Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] firmware: stratix10-svc: Add mutex in stratix10 memory" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jan 6

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 85f96cbbbc67b59652b2c1ec394b8ddc0ddf1b0b
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026010654-universe-wrongly-32af@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 85f96cbbbc67b59652b2c1ec394b8ddc0ddf1b0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mahesh Rao <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 22:54:40 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: stratix10-svc: Add mutex in stratix10 memory
management

Add mutex lock to stratix10_svc_allocate_memory and stratix10_svc_free_memory for thread safety. This prevents race conditions and ensures proper synchronization during memory operations. This is required for parallel communication with the Stratix10 service channel.

Fixes 7ca5ce896524f ("firmware: add Intel Stratix10 service layer driver")
drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c +11 -0
index 5a32c1054bee..9372a17d89b7 100644
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
  * Copyright (C) 2017-2018, Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright (C) 2025, Altera Corporation
  */
 
 #include <linux/completion.h>
@@ -172,6 +173,12 @@ struct stratix10_svc_chan {
 static LIST_HEAD(svc_ctrl);
 static LIST_HEAD(svc_data_mem);
 
+/**
+ * svc_mem_lock protects access to the svc_data_mem list for
+ * concurrent multi-client operations
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(svc_mem_lock);
+
 /**
  * svc_pa_to_va() - translate physical address to virtual address
  * @addr: to be translated physical address
@@ -184,6 +191,7 @@ static void *svc_pa_to_va(unsigned long addr)
 	struct stratix10_svc_data_mem *pmem;
 
 	pr_debug("claim back P-addr=0x%016x\n", (unsigned int)addr);
+	guard(mutex)(&svc_mem_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(pmem, &svc_data_mem, node)
 		if (pmem->paddr == addr)
 			return pmem->vaddr;
@@ -1002,6 +1010,7 @@ int stratix10_svc_send(struct stratix10_svc_chan *chan, void *msg)
 			p_data->flag = ct->flags;
 		}
 	} else {
+		guard(mutex)(&svc_mem_lock);
 		list_for_each_entry(p_mem, &svc_data_mem, node)
 			if (p_mem->vaddr == p_msg->payload) {
 				p_data->paddr = p_mem->paddr;
@@ -1084,6 +1093,7 @@ void *stratix10_svc_allocate_memory(struct stratix10_svc_chan *chan,
 	if (!pmem)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
+	guard(mutex)(&svc_mem_lock);
 	va = gen_pool_alloc(genpool, s);
 	if (!va)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -1112,6 +1122,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stratix10_svc_allocate_memory);
 void stratix10_svc_free_memory(struct stratix10_svc_chan *chan, void *kaddr)
 {
 	struct stratix10_svc_data_mem *pmem;
+	guard(mutex)(&svc_mem_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(pmem, &svc_data_mem, node)
 		if (pmem->vaddr == kaddr) {