mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v2 1/1 mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage
From: Lance Yang <[email protected]>
When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the shared zeropage, try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage() currently drops several important PTE bits.
For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore.
As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped. This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data corruption.
Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked.
---
v1 -> v2:
- Avoid calling ptep_get() multiple times (per Dev)
- Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David)
- Collect Acked-by from David - thanks!
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
mm/migrate.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/migrate.c +8 -1
@@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, unsigned long idx) {struct page *page =folio_page (folio, idx); +pte_t oldpte =ptep_get (pvmw->pte);pte_t newpte;if (PageCompound (page))return false;VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (!PageAnon (page), page);VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (!PageLocked (page), page); -VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (pte_present (ptep_get (pvmw->pte)), page); +VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (pte_present (oldpte), page);if (folio_test_mlocked (folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags &VM_LOCKED ) ||mm_forbids_zeropage (pvmw->vma->vm_mm))
@@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, newpte =pte_mkspecial (pfn_pte (my_zero_pfn (pvmw->address), pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); + +if (pte_swp_soft_dirty (oldpte)) + newpte =pte_mksoft_dirty (newpte); +if (pte_swp_uffd_wp (oldpte)) + newpte =pte_mkuffd_wp (newpte); +set_pte_at (pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte);dec_mm_counter (pvmw->vma->vm_mm,mm_counter (folio));
Signature · 1 line
2.49.0
Quoted 39 lines · Lance Yang
From: Lance Yang <[email protected]>
When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the shared zeropage,
try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage()currently drops several important PTE bits.For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore.
As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped. This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data corruption.
Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked.
Cc <[email protected]>Fixes b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")Suggested-by David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>Suggested-by Dev Jain <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Lance Yang <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- Avoid callingptep_get()multiple times (per Dev)
- Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David)
- Collect Acked-by from David - thanks!
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/mm/migrate.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)mm/migrate.c +0
-0
mm/migrate.c static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, · line 303
Quoted 4 lines
mm/migrate.c +1
-0@@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, unsigned long idx) {struct page *page =folio_page (folio, idx); +pte_t oldpte =ptep_get (pvmw->pte);
What I meant to say was, you can pass oldpte from remove_migration_pte to this function. Basically define old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte) in the declarations of the start of the while block in remove_migration_pte and remove the existing one. That will ensure ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration.
Quoted 24 lines
mm/migrate.c +7
-1pte_t newpte;if (PageCompound (page))return false;VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (!PageAnon (page), page);VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (!PageLocked (page), page); -VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (pte_present (ptep_get (pvmw->pte)), page); +VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (pte_present (oldpte), page);if (folio_test_mlocked (folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags &VM_LOCKED ) ||mm_forbids_zeropage (pvmw->vma->vm_mm))@@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, newpte =pte_mkspecial (pfn_pte (my_zero_pfn (pvmw->address), pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); + +if (pte_swp_soft_dirty (oldpte)) + newpte =pte_mksoft_dirty (newpte); +if (pte_swp_uffd_wp (oldpte)) + newpte =pte_mkuffd_wp (newpte); +set_pte_at (pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte);dec_mm_counter (pvmw->vma->vm_mm,mm_counter (folio));
Quoted 36 lines · Dev Jain
Quoted 34 lines · Lance Yang
From: Lance Yang <[email protected]>
When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the shared zeropage,
try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage()currently drops several important PTE bits.For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore.
As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped. This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data corruption.
Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked.
Cc <[email protected]>Fixes b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")Suggested-by David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>Suggested-by Dev Jain <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Lance Yang <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- Avoid callingptep_get()multiple times (per Dev)
- Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David)
- Collect Acked-by from David - thanks!
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1- [email protected]/
mm/migrate.c| 9 ++++++++-1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Quoted 15 lines
mm/migrate.c static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct · line 304
Quoted 10 lines
mm/migrate.c +1
-0@@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(structpage_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, unsigned long idx) { struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx); + pte_t oldpte = ptep_get(pvmw->pte);What I meant to say was, you can pass oldpte from
remove_migration_pteto this function. Basically defineold_pte=ptep_get(pvmw.pte)in the declarations of the start of the while block inremove_migration_pteand remove the existing one. That will ensureptep_get()gets called only once per iteration.
Ah, got it. Thanks for the clarification!
IIUC, you mean something like this:
```
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index ce83c2c3c287..bafd8cb3bebe 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk
*pvmw,
struct folio *folio,
+ pte_t old_pte,
unsigned long idx)
{
struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx);
@@ -306,7 +307,7 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
return false;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page);
+ VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(old_pte), page);
if (folio_test_mlocked(folio) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) ||
mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm))
@@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address),
pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot));
+
+ if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(old_pte))
+ newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte);
+ if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(old_pte))
+ newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte);
+
set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte);
dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio));
@@ -344,7 +351,7 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio,
while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
rmap_t rmap_flags = RMAP_NONE;
- pte_t old_pte;
+ pte_t old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte);
pte_t pte;
swp_entry_t entry;
struct page *new;
@@ -365,12 +372,11 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio,
}
#endif
if (rmap_walk_arg->map_unused_to_zeropage &&
- try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, idx))
+ try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, old_pte, idx))
continue;
folio_get(folio);
pte = mk_pte(new, READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot));
- old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte);
entry = pte_to_swp_entry(old_pte);
if (!is_migration_entry_young(entry))
```ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration, right?
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 22 lines
mm/migrate.c +1
-1pte_t newpte; if (PageCompound(page)) return false; VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page); VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page); + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(oldpte), page);if (
folio_test_mlocked(folio)|| (pvmw->vma->vm_flags&VM_LOCKED) ||mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm))mm/migrate.c +6
-0@@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(structpage_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address), pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); + + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(oldpte)) + newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte); + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(oldpte)) + newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte); + set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte); dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio));
Quoted 119 lines · Lance Yang
Quoted 36 lines · Dev Jain
Quoted 34 lines · Lance Yang
From: Lance Yang <[email protected]>
When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the shared zeropage,
try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage()currently drops several important PTE bits.For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore.
As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped. This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data corruption.
Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked.
Cc <[email protected]>Fixes b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")Suggested-by David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>Suggested-by Dev Jain <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Lance Yang <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- Avoid callingptep_get()multiple times (per Dev)
- Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David)
- Collect Acked-by from David - thanks!
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1- [email protected]/
mm/migrate.c| 9 ++++++++-1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)Quoted 15 lines
mm/migrate.c static bool · line 304
Quoted 10 lines
mm/migrate.c +1
-0@@ -300,13 +300,14 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, unsigned long idx) { struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx); + pte_t oldpte = ptep_get(pvmw->pte);What I meant to say was, you can pass oldpte from
remove_migration_pteto this function. Basically defineold_pte=ptep_get(pvmw.pte)in the declarations of the start of the while block inremove_migration_pteand remove the existing one. That will ensureptep_get()gets called only once per iteration.Ah, got it. Thanks for the clarification!
IIUC, you mean something like this:
```
mm/migrate.c +1
-0@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list) static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, struct folio *folio, + pte_t old_pte, unsigned long idx) {struct page *page =
folio_page(folio, idx);mm/migrate.c +1
-1@@ -306,7 +307,7 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(structpage_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, return false; VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page); VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)), page); + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(old_pte), page);if (
folio_test_mlocked(folio)|| (pvmw->vma->vm_flags&VM_LOCKED) ||mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm))mm/migrate.c +6
-0@@ -322,6 +323,12 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(structpage_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address), pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot)); + + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(old_pte)) + newpte = pte_mksoft_dirty(newpte); + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(old_pte)) + newpte = pte_mkuffd_wp(newpte); + set_pte_at(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->address, pvmw->pte, newpte);
dec_mm_counter(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, mm_counter(folio));mm/migrate.c +1
-1@@ -344,7 +351,7 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio, while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) { rmap_t rmap_flags = RMAP_NONE; - pte_t old_pte; + pte_t old_pte = ptep_get(pvmw.pte); pte_t pte; swp_entry_t entry; struct page *new;@@ -365,12 +372,11 @@ static bool remove_migration_pte(struct folio *folio, } #endifif (
rmap_walk_arg->map_unused_to_zeropage&&
-try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, idx)) +try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(&pvmw, folio, old_pte, idx)) continue;
folio_get(folio);
pte =mk_pte(new, READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot)); -old_pte=ptep_get(pvmw.pte);
Quoted 5 lines
entry =
pte_to_swp_entry(old_pte);
if (!is_migration_entry_young(entry))
```
ptep_get()gets called only once per iteration, right?
Yup.