usb: core: remove unnecessary goto in usb_create_newid_files()
PATCH v2 1/1 usb: core: remove unnecessary goto in usb_create_newid_files()
The goto to 'exit' only returns the already initialized variable 'error', which would be 0. At that point it could not yet be anything else. Replacing with an early return 0 removes the
need for the label entirely.
--- drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/core/driver.c +2 -2
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int usb_create_newid_files(struct usb_driver *usb_drv)int error =0 ;if (usb_drv->no_dynamic_id) - goto exit; +return 0 ;if (usb_drv->probe !=NULL ) { error = driver_create_file(&usb_drv->driver,
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int usb_create_newid_files(struct usb_driver *usb_drv) &driver_attr_new_id); } } -exit: +return error; }
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 36 lines · Mark Adamenko
The goto to 'exit' only returns the already initialized variable 'error', which would be 0. At that point it could not yet be anything else. Replacing with an early return 0 removes the
need for the label entirely.Signed-off-by Mark Adamenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/usb/core/driver.c +2
-2@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int usb_create_newid_files(struct usb_driver *usb_drv)int error =0 ;if (usb_drv->no_dynamic_id) - goto exit; +return 0 ;if (usb_drv->probe !=NULL ) { error = driver_create_file(&usb_drv->driver,@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int usb_create_newid_files(struct usb_driver *usb_drv) &driver_attr_new_id); } } -exit: +return error; }Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot