Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ASoC: davinci-evm: Fix reference leak in davinci_evm_probe

PATCH In review Kery Qi 2 participants 2 messages Jan 7 – Jan 9

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Kery Qi

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ASoC: davinci-evm: Fix reference leak in davinci_evm_probe

The davinci_evm_probe() function calls of_parse_phandle() to acquire device nodes for "ti,audio-codec" and "ti,mcasp-controller". These functions return device nodes with incremented reference counts.

However, in several error paths (e.g., when the second of_parse_phandle(), snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(), or devm_snd_soc_register_card() fails), the function returns directly without releasing the acquired nodes, leading to reference leaks.

This patch adds an error handling path 'err_put' to properly release the device nodes using of_node_put() and clean up the pointers when an error occurs.

---
 sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c +31 -8
index 3848766d96c3..ad514c2e5a25 100644
@@ -194,27 +194,32 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	dai->cpus->of_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ti,mcasp-controller", 0);
-	if (!dai->cpus->of_node)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!dai->cpus->of_node) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_put;
+	}
 
 	dai->platforms->of_node = dai->cpus->of_node;
 
 	evm_soc_card.dev = &pdev->dev;
 	ret = snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(&evm_soc_card, "ti,model");
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		goto err_put;
 
 	mclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mclk");
 	if (PTR_ERR(mclk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
-		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		goto err_put;
 	} else if (IS_ERR(mclk)) {
 		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "mclk not found.\n");
 		mclk = NULL;
 	}
 
 	drvdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!drvdata)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!drvdata) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_put;
+	}
 
 	drvdata->mclk = mclk;
 
@@ -224,7 +229,8 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		if (!drvdata->mclk) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 				"No clock or clock rate defined.\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_put;
 		}
 		drvdata->sysclk = clk_get_rate(drvdata->mclk);
 	} else if (drvdata->mclk) {
@@ -240,8 +246,25 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(&evm_soc_card, drvdata);
 	ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, &evm_soc_card);
 
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "snd_soc_register_card failed (%d)\n", ret);
+		goto err_put;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+
+err_put:
+	dai->platforms->of_node = NULL;
+
+	if (dai->cpus->of_node) {
+		of_node_put(dai->cpus->of_node);
+		dai->cpus->of_node = NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (dai->codecs->of_node) {
+		of_node_put(dai->codecs->of_node);
+		dai->codecs->of_node = NULL;
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Kery Qi

The davinci_evm_probe() function calls of_parse_phandle() to acquire device nodes for "ti,audio-codec" and "ti,mcasp-controller". These functions return device nodes with incremented reference counts.

However, in several error paths (e.g., when the second of_parse_phandle(), snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(), or devm_snd_soc_register_card() fails), the function returns directly without releasing the acquired nodes, leading to reference leaks.

[...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: davinci-evm: Fix reference leak in davinci_evm_probe

      commit: 5b577d214fcc109707bcb77b4ae72a31cfd86798

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark