FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86: Don't (re)check L1 intercepts when completing" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e750f85391286a4c8100275516973324b621a269
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2025101005-married-company-a3fc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e750f85391286a4c8100275516973324b621a269 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:06:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Don't (re)check L1 intercepts when completing
userspace I/O
When completing emulation of instruction that generated a userspace exit for I/O, don't recheck L1 intercepts as KVM has already finished that phase of instruction execution, i.e. has already committed to allowing L2 to perform I/O. If L1 (or host userspace) modifies the I/O permission bitmaps during the exit to userspace, KVM will treat the access as being intercepted despite already having emulated the I/O access.
Pivot on EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE to detect that KVM is completing emulation. Of the three users of EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE, only complete_emulated_io() (the intended "recipient") can reach the code in question. gp_interception()'s use is mutually exclusive with is_guest_mode(), and complete_emulated_insn_gp() unconditionally pairs EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE with EMULTYPE_SKIP.
The bad behavior was detected by a syzkaller program that toggles port I/O interception during the userspace I/O exit, ultimately resulting in a WARN on vcpu->arch.pio.count being non-zero due to KVM no completing emulation of the I/O instruction.
WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 1083 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:8039 emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 23 UID: 1000 PID: 1083 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-c1610d2d66b1-next-vm #74 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_fast_pio+0xd6/0x1d0 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x149/0x610 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xda8/0x1ac0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x244/0x8c0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xc60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK>
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +4 -5
@@ -5107,12 +5107,11 @@ void init_decode_cache(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) ctxt->mem_read.end =0 ; } -int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) +int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,bool check_intercepts) {const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops = ctxt->ops;int rc =X86EMUL_CONTINUE ;int saved_dst_type = ctxt->dst.type; -bool is_guest_mode = ctxt->ops->is_guest_mode (ctxt); ctxt->mem_read.pos =0 ;
@@ -5160,7 +5159,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)fetch_possible_mmx_operand (&ctxt->dst); } -if (unlikely (is_guest_mode) && ctxt->intercept) { +if (unlikely (check_intercepts) && ctxt->intercept) { rc =emulator_check_intercept (ctxt, ctxt->intercept,X86_ICPT_PRE_EXCEPT );if (rc !=X86EMUL_CONTINUE )
@@ -5189,7 +5188,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) goto done; } -if (unlikely (is_guest_mode) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { +if (unlikely (check_intercepts) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { rc =emulator_check_intercept (ctxt, ctxt->intercept,X86_ICPT_POST_EXCEPT );if (rc !=X86EMUL_CONTINUE )
@@ -5243,7 +5242,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) special_insn: -if (unlikely (is_guest_mode) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { +if (unlikely (check_intercepts) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { rc =emulator_check_intercept (ctxt, ctxt->intercept,X86_ICPT_POST_MEMACCESS );if (rc !=X86EMUL_CONTINUE )
arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h +1 -2
@@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ struct x86_emulate_ops {void (*set_nmi_mask)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,bool masked);bool (*is_smm)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); -bool (*is_guest_mode)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);int (*leave_smm)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);void (*triple_fault)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);int (*set_xcr)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,u32 index,u64 xcr);
@@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ bool x86_page_table_writing_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);#define EMULATION_RESTART 1#define EMULATION_INTERCEPTED 2void init_decode_cache (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); -int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); +int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,bool check_intercepts);int emulator_task_switch (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,u16 tss_selector,int idt_index,int reason,bool has_error_code,u32 error_code);
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +8 -7
@@ -8470,11 +8470,6 @@ static bool emulator_is_smm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)return is_smm (emul_to_vcpu (ctxt)); } -static bool emulator_is_guest_mode (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) -{ -return is_guest_mode (emul_to_vcpu (ctxt)); -} -#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_SMM static int emulator_leave_smm (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) {
@@ -8558,7 +8553,6 @@ static const struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = { .guest_cpuid_is_intel_compatible = emulator_guest_cpuid_is_intel_compatible, .set_nmi_mask = emulator_set_nmi_mask, .is_smm = emulator_is_smm, - .is_guest_mode = emulator_is_guest_mode, .leave_smm = emulator_leave_smm, .triple_fault = emulator_triple_fault, .set_xcr = emulator_set_xcr,
@@ -9143,7 +9137,14 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, ctxt->exception.address =0 ; } - r =x86_emulate_insn (ctxt); +/* +* Check L1's instruction intercepts when emulating instructions for +* L2, unless KVM is re-emulating a previously decoded instruction, +* e.g. to complete userspace I/O, in which case KVM has already +* checked the intercepts. +*/ + r =x86_emulate_insn (ctxt,is_guest_mode (vcpu) && + !(emulation_type &EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE ));if (r ==EMULATION_INTERCEPTED )return 1 ;
Sasha Levin
maintainerPATCH 1/1 KVM: x86: Don't (re)check L1 intercepts when completing userspace I/O
From: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit e750f85391286a4c8100275516973324b621a269 ]
When completing emulation of instruction that generated a userspace exit for I/O, don't recheck L1 intercepts as KVM has already finished that phase of instruction execution, i.e. has already committed to allowing L2 to perform I/O. If L1 (or host userspace) modifies the I/O permission bitmaps during the exit to userspace, KVM will treat the access as being intercepted despite already having emulated the I/O access.
Pivot on EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE to detect that KVM is completing emulation. Of the three users of EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE, only complete_emulated_io() (the intended "recipient") can reach the code in question. gp_interception()'s use is mutually exclusive with is_guest_mode(), and complete_emulated_insn_gp() unconditionally pairs EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE with EMULTYPE_SKIP.
The bad behavior was detected by a syzkaller program that toggles port I/O interception during the userspace I/O exit, ultimately resulting in a WARN on vcpu->arch.pio.count being non-zero due to KVM no completing emulation of the I/O instruction.
WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 1083 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:8039 emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 23 UID: 1000 PID: 1083 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-c1610d2d66b1-next-vm #74 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_fast_pio+0xd6/0x1d0 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x149/0x610 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xda8/0x1ac0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x244/0x8c0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xc60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK>
--- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 11 ++++------- arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++++- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +4 -7
@@ -5478,12 +5478,11 @@ void init_decode_cache(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) ctxt->mem_read.end =0 ; } -int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) +int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,bool check_intercepts) {const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops = ctxt->ops;int rc =X86EMUL_CONTINUE ;int saved_dst_type = ctxt->dst.type; -unsigned emul_flags; ctxt->mem_read.pos =0 ;
@@ -5497,8 +5496,6 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) rc =emulate_ud (ctxt); goto done; } - - emul_flags = ctxt->ops->get_hflags (ctxt);if (unlikely (ctxt->d & (No64|Undefined|Sse|Mmx|Intercept|CheckPerm|Priv|Prot|String))) { if ((ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 && (ctxt->d & No64)) ||
@@ -5532,7 +5529,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)fetch_possible_mmx_operand (&ctxt->dst); } -if (unlikely (emul_flags &X86EMUL_GUEST_MASK ) && ctxt->intercept) { +if (unlikely (check_intercepts) && ctxt->intercept) { rc =emulator_check_intercept (ctxt, ctxt->intercept,X86_ICPT_PRE_EXCEPT );if (rc !=X86EMUL_CONTINUE )
@@ -5561,7 +5558,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) goto done; } -if (unlikely (emul_flags &X86EMUL_GUEST_MASK ) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { +if (unlikely (check_intercepts) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { rc =emulator_check_intercept (ctxt, ctxt->intercept,X86_ICPT_POST_EXCEPT );if (rc !=X86EMUL_CONTINUE )
@@ -5615,7 +5612,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) special_insn: -if (unlikely (emul_flags &X86EMUL_GUEST_MASK ) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { +if (unlikely (check_intercepts) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { rc =emulator_check_intercept (ctxt, ctxt->intercept,X86_ICPT_POST_MEMACCESS );if (rc !=X86EMUL_CONTINUE )
arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h +1 -1
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ bool x86_page_table_writing_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);#define EMULATION_RESTART 1#define EMULATION_INTERCEPTED 2void init_decode_cache (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); -int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); +int x86_emulate_insn (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,bool check_intercepts);int emulator_task_switch (struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,u16 tss_selector,int idt_index,int reason,bool has_error_code,u32 error_code);
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +8 -1
@@ -8976,7 +8976,14 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, ctxt->exception.address =0 ; } - r =x86_emulate_insn (ctxt); +/* +* Check L1's instruction intercepts when emulating instructions for +* L2, unless KVM is re-emulating a previously decoded instruction, +* e.g. to complete userspace I/O, in which case KVM has already +* checked the intercepts. +*/ + r =x86_emulate_insn (ctxt,is_guest_mode (vcpu) && + !(emulation_type &EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE ));if (r ==EMULATION_INTERCEPTED )return 1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.51.0
Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] KVM: x86: Don't (re)check L1 intercepts when completing userspace I/O
Quoted 49 lines · Sasha Levin
From: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit
e750f85391286a4c8100275516973324b621a269]When completing emulation of instruction that generated a userspace exit for I/O, don't recheck L1 intercepts as KVM has already finished that phase of instruction execution, i.e. has already committed to allowing L2 to perform I/O. If L1 (or host userspace) modifies the I/O permission bitmaps during the exit to userspace, KVM will treat the access as being intercepted despite already having emulated the I/O access.
Pivot on
EMULTYPE_NO_DECODEto detect that KVM is completing emulation. Of the three users ofEMULTYPE_NO_DECODE, onlycomplete_emulated_io()(the intended "recipient") can reach the code in question. gp_interception()'s use is mutually exclusive withis_guest_mode(), andcomplete_emulated_insn_gp()unconditionally pairsEMULTYPE_NO_DECODEwithEMULTYPE_SKIP.The bad behavior was detected by a syzkaller program that toggles port I/O interception during the userspace I/O exit, ultimately resulting in a WARN on
vcpu->arch.pio.countbeing non-zero due to KVM no completing emulation of the I/O instruction.WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 1083 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:8039 emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 23 UID: 1000 PID: 1083 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-c1610d2d66b1-next-vm #74 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_fast_pio+0xd6/0x1d0 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x149/0x610 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xda8/0x1ac0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x244/0x8c0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xc60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK>Reported-by [email protected]Fixes 8a76d7f25f8f ("KVM: x86: Add x86 callback for intercept check")Cc Jim Mattson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>[ is_guest_mode() was open coded ]Signed-off-by Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Quoted 1 line
---
Thanks Sasha!