spi: dt-bindings: spi-mux: Drop "spi-max-frequency" as required
Subsystems (2)
Rob Herring (Arm)
maintainerPATCH 1/1 spi: dt-bindings: spi-mux: Drop "spi-max-frequency" as required
There's little reason to require the SPI mux to define a maximum bus frequency as the muxing is just the chip select and devices still define their maximum freq. In fact, several users don't set "spi-max-frequency" which caused warnings.
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-mux.yaml | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-mux.yaml +0 -1
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ properties: required: - compatible - reg - - spi-max-frequency - mux-controls unevaluatedProperties: false
Signature · 1 line
2.47.2
Hi Rob,
Quoted 6 lines · Rob Herring (Arm)
There's little reason to require the SPI mux to define a maximum bus frequency as the muxing is just the chip select and devices still define their maximum freq. In fact, several users don't set "spi-max-frequency" which caused warnings.
Signed-off-by Rob Herring (Arm) <[email protected]>
Quoted 16 lines
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-mux.yaml | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-mux.yaml +0
-1@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ properties: required: - compatible - reg - - spi-max-frequency - mux-controls unevaluatedProperties: false
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Rob Herring (Arm)
There's little reason to require the SPI mux to define a maximum bus frequency as the muxing is just the chip select and devices still define their maximum freq. In fact, several users don't set "spi-max-frequency" which caused warnings.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: dt-bindings: spi-mux: Drop "spi-max-frequency" as required
commit: d5255ae7ec48ac1f702e95b472801dbb7bf1e97f
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark