Skip to contentSkip to conversation

rust: kernel: introduce `unsafe_precondition_assert!` macro

PATCH Superseded Ritvik Gupta 2 participants 3 messages Jul 30, 2025 Rust

v2 of 6 Superseded Latest is v6 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 rust: kernel: introduce `unsafe_precondition_assert!` macro

Introduce a new safety module containing unsafe_precondition_assert! macro. It is a wrapper around debug_assert!, intended for validating pre-conditions of unsafe function.

When CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS flag is enabled, this macro performs runtime checks to ensure that the preconditions for unsafe function hold. Otherwise, the macro is a no-op.

---

Changes in v2:
- Wrap debug_assert! internally instead of using pr_err! with assert! + `cfg!(debug_assertions)
- Print “unsafe precondition(s) violated” only on assertion failure (no longer always printed)
- Use # Safety section instead of comment in the example
- Rename module-level doc
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/

---
 rust/kernel/lib.rs    |  1 +
 rust/kernel/safety.rs | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 rust/kernel/safety.rs
rust/kernel/lib.rs +1 -0
index 11a6461e98da..7aab607dd879 100644
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
 pub mod print;
 pub mod rbtree;
 pub mod revocable;
+pub mod safety;
 pub mod security;
 pub mod seq_file;
 pub mod sizes;
rust/kernel/safety.rs new file +52 -0

52 lines not on this page · raw message

base-commit: dff64b072708ffef23c117fa1ee1ea59eb417807

Signature · 1 line
2.50.1
reviewer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:41:28 +0530 Ritvik Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:

Introduce a new safety module containing unsafe_precondition_assert! macro. It is a wrapper around debug_assert!, intended for validating pre-conditions of unsafe function.

When CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS flag is enabled, this macro performs runtime checks to ensure that the preconditions for unsafe function hold. Otherwise, the macro is a no-op.

This email should be include the Rust-for-Linux list.

Quoted 53 lines

---

Changes in v2:
- Wrap debug_assert! internally instead of using pr_err! with assert! + `cfg!(debug_assertions)
- Print “unsafe precondition(s) violated” only on assertion failure (no longer always printed)
- Use # Safety section instead of comment in the example
- Rename module-level doc
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/

---
 rust/kernel/lib.rs    |  1 +
 rust/kernel/safety.rs | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 rust/kernel/safety.rs
rust/kernel/lib.rs +1 -0
index 11a6461e98da..7aab607dd879 100644
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
 pub mod print;
 pub mod rbtree;
 pub mod revocable;
+pub mod safety;
 pub mod security;
 pub mod seq_file;
 pub mod sizes;
rust/kernel/safety.rs new file +15 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..42f7763a044f
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+//! Safety related APIs.
+
+/// Checks that preconditions of an unsafe function are followed.
+///
+/// The check is enabled at runtime if debug assertions (`CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS`)
+/// are enabled. Otherwise, this macro is no-op.
+///
+/// # Examples
+///
+/// ```
+/// /// # Safety
+/// ///
+/// /// The caller must ensure that interpreting the bytes of `[T; N]` as `[U; N]` is valid.

rust/kernel/safety.rs line 25

Quoted 10 lines
rust/kernel/safety.rs new file +10 -0
+/// ///
+/// /// This requires:
+/// /// - `T` and `U` must have same size.
+/// /// - The bit pattern of `T` must be valid for `U`.
+/// /// - The alignment of `T` must be at least as strict as `U`.
+/// unsafe fn transmute_array<const N: usize, T: Copy, U: Copy>(input: [T; N]) -> [U; N] {
+///     unsafe_precondition_assert!(
+///         core::mem::size_of::<T>() == core::mem::size_of::<U>(),
+///         "src and dst must have the same size"
+///     );

These can just be const { assert!() }? There's no reason for this to be runtime.

Best,
Gary

Quoted 29 lines
rust/kernel/safety.rs new file +27 -0
+///
+///     unsafe_precondition_assert!(
+///         core::mem::align_of::<T>() >= core::mem::align_of::<U>(),
+///         "src alignment must be compatible with dst alignment"
+///     );
+///
+///     unsafe { core::mem::transmute_copy(&input) }
+/// }
+/// ```
+///
+/// # Panics
+///
+/// Panics if the expression is evaluated to `false` at runtime.
+///
+#[macro_export]
+macro_rules! unsafe_precondition_assert {
+    ($cond:expr $(,)?) => {
+        $crate::unsafe_precondition_assert!(@inner $cond, ::core::stringify!($cond))
+    };
+
+    ($cond:expr, $($arg:tt)+) => {
+        $crate::unsafe_precondition_assert!(@inner $cond, ::core::format_args!($($arg)+))
+    };
+
+    (@inner $cond:expr, $msg:expr) => {
+        ::core::debug_assert!($cond, "unsafe precondition(s) violated: {}", $msg) };
+}

base-commit: dff64b072708ffef23c117fa1ee1ea59eb417807

#2 lore raw
Quoted 1 line

This email should be include the Rust-for-Linux list.

Apologies for oversight.
Automated it to prevent in future :)

Quoted 2 lines

These can just be const { assert!() }? There's no reason for this to be runtime.

Yeah! static_assert! makes sense here.
I'll add more relevant example in v3.

Thanks for the feedback :)