUL-terminated C string, living across the call, by `CStr` invariant.
@@ -160,6 +207,32 @@ pub fn display_file<'b, T: Display + Sized>(
 
         File(dir)
     }
+
+    /// Create a file in a DebugFS directory with the provided name, and contents from invoking the
+    /// fomatter on the attached data.
+    ///
+    /// The attached function must be a ZST, and will cause a compilation error if it is not.
+    ///
+    /// # Safety
+    ///
+    /// `data` must outlive the resulting file's accessibility
+    unsafe fn fmt_file_raw<'b, T, F: Fn(&T, &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result>(
+        &'b self,
+        name: &CStr,
+        data: &T,
+        f: &'static F,
+    ) -> File<'b> {
+        #[cfg(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)]
+        let data_adapted = FormatAdapter::new(data, f);
+        #[cfg(not(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS))]
+        let data_adapted = {
+            // Mark used
+            let (_, _) = (data, f);
+            &0
+        };
+        // SAFETY: data outlives the file's accessibility, so data_adapted does too
+        unsafe { self.display_file_raw(name, data_adapted) }
+    }
 }
 
 impl<'a> Dir<'a, false> {
@@ -234,7 +307,9 @@ pub fn remove(self) {
 mod helpers {
     use crate::seq_file::SeqFile;
     use crate::seq_print;
-    use core::fmt::Display;
+    use core::fmt;
+    use core::fmt::{Display, Formatter};
+    use core::marker::PhantomData;
     use core::ptr::addr_of;
 
     /// Implements `open` for `file_operations` via `single_open` to fill out a `seq_file`.
@@ -292,6 +367,51 @@ pub(crate) trait DisplayFile: Display + Sized {
     }
 
     impl<T: Display + Sized> DisplayFile for T {}
+
+    /// Adapter to implement `Display` via a callback with the same representation as `T`.
+    ///
+    /// # Invariants
+    ///
+    /// If an instance for `FormatAdapter<_, F>` is constructed, `F` is inhabited.
+    #[repr(transparent)]
+    pub(crate) struct FormatAdapter<T, F> {
+        inner: T,
+        _formatter: PhantomData<F>,
+    }
+
+    impl<T, F> FormatAdapter<T, F> {
+        pub(crate) fn new<'a>(inner: &'a T, _f: &'static F) -> &'a Self {
+            // SAFETY: FormatAdapater is a repr(transparent) wrapper around T, so
+            // casting a reference is legal
+            // INVARIANT: We were passed a reference to F, so it is inhabited.
+            unsafe { core::mem::transmute(inner) }
+        }
+    }
+
+    impl<T, F> Display for FormatAdapter<T, F>
+    where
+        F: Fn(&T, &mut Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result + 'static,
+    {
+        fn fmt(&self, fmt: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
+            // SAFETY: FormatAdapter<_, F> can only be constructed if F is inhabited
+            let f: &F = unsafe { materialize_zst_fmt() };
+            f(&self.inner, fmt)
+        }
+    }
+
+    /// For types with a unique value, produce a static reference to it.
+    ///
+    /// # Safety
+    ///
+    /// The caller asserts that F is inhabited
+    unsafe fn materialize_zst_fmt<F>() -> &'static F {
+        const { assert!(core::mem::size_of::<F>() == 0) };
+        let zst_dangle: core::ptr::NonNull<F> = core::ptr::NonNull::dangling();
+        // SAFETY: While the pointer is dangling, it is a dangling pointer to a ZST, based on the
+        // assertion above. The type is also inhabited, by the caller's assertion. This means
+        // we can materialize it.
+        unsafe { zst_dangle.as_ref() }
+    }
 }
 
 #[cfg(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)]
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0.906.g1f30a19c02-goog
#10 lore raw

PATCH v4 4/4 rust: samples: Add debugfs sample

In reply to Matthew Maurer

Provides an example of using the Rust DebugFS bindings.

---
 MAINTAINERS                  |  1 +
 samples/rust/Kconfig         | 11 +++++++++
 samples/rust/Makefile        |  1 +
 samples/rust/rust_debugfs.rs | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
MAINTAINERS +1 -0
index a3b835e427b083a4ddd690d9e7739851f0af47ae..426bcdac025134e20911de8e2cf5c9efb0591814 100644
@@ -7278,6 +7278,7 @@ F:	rust/kernel/devres.rs
 F:	rust/kernel/driver.rs
 F:	rust/kernel/faux.rs
 F:	rust/kernel/platform.rs
+F:	samples/rust/rust_debugfs.rs
 F:	samples/rust/rust_driver_platform.rs
 F:	samples/rust/rust_driver_faux.rs
 
samples/rust/Kconfig +11 -0
index 43cb72d72631bb2d6e06185e1d88778edff6ee13..6c42ed73f842cda26256039e6917bb443738d3f1 100644
@@ -51,6 +51,17 @@ config SAMPLE_RUST_DMA
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
+config SAMPLE_RUST_DEBUGFS
+	tristate "DebugFS Test Driver"
+	depends on DEBUG_FS
+	help
+	  This option builds the Rust DebugFS Test driver sample.
+
+	  To compile this as a module, choose M here:
+	  the module will be called rust_debugfs.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config SAMPLE_RUST_DRIVER_PCI
 	tristate "PCI Driver"
 	depends on PCI
samples/rust/Makefile +1 -0
index 6a466afd2a21eba84a3b7b2be29f25dce44e9053..b1fc4677ed53fcf7d0f5a3dbf322f65851bc1784 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ ccflags-y += -I$(src)				# needed for trace events
 obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_MINIMAL)		+= rust_minimal.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_MISC_DEVICE)		+= rust_misc_device.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_PRINT)			+= rust_print.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_DEBUGFS)		+= rust_debugfs.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_DMA)			+= rust_dma.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_DRIVER_PCI)		+= rust_driver_pci.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_RUST_DRIVER_PLATFORM)	+= rust_driver_platform.o
samples/rust/rust_debugfs.rs new file +56 -0

56 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.49.0.906.g1f30a19c02-goog