powerpc/kexec_file: Use inclusive range checks for excluded memory
PATCH 1/1 powerpc/kexec_file: Use inclusive range checks for excluded memory
arch_check_excluded_range() checks if a kexec segment overlaps an excluded memory range.
Both ranges use inclusive end addresses, but the overlap check uses exclusive comparisons. This skips ranges with start == ->ranges[i].end or end == ->ranges[i].start. Use inclusive comparisons instead.
---
Sashiko found this issue when reviewing another patch:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260809162403.18142-2-thorsten.blum%40linux.dev
--- arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c +1 -1
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ int arch_check_excluded_range(struct kimage *image, unsigned long start, emem = image->arch.exclude_ranges;for (i =0 ; i < emem->nr_ranges; i++) -if (start < emem->ranges[i].end && end > emem->ranges[i].start) +if (start <= emem->ranges[i].end && end >= emem->ranges[i].start)return 1 ;return 0 ;
Quoted 21 lines · Thorsten Blum
arch_check_excluded_range()checks if a kexec segment overlaps an excluded memory range.Both ranges use inclusive end addresses, but the overlap check uses exclusive comparisons. This skips ranges with start == ->ranges[i].end or end == ->ranges[i].start. Use inclusive comparisons instead.
Fixes 6e5250eaa665 ("powerpc/crash: use generic APIs to locate memory hole for kdump")Signed-off-by Thorsten Blum <[email protected]>---
Sashiko found this issue when reviewing another patch:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260809162403.18142-2-thorsten.blum%40linux.dev--- arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c +0
-0
arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c int arch_check_excluded_range(struct kimage *image, unsigned long start, · line 61
Quoted 5 lines
arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c +1
-1@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ int arch_check_excluded_range(struct kimage *image, unsigned long start, emem = image->arch.exclude_ranges;for (i =0 ; i < emem->nr_ranges; i++) -if (start < emem->ranges[i].end && end > emem->ranges[i].start) +if (start <= emem->ranges[i].end && end >= emem->ranges[i].start)
Like [1] this also extends the condition to check for a 1-byte overlap. It is unlikely to occur in practice, but I don't see any harm in doing so. Hence the changes looks good to me. Feel free to add.
Quoted 3 lines
arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c +0
-0return 1 ;return 0 ;
Quoted 8 lines · Thorsten Blum
arch_check_excluded_range()checks if a kexec segment overlaps an excluded memory range.Both ranges use inclusive end addresses, but the overlap check uses exclusive comparisons. This skips ranges with start == ->ranges[i].end or end == ->ranges[i].start. Use inclusive comparisons instead.
[...]
Applied to powerpc/fixes.
[1/1] powerpc/kexec_file: Use inclusive range checks for excluded memory
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/449f60f99f8f3cbe80a9bd2242945e827c5ed003
cheers