block: don't overwrite bip_vcnt in bio_integrity_copy_user()
PATCH 1/1 block: don't overwrite bip_vcnt in bio_integrity_copy_user()
bio_integrity_add_page() already sets bip_vcnt to 1 for the bounce segment. Overwriting it with nr_vecs breaks bip_vcnt <= bip_max_vcnt on WRITE (bip_max_vcnt is 1), so the gap-merge checks in block/blk.h read past the bip_vec[] flex array. On READ the read is in bounds but lands on a saved user bvec instead of the bounce.
The line was added for split propagation, but bio_integrity_clone() doesn't copy bip_vcnt and BIP_CLONE_FLAGS excludes BIP_COPY_USER.
--- block/bio-integrity.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
block/bio-integrity.c +0 -1
@@ -308,7 +308,6 @@ static int bio_integrity_copy_user(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *bvec, } bip->bip_flags |=BIP_COPY_USER ; - bip->bip_vcnt = nr_vecs;return 0 ; free_bip:bio_integrity_free (bio);
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
Quoted 8 lines · David Carlier
bio_integrity_add_page()already setsbip_vcntto 1 for the bounce segment. Overwriting it withnr_vecsbreaksbip_vcnt<=bip_max_vcnton WRITE (bip_max_vcntis 1), so the gap-merge checks inblock/blk.hread past the bip_vec[] flex array. On READ the read is in bounds but lands on a saved user bvec instead of the bounce.The line was added for split propagation, but
bio_integrity_clone()doesn't copybip_vcntandBIP_CLONE_FLAGSexcludesBIP_COPY_USER.
Looks good:
Quoted 10 lines · David Carlier
bio_integrity_add_page()already setsbip_vcntto 1 for the bounce segment. Overwriting it withnr_vecsbreaksbip_vcnt<=bip_max_vcnton WRITE (bip_max_vcntis 1), so the gap-merge checks inblock/blk.hread past the bip_vec[] flex array. On READ the read is in bounds but lands on a saved user bvec instead of the bounce.The line was added for split propagation, but
bio_integrity_clone()doesn't copybip_vcntandBIP_CLONE_FLAGSexcludesBIP_COPY_USER.[...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] block: don't overwrite bip_vcnt in bio_integrity_copy_user()
commit: 637ad3a56a3b889527d1dacea6fea2a8bd648140
Best regards,
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe