FAILED: patch "[PATCH] power: supply: charger-manager: register regulators before" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x c57cb36f76eb7ced45f57af1a890d8f3a6d76342
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2026090320-shirt-underuse-eb92@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From c57cb36f76eb7ced45f57af1a890d8f3a6d76342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fan Wu <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 03:01:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] power: supply: charger-manager: register regulators before
exposing sysfs
charger_manager_remove() and the err_reg_extcon probe error path free each charger regulator with regulator_put() before tearing down the power_supply sysfs entries (power_supply_unregister()). charger_manager_remove() also calls try_charger_enable(cm, false) after the regulator_put() loop. A concurrent write to a charger's externally_control sysfs attribute that lands between regulator_put() and power_supply_unregister() can run charger_externally_control_store() and call try_charger_enable(), which, when charging is enabled, dereferences the already-freed consumer handle. When charging is enabled, try_charger_enable(cm, false) in .remove() also dereferences the freed handles directly. Both leave use-after-free windows. Symmetrically, probe registers the sysfs entries (power_supply_register) before acquiring the regulators (regulator_get, inside charger_manager_register_extcon), so userspace can reach externally_control before the regulators are available.
Split charger_manager_register_extcon() on the sync/async boundary:charger_manager_get_regulators() (regulator_get only, no async producer) now runs before power_supply_register() so sysfs is not live before regulators are available, and charger_manager_register_extcon() keeps only the extcon notifier/work setup, still after power_supply_register() so a power_supply_register() failure cannot reach extcon setup. This keeps the sysfs setup/teardown ordering symmetric without introducing an asynchronous producer on the earlier probe-error path.
Move power_supply_unregister() and try_charger_enable(cm, false) ahead of the regulator_put() loop on both teardown paths, and adjust err_reg_extcon (power_supply_unregister() then fall through err_regulator for regulator_put(); get_regulators self-rolls back on its own failure).
This does not address the separate extcon-notifier-driven deref of the same handles, which needs its own synchronization design.
Found by an in-house static analysis tool.
drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c +39 -15
@@ -1014,6 +1014,29 @@ static int charger_extcon_init(struct charger_manager *cm,return 0 ; } +static int charger_manager_get_regulators (struct charger_manager *cm) +{ +struct charger_desc *desc = cm->desc; +struct charger_regulator *charger; +int i, ret; + +for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators; i++) { + charger = &desc->charger_regulators[i]; + charger->consumer =regulator_get (cm->dev, + charger->regulator_name); +if (IS_ERR (charger->consumer)) { +dev_err (cm->dev,"Cannot find charger(%s)\n" , + charger->regulator_name); + ret =PTR_ERR (charger->consumer); +while (i-- >0 ) +regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); +return ret; + } + charger->cm = cm; + } +return 0 ; +} +/** * charger_manager_register_extcon - Register extcon device to receive state * of charger cable.
@@ -1036,15 +1059,6 @@ static int charger_manager_register_extcon(struct charger_manager *cm)for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators; i++) { charger = &desc->charger_regulators[i]; - charger->consumer =regulator_get (cm->dev, - charger->regulator_name); -if (IS_ERR (charger->consumer)) { -dev_err (cm->dev,"Cannot find charger(%s)\n" , - charger->regulator_name); -return PTR_ERR (charger->consumer); - } - charger->cm = cm; -for (j =0 ; j < charger->num_cables; j++) {struct charger_cable *cable = &charger->cables[j];
@@ -1580,13 +1594,23 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } psy_cfg.attr_grp = desc->sysfs_groups; +/* +* Acquire charger regulators before exposing the sysfs entries, so +* userspace cannot reach externally_control before the regulators +* (and charger->cm) are available. Mirrors the order in remove(). +*/ + ret =charger_manager_get_regulators (cm); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + cm->charger_psy =power_supply_register (&pdev->dev, &cm->charger_psy_desc, &psy_cfg);if (IS_ERR (cm->charger_psy)) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"Cannot register charger-manager with name \"%s\"\n" , cm->charger_psy_desc.name); -return PTR_ERR (cm->charger_psy); + ret =PTR_ERR (cm->charger_psy); + goto err_regulator; }/* Register extcon device for charger cable */
@@ -1620,11 +1644,11 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return 0 ; err_reg_extcon: +power_supply_unregister (cm->charger_psy); +err_regulator:for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators; i++)regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); -power_supply_unregister (cm->charger_psy); -return ret; }
@@ -1642,12 +1666,12 @@ static void charger_manager_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)cancel_work_sync (&setup_polling);cancel_delayed_work_sync (&cm_monitor_work); -for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators ; i++) -regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); +try_charger_enable (cm, false);power_supply_unregister (cm->charger_psy); -try_charger_enable (cm, false); +for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators ; i++) +regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); }static const struct platform_device_id charger_manager_id[] = {
Sasha Levin
maintainerPATCH 1/2 power: supply: charger-manager: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
From: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 403eebf95c38302cacc48c127e575461f0e798be ]
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant.
Stable-dep-of: c57cb36f76eb ("power: supply: charger-manager: register regulators before exposing sysfs")
--- drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c +2 -4
@@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return ret; } -static int charger_manager_remove (struct platform_device *pdev) +static void charger_manager_remove (struct platform_device *pdev) {struct charger_manager *cm =platform_get_drvdata (pdev);struct charger_desc *desc = cm->desc;
@@ -1650,8 +1650,6 @@ static int charger_manager_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)power_supply_unregister (cm->charger_psy);try_charger_enable (cm, false); - -return 0 ; }static const struct platform_device_id charger_manager_id[] = {
@@ -1742,7 +1740,7 @@ static struct platform_driver charger_manager_driver = { .of_match_table = charger_manager_match, }, .probe = charger_manager_probe, - .remove = charger_manager_remove, + .remove_new = charger_manager_remove, .id_table = charger_manager_id, };
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0
Sasha Levin
maintainerPATCH 2/2 power: supply: charger-manager: register regulators before exposing sysfs
From: Fan Wu <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit c57cb36f76eb7ced45f57af1a890d8f3a6d76342 ]
charger_manager_remove() and the err_reg_extcon probe error path free each charger regulator with regulator_put() before tearing down the power_supply sysfs entries (power_supply_unregister()). charger_manager_remove() also calls try_charger_enable(cm, false) after the regulator_put() loop. A concurrent write to a charger's externally_control sysfs attribute that lands between regulator_put() and power_supply_unregister() can run charger_externally_control_store() and call try_charger_enable(), which, when charging is enabled, dereferences the already-freed consumer handle. When charging is enabled, try_charger_enable(cm, false) in .remove() also dereferences the freed handles directly. Both leave use-after-free windows. Symmetrically, probe registers the sysfs entries (power_supply_register) before acquiring the regulators (regulator_get, inside charger_manager_register_extcon), so userspace can reach externally_control before the regulators are available.
Split charger_manager_register_extcon() on the sync/async boundary:charger_manager_get_regulators() (regulator_get only, no async producer) now runs before power_supply_register() so sysfs is not live before regulators are available, and charger_manager_register_extcon() keeps only the extcon notifier/work setup, still after power_supply_register() so a power_supply_register() failure cannot reach extcon setup. This keeps the sysfs setup/teardown ordering symmetric without introducing an asynchronous producer on the earlier probe-error path.
Move power_supply_unregister() and try_charger_enable(cm, false) ahead of the regulator_put() loop on both teardown paths, and adjust err_reg_extcon (power_supply_unregister() then fall through err_regulator for regulator_put(); get_regulators self-rolls back on its own failure).
This does not address the separate extcon-notifier-driven deref of the same handles, which needs its own synchronization design.
Found by an in-house static analysis tool.
--- drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c +39 -15
@@ -1017,6 +1017,29 @@ static int charger_extcon_init(struct charger_manager *cm,return 0 ; } +static int charger_manager_get_regulators (struct charger_manager *cm) +{ +struct charger_desc *desc = cm->desc; +struct charger_regulator *charger; +int i, ret; + +for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators; i++) { + charger = &desc->charger_regulators[i]; + charger->consumer =regulator_get (cm->dev, + charger->regulator_name); +if (IS_ERR (charger->consumer)) { +dev_err (cm->dev,"Cannot find charger(%s)\n" , + charger->regulator_name); + ret =PTR_ERR (charger->consumer); +while (i-- >0 ) +regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); +return ret; + } + charger->cm = cm; + } +return 0 ; +} +/** * charger_manager_register_extcon - Register extcon device to receive state * of charger cable.
@@ -1039,15 +1062,6 @@ static int charger_manager_register_extcon(struct charger_manager *cm)for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators; i++) { charger = &desc->charger_regulators[i]; - charger->consumer =regulator_get (cm->dev, - charger->regulator_name); -if (IS_ERR (charger->consumer)) { -dev_err (cm->dev,"Cannot find charger(%s)\n" , - charger->regulator_name); -return PTR_ERR (charger->consumer); - } - charger->cm = cm; -for (j =0 ; j < charger->num_cables; j++) {struct charger_cable *cable = &charger->cables[j];
@@ -1582,13 +1596,23 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } psy_cfg.attr_grp = desc->sysfs_groups; +/* +* Acquire charger regulators before exposing the sysfs entries, so +* userspace cannot reach externally_control before the regulators +* (and charger->cm) are available. Mirrors the order in remove(). +*/ + ret =charger_manager_get_regulators (cm); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + cm->charger_psy =power_supply_register (&pdev->dev, &cm->charger_psy_desc, &psy_cfg);if (IS_ERR (cm->charger_psy)) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"Cannot register charger-manager with name \"%s\"\n" , cm->charger_psy_desc.name); -return PTR_ERR (cm->charger_psy); + ret =PTR_ERR (cm->charger_psy); + goto err_regulator; }/* Register extcon device for charger cable */
@@ -1622,11 +1646,11 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return 0 ; err_reg_extcon: +power_supply_unregister (cm->charger_psy); +err_regulator:for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators; i++)regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); -power_supply_unregister (cm->charger_psy); -return ret; }
@@ -1644,12 +1668,12 @@ static void charger_manager_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)cancel_work_sync (&setup_polling);cancel_delayed_work_sync (&cm_monitor_work); -for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators ; i++) -regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); +try_charger_enable (cm, false);power_supply_unregister (cm->charger_psy); -try_charger_enable (cm, false); +for (i =0 ; i < desc->num_charger_regulators ; i++) +regulator_put (desc->charger_regulators[i].consumer); }static const struct platform_device_id charger_manager_id[] = {
Signature · 1 line
2.53.0