Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm-mglru-fix-stale-batch-updates-after-memcg-reparenting.patch removed from -mm tree

merged mm-hotfixes-stable Andrew Morton 1 participant 1 message Jul 21 Stable branch

lore
Share & tools
lore

Andrew Morton

author tree notice Applied
#0 lore raw

The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm: mglru: fix stale batch updates after memcg reparenting
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-mglru-fix-stale-batch-updates-after-memcg-reparenting.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Qi Zheng <[email protected]>
Subject: mm: mglru: fix stale batch updates after memcg reparenting
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 23:43:18 +0800

The mglru page table walker batches per-generation size deltas in walk->nr_pages while walking page tables without holding the lruvec lock. The reset_batch_size() later folds those deltas into walk->lruvec under the lruvec lock.

The page table walker can run concurrently with the memcg reparenting path as follows:

CPU0 CPU1
==== ====

walk_mm
--> walk_page_range

    --> update_batch_size
        --> walk->nr_pages += delta

                              mem_cgroup_css_offline
                              --> memcg_reparent_objcgs
                                  --> lock lruvec
                                      lru_gen_reparent_memcg
                                      --> reparent child folios to parent
                                      unlock lruvec

    lock lruvec
    reset_batch_size
    --> child lrugen->nr_pages += delta

This will trigger the following warning in lru_gen_exit_memcg():

	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(memchr_inv(lruvec->lrugen.nr_pages, 0,
				   sizeof(lruvec->lrugen.nr_pages)));

And the user-visible impact of underestimated nr_pages in MGLRU was premature OOMs because MGLRU does not try to reclaim memory when nr_pages reaches zero, but there are still more pages.

To fix it, make reset_batch_size() check CSS_DYING under RCU before flushing the pending batch. A non-dying memcg keeps the original lruvec stable against RCU-delayed offlining; a dying memcg redirects the deltas to the first non-dying ancestor.

---

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/vmscan.c                |   11 ++++-------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
include/linux/memcontrol.h renamed from include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-mglru-fix-stale-batch-updates-after-memcg-reparenting +25 -0
@@ -1472,6 +1472,31 @@ static inline void lruvec_lock_irq(struc
 	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
 }
 
+static inline struct lruvec *lruvec_live_lock_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	/*
+	 * The memcg can be NULL when the memory controller is disabled.
+	 * Otherwise, the caller keeps the memcg owning @lruvec alive.
+	 */
+	while (unlikely(memcg && css_is_dying(&memcg->css))) {
+		memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
+		lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+#else
+	lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
+#endif
+
+	return lruvec;
+}
+
 static inline void lruvec_unlock(struct lruvec *lruvec)
 {
 	spin_unlock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
mm/vmscan.c renamed from mm/vmscan.c~mm-mglru-fix-stale-batch-updates-after-memcg-reparenting +4 -7
@@ -3265,7 +3265,7 @@ static void update_batch_size(struct lru
 static void reset_batch_size(struct lru_gen_mm_walk *walk)
 {
 	int gen, type, zone;
-	struct lruvec *lruvec = walk->lruvec;
+	struct lruvec *lruvec = lruvec_live_lock_irq(walk->lruvec);
 	struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
 
 	walk->batched = 0;
@@ -3285,6 +3285,8 @@ static void reset_batch_size(struct lru_
 			lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
 		__update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, zone, delta);
 	}
+
+	lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 }
 
 static int should_skip_vma(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *args)
@@ -3779,11 +3781,8 @@ static void walk_mm(struct mm_struct *mm
 			mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 		}
 
-		if (walk->batched) {
-			lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
+		if (walk->batched)
 			reset_batch_size(walk);
-			lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
-		}
 
 		cond_resched();
 	} while (err == -EAGAIN);
@@ -4867,9 +4866,7 @@ retry:
 	walk = current->reclaim_state->mm_walk;
 	if (walk && walk->batched) {
 		walk->lruvec = lruvec;
-		lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
 		reset_batch_size(walk);
-		lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
 	}
 
 	mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc),

_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are