FAILED: patch "[PATCH] s390/entry: Scrub r12 register on kernel entry" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 0738d395aab8fae3b5a3ad3fc640630c91693c27
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026032923-rerun-crouch-f0cc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 0738d395aab8fae3b5a3ad3fc640630c91693c27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:50:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] s390/entry: Scrub r12 register on kernel entry
Before commit f33f2d4c7c80 ("s390/bp: remove TIF_ISOLATE_BP"), all entry handlers loaded r12 with the current task pointer (lg %r12,__LC_CURRENT) for use by the BPENTER/BPEXIT macros. That commit removed TIF_ISOLATE_BP, dropping both the branch prediction macros and the r12 load, but did not add r12 to the register clearing sequence.
Add the missing xgr %r12,%r12 to make the register scrub consistent across all entry points.
arch/s390/kernel/entry.S +3 -0
@@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(system_call) xgr %r9,%r9 xgr %r10,%r10 xgr %r11,%r11 + xgr %r12,%r12 la %r2,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD(%r15) # pointer to pt_regs mvc __PT_R8(64,%r2),__LC_SAVE_AREA(%r13) MBEAR %r2,%r13
@@ -407,6 +408,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(\name) xgr %r6,%r6 xgr %r7,%r7 xgr %r10,%r10 + xgr %r12,%r12 xc __PT_FLAGS(8,%r11),__PT_FLAGS(%r11) mvc __PT_R8(64,%r11),__LC_SAVE_AREA(%r13) MBEAR %r11,%r13
@@ -496,6 +498,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(mcck_int_handler) xgr %r6,%r6 xgr %r7,%r7 xgr %r10,%r10 + xgr %r12,%r12 stmg %r8,%r9,__PT_PSW(%r11) xc __PT_FLAGS(8,%r11),__PT_FLAGS(%r11) xc __SF_BACKCHAIN(8,%r15),__SF_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
Vasily Gorbik
maintainerPATCH 1/1 s390/entry: Scrub r12 register on kernel entry
Before commit f33f2d4c7c80 ("s390/bp: remove TIF_ISOLATE_BP"), all entry handlers loaded r12 with the current task pointer (lg %r12,__LC_CURRENT) for use by the BPENTER/BPEXIT macros. That commit removed TIF_ISOLATE_BP, dropping both the branch prediction macros and the r12 load, but did not add r12 to the register clearing sequence.
Add the missing xgr %r12,%r12 to make the register scrub consistent across all entry points.
--- arch/s390/kernel/entry.S | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
arch/s390/kernel/entry.S +4 -0
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(system_call) xgr %r9,%r9 xgr %r10,%r10 xgr %r11,%r11 + xgr %r12,%r12 la %r2,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD(%r15) # pointer to pt_regs mvc __PT_R8(64,%r2),__LC_SAVE_AREA_SYNC MBEAR %r2
@@ -378,6 +379,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(pgm_check_handler) xgr %r5,%r5 xgr %r6,%r6 xgr %r7,%r7 + xgr %r12,%r12 lgr %r2,%r11 brasl %r14,__do_pgm_check tmhh %r8,0x0001 # returning to user space?
@@ -439,6 +441,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(\name) xgr %r6,%r6 xgr %r7,%r7 xgr %r10,%r10 + xgr %r12,%r12 xc __PT_FLAGS(8,%r11),__PT_FLAGS(%r11) mvc __PT_R8(64,%r11),__LC_SAVE_AREA_ASYNC MBEAR %r11
@@ -547,6 +550,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(mcck_int_handler) xgr %r6,%r6 xgr %r7,%r7 xgr %r10,%r10 + xgr %r12,%r12 mvc __PT_R8(64,%r11),0(%r14) stmg %r8,%r9,__PT_PSW(%r11) xc __PT_FLAGS(8,%r11),__PT_FLAGS(%r11)
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0