6.18-stable inclusion request
Subsystems (2)
Jens Axboe
maintainerHi Greg/stable,
Can you add these two patches to the 6.18-stable queue? You can also just cherry pick these in order:
38aa434ab9335ce2d178b7538cdf01d60b2014c391214661489467f8452d34edbf257488d85176e4
It's in the nice-to-have category just to be consistent with the older/current stable release.
Thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
From efa9f164e9345e613b50c203eb763922a3d130d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Chen <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 22:37:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring/io-wq: add exit-on-idle state
Commit 38aa434ab9335ce2d178b7538cdf01d60b2014c3 upstream.
io-wq uses an idle timeout to shrink the pool, but keeps the last worker around indefinitely to avoid churn.
For tasks that used io_uring for file I/O and then stop using io_uring, this can leave an iou-wrk-* thread behind even after all io_uring instances are gone. This is unnecessary overhead and also gets in the way of process checkpoint/restore.
Add an exit-on-idle state that makes all io-wq workers exit as soon as they become idle, and provide io_wq_set_exit_on_idle() to toggle it.
--- io_uring/io-wq.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- io_uring/io-wq.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
io_uring/io-wq.c +25 -2
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum {enum {IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT =0 ,/* wq exiting */ +IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT_ON_IDLE =1 ,/* allow all workers to exit on idle */ };enum {
@@ -706,9 +707,13 @@ static int io_wq_worker(void *data)raw_spin_lock (&acct->workers_lock);/* * Last sleep timed out. Exit if we're not the last worker, -* or if someone modified our affinity. +* or if someone modified our affinity. If wq is marked +* idle-exit, drop the worker as well. This is used to avoid +* keeping io-wq workers around for tasks that no longer have +* any active io_uring instances. */ -if (last_timeout && (exit_mask || acct->nr_workers >1 )) { +if ((last_timeout && (exit_mask || acct->nr_workers >1 )) || +test_bit (IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT_ON_IDLE , &wq->state)) { acct->nr_workers--;raw_spin_unlock (&acct->workers_lock);__set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING );
@@ -965,6 +970,24 @@ static bool io_wq_worker_wake(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)return false; } +void io_wq_set_exit_on_idle (struct io_wq *wq,bool enable) +{ +if (!wq->task) +return ; + +if (!enable) { +clear_bit (IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT_ON_IDLE , &wq->state); +return ; + } + +if (test_and_set_bit (IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT_ON_IDLE , &wq->state)) +return ; + +rcu_read_lock (); +io_wq_for_each_worker (wq, io_wq_worker_wake,NULL ); +rcu_read_unlock (); +} +static void io_run_cancel (struct io_wq_work *work,struct io_wq *wq) { do {
io_uring/io-wq.h +1 -0
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct io_wq_data {struct io_wq *io_wq_create (unsigned bounded,struct io_wq_data *data);void io_wq_exit_start (struct io_wq *wq);void io_wq_put_and_exit (struct io_wq *wq); +void io_wq_set_exit_on_idle (struct io_wq *wq,bool enable);void io_wq_enqueue (struct io_wq *wq,struct io_wq_work *work);void io_wq_hash_work (struct io_wq_work *work,void *val);
Signature · 1 line
2.51.0
From 6809ad872df9f746f737ab762ee72f1d9a692c1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Chen <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 22:37:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: allow io-wq workers to exit when unused
Commit 91214661489467f8452d34edbf257488d85176e4 upstream.
io_uring keeps a per-task io-wq around, even when the task no longer has any io_uring instances.
If the task previously used io_uring for file I/O, this can leave an unrelated iou-wrk-* worker thread behind after the last io_uring instance is gone.
When the last io_uring ctx is removed from the task context, mark the io-wq exit-on-idle so workers can go away. Clear the flag on subsequent io_uring usage.
--- io_uring/tctx.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
io_uring/tctx.c +11 -0
@@ -122,6 +122,14 @@ int __io_uring_add_tctx_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)return ret; } } + +/* +* Re-activate io-wq keepalive on any new io_uring usage. The wq may have +* been marked for idle-exit when the task temporarily had no active +* io_uring instances. +*/ +if (tctx->io_wq) +io_wq_set_exit_on_idle (tctx->io_wq, false);if (!xa_load (&tctx->xa, (unsigned long )ctx)) { node =kmalloc (sizeof (*node),GFP_KERNEL );if (!node)
@@ -183,6 +191,9 @@ __cold void io_uring_del_tctx_node(unsigned long index)if (tctx->last == node->ctx) tctx->last =NULL ;kfree (node); + +if (xa_empty (&tctx->xa) && tctx->io_wq) +io_wq_set_exit_on_idle (tctx->io_wq, true); }__cold void io_uring_clean_tctx (struct io_uring_task *tctx)
Signature · 1 line
2.51.0
Jens Axboe
maintainerQuoted 10 lines · Jens Axboe
Hi Greg/stable,
Can you add these two patches to the 6.18-stable queue? You can also just cherry pick these in order:
38aa434ab9335ce2d178b7538cdf01d60b2014c391214661489467f8452d34edbf257488d85176e4It's in the nice-to-have category just to be consistent with the older/current stable release.
Oh and since 6.19 is out as well, 6.19-stable queue as well, please.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 5 lines · Jens Axboe
Hi Greg/stable,
Can you add these two patches to the 6.18-stable queue? You can also just cherry pick these in order:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
38aa434ab9335ce2d178b7538cdf01d60b2014c391214661489467f8452d34edbf257488d85176e4It's in the nice-to-have category just to be consistent with the older/current stable release.
Oh and since 6.19 is out as well, 6.19-stable queue as well, please.
Now done, thanks!
greg k-h