Skip to contentSkip to conversation

regulator MAX8998/LP3974: Support DVS-GPIO.

PATCH MyungJoo Ham 2 participants 2 messages Jan 5, 2011

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 4 lines · MyungJoo Ham
Quoted 2 lines · Lukasz Majewski

Is it desirable to define all four for BUCK1 and two for BUCK2 DVS voltages in platform code?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

In case a system with 4 buck1 preset voltages and 2 buck2 preset voltages, it is desirable. :)

I suspect Lukasz's question is more why this would be useful; I can imagine that the main reason would be performance and in any case I don't see it hurting to have the option.

Yes, it is supposed to be faster to set GPIO pins rather than sending values thru I2C busses. And some boards require all the four BUCK1 voltages and two BUCK2 voltages; e.g., S5PC110-Universal.

MyungJoo Ham (함명주)
Mobile Software Platform Lab,
Digital Media and Communications (DMC) Business
Samsung Electronics
cell: +82-10-6714-2858 / office: +82-31-279-8033�淸�{.n�+돴윯돪�+%듚�깁負쪐w��{.n�+돴쪐{깸G쳺��{ay����,j�f"톒쉹��묎�z_溫(�쉸듶줷"얎�m����G쳺�◀?솳鈺�&x�~뤳턨O뺞촾퇉v�^�m��� �띠�◀?뻀�

#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · MyungJoo Ham

Yes, it is supposed to be faster to set GPIO pins rather than sending values thru I2C busses. And some boards require all the four BUCK1 voltages and two BUCK2 voltages; e.g., S5PC110-Universal.

Obviously the expectation there would be that the automatic stuff would figure out the set of voltages that are in use and end up using the GPIOs almost all the time anyway.