svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/at91bootstrap
I am afraid that AT91Bootstrap version 2.10 is broken regarding NAND flash. The main problem being in Makefile:
ifeq ($(CONFIG_NANDFLASH),y)
CPPFLAGS += -DCONFIG_NAND_FLASH
endif
See the extra underscore which should not be there? Unfortunately this is not the only problem, even if Makefile is corrected, there is an #include missing
in driver/nandflash.c causing the compilation to fail. In other words version 2.10 is buggy like hell,
at least concerning NADN flash.
Unless you are willing to fix it yourself, I recommend using version 2.4.
BTW if I would like to submit a patch for AT91Bootstrap, where should I send it so that it makes its way
info the official release?
Signature · 2 lines
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/svn-commit%3A-trunk-buildroot-target-device-Atmel-at91bootstrap-tp21404604p21805444.html Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"tigmac" == tigmac <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
tigmac> Unfortunately this is not the only problem, even if Makefile tigmac> is corrected, there is an #include missing in tigmac> driver/nandflash.c causing the compilation to fail. In other tigmac> words version 2.10 is buggy like hell, at least concerning tigmac> NADN flash. Unless you are willing to fix it yourself, I tigmac> recommend using version 2.4.
Ok. I don't have any at91 hw, so I don't know anything about it.
Ulf, you bumped the at91bootstrap version recently - What's up?
tigmac> BTW if I would like to submit a patch for AT91Bootstrap, tigmac> where should I send it so that it makes its way info the tigmac> official release?
Don't know, somewhere at Atmel I guess - Ulf?
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard