lib/crypto: gf128hash: mark clmul32() as noinline_for_stack
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 lib/crypto: gf128hash: mark clmul32() as noinline_for_stack
From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
During randconfig testing, I came across a lot of warnings for the newly added carryless multiplication function triggering excessive stack usage from spilling temporary variables to the stack:
lib/crypto/gf128hash.c:166:1: error: stack frame size (1192) exceeds limit (1024) in 'polyval_mul_generic' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
In addition to the possible risk of overflowing the kernel stack, the generated object code surely performs very poorly.
This only happens on architectures that don't provide uint128_t (which should be all 32-bit architectures on modern compilers), but though I tested random x86 and arm configs, I only saw this with arm's CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, which adds more pressure to the register allocator.
The testing was done using clang-22, I don't know if gcc has the same problem. Marking clmul32() as noinline_for_stack experimentally shows all of the affected builds to completely solve the problem, reducing the stack usage to a few bytes as expected.
Since u64 arithmetic frequently leads to compilers badly optimizing 32-bit targets, keeping clmul32 out of line is likely to help on other 32-bit configurations as well when they run into this problem, though it may also result in a small performance degradation in configurations that would benefit from inlining.
---
--- lib/crypto/gf128hash.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
lib/crypto/gf128hash.c +1 -1
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void clmul64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 *out_lo, u64 *out_hi)#else /* CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 */ /* Do a 32 x 32 => 64 bit carryless multiplication. */ -static u64 clmul32 (u32 a,u32 b) +static noinline_for_stack u64 clmul32(u32 a, u32 b) {/* * With 32-bit multiplicands and one term every 4 bits, there are up to
Signature · 1 line
2.39.5
Quoted 21 lines · Arnd Bergmann
From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
During randconfig testing, I came across a lot of warnings for the newly added carryless multiplication function triggering excessive stack usage from spilling temporary variables to the stack:
lib/crypto/gf128hash.c:166:1: error: stack frame size (1192) exceeds limit (1024) in 'polyval_mul_generic' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]In addition to the possible risk of overflowing the kernel stack, the generated object code surely performs very poorly.
This only happens on architectures that don't provide
uint128_t(which should be all 32-bit architectures on modern compilers), but though I tested random x86 and arm configs, I only saw this with arm'sCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, which adds more pressure to the register allocator.The testing was done using clang-22, I don't know if gcc has the same problem. Marking
clmul32()asnoinline_for_stackexperimentally shows all of the affected builds to completely solve the problem, reducing the stack usage to a few bytes as expected.
Quoted 8 lines
Since u64 arithmetic frequently leads to compilers badly optimizing 32-bit targets, keeping clmul32 out of line is likely to help on other 32-bit configurations as well when they run into this problem, though it may also result in a small performance degradation in configurations that would benefit from inlining.
Signed-off-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>---
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git/log/?h=libcrypto-next
- Eric