FAILED: patch "[PATCH] pwm: mediatek: Ensure to disable clocks in error path" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 505b730ede7f5c4083ff212aa955155b5b92e574
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2025071236-generous-jazz-41e4@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 505b730ede7f5c4083ff212aa955155b5b92e574 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Uwe=20Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 19:27:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: mediatek: Ensure to disable clocks in error path
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

After enabling the clocks each error path must disable the clocks again. One of them failed to do so. Unify the error paths to use goto to make it harder for future changes to add a similar bug.

index 7eaab5831499..33d3554b9197 100644
@@ -130,8 +130,10 @@ static int pwm_mediatek_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		return ret;
 
 	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk_pwms[pwm->hwpwm]);
-	if (!clk_rate)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!clk_rate) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/* Make sure we use the bus clock and not the 26MHz clock */
 	if (pc->soc->has_ck_26m_sel)

@@ -150,9 +152,9 @@ static int pwm_mediatek_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	}
 
 	if (clkdiv > PWM_CLK_DIV_MAX) {
-		pwm_mediatek_clk_disable(chip, pwm);
 		dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), "period of %d ns not supported\n", period_ns);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (pc->soc->pwm45_fixup && pwm->hwpwm > 2) {

@@ -169,9 +171,10 @@ static int pwm_mediatek_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	pwm_mediatek_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, reg_width, cnt_period);
 	pwm_mediatek_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, reg_thres, cnt_duty);
 
+out:
 	pwm_mediatek_clk_disable(chip, pwm);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int pwm_mediatek_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)

Hello,

the patch I just sent for 5.15 applies fine on 5.4.y. I assume this is good enough and someone will tell me if not.

Best regards
Uwe

All now queued up, thanks for the backports.

greg k-h