Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message May 4

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x a0d9555bf9eaeba34fe6b6bb86f442fe08ba3842
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026050454-boundless-till-f646@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From a0d9555bf9eaeba34fe6b6bb86f442fe08ba3842 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Edwards <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 19:37:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails

move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() may fail if the file is encrypted, the dirty folio is not the first in the batch, and it fails to allocate a bounce buffer to hold the ciphertext. When that happens, ceph_process_folio_batch() simply redirties the folio and flushes the current batch -- it can retry that folio in a future batch.

However, if this failed folio is not contiguous with the last folio that did make it into the batch, then ceph_process_folio_batch() has already incremented ceph_wbc->num_ops; because it doesn't follow through and add the discontiguous folio to the array, ceph_submit_write() -- which expects that ceph_wbc->num_ops accurately reflects the number of contiguous ranges (and therefore the required number of "write extent" ops) in the writeback -- will panic the kernel:

    BUG_ON(ceph_wbc->op_idx + 1 != req->r_num_ops);

This issue can be reproduced on affected kernels by writing to fscrypt-enabled CephFS file(s) with a 4KiB-written/4KiB-skipped/repeat pattern (total filesize should not matter) and gradually increasing the system's memory pressure until a bounce buffer allocation fails.

Fix this crash by decrementing ceph_wbc->num_ops back to the correct value when move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() fails, but the folio already started counting a new (i.e. still-empty) extent.

The defect corrected by this patch has existed since 2022 (see first Fixes:), but another bug blocked multi-folio encrypted writeback until recently (see second Fixes:). The second commit made it into 6.18.16, 6.19.6, and 7.0-rc1, unmasking the panic in those versions. This patch therefore fixes a regression (panic) introduced by cac190c7674f.

Fixes d55207717ded ("ceph: add encryption support to writepage and writepages")
Fixes cac190c7674f ("ceph: fix write storm on fscrypted files")
fs/ceph/addr.c +4 -0
index 2090fc78529c..44553556ac74 100644
@@ -1365,6 +1365,10 @@ void ceph_process_folio_batch(struct address_space *mapping,
 		rc = move_dirty_folio_in_page_array(mapping, wbc, ceph_wbc,
 				folio);
 		if (rc) {
+			/* Did we just begin a new contiguous op? Nevermind! */
+			if (ceph_wbc->len == 0)
+				ceph_wbc->num_ops--;
+
 			folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, folio);
 			folio_unlock(folio);
 			break;