Skip to contentSkip to conversation

slab: Avoid race on slab->obj_exts in alloc_slab_obj_exts

PATCH Superseded Hao Ge 2 participants 2 messages Oct 20, 2025

Subsystems (2)

v2 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Hao Ge

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 slab: Avoid race on slab->obj_exts in alloc_slab_obj_exts

From: Hao Ge <[email protected]>

In the alloc_slab_obj_exts function, there is a race condition between the successful allocation of slab->obj_exts and its setting to OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL due to allocation failure.

When two threads are both allocating objects from the same slab, they both end up entering the alloc_slab_obj_exts function because the slab has no obj_exts (allocated yet).

And One call succeeds in allocation, but the racing one overwrites our obj_ext with OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL. The threads that successfully allocated will have prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook() return slab_obj_exts(slab) + obj_to_index(s, slab, p), where slab_obj_exts(slab) already sees OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL and thus it returns an offset based on the zero address.

And then it will call alloc_tag_add, where the member codetag_ref *ref of obj_exts will be referenced.Thus, a NULL pointer dereference occurs, leading to a panic.

In order to avoid that, for the case of allocation failure where OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL is assigned, we use cmpxchg to handle this assignment.

Conversely, in a race condition, if mark_failed_objexts_alloc wins the race, the other process (that previously succeeded in allocation) will lose the race. A null pointer dereference may occur in the following scenario:

Thread1 Thead2

alloc_slab_obj_exts alloc_slab_obj_exts

old_exts = READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts) = 0

						  mark_failed_objexts_alloc(slab);

cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts

kfree and return 0;

alloc_tag_add -> a panic occurs.

To fix this, introduce a retry mechanism for the cmpxchg() operation:
1. Add a 'retry' label at the point where READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts) is invoked, ensuring the latest value is fetched during subsequent retries.
2. if cmpxchg() fails (indicating a concurrent update), jump back to "retry" to re-read old_exts and recheck the validity of the obj_exts allocated in this operation.

Thanks for Vlastimil and Suren's help with debugging.

Fixes f7381b911640 ("slab: mark slab->obj_exts allocation failures unconditionally")

---
v2: Incorporate handling for the scenario where, if mark_failed_objexts_alloc wins the race,
the other process (that previously succeeded in allocation) will lose the race, based on Suren's suggestion. Add Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>

---
 mm/slub.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
mm/slub.c +17 -3
index 2e4340c75be2..fd1b5dda3863 100644
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ static inline void mark_objexts_empty(struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts)
 
 static inline void mark_failed_objexts_alloc(struct slab *slab)
 {
-	slab->obj_exts = OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL;
+	cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, 0, OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL);
 }
 
 static inline void handle_failed_objexts_alloc(unsigned long obj_exts,
@@ -2136,6 +2136,7 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 	new_exts |= MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS;
 #endif
+retry:
 	old_exts = READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts);
 	handle_failed_objexts_alloc(old_exts, vec, objects);
 	if (new_slab) {
@@ -2145,8 +2146,7 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
 		 * be simply assigned.
 		 */
 		slab->obj_exts = new_exts;
-	} else if ((old_exts & ~OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK) ||
-		   cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts) {
+	} else if (old_exts & ~OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK) {
 		/*
 		 * If the slab is already in use, somebody can allocate and
 		 * assign slabobj_exts in parallel. In this case the existing
@@ -2158,6 +2158,20 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
 		else
 			kfree(vec);
 		return 0;
+	} else if (cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts) {
+		/*
+		 * There are some abnormal scenarios caused by race conditions:
+		 *
+		 *	Thread1				Thead2
+		 *   alloc_slab_obj_exts		alloc_slab_obj_exts
+		 *   old_exts = READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts) = 0
+		 *					mark_failed_objexts_alloc(slab);
+		 *   cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts
+		 *
+		 * We should retry to ensure the validity of the slab_ext
+		 * allocated in this operation.
+		 */
+		goto retry;
 	}
 
 	if (allow_spin)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 36 lines · Hao Ge

From: Hao Ge <[email protected]>

In the alloc_slab_obj_exts function, there is a race condition between the successful allocation of slab->obj_exts and its setting to OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL due to allocation failure.

When two threads are both allocating objects from the same slab, they both end up entering the alloc_slab_obj_exts function because the slab has no obj_exts (allocated yet).

And One call succeeds in allocation, but the racing one overwrites our obj_ext with OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL. The threads that successfully allocated will have prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook() return slab_obj_exts(slab) + obj_to_index(s, slab, p), where slab_obj_exts(slab) already sees OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL and thus it returns an offset based on the zero address.

And then it will call alloc_tag_add, where the member codetag_ref *ref of obj_exts will be referenced.Thus, a NULL pointer dereference occurs, leading to a panic.

In order to avoid that, for the case of allocation failure where OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL is assigned, we use cmpxchg to handle this assignment.

Conversely, in a race condition, if mark_failed_objexts_alloc wins the race, the other process (that previously succeeded in allocation) will lose the race. A null pointer dereference may occur in the following scenario:

Thread1 Thead2

alloc_slab_obj_exts alloc_slab_obj_exts

old_exts = READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts) = 0

Quoted 7 lines
                                                  mark_failed_objexts_alloc(slab);

cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts

kfree and return 0;

alloc_tag_add -> a panic occurs.

I appreciate the time and effort you put in this description but it sounds overly-complicated IMHO. IIUC in both cases the issue happens when a valid slab->obj_exts pointer is overwritten by OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL. I would simply say:

If two competing threads enter alloc_slab_obj_exts() and one of them fails to allocate the object extension vector, it might override the valid slab->obj_exts allocated by the other thread with OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL. This will cause the thread that lost this race and expects a valid pointer to dereference a NULL pointer later on.

Quoted 7 lines

To fix this, introduce a retry mechanism for the cmpxchg() operation:
1. Add a 'retry' label at the point where READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts) is invoked, ensuring the latest value is fetched during subsequent retries.
2. if cmpxchg() fails (indicating a concurrent update), jump back to "retry" to re-read old_exts and recheck the validity of the obj_exts allocated in this operation.

The paragraph above explains "what" you do but we can use the code to understand that. Changelog should describe "why" not "what" you do. I would just say:

Update slab->obj_exts atomically using cmpxchg() to avoid slab->obj_exts overrides by racing threads.

Quoted 52 lines

Thanks for Vlastimil and Suren's help with debugging.

Fixes f7381b911640 ("slab: mark slab->obj_exts allocation failures unconditionally")

---
v2: Incorporate handling for the scenario where, if mark_failed_objexts_alloc wins the race,
the other process (that previously succeeded in allocation) will lose the race, based on Suren's suggestion. Add Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>

---
 mm/slub.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
mm/slub.c +6 -3
index 2e4340c75be2..fd1b5dda3863 100644
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ static inline void mark_objexts_empty(struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts)
 
 static inline void mark_failed_objexts_alloc(struct slab *slab)
 {
-       slab->obj_exts = OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL;
+       cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, 0, OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL);
 }
 
 static inline void handle_failed_objexts_alloc(unsigned long obj_exts,
@@ -2136,6 +2136,7 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
        new_exts |= MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS;
 #endif
+retry:
        old_exts = READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts);
        handle_failed_objexts_alloc(old_exts, vec, objects);
        if (new_slab) {
@@ -2145,8 +2146,7 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
                 * be simply assigned.
                 */
                slab->obj_exts = new_exts;
-       } else if ((old_exts & ~OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK) ||
-                  cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts) {
+       } else if (old_exts & ~OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK) {
                /*
                 * If the slab is already in use, somebody can allocate and
                 * assign slabobj_exts in parallel. In this case the existing
@@ -2158,6 +2158,20 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
                else
                        kfree(vec);
                return 0;
+       } else if (cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts) {
+               /*
+                * There are some abnormal scenarios caused by race conditions:

mm/slub.c int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s, · line 2173

Quoted 10 lines
mm/slub.c +10 -0
+                *
+                *      Thread1                         Thead2
+                *   alloc_slab_obj_exts                alloc_slab_obj_exts
+                *   old_exts = READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts) = 0
+                *                                      mark_failed_objexts_alloc(slab);
+                *   cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, old_exts, new_exts) != old_exts
+                *
+                * We should retry to ensure the validity of the slab_ext
+                * allocated in this operation.
+                */

I don't think we need a diagram here. The race is quite trivial. Maybe a simple comment like this?

/* Retry if a racing thread changed slab->obj_exts from under us. */

Quoted 7 lines
mm/slub.c +1 -1
+               goto retry;
        }
 
        if (allow_spin)
--

2.25.1