Bluetooth: hci_release_dev: disable delayed devcoredump work
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 Bluetooth: hci_release_dev: disable delayed devcoredump work
It is not necessary that the pending delayed hci devcoredump timeout work, hdev->dump.dump_timeout, submitted to the hdev->workqueue by the bluetooth devcoredump state machine,
hci_devcd_rx() hci_devcd_handle_pkt_init()
will be reset by it or by the timeout func hci_devcd_timeout(), using hci_devcd_reset(), before destroying the workqueue or before the hci device is freed up in hci_release_dev().
In this bug the active delayed devcoredump timeout work's timer object is active when the memory associated with the hci device is freed up in hci_release_dev() causing the ODEBUG WARNING.
Make sure that the delayed devcoredump timeout work is disabled before the hdev->workqueue is destroyed and before the hdev memory is freed in hci_release_dev().
Tested the change with the syzbot reproducer that uses vhci device locally on x86_64 and on syzbot portal as well. Ran kselftest with net target.
--- net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
net/bluetooth/hci_core.c +3 -0
@@ -2747,6 +2747,9 @@ void hci_release_dev(struct hci_dev *hdev)kfree_const (hdev->hw_info);kfree_const (hdev->fw_info); +if (hdev->dump.supported) +disable_delayed_work_sync (&hdev->dump.dump_timeout); +destroy_workqueue (hdev->workqueue);destroy_workqueue (hdev->req_workqueue);
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1070558
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PENDING 0.39 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.25 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds BuildKernel PASS 26.40 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 28.76 seconds CheckSparse PASS 30.08 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 25.51 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 569.23 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 28.00 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester FAIL 32.58 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.38 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 115.69 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.48 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.16 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.13 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.48 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.47 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.71 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.48 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
##############################
Test: TestRunner_iso-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run iso-tester with test-runner
Output:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in le_read_features_complete+0x7e/0x2b0
Total: 141, Passed: 141 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4
Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.107 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782
Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.773 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.993 seconds
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output:
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerHi Aby,
Quoted 46 lines · Aby Sam Ross
It is not necessary that the pending delayed hci devcoredump timeout work,
hdev->dump.dump_timeout, submitted to thehdev->workqueueby the bluetooth devcoredump state machine,hci_devcd_rx() hci_devcd_handle_pkt_init()will be reset by it or by the timeout func
hci_devcd_timeout(), usinghci_devcd_reset(), before destroying the workqueue or before the hci device is freed up inhci_release_dev().In this bug the active delayed devcoredump timeout work's timer object is active when the memory associated with the hci device is freed up in
hci_release_dev()causing the ODEBUG WARNING.Make sure that the delayed devcoredump timeout work is disabled before the
hdev->workqueueis destroyed and before the hdev memory is freed inhci_release_dev().Tested the change with the syzbot reproducer that uses vhci device locally on
x86_64and on syzbot portal as well. Ran kselftest with net target.Fixes 9695ef876fd1 ("Bluetooth: Add support for hci devcoredump")Reported-by [email protected]Tested-by [email protected]Signed-off-by Aby Sam Ross <[email protected]>--- net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)net/bluetooth/hci_core.c +3
-1@@ -2747,6 +2747,9 @@ void hci_release_dev(struct hci_dev *hdev)kfree_const (hdev->hw_info);kfree_const (hdev->fw_info); +if (hdev->dump.supported) +disable_delayed_work_sync (&hdev->dump.dump_timeout); +destroy_workqueue (hdev->workqueue);destroy_workqueue (hdev->req_workqueue); --
Quoted 2 lines
2.53.0
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260322210849.68743-1-abysamross%40gmail.com
Both points seems valid, that perhaps the dump shouldn't be attached to hdev object since it maybe necessary to unregister the hdev as part of devcoredump handling, anyway if it is required then upon unregister it shall actually cleanup the dump object as well.
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Quoted 54 lines · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Aby,
Quoted 46 lines · Aby Sam Ross
It is not necessary that the pending delayed hci devcoredump timeout work,
hdev->dump.dump_timeout, submitted to thehdev->workqueueby the bluetooth devcoredump state machine,hci_devcd_rx() hci_devcd_handle_pkt_init()will be reset by it or by the timeout func
hci_devcd_timeout(), usinghci_devcd_reset(), before destroying the workqueue or before the hci device is freed up inhci_release_dev().In this bug the active delayed devcoredump timeout work's timer object is active when the memory associated with the hci device is freed up in
hci_release_dev()causing the ODEBUG WARNING.Make sure that the delayed devcoredump timeout work is disabled before the
hdev->workqueueis destroyed and before the hdev memory is freed inhci_release_dev().Tested the change with the syzbot reproducer that uses vhci device locally on
x86_64and on syzbot portal as well. Ran kselftest with net target.Fixes 9695ef876fd1 ("Bluetooth: Add support for hci devcoredump")Reported-by [email protected]Tested-by [email protected]Signed-off-by Aby Sam Ross <[email protected]>--- net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)net/bluetooth/hci_core.c +3
-1@@ -2747,6 +2747,9 @@ void hci_release_dev(struct hci_dev *hdev)kfree_const (hdev->hw_info);kfree_const (hdev->fw_info); +if (hdev->dump.supported) +disable_delayed_work_sync (&hdev->dump.dump_timeout); +destroy_workqueue (hdev->workqueue);destroy_workqueue (hdev->req_workqueue); --Quoted 2 lines
2.53.0
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260322210849.68743-1-abysamross%40gmail.com
Quoted 7 lines
Both points seems valid, that perhaps the dump shouldn't be attached to hdev object since it maybe necessary to unregister the hdev as part of devcoredump handling, anyway if it is required then upon unregister it shall actually cleanup the dump object as well.
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
From what I see hci_unregister_dev() is called by all bluetooth drivers that use hci_devcd_init(). Please correct me if I am wrong.
So we can either make hci_devcd_free() non-static and then call it from hci_unregister_dev()
OR
Do vfree(hdev->dump.head) followed by disabling the delayed devcoredump timeout work in hci_unregister_dev()
And then destroy the workqueue(dump_rx)?
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1070558
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PENDING 0.45 seconds GitLint PENDING 0.25 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds BuildKernel PASS 25.33 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 27.93 seconds CheckSparse PASS 27.17 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 25.03 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 530.15 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 27.92 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 39.73 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.37 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 111.81 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 10.84 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester FAIL 14.51 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.38 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester FAIL 12.58 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.77 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.72 seconds TestRunner_6lowpan-tester FAIL 8.77 seconds IncrementalBuild PENDING 0.26 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PENDING
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
##############################
Test: GitLint - PENDING
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4
Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.103 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_sco-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run sco-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.0.0-rc2-g58df065202ea #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u5:2/117 is trying to acquire lock:ffff888001abe240 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
but task is already holding lock:ffff888002094c20 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_connect_cfm+0x22d/0x8d0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
sco_sock_connect+0x4d7/0x1280
__sys_connect+0x1a3/0x260
__x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add+0xe9/0xc70
__lock_acquire+0x1457/0x1df0
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xd0
sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0
hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0
hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10
hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
kthread+0x368/0x490
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30other info that might help us debug this:
...
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3782
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 117, name: kworker/u5:2preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/u5:2 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-g58df065202ea #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x60 __might_resched+0x2ea/0x500 lock_sock_nested+0x47/0xd0 ? sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 sco_connect_cfm+0x358/0x8d0 ? hci_debugfs_create_conn+0x190/0x210 ? __pfx_sco_connect_cfm+0x10/0x10 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x3d3/0x8e0 hci_event_packet+0x74f/0xb10 ? __pfx_hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_hci_event_packet+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x80 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 hci_rx_work+0x398/0xd00 process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0 ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x110 ? __pfx_hci_rx_work+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x368/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0 ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 ? __switch_to+0x9e4/0xe50 ? __switch_to_asm+0x32/0x60
...
Total: 30, Passed: 30 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1 Timed out 2.679 seconds Mesh - Send cancel - 2 Timed out 1.992 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner
Output:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc2-g58df065202ea #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:0/9 is trying to acquire lock:ffff88800275c140 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x75/0x180
but task is already holding lock:ffffffffb2e4d720 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lowpan_unregister_netdev+0xd/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
__mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0
lowpan_register_netdev+0x11/0x30
chan_ready_cb+0x836/0xd00
l2cap_recv_frame+0x6a06/0x8920
l2cap_recv_acldata+0x790/0xdf0
hci_rx_work+0x500/0xd00
process_scheduled_works+0xb16/0x1ac0
worker_thread+0x4ff/0xba0
kthread+0x368/0x490
ret_from_fork+0x498/0x7e0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x19/0x30-> #3 (&chan->lock#3/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0xf7/0x2c0
__mutex_lock+0x16b/0x1fc0
l2cap_chan_connect+0x74e/0x1980
lowpan_control_write+0x523/0x660
full_proxy_write+0x10b/0x190
vfs_write+0x1c0/0xf60
ksys_write+0xf1/0x1d0
do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x74/0x7c-> #2 (&conn->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
...
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: IncrementalBuild - PENDING
Desc: Incremental build with the patches in the series Output:
https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/27/checks
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth