kbuild: Allow to reduce the number of suffixes for clang thin-lto build
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 kbuild: Allow to reduce the number of suffixes for clang thin-lto build
The current clang thin-lto build often produces lots of symbols with suffix. The following is a partial list of such function call symbols:
...
ethnl_module_fw_flash_ntf.llvm.7631589765585346066
__nf_conntrack_alloc.llvm.6438426151906658917
tcp_can_early_drop.llvm.11937612064648250727
tcp_print_conntrack.llvm.11937612064648250727
...In my particular build with current bpf-next, the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' function calls is 1212. Such symbols make kernel live patching difficult since
- a minor code change will change the hash and then the '*.llvm.<hash>' symbol becomes another one with a different hash or no hash, and
- a previous source-level symbol may become an one with suffix after live patching code.
In [1], Song Liu suggested to reduce the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' functions to make live patch easier. In respond of this, I implemented this in llvm ([2]). The same thin-lto build with [2] only has two symbols with suffix:
m_stop.llvm.14460341347352036579
m_next.llvm.14460341347352036579This should make live patch much easier.
To support suffix symbol reduction, a new config
LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION
is introduced and the config depends on thin-lto and llvm23 or higher.
Two lld flags are necessary to enable this feature in kernel:
- Flag '--lto-whole-program-visibility' is needed as it ensures that all modules are available in the same process, which is true for kernel at thin-lto lld.
- Flag '-mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false' is needed to enable suffix reduction. Currently in llvm [1], only process mode is supported. There is another distributed mode (across different processes or even different machines) which is not supported yet ([2]).
[1] https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2212
[2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587
--- Makefile | 3 +++ arch/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
Makefile +3 -0
@@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit +ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION +KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false +endif else CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto endif
arch/Kconfig +15 -0
@@ -861,8 +861,23 @@ config LTO_CLANG_THIN https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html If unsure, say Y. + endchoice +config LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION + bool "Clang ThinLTO Suffix Reduction (EXPERIMENTAL)" + depends on LTO_CLANG_THIN + depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 230000 + default y + help + This option allows to reduce the number of symbols with + '.llvm.<hash' suffixes. This can help KLP (kernel living + patch) as symbol name can stay stable in most cases. + + See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587 + + If unsure, say N. + config ARCH_SUPPORTS_AUTOFDO_CLANG bool
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
Josh Poimboeuf
maintainerQuoted 76 lines · Yonghong Song
The current clang thin-lto build often produces lots of symbols with suffix. The following is a partial list of such function call symbols:
... ethnl_module_fw_flash_ntf.llvm.7631589765585346066 __nf_conntrack_alloc.llvm.6438426151906658917 tcp_can_early_drop.llvm.11937612064648250727 tcp_print_conntrack.llvm.11937612064648250727 ...In my particular build with current bpf-next, the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' function calls is 1212. Such symbols make kernel live patching difficult since
- a minor code change will change the hash and then the '*.llvm.<hash>' symbol becomes another one with a different hash or no hash, and
- a previous source-level symbol may become an one with suffix after live patching code.In [1], Song Liu suggested to reduce the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' functions to make live patch easier. In respond of this, I implemented this in llvm ([2]). The same thin-lto build with [2] only has two symbols with suffix:
m_stop.llvm.14460341347352036579 m_next.llvm.14460341347352036579This should make live patch much easier.
To support suffix symbol reduction, a new config
LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION
is introduced and the config depends on thin-lto and llvm23 or higher.Two lld flags are necessary to enable this feature in kernel:
- Flag '--lto-whole-program-visibility' is needed as it ensures that all modules are available in the same process, which is true for kernel at thin-lto lld.
- Flag '-mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false' is needed to enable suffix reduction. Currently in llvm [1], only process mode is supported. There is another distributed mode (across different processes or even different machines) which is not supported yet ([2]).[1] https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2212
[2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587Signed-off-by Yonghong Song <[email protected]>--- Makefile | 3 +++ arch/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)Makefile +3
-0@@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit +ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION +KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false +endif else CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto endifarch/Kconfig +5
-0@@ -861,8 +861,23 @@ config LTO_CLANG_THIN https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html If unsure, say Y. + endchoice +config LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION + bool "Clang ThinLTO Suffix Reduction (EXPERIMENTAL)" + depends on LTO_CLANG_THIN + depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 230000
arch/Kconfig config LTO_CLANG_THIN · line 880
Quoted 10 lines
arch/Kconfig +10
-0+ default y + help + This option allows to reduce the number of symbols with + '.llvm.<hash' suffixes. This can help KLP (kernel living + patch) as symbol name can stay stable in most cases. + + See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587 + + If unsure, say N. +
Thanks! Would there be any downsides to enabling this feature unconditionally in the kernel when the compiler supports it?
Signature · 1 line
Josh
Quoted 73 lines · Josh Poimboeuf
Quoted 72 lines · Yonghong Song
The current clang thin-lto build often produces lots of symbols with suffix. The following is a partial list of such function call symbols:
... ethnl_module_fw_flash_ntf.llvm.7631589765585346066 __nf_conntrack_alloc.llvm.6438426151906658917 tcp_can_early_drop.llvm.11937612064648250727 tcp_print_conntrack.llvm.11937612064648250727 ...In my particular build with current bpf-next, the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' function calls is 1212. Such symbols make kernel live patching difficult since
- a minor code change will change the hash and then the '*.llvm.<hash>' symbol becomes another one with a different hash or no hash, and
- a previous source-level symbol may become an one with suffix after live patching code.In [1], Song Liu suggested to reduce the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' functions to make live patch easier. In respond of this, I implemented this in llvm ([2]). The same thin-lto build with [2] only has two symbols with suffix:
m_stop.llvm.14460341347352036579 m_next.llvm.14460341347352036579This should make live patch much easier.
To support suffix symbol reduction, a new config
LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION
is introduced and the config depends on thin-lto and llvm23 or higher.Two lld flags are necessary to enable this feature in kernel:
- Flag '--lto-whole-program-visibility' is needed as it ensures that all modules are available in the same process, which is true for kernel at thin-lto lld.
- Flag '-mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false' is needed to enable suffix reduction. Currently in llvm [1], only process mode is supported. There is another distributed mode (across different processes or even different machines) which is not supported yet ([2]).[1] https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2212 [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587Signed-off-by Yonghong Song <[email protected]>--- Makefile | 3 +++ arch/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)Makefile +3
-0@@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit +ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION +KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false +endif else CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto endifarch/Kconfig +1
-0@@ -861,8 +861,23 @@ config LTO_CLANG_THIN https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html If unsure, say Y. + endchoice
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 4 lines
arch/Kconfig +4
-0+config LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION + bool "Clang ThinLTO Suffix Reduction (EXPERIMENTAL)" + depends on LTO_CLANG_THIN + depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 230000arch/Kconfig config LTO_CLANG_THIN · line 880
Quoted 10 lines
arch/Kconfig +10
-0+ default y + help + This option allows to reduce the number of symbols with + '.llvm.<hash' suffixes. This can help KLP (kernel living + patch) as symbol name can stay stable in most cases. + + See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587 + + If unsure, say N. +Thanks! Would there be any downsides to enabling this feature unconditionally in the kernel when the compiler supports it?
The only downside is for the following case:
C file: static function foo()
Asm file: global function foo()
The thin-lto will collect all C files and with the above llvm patch, the static function foo() may be promoted to global function foo() if there is no other pre-existing global function foo() in all C files.
In such cases, there will be a conflict since
there are two global function foo() (one from C file, another from Asm file). In such cases, the build will fail.
How do you think we could hit such issues in linux kernel? Maybe should have default no for the new config?
I think the chance should be very low. The following is a grab for x86 for global symbols in asm code:
[~/work/others/linux/arch/x86 (master)]$ egrep -r globl
egrep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E
boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c: printf(".globl z_input_len\n");
boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c: printf(".globl z_output_len\n");
boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c: printf(".globl input_data, input_data_end\n");
boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c: printf(".globl input_len\n");
boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c: printf(".globl output_len\n");
boot/compressed/head_64.S: .globl verify_cpu
boot/bioscall.S: .globl intcall
boot/header.S: .globl pecompat_fstart
boot/header.S: .globl sentinel
boot/header.S: .globl hdr
boot/header.S: .globl _start
boot/header.S: .globl realmode_swtch
boot/header.S: .globl die
entry/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: .globl __kernel_sigreturn
entry/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: .globl __kernel_rt_sigreturn
entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S: .globl __kernel_vsyscall
entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_emu_64.S: .globl __vsyscall_page
entry/entry_32.S: .globl __irqentry_text_start
entry/entry_32.S: .globl __irqentry_text_end
entry/entry_64.S: .globl __irqentry_text_start
entry/entry_64.S: .globl __irqentry_text_end
include/asm/paravirt_types.h: ".globl " PV_THUNK_NAME(func) ";" \
include/asm/static_call.h: ".globl " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(name) " \n" \
kernel/cpu/amd.c: ".globl vide\n"kernel/ftrace_32.S:.globl ftrace_call
kernel/ftrace_32.S:.globl ftrace_graph_call
kernel/ftrace_32.S:.globl return_to_handlerkernel/relocate_kernel_32.S: .globl kexec_control_code_size
kernel/head_32.S:.globl initial_pg_pmd
kernel/head_32.S:.globl initial_page_table
kernel/head_32.S:.globl swapper_pg_dir
kernel/head_32.S:.globl empty_zero_pagelib/error-inject.c: ".globl just_return_func\n"
math-emu/reg_round.S:.globl fpu_reg_round
math-emu/reg_round.S:.globl fpu_Arith_exit
purgatory/kexec-purgatory.S: .globl kexec_purgatory purgatory/kexec-purgatory.S: .globl kexec_purgatory_size um/setjmp_32.S: .globl kernel_setjmp um/setjmp_32.S: .globl kernel_longjmp um/setjmp_64.S: .globl kernel_setjmp um/setjmp_64.S: .globl kernel_longjmp xen/xen-head.S: ELFNOTE(Xen, XEN_ELFNOTE_ENTRY, .globl xen_elfnote_entry;
[~/work/others/linux/arch/x86 (master)]$
Maybe we could collect all global symbols in asm codes before lld, and then we add an option in lld to feed those global symbols (with a file?), then we can be sure there won't be any conflict?
Josh Poimboeuf
maintainerQuoted 104 lines · Yonghong Song
Quoted 79 lines · Josh Poimboeuf
Quoted 78 lines · Yonghong Song
The current clang thin-lto build often produces lots of symbols with suffix. The following is a partial list of such function call symbols:
... ethnl_module_fw_flash_ntf.llvm.7631589765585346066 __nf_conntrack_alloc.llvm.6438426151906658917 tcp_can_early_drop.llvm.11937612064648250727 tcp_print_conntrack.llvm.11937612064648250727 ...In my particular build with current bpf-next, the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' function calls is 1212. Such symbols make kernel live patching difficult since
- a minor code change will change the hash and then the '*.llvm.<hash>' symbol becomes another one with a different hash or no hash, and
- a previous source-level symbol may become an one with suffix after live patching code.In [1], Song Liu suggested to reduce the number of '*.llvm.<hash>' functions to make live patch easier. In respond of this, I implemented this in llvm ([2]). The same thin-lto build with [2] only has two symbols with suffix:
m_stop.llvm.14460341347352036579 m_next.llvm.14460341347352036579This should make live patch much easier.
To support suffix symbol reduction, a new config
LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION
is introduced and the config depends on thin-lto and llvm23 or higher.Two lld flags are necessary to enable this feature in kernel:
- Flag '--lto-whole-program-visibility' is needed as it ensures that all modules are available in the same process, which is true for kernel at thin-lto lld.
- Flag '-mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false' is needed to enable suffix reduction. Currently in llvm [1], only process mode is supported. There is another distributed mode (across different processes or even different machines) which is not supported yet ([2]).[1] https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2212 [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587Signed-off-by Yonghong Song <[email protected]>--- Makefile | 3 +++ arch/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)Makefile +3
-0@@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit +ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION +KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false +endif else CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto endifarch/Kconfig +9
-0@@ -861,8 +861,23 @@ config LTO_CLANG_THIN https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html If unsure, say Y. + endchoice +config LTO_CLANG_THIN_SUFFIX_REDUCTION + bool "Clang ThinLTO Suffix Reduction (EXPERIMENTAL)" + depends on LTO_CLANG_THIN + depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 230000 + default y + help + This option allows to reduce the number of symbols with + '.llvm.<hash' suffixes. This can help KLP (kernel livingQuoted 8 lines
arch/Kconfig config LTO_CLANG_THIN · line 880
Quoted 6 lines
arch/Kconfig +6
-0+ patch) as symbol name can stay stable in most cases. + + See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178587 + + If unsure, say N. +Thanks! Would there be any downsides to enabling this feature unconditionally in the kernel when the compiler supports it?
The only downside is for the following case:
C file: static function
foo()
Asm file: global functionfoo()The thin-lto will collect all C files and with the above llvm patch, the static function
foo()may be promoted to global functionfoo()if there is no other pre-existing global functionfoo()in all C files.In such cases, there will be a conflict since
there are two global functionfoo()(one from C file, another from Asm file). In such cases, the build will fail.
Quoted 7 lines
How do you think we could hit such issues in linux kernel? Maybe should have default no for the new config?
I think the chance should be very low. The following is a grab for x86 for global symbols in asm code:
[~/work/others/linux/arch/x86 (master)]$ egrep -r globl
There are actually quite a bit more than that, see SYM_CODE_START:
$ git grep 'SYM_CODE_START(' |wc -l
169But still, I agree the chance of a conflict would be very low. And global assembly functions tend to be rather uniquely named.
Quoted 3 lines
Maybe we could collect all global symbols in asm codes before lld, and then we add an option in lld to feed those global symbols (with a file?), then we can be sure there won't be any conflict?
That wouldn't be worth the effort in my opinion.
I think we should just unconditionally enable -always-rename-promoted-locals=false when it's available. While that will implicitly enforce that global asm functions be uniquely named across the tree, I don't see that as a problem. In the rare case of a conflict, we can just rename the function.
Signature · 1 line
Josh
Josh Poimboeuf
maintainerQuoted 37 lines · Josh Poimboeuf
Quoted 16 lines · Yonghong Song
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks! Would there be any downsides to enabling this feature unconditionally in the kernel when the compiler supports it?
The only downside is for the following case:
C file: static function
foo()
Asm file: global functionfoo()The thin-lto will collect all C files and with the above llvm patch, the static function
foo()may be promoted to global functionfoo()if there is no other pre-existing global functionfoo()in all C files.In such cases, there will be a conflict since
there are two global functionfoo()(one from C file, another from Asm file). In such cases, the build will fail.Quoted 7 lines
How do you think we could hit such issues in linux kernel? Maybe should have default no for the new config?
I think the chance should be very low. The following is a grab for x86 for global symbols in asm code:
[~/work/others/linux/arch/x86 (master)]$ egrep -r globl
There are actually quite a bit more than that, see
SYM_CODE_START:$ git grep 'SYM_CODE_START(' |wc -l 169But still, I agree the chance of a conflict would be very low. And global assembly functions tend to be rather uniquely named.
Quoted 3 lines
Maybe we could collect all global symbols in asm codes before lld, and then we add an option in lld to feed those global symbols (with a file?), then we can be sure there won't be any conflict?
Quoted 7 lines
That wouldn't be worth the effort in my opinion.
I think we should just unconditionally enable -always-rename-promoted-locals=false when it's available. While that will implicitly enforce that global asm functions be uniquely named across the tree, I don't see that as a problem. In the rare case of a conflict, we can just rename the function.
BTW, reading this again I realize that this would affect not only global asm *functions*, but also global asm *data*. But asm global data is quite rare and also tends to be uniquely named, so my conclusion is the same.
Signature · 1 line
Josh
Quoted 35 lines · Josh Poimboeuf
Quoted 34 lines · Josh Poimboeuf
Quoted 15 lines · Yonghong Song
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks! Would there be any downsides to enabling this feature unconditionally in the kernel when the compiler supports it?
The only downside is for the following case:
C file: static function
foo()
Asm file: global functionfoo()The thin-lto will collect all C files and with the above llvm patch, the static function
foo()may be promoted to global functionfoo()if there is no other pre-existing global functionfoo()in all C files.In such cases, there will be a conflict since
there are two global functionfoo()(one from C file, another from Asm file). In such cases, the build will fail.Quoted 7 lines
How do you think we could hit such issues in linux kernel? Maybe should have default no for the new config?
I think the chance should be very low. The following is a grab for x86 for global symbols in asm code:
[~/work/others/linux/arch/x86 (master)]$ egrep -r globl
There are actually quite a bit more than that, see
SYM_CODE_START:$ git grep 'SYM_CODE_START(' |wc -l 169But still, I agree the chance of a conflict would be very low. And global assembly functions tend to be rather uniquely named.
Quoted 3 lines
Maybe we could collect all global symbols in asm codes before lld, and then we add an option in lld to feed those global symbols (with a file?), then we can be sure there won't be any conflict?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
That wouldn't be worth the effort in my opinion.
I think we should just unconditionally enable -always-rename-promoted-locals=false when it's available. While that will implicitly enforce that global asm functions be uniquely named across the tree, I don't see that as a problem. In the rare case of a conflict, we can just rename the function.
So you mean we do not need a new config. Should just check clang and clang versionn like below?
Makefile +5 -0
@@ -1034,6 +1034,11 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG +ifeq ($(shell test $(CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION) -ge 230000; echo $$?),0) +KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false +endif +endif else CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto endif
I think this should work. In rare case, renaming the function should solve the problem.
Quoted 5 lines
BTW, reading this again I realize that this would affect not only global asm *functions*, but also global asm *data*. But asm global data is quite rare and also tends to be uniquely named, so my conclusion is the same.
With thin-lto, the cross-file data inlining is a side effect of cross-file function inlining. So the number of cross-file data inlining is small. Compared to 1212 number of functions with suffix .llvm.<hash>, the number of data with suffix only 9:
ffffffff84e8ad09 d __func__.net_ratelimit.llvm.12310750674033017485 ffffffff84f1d569 d .str.llvm.11541892489833206993 ffffffff87f42d40 b __cfs_bandwidth_used.llvm.9245315756205243639 ffffffff87f457c0 b __sched_clock_stable.llvm.13183765431478218167 ffffffff881968d0 b lock_chains_in_use.llvm.17116087415131265585 ffffffff88bba180 b timekeeper_data.llvm.4127123038948722377 ffffffff88bd0eb0 b slab_debugfs_root.llvm.537776758349482510 ffffffff88c0b300 b __acpi_os_prepare_sleep.llvm.3969442148434754585 ffffffff88c63b00 b handshake_rhashtbl.llvm.12810142853876704317
With newly added KBUILD_LDFLAGS flags, none of them have suffixes. Again, the conflict for data variable should be rare too.
I will repost the patch with Makefile change once llvm23 release is cut.
Thanks!
Nathan Chancellor
maintainerMakefile endif · line 1038
Quoted 13 lines · Yonghong Song
So you mean we do not need a new config. Should just check clang and clang versionn like below?
Makefile +2
-0@@ -1034,6 +1034,11 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG +ifeq ($(shell test $(CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION) -ge 230000; echo $$?),0)
This is the same as
ifeq ($(call clang-min-version,230000),y)
That being said, could we not just do a dynamic check so that it always works when these flags are supported?
Makefile endif · line 1039
Quoted 1 line
Makefile +1
-0+KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false
KBUILD_LDFLAGS += $(call ld-option,--lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false)
Quoted 8 lines
Makefile +2
-0+endif +endif else CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto endifI think this should work. In rare case, renaming the function should solve the problem.
I agree with Josh that having this be the default behavior with the workarounds that we have available to us to avoid problems from it is worth it. Thanks for chasing this after the discussions at LPC.
Cheers,
Nathan
Quoted 16 lines · Nathan Chancellor
Makefile endif · line 1038
Quoted 13 lines · Yonghong Song
So you mean we do not need a new config. Should just check clang and clang versionn like below?
Makefile +2
-0@@ -1034,6 +1034,11 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG +ifeq ($(shell test $(CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION) -ge 230000; echo $$?),0)This is the same as
Quoted 4 lines
ifeq ($(call clang-min-version,230000),y)That being said, could we not just do a dynamic check so that it always works when these flags are supported?
Thanks for the suggestion! What you had below with 'call ld-option' is perfect to satisfy this requirement: <= llvm22, two flags will be ignored, and
Quoted 1 line
= llvm23, two flags will be used.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/[email protected]/
Quoted 18 lines
Makefile endif · line 1039
Quoted 2 lines
Makefile +1
-0+KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false
KBUILD_LDFLAGS+= $(call ld-option,--lto-whole-program-visibility -mllvm -always-rename-promoted-locals=false)Quoted 8 lines
Makefile +2
-0+endif +endif else CC_FLAGS_LTO := -flto endifI think this should work. In rare case, renaming the function should solve the problem.
I agree with Josh that having this be the default behavior with the workarounds that we have available to us to avoid problems from it is worth it. Thanks for chasing this after the discussions at LPC.
Cheers,
Nathan