FAILED: patch "[PATCH] regulator: scmi: fix of_node refcount leak in" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x fa11039d6cdff84584a3ef8cc1f5e1b56e045da2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026071525-sudoku-chapter-20d7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From fa11039d6cdff84584a3ef8cc1f5e1b56e045da2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wentao Liang <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 10:48:50 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: scmi: fix of_node refcount leak in
scmi_regulator_probe()
scmi_regulator_probe() calls of_find_node_by_name() which takes a reference on the returned device node. On the error path where process_scmi_regulator_of_node() fails, the function returns without calling of_node_put() on the child node, leaking the reference.
Add of_node_put(np) on the error path to properly release the reference.
drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c +3 -1
@@ -345,8 +345,10 @@ static int scmi_regulator_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)for_each_child_of_node_scoped (np, child) { ret =process_scmi_regulator_of_node (sdev, ph, child, rinfo);/* abort on any mem issue */ -if (ret == -ENOMEM ) +if (ret == -ENOMEM ) { +of_node_put (np);return ret; + } }of_node_put (np);/*
Sasha Levin
maintainerPATCH 1/2 regulator: scmi: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 99cf5db9cdd39136fd5dbd10bda833aa0f870452 ]
Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
Stable-dep-of: fa11039d6cdf ("regulator: scmi: fix of_node refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe()")
--- drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c +3 -5
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int process_scmi_regulator_of_node(struct scmi_device *sdev,static int scmi_regulator_probe (struct scmi_device *sdev) {int d, ret, num_doms; -struct device_node *np, *child; +struct device_node *np;const struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle;struct scmi_regulator_info *rinfo;struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph;
@@ -346,13 +346,11 @@ static int scmi_regulator_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)*/ of_node_get (handle->dev->of_node); np =of_find_node_by_name (handle->dev->of_node,"regulators" ); -for_each_child_of_node (np, child) { +for_each_child_of_node_scoped (np, child) { ret =process_scmi_regulator_of_node (sdev, ph, child, rinfo);/* abort on any mem issue */ -if (ret == -ENOMEM ) { -of_node_put (child); +if (ret == -ENOMEM )return ret; - } }of_node_put (np);/*
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
Sasha Levin
maintainerPATCH 2/2 regulator: scmi: fix of_node refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe()
From: Wentao Liang <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit fa11039d6cdff84584a3ef8cc1f5e1b56e045da2 ]
scmi_regulator_probe() calls of_find_node_by_name() which takes a reference on the returned device node. On the error path where process_scmi_regulator_of_node() fails, the function returns without calling of_node_put() on the child node, leaking the reference.
Add of_node_put(np) on the error path to properly release the reference.
--- drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c +3 -1
@@ -349,8 +349,10 @@ static int scmi_regulator_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)for_each_child_of_node_scoped (np, child) { ret =process_scmi_regulator_of_node (sdev, ph, child, rinfo);/* abort on any mem issue */ -if (ret == -ENOMEM ) +if (ret == -ENOMEM ) { +of_node_put (np);return ret; + } }of_node_put (np);/*
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0