Skip to contentSkip to conversation

lib/crypto: gf128hash: mark clmul32() as noinline_for_stack

PATCH Applied Arnd Bergmann 2 participants 2 messages Jun 11

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 lib/crypto: gf128hash: mark clmul32() as noinline_for_stack

From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

During randconfig testing, I came across a lot of warnings for the newly added carryless multiplication function triggering excessive stack usage from spilling temporary variables to the stack:

lib/crypto/gf128hash.c:166:1: error: stack frame size (1192) exceeds limit (1024) in 'polyval_mul_generic' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]

In addition to the possible risk of overflowing the kernel stack, the generated object code surely performs very poorly.

This only happens on architectures that don't provide uint128_t (which should be all 32-bit architectures on modern compilers), but though I tested random x86 and arm configs, I only saw this with arm's CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, which adds more pressure to the register allocator.

The testing was done using clang-22, I don't know if gcc has the same problem. Marking clmul32() as noinline_for_stack experimentally shows all of the affected builds to completely solve the problem, reducing the stack usage to a few bytes as expected.

Since u64 arithmetic frequently leads to compilers badly optimizing 32-bit targets, keeping clmul32 out of line is likely to help on other 32-bit configurations as well when they run into this problem, though it may also result in a small performance degradation in configurations that would benefit from inlining.

---

---
 lib/crypto/gf128hash.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
lib/crypto/gf128hash.c +1 -1
index 2650603d8ba8..8dcdf5ec98be 100644
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void clmul64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 *out_lo, u64 *out_hi)
 #else /* CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 */
 
 /* Do a 32 x 32 => 64 bit carryless multiplication. */
-static u64 clmul32(u32 a, u32 b)
+static noinline_for_stack u64 clmul32(u32 a, u32 b)
 {
 	/*
 	 * With 32-bit multiplicands and one term every 4 bits, there are up to
Signature · 1 line
2.39.5
maintainer Applied
#1 lore raw
Quoted 21 lines · Arnd Bergmann

From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

During randconfig testing, I came across a lot of warnings for the newly added carryless multiplication function triggering excessive stack usage from spilling temporary variables to the stack:

lib/crypto/gf128hash.c:166:1: error: stack frame size (1192) exceeds limit (1024) in 'polyval_mul_generic' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]

In addition to the possible risk of overflowing the kernel stack, the generated object code surely performs very poorly.

This only happens on architectures that don't provide uint128_t (which should be all 32-bit architectures on modern compilers), but though I tested random x86 and arm configs, I only saw this with arm's CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, which adds more pressure to the register allocator.

The testing was done using clang-22, I don't know if gcc has the same problem. Marking clmul32() as noinline_for_stack experimentally shows all of the affected builds to completely solve the problem, reducing the stack usage to a few bytes as expected.

Quoted 8 lines

Since u64 arithmetic frequently leads to compilers badly optimizing 32-bit targets, keeping clmul32 out of line is likely to help on other 32-bit configurations as well when they run into this problem, though it may also result in a small performance degradation in configurations that would benefit from inlining.

---

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git/log/?h=libcrypto-next

- Eric