RDMA/irdma: Fix typo in SQ completions generation

When we generate completion for SQ the opcode while being properly read from ring buffer is ignored when written back to completion. Seems to be a simple typo.

---
Hopefully I didn't miss something obvious here, found it while been fighting with unrelated issue.

 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/utils.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-tip.git/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/utils.c
===================================================================
@@ -2442,7 +2442,7 @@ void irdma_generate_flush_completions(st
 			cmpl->cpi.wr_id = qp->sq_wrtrk_array[wqe_idx].wrid;
 			sw_wqe = qp->sq_base[wqe_idx].elem;
 			get_64bit_val(sw_wqe, 24, &wqe_qword);
-			cmpl->cpi.op_type = (u8)FIELD_GET(IRDMAQPSQ_OPCODE, IRDMAQPSQ_OPCODE);
+			cmpl->cpi.op_type = (u8)FIELD_GET(IRDMAQPSQ_OPCODE, wqe_qword);
 			cmpl->cpi.q_type = IRDMA_CQE_QTYPE_SQ;
 			/* remove the SQ WR by moving SQ tail*/
 			IRDMA_RING_SET_TAIL(*sq_ring,

Nice find. I took a look and your fix seems valid to me.

I guess prior to this fix, it could potentially generate flush completions for the NOP/pad WQEs which I can see being a problem since the WR ID would be totally bogus.

Thanks a lot for the review, Jacob! I miss to add that the nit came in with commit 81091d7696ae71627ff80bbf2c6b0986d2c1cce3,
which is 5.18 series, so I guess we might need to fetch it to stable tree later.

BTW, your fix matches the OOT driver code:
https://github.com/intel/ethernet-linux-irdma-and-idpf/blob/main/rdma-driver/src/irdma/utils.c#L3561

Regarding the "unrelated issue" - is it an irdma issue? Anything we can help with?

- Jake

Oh lovely.

Can I delete irdma then if Intel would prefer to keep functional bug fixes out of tree? Hmm?

Jason

I guess there are simply not enough man power to keep OOT code in sync with kernel tree.

Cyrill

Sorry, didn't mean to open up a can of worms. I personally would like to move in the other direction - let's get all of these fixes upstream :)

I think this has come up before. For example, I vaguely recall an async VF reset during heavy RDMA CM activity resulting in some timeout firing (cm_destroy_id_wait_timeout), which I think was due to completions getting lost.

You may be on to something regarding flushing that WQ. I'll give it a try on my end.

- Jake

Wow, didn't know about OOT driver :-) Thanks for pointing!

Well, the issue I'm dealing with is messy yet (i mean i'm not sure if it is irdma issue or not -- i'm loosing completions on posted operations when hardware in reset mode and same time the card is physically removed). Look, once I manage to collect all pieces of a problem I'll back with report ) At moment I suspect that we need to *flush* queue here instead of cancelling it

---
static int irdma_destroy_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp, struct ib_udata *udata)

{
	struct irdma_qp *iwqp = to_iwqp(ibqp);
	struct irdma_device *iwdev = iwqp->iwdev;

	iwqp->sc_qp.qp_uk.destroy_pending = true;

	if (iwqp->iwarp_state == IRDMA_QP_STATE_RTS)
		irdma_modify_qp_to_err(&iwqp->sc_qp);

	if (!iwqp->user_mode)

--> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&iwqp->dwork_flush);

Applied to for-next, thanks

Jason

Thanks a huge, Jason! What about the series https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ ? Guys, could you take a glance please?

Cyrill