Add in_flight_bitmask so as to use full 32 bits of tag.
PATCH v3 1/1 Add in_flight_bitmask so as to use full 32 bits of tag.
With introduction of in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag can be used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when finding the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers and RTE_MAX_LCORE is now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure the RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is less than or equal to size of double-word.
--- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +47 -17
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@#define RTE_DISTRIB_RETURNS_MASK (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_RETURNS - 1)/** +* Maximum number of workers allowed. +* Be aware of increasing the limit, becaus it is limited by how we track +* in-flight tags. See @in_flight_bitmask and @rte_distributor_process +*/ +#define RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS 64 + +/** * Buffer structure used to pass the pointer data between cores. This is cache * line aligned, but to improve performance and prevent adjacent cache-line * prefetches of buffers for other workers, e.g. when worker 1's buffer is on
@@ -91,11 +98,17 @@ struct rte_distributor {char name[RTE_DISTRIBUTOR_NAMESIZE ];/**< Name of the ring. */ unsigned num_workers;/**< Number of workers polling */ -uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; -/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core, 0 == no pkt */ -struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; +/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core */ +uint64_t in_flight_bitmask; +/**< on/off bits for in-flight tags. +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64 then +* the bitmask has to expand. +*/ + +struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; -union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ];struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns; };
@@ -189,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) { d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =0 ;if (unlikely (d->backlog[wkr].count !=0 )) {/* On return of a packet, we need to move the
@@ -211,7 +225,10 @@ handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) pkts[i] = (void *)((uintptr_t )(bl->pkts[idx] >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS )); } -/* recursive call */ +/* recursive call. +* Note that the tags were set before first level call +* to rte_distributor_process. +*/ rte_distributor_process (d, pkts, i); bl->count = bl->start =0 ; }
@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d)else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF ; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ; }else if (data &RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF ) {
@@ -284,14 +302,18 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, next_value = (((int64_t )(uintptr_t )next_mb) <<RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS );/* -* Set the low bit on the tag, so we can guarantee that -* we never store a tag value of zero. That means we can -* use the zero-value to indicate that no packet is -* being processed by a worker. +* User is advocated to set tag vaue for each +* mbuf before calling rte_distributor_process. +* User defined tags are used to identify flows, +* or sessions. */ - new_tag = (next_mb->hash.usr |1 ); + new_tag = next_mb->hash.usr; -uint32_t match =0 ; +/* +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64 +* then the size of match has to be expanded. +*/ +uint64_t match =0 ;unsigned i;/* * to scan for a match use "xor" and "not" to get a 0/1
@@ -303,9 +325,12 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, match |= (!(d->in_flight_tags[i] ^ new_tag) << i); +/* Only turned-on bits are considered as match */ + match &= d->in_flight_bitmask; +if (match) { next_mb =NULL ; -unsigned worker =__builtin_ctz (match); +unsigned worker =__builtin_ctzl (match);if (add_to_backlog (&d->backlog[worker], next_value) <0 ) next_idx--;
@@ -322,6 +347,7 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 = next_value; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] = new_tag; + d->in_flight_bitmask |= (1UL << wkr); next_mb =NULL ; } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ;
@@ -379,11 +405,13 @@ rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct rte_distributor *d,static inline unsigned total_outstanding (const struct rte_distributor *d) { -unsigned wkr, total_outstanding =0 ; +unsigned wkr, total_outstanding; + + total_outstanding =__builtin_popcountl (d->in_flight_bitmask);for (wkr =0 ; wkr < d->num_workers; wkr++) - total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count + - !!(d->in_flight_tags[wkr]); + total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count; +return total_outstanding; }
@@ -423,9 +451,11 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name,/* compilation-time checks */ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((sizeof (*d) &CACHE_LINE_MASK ) !=0 ); -RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_MAX_LCORE &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS > +sizeof (d->in_flight_bitmask) *CHAR_BIT ); -if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_MAX_LCORE ) { +if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ) { rte_errno =EINVAL ;return NULL ; }
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +4 -0
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned socket_id,* packets. The distributor will ensure that no two packets that have the * same flow id, or tag, in the mbuf will be procesed at the same time. * +* The user is advocated to set tag for each mbuf before calling this function. +* If user doesn't set the tag, the tag value can be various values depending on +* driver implementation and configuration. +* * This is not multi-thread safe and should only be called on a single lcore. * * @param d
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 1415630642-3905-1-git-send-email-jigsaw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Quoted 9 lines · Qinglai Xiao
With introduction of
in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag can be used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when finding the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers andRTE_MAX_LCOREis now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure theRTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERSis less than or equal to size of double-word.Signed-off-by Qinglai Xiao <[email protected]>
Looks good to me.
Just before I ack this, have you checked to see if there is any performance impact?
/Bruce
Quoted 169 lines
--- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +47
-17@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@#define RTE_DISTRIB_RETURNS_MASK (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_RETURNS - 1)/** +* Maximum number of workers allowed. +* Be aware of increasing the limit, becaus it is limited by how we track +* in-flight tags. See @in_flight_bitmask and @rte_distributor_process +*/ +#define RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS 64 + +/** * Buffer structure used to pass the pointer data between cores. This is cache * line aligned, but to improve performance and prevent adjacent cache-line * prefetches of buffers for other workers, e.g. when worker 1's buffer is on @@ -91,11 +98,17 @@ struct rte_distributor {char name[RTE_DISTRIBUTOR_NAMESIZE ];/**< Name of the ring. */ unsigned num_workers;/**< Number of workers polling */ -uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; -/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core, 0 == no pkt */ -struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; +/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core */ +uint64_t in_flight_bitmask; +/**< on/off bits for in-flight tags. +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64 then +* the bitmask has to expand. +*/ + +struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; -union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ];struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns; };@@ -189,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) { d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =0 ;if (unlikely (d->backlog[wkr].count !=0 )) {/* On return of a packet, we need to move the @@ -211,7 +225,10 @@ handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) pkts[i] = (void *)((uintptr_t )(bl->pkts[idx] >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS )); } -/* recursive call */ +/* recursive call. +* Note that the tags were set before first level call +* to rte_distributor_process. +*/ rte_distributor_process (d, pkts, i); bl->count = bl->start =0 ; }@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d)else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF ; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ; }else if (data &RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF ) {@@ -284,14 +302,18 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, next_value = (((int64_t )(uintptr_t )next_mb) <<RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS );/* -* Set the low bit on the tag, so we can guarantee that -* we never store a tag value of zero. That means we can -* use the zero-value to indicate that no packet is -* being processed by a worker. +* User is advocated to set tag vaue for each +* mbuf before calling rte_distributor_process. +* User defined tags are used to identify flows, +* or sessions. */ - new_tag = (next_mb->hash.usr |1 ); + new_tag = next_mb->hash.usr; -uint32_t match =0 ; +/* +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64 +* then the size of match has to be expanded. +*/ +uint64_t match =0 ;unsigned i;/* * to scan for a match use "xor" and "not" to get a 0/1 @@ -303,9 +325,12 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, match |= (!(d->in_flight_tags[i] ^ new_tag) << i); +/* Only turned-on bits are considered as match */ + match &= d->in_flight_bitmask; +if (match) { next_mb =NULL ; -unsigned worker =__builtin_ctz (match); +unsigned worker =__builtin_ctzl (match);if (add_to_backlog (&d->backlog[worker], next_value) <0 ) next_idx--;@@ -322,6 +347,7 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 = next_value; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] = new_tag; + d->in_flight_bitmask |= (1UL << wkr); next_mb =NULL ; } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ;@@ -379,11 +405,13 @@ rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct rte_distributor *d,static inline unsigned total_outstanding (const struct rte_distributor *d) { -unsigned wkr, total_outstanding =0 ; +unsigned wkr, total_outstanding; + + total_outstanding =__builtin_popcountl (d->in_flight_bitmask);for (wkr =0 ; wkr < d->num_workers; wkr++) - total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count + - !!(d->in_flight_tags[wkr]); + total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count; +return total_outstanding; }@@ -423,9 +451,11 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name,/* compilation-time checks */ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((sizeof (*d) &CACHE_LINE_MASK ) !=0 ); -RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_MAX_LCORE &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS > +sizeof (d->in_flight_bitmask) *CHAR_BIT ); -if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_MAX_LCORE ) { +if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ) { rte_errno =EINVAL ;return NULL ; }lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +4
-0@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned socket_id,* packets. The distributor will ensure that no two packets that have the * same flow id, or tag, in the mbuf will be procesed at the same time. * +* The user is advocated to set tag for each mbuf before calling this function. +* If user doesn't set the tag, the tag value can be various values depending on +* driver implementation and configuration. +* * This is not multi-thread safe and should only be called on a single lcore. * * @param d Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Hi Bruce,
Sorry I didn't. I will run a performance test tomorrow.
thx &
rgds,
-qinglai
Quoted 209 lines · Bruce Richardson
Quoted 9 lines · Qinglai Xiao
With introduction of
in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag can be used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when finding the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers andRTE_MAX_LCOREis now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure theRTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERSis less than or equal to size of double-word.Signed-off-by Qinglai Xiao <[email protected]>Looks good to me.
Just before I ack this, have you checked to see if there is any performance impact?/Bruce
Quoted 2 lines
--- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 64++++++++++++++++++++++--------
Review
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.clib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 66
Quoted 9 lines
index 3dfec4a..2c5d61c 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +2
-0@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@#define RTE_DISTRIB_RETURNS_MASK (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_RETURNS - 1)/** +* Maximum number of workers allowed. +* Be aware of increasing the limit, becaus it is limited by how we track
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-0+* in-flight tags. See @in_flight_bitmask and @rte_distributor_process +*/ +#define RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS 64 + +/** * Buffer structure used to pass the pointer data between cores. This is cache
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 73
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* line aligned, but to improve performance and prevent adjacent cache-line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 74
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* prefetches of buffers for other workers, e.g. when worker 1's buffer is on
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor { · line 99
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -91,11 +98,17 @@ struct rte_distributor {char name[RTE_DISTRIBUTOR_NAMESIZE ];/**< Name of the ring. */ unsigned num_workers;/**< Number of workers polling */
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor { · line 94
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-2-uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; -/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core, 0 == no pkt */
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor {
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-1-struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; +/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core */ +uint64_t in_flight_bitmask; +/**< on/off bits for in-flight tags. +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64 then
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 19 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +6
-1+* the bitmask has to expand. +*/ + +struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; -union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ];struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns; };@@ -189,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) { d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =0 ;if (unlikely (d->backlog[wkr].count !=0 )) {/* On return of a packet, we need to move the @@ -211,7 +225,10 @@ handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d,unsigned wkr)
Quoted 12 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-1pkts[i] = (void *)((uintptr_t )(bl->pkts[idx] >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS )); } -/* recursive call */ +/* recursive call. +* Note that the tags were set before first level call +* to rte_distributor_process. +*/ rte_distributor_process (d, pkts, i); bl->count = bl->start =0 ; }lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d) · line 260
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d)else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =
RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, · line 287
Quoted 10 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-1d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ; }else if (data &RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF ) {@@ -284,14 +302,18 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, next_value = (((int64_t )(uintptr_t )next_mb) <<RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS );/* -* Set the low bit on the tag, so we can guarantee that
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, · line 288
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1-* we never store a tag value of zero. That means we can
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 13 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +7
-4-* use the zero-value to indicate that no packet is -* being processed by a worker. +* User is advocated to set tag vaue for each +* mbuf before calling rte_distributor_process. +* User defined tags are used to identify flows, +* or sessions. */ - new_tag = (next_mb->hash.usr |1 ); + new_tag = next_mb->hash.usr; -uint32_t match =0 ; +/* +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-0+* then the size of match has to be expanded. +*/ +uint64_t match =0 ;unsigned i;/* * to scan for a match use "xor" and "not" to get a 0/1
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
Quoted 23 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-1@@ -303,9 +325,12 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, match |= (!(d->in_flight_tags[i] ^ new_tag) << i); +/* Only turned-on bits are considered as match */ + match &= d->in_flight_bitmask; +if (match) { next_mb =NULL ; -unsigned worker =__builtin_ctz (match); +unsigned worker =__builtin_ctzl (match);if (add_to_backlog (&d->backlog[worker], next_value) <0 ) next_idx--;@@ -322,6 +347,7 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 = next_value; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] = new_tag; + d->in_flight_bitmask |= (1UL << wkr); next_mb =NULL ; } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ;@@ -379,11 +405,13 @@ rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
rte_distributor*d,Review
Quoted 31 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +9
-5static inline unsigned total_outstanding (const struct rte_distributor *d) { -unsigned wkr, total_outstanding =0 ; +unsigned wkr, total_outstanding; + + total_outstanding =__builtin_popcountl (d->in_flight_bitmask);for (wkr =0 ; wkr < d->num_workers; wkr++) - total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count + - !!(d->in_flight_tags[wkr]); + total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count; +return total_outstanding; }@@ -423,9 +451,11 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name,/* compilation-time checks */ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((sizeof (*d) &CACHE_LINE_MASK ) !=0 ); -RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_MAX_LCORE &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS > +sizeof (d->in_flight_bitmask) *CHAR_BIT ); -if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_MAX_LCORE ) { +if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ) { rte_errno =EINVAL ;return NULL ; }(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.hlib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
Quoted 4 lines
index ec0d74a..cc1d559 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
socket_id,lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 88
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0* packets. The distributor will ensure that no two packets that have the
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned socket_id,
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0* same flow id, or tag, in the mbuf will be procesed at the same time. * +* The user is advocated to set tag for each mbuf before calling this function.
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 92
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0+* If user doesn't set the tag, the tag value can be various values depending on
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned socket_id,
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +2
-0+* driver implementation and configuration. +* * This is not multi-thread safe and should only be called on a single lcore.
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-1* * @param d -- 1.7.1
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAHVfvh6oTLE2bzGitVXDn+O7MicbvB2nsiR_SnQtQHGKVdk93g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Bruce Richardson
Acked-byQuoted 8 lines · jigsaw
Hi Bruce,
Sorry I didn't. I will run a performance test tomorrow.
thx &
rgds,
-qinglai
On the assumption that no performance regressions show up...
Quoted 212 lines
Quoted 209 lines · Bruce Richardson
Quoted 9 lines · Qinglai Xiao
With introduction of
in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag can be used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when finding the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers andRTE_MAX_LCOREis now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure theRTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERSis less than or equal to size of double-word.Signed-off-by Qinglai Xiao <[email protected]>Looks good to me.
Just before I ack this, have you checked to see if there is any performance impact?/Bruce
Quoted 2 lines
--- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 64++++++++++++++++++++++--------
Review
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.clib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 66
Quoted 9 lines
index 3dfec4a..2c5d61c 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +2
-0@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@#define RTE_DISTRIB_RETURNS_MASK (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_RETURNS - 1)/** +* Maximum number of workers allowed. +* Be aware of increasing the limit, becaus it is limited by how we track
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-0+* in-flight tags. See @in_flight_bitmask and @rte_distributor_process +*/ +#define RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS 64 + +/** * Buffer structure used to pass the pointer data between cores. This is cache
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 73
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* line aligned, but to improve performance and prevent adjacent cache-line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 74
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* prefetches of buffers for other workers, e.g. when worker 1's buffer is on
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor { · line 99
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -91,11 +98,17 @@ struct rte_distributor {char name[RTE_DISTRIBUTOR_NAMESIZE ];/**< Name of the ring. */ unsigned num_workers;/**< Number of workers polling */
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor { · line 94
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-2-uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; -/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core, 0 == no pkt */
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor {
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-1-struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; +/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core */ +uint64_t in_flight_bitmask; +/**< on/off bits for in-flight tags. +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64 then
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 19 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +6
-1+* the bitmask has to expand. +*/ + +struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; -union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ];struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns; };@@ -189,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) { d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =0 ;if (unlikely (d->backlog[wkr].count !=0 )) {/* On return of a packet, we need to move the @@ -211,7 +225,10 @@ handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d,unsigned wkr)
Quoted 12 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-1pkts[i] = (void *)((uintptr_t )(bl->pkts[idx] >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS )); } -/* recursive call */ +/* recursive call. +* Note that the tags were set before first level call +* to rte_distributor_process. +*/ rte_distributor_process (d, pkts, i); bl->count = bl->start =0 ; }lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d) · line 260
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d)else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =
RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, · line 287
Quoted 10 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-1d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ; }else if (data &RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF ) {@@ -284,14 +302,18 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, next_value = (((int64_t )(uintptr_t )next_mb) <<RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS );/* -* Set the low bit on the tag, so we can guarantee that
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, · line 288
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1-* we never store a tag value of zero. That means we can
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 13 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +7
-4-* use the zero-value to indicate that no packet is -* being processed by a worker. +* User is advocated to set tag vaue for each +* mbuf before calling rte_distributor_process. +* User defined tags are used to identify flows, +* or sessions. */ - new_tag = (next_mb->hash.usr |1 ); + new_tag = next_mb->hash.usr; -uint32_t match =0 ; +/* +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-0+* then the size of match has to be expanded. +*/ +uint64_t match =0 ;unsigned i;/* * to scan for a match use "xor" and "not" to get a 0/1
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
Quoted 23 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-1@@ -303,9 +325,12 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, match |= (!(d->in_flight_tags[i] ^ new_tag) << i); +/* Only turned-on bits are considered as match */ + match &= d->in_flight_bitmask; +if (match) { next_mb =NULL ; -unsigned worker =__builtin_ctz (match); +unsigned worker =__builtin_ctzl (match);if (add_to_backlog (&d->backlog[worker], next_value) <0 ) next_idx--;@@ -322,6 +347,7 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 = next_value; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] = new_tag; + d->in_flight_bitmask |= (1UL << wkr); next_mb =NULL ; } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ;@@ -379,11 +405,13 @@ rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
rte_distributor*d,Review
Quoted 31 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +9
-5static inline unsigned total_outstanding (const struct rte_distributor *d) { -unsigned wkr, total_outstanding =0 ; +unsigned wkr, total_outstanding; + + total_outstanding =__builtin_popcountl (d->in_flight_bitmask);for (wkr =0 ; wkr < d->num_workers; wkr++) - total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count + - !!(d->in_flight_tags[wkr]); + total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count; +return total_outstanding; }@@ -423,9 +451,11 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name,/* compilation-time checks */ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((sizeof (*d) &CACHE_LINE_MASK ) !=0 ); -RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_MAX_LCORE &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS > +sizeof (d->in_flight_bitmask) *CHAR_BIT ); -if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_MAX_LCORE ) { +if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ) { rte_errno =EINVAL ;return NULL ; }(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.hlib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
Quoted 4 lines
index ec0d74a..cc1d559 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
socket_id,lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 88
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0* packets. The distributor will ensure that no two packets that have the
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned socket_id,
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0* same flow id, or tag, in the mbuf will be procesed at the same time. * +* The user is advocated to set tag for each mbuf before calling this function.
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 92
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0+* If user doesn't set the tag, the tag value can be various values depending on
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned socket_id,
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +2
-0+* driver implementation and configuration. +* * This is not multi-thread safe and should only be called on a single lcore.
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-1* * @param d -- 1.7.1
Hi Bruce,
This patch has little, if any, performance impact. See the perf stat -d for original and patched version of test_distributor_perf.
Original version
============
perf stat -d ./test_orig -cffff -n2
============
==== Cache line switch test ===
[4/4590]
Time for 1048576 iterations = 362349056 ticks
Ticks per iteration = 345
=== Performance test of distributor ===
Time per burst: 7043 Time per packet: 220
Worker 0 handled 3377372 packets
Worker 1 handled 2857280 packets
Worker 2 handled 2120982 packets
Worker 3 handled 2112720 packets
Worker 4 handled 2102014 packets
Worker 5 handled 2101314 packets
Worker 6 handled 2099248 packets
Worker 7 handled 2098560 packets
Worker 8 handled 2098114 packets
Worker 9 handled 2097962 packets
Worker 10 handled 2097892 packets
Worker 11 handled 2097856 packets
Worker 12 handled 2097762 packets
Worker 13 handled 2097726 packets
Worker 14 handled 2097630 packets
Total packets: 33554432 (2000000)
=== Perf test done ===
Performance counter stats for './test_orig -cffff -n2 --no-huge':
45784.935475 task-clock # 12.847 CPUs utilized
4822 context-switches # 0.105 K/sec
7 CPU-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
1017 page-faults # 0.022 K/sec
118181375409 cycles # 2.581 GHz
[40.00%]
88915381373 stalled-cycles-frontend # 75.24% frontend cycles
idle [39.98%]
77015854611 stalled-cycles-backend # 65.17% backend cycles
idle [39.96%]
30469536186 instructions # 0.26 insns per cycle
# 2.92 stalled cycles per
insn [49.96%]
6481829773 branches # 141.571 M/sec
[49.97%]
45283365 branch-misses # 0.70% of all branches
[50.00%]
6537115556 L1-dcache-loads # 142.779 M/sec
[50.05%]
249533128 L1-dcache-load-misses # 3.82% of all L1-dcache
hits [50.08%]
144469663 LLC-loads # 3.155 M/sec
[40.05%]
69897760 LLC-load-misses # 48.38% of all LL-cachehits [40.03%]
3.563886431 seconds time elapsed
Patched version
=============
perf stat -d ./test_patch -cffff -n2
==== Cache line switch test ===
[4/4747]
Time for 1048576 iterations = 456390606 ticks
Ticks per iteration = 435
=== Performance test of distributor ===
Time per burst: 6566 Time per packet: 205
Worker 0 handled 2528418 packets
Worker 1 handled 2531906 packets
Worker 2 handled 2524133 packets
Worker 3 handled 2507720 packets
Worker 4 handled 2332648 packets
Worker 5 handled 2300046 packets
Worker 6 handled 2213035 packets
Worker 7 handled 2125486 packets
Worker 8 handled 2096726 packets
Worker 9 handled 2089150 packets
Worker 10 handled 2079626 packets
Worker 11 handled 2074512 packets
Worker 12 handled 2073560 packets
Worker 13 handled 2054838 packets
Worker 14 handled 2022628 packets
Total packets: 33554432 (2000000)
=== Perf test done ===
Performance counter stats for './test_patch -cffff -n2 --no-huge':
42784.064267 task-clock # 12.546 CPUs utilized
4517 context-switches # 0.106 K/sec
5 CPU-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
1020 page-faults # 0.024 K/sec
110531300647 cycles # 2.583 GHz
[40.06%]
83135557406 stalled-cycles-frontend # 75.21% frontend cycles
idle [40.02%]
71862086289 stalled-cycles-backend # 65.02% backend cycles
idle [39.99%]
28847200612 instructions # 0.26 insns per cycle
# 2.88 stalled cycles per
insn [49.98%]
6059139104 branches # 141.621 M/sec
[49.94%]
38455463 branch-misses # 0.63% of all branches
[49.95%]
6090169906 L1-dcache-loads # 142.347 M/sec
[49.99%]
235094118 L1-dcache-load-misses # 3.86% of all L1-dcache
hits [50.03%]
129974492 LLC-loads # 3.038 M/sec
[40.07%]
56701883 LLC-load-misses # 43.63% of all LL-cachehits [40.08%]
3.410231367 seconds time elapsed
The patched version even runs a bit faster.
Perf annotation shows that 92% time is spent in the while loop of rte_distributor_get_pkt.
Anothoer 6% spent in the calculation of match
inside rte_distributor_process.
Also we can see that there is a big amount of LLC load miss, which is perhaps due to cache conflict
in the while-loop of rte_distributor_get_pkt?
I'm no going to draw any conclusion here but evidently the in_flight_bitmask is not in the hot path, and
is irrelevant to the performance of distributor.
Thanks a lot for your code review and ack.
thx &
rgds,
-qinglai
Quoted 253 lines · Bruce Richardson
Quoted 8 lines · jigsaw
Hi Bruce,
Sorry I didn't. I will run a performance test tomorrow.
thx &
rgds,
-qinglaiOn the assumption that no performance regressions show up...
Acked-by Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines · Bruce Richardson
Quoted 1 line · Qinglai Xiao
With introduction of
in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag canbe
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when
finding
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 7 lines
the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers andRTE_MAX_LCOREis now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure theRTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERSis less than or equal to size of double-word.Signed-off-by Qinglai Xiao <[email protected]>Looks good to me.
Just before I ack this, have you checked to see if there is any performance impact?/Bruce
Quoted 2 lines
--- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 64++++++++++++++++++++++--------
Review
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.cQuoted 6 lines
index 3dfec4a..2c5d61c 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@#define RTE_DISTRIB_RETURNS_MASK (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_RETURNS - 1)Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +2
-0/** +* Maximum number of workers allowed. +* Be aware of increasing the limit, becaus it is limited by how we track
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0+* in-flight tags. See @in_flight_bitmask and @rte_distributor_process
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-0+*/ +#define RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS 64 + +/** * Buffer structure used to pass the pointer data between cores. This
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
is cache
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 73
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* line aligned, but to improve performance and prevent adjacent cache-line
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* prefetches of buffers for other workers, e.g. when worker 1's buffer
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
is on
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor { · line 99
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -91,11 +98,17 @@ struct rte_distributor {char name[RTE_DISTRIBUTOR_NAMESIZE ];/**< Name of the ring. */ unsigned num_workers;/**< Number of workers polling */
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-2-uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; -/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core, 0 == no pkt
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
*/
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-1-struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; +/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core */ +uint64_t in_flight_bitmask; +/**< on/off bits for in-flight tags. +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
then
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-0+* the bitmask has to expand. +*/ + +struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS];
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-1-union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ];Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 11 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns; };@@ -189,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) { d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =0 ;if (unlikely (d->backlog[wkr].count !=0 )) {/* On return of a packet, we need to move the @@ -211,7 +225,10 @@ handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
unsigned wkr)
Quoted 12 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-1pkts[i] = (void *)((uintptr_t )(bl->pkts[idx] >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS )); } -/* recursive call */ +/* recursive call. +* Note that the tags were set before first level call +* to rte_distributor_process. +*/ rte_distributor_process (d, pkts, i); bl->count = bl->start =0 ; }lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d) · line 260
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d)else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =
RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ; }else if (data &RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF ) {@@ -284,14 +302,18 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1next_value = (((int64_t )(uintptr_t )next_mb) <<RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS );/* -* Set the low bit on the tag, so we can guarantee
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
that
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1-* we never store a tag value of zero. That means
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
we can
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1-* use the zero-value to indicate that no packet is
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-1-* being processed by a worker. +* User is advocated to set tag vaue for each +* mbuf before calling rte_distributor_process. +* User defined tags are used to identify flows,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-2+* or sessions. */ - new_tag = (next_mb->hash.usr |1 ); + new_tag = next_mb->hash.usr; -uint32_t match =0 ; +/* +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
than 64
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-0+* then the size of match has to be expanded. +*/ +uint64_t match =0 ;unsigned i;/* * to scan for a match use "xor" and "not" to get
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
a 0/1
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -303,9 +325,12 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 325
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0match |= (!(d->in_flight_tags[i] ^
new_tag)Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 328
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0<< i); +/* Only turned-on bits are considered as match */
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-1+ match &= d->in_flight_bitmask; +if (match) { next_mb =NULL ; -unsigned worker =__builtin_ctz (match); + unsigned worker =
__builtin_ctzl(match);Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0if (add_to_backlog (&d->backlog[worker], next_value) <0 ) next_idx--;@@ -322,6 +347,7 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 25 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 = next_value; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] = new_tag; + d->in_flight_bitmask |= (1UL << wkr); next_mb =NULL ; } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ;@@ -379,11 +405,13 @@ rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
rte_distributor*d,Quoted 16 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-3static inline unsigned total_outstanding (const struct rte_distributor *d) { -unsigned wkr, total_outstanding =0 ; +unsigned wkr, total_outstanding; + + total_outstanding =__builtin_popcountl (d->in_flight_bitmask);for (wkr =0 ; wkr < d->num_workers; wkr++) - total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count + - !!(d->in_flight_tags[wkr]); + total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count; +return total_outstanding; }Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_create(const char *name, · line 456
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-1@@ -423,9 +451,11 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name,/* compilation-time checks */ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((sizeof (*d) &CACHE_LINE_MASK ) !=0 ); -RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_MAX_LCORE &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS > + sizeof(d->in_flight_bitmask) *
CHAR_BIT);Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 7 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-1-if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_MAX_LCORE ) { +if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ) { rte_errno =EINVAL ;return NULL ; }(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.hQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
Quoted 4 lines
index ec0d74a..cc1d559 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
socket_id,Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0* packets. The distributor will ensure that no two packets that have
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
the
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0* same flow id, or tag, in the mbuf will be procesed at the same time.
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 91
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0* +* The user is advocated to set tag for each mbuf before calling this
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
function.
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 92
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0+* If user doesn't set the tag, the tag value can be various values depending on
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +2
-0+* driver implementation and configuration. +* * This is not multi-thread safe and should only be called on a single
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
lcore.
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-1* * @param d -- 1.7.1
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAHVfvh7wgkRGT=SrE-e6h=VGHh-japqQKOmmj7aP1THh=aLb3A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Quoted 5 lines · jigsaw
Hi Bruce,
This patch has little, if any, performance impact. See the perf stat -d for original and patched version of
test_distributor_perf.
Thanks for running the test. Results look ok to me. I confirm my previous ack.
/Bruce
Quoted 406 lines
Original version
============
perf stat -d ./test_orig -cffff -n2
============
==== Cache line switch test ===[4/4590]
Time for 1048576 iterations = 362349056 ticks
Ticks per iteration = 345=== Performance test of distributor ===
Time per burst: 7043 Time per packet: 220Worker 0 handled 3377372 packets
Worker 1 handled 2857280 packets
Worker 2 handled 2120982 packets
Worker 3 handled 2112720 packets
Worker 4 handled 2102014 packets
Worker 5 handled 2101314 packets
Worker 6 handled 2099248 packets
Worker 7 handled 2098560 packets
Worker 8 handled 2098114 packets
Worker 9 handled 2097962 packets
Worker 10 handled 2097892 packets
Worker 11 handled 2097856 packets
Worker 12 handled 2097762 packets
Worker 13 handled 2097726 packets
Worker 14 handled 2097630 packets
Total packets: 33554432 (2000000)
=== Perf test done ===Performance counter stats for './test_orig -cffff -n2 --no-huge':
45784.935475 task-clock # 12.847 CPUs utilized 4822 context-switches # 0.105 K/sec 7 CPU-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 1017 page-faults # 0.022 K/sec 118181375409 cycles # 2.581 GHz [40.00%] 88915381373 stalled-cycles-frontend # 75.24% frontend cycles idle [39.98%] 77015854611 stalled-cycles-backend # 65.17% backend cycles idle [39.96%] 30469536186 instructions # 0.26 insns per cycle # 2.92 stalled cycles per insn [49.96%] 6481829773 branches # 141.571 M/sec [49.97%] 45283365 branch-misses # 0.70% of all branches [50.00%] 6537115556 L1-dcache-loads # 142.779 M/sec [50.05%] 249533128 L1-dcache-load-misses # 3.82% of all L1-dcache hits [50.08%] 144469663 LLC-loads # 3.155 M/sec [40.05%] 69897760 LLC-load-misses # 48.38% of all LL-cachehits [40.03%]
3.563886431 seconds time elapsedPatched version
=============
perf stat -d ./test_patch -cffff -n2
==== Cache line switch test ===[4/4747]
Time for 1048576 iterations = 456390606 ticks
Ticks per iteration = 435=== Performance test of distributor ===
Time per burst: 6566 Time per packet: 205Worker 0 handled 2528418 packets
Worker 1 handled 2531906 packets
Worker 2 handled 2524133 packets
Worker 3 handled 2507720 packets
Worker 4 handled 2332648 packets
Worker 5 handled 2300046 packets
Worker 6 handled 2213035 packets
Worker 7 handled 2125486 packets
Worker 8 handled 2096726 packets
Worker 9 handled 2089150 packets
Worker 10 handled 2079626 packets
Worker 11 handled 2074512 packets
Worker 12 handled 2073560 packets
Worker 13 handled 2054838 packets
Worker 14 handled 2022628 packets
Total packets: 33554432 (2000000)
=== Perf test done ===Performance counter stats for './test_patch -cffff -n2 --no-huge':
42784.064267 task-clock # 12.546 CPUs utilized 4517 context-switches # 0.106 K/sec 5 CPU-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 1020 page-faults # 0.024 K/sec 110531300647 cycles # 2.583 GHz [40.06%] 83135557406 stalled-cycles-frontend # 75.21% frontend cycles idle [40.02%] 71862086289 stalled-cycles-backend # 65.02% backend cycles idle [39.99%] 28847200612 instructions # 0.26 insns per cycle # 2.88 stalled cycles per insn [49.98%] 6059139104 branches # 141.621 M/sec [49.94%] 38455463 branch-misses # 0.63% of all branches [49.95%] 6090169906 L1-dcache-loads # 142.347 M/sec [49.99%] 235094118 L1-dcache-load-misses # 3.86% of all L1-dcache hits [50.03%] 129974492 LLC-loads # 3.038 M/sec [40.07%] 56701883 LLC-load-misses # 43.63% of all LL-cachehits [40.08%]
3.410231367 seconds time elapsedThe patched version even runs a bit faster.
Perf annotation shows that 92% time is spent in the while loop of
rte_distributor_get_pkt.
Anothoer 6% spent in the calculation of match
insiderte_distributor_process.Also we can see that there is a big amount of LLC load miss, which is perhaps due to cache conflict
in the while-loop ofrte_distributor_get_pkt?I'm no going to draw any conclusion here but evidently the
in_flight_bitmaskis not in the hot path, and
is irrelevant to the performance of distributor.Thanks a lot for your code review and ack.
thx &
rgds,
-qinglaiQuoted 253 lines · Bruce Richardson
Quoted 8 lines · jigsaw
Hi Bruce,
Sorry I didn't. I will run a performance test tomorrow.
thx &
rgds,
-qinglaiOn the assumption that no performance regressions show up...
Acked-by Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines · Bruce Richardson
Quoted 1 line · Qinglai Xiao
With introduction of
in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag canbe
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when
finding
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 7 lines
the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers andRTE_MAX_LCOREis now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure theRTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERSis less than or equal to size of double-word.Signed-off-by Qinglai Xiao <[email protected]>Looks good to me.
Just before I ack this, have you checked to see if there is any performance impact?/Bruce
Quoted 2 lines
--- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 64++++++++++++++++++++++--------
Review
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.cQuoted 6 lines
index 3dfec4a..2c5d61c 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@#define RTE_DISTRIB_RETURNS_MASK (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_RETURNS - 1)Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 66
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +2
-0/** +* Maximum number of workers allowed. +* Be aware of increasing the limit, becaus it is limited by how we track
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0+* in-flight tags. See @in_flight_bitmask and @rte_distributor_process
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 72
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-0+*/ +#define RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS 64 + +/** * Buffer structure used to pass the pointer data between cores. This
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
is cache
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c line 73
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* line aligned, but to improve performance and prevent adjacent cache-line
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0* prefetches of buffers for other workers, e.g. when worker 1's buffer
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
is on
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c struct rte_distributor { · line 99
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -91,11 +98,17 @@ struct rte_distributor {char name[RTE_DISTRIBUTOR_NAMESIZE ];/**< Name of the ring. */ unsigned num_workers;/**< Number of workers polling */
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-2-uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; -/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core, 0 == no pkt
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
*/
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-1-struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +uint32_t in_flight_tags[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ]; +/**< Tracks the tag being processed per core */ +uint64_t in_flight_bitmask; +/**< on/off bits for in-flight tags. +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger than 64
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
then
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-0+* the bitmask has to expand. +*/ + +struct rte_distributor_backlog backlog[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS];
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-1-union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_MAX_LCORE ]; +union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ];Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 11 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns; };@@ -189,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor *d, unsigned wkr) { d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =0 ;if (unlikely (d->backlog[wkr].count !=0 )) {/* On return of a packet, we need to move the @@ -211,7 +225,10 @@ handle_worker_shutdown(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
unsigned wkr)
Quoted 12 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-1pkts[i] = (void *)((uintptr_t )(bl->pkts[idx] >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS )); } -/* recursive call */ +/* recursive call. +* Note that the tags were set before first level call +* to rte_distributor_process. +*/ rte_distributor_process (d, pkts, i); bl->count = bl->start =0 ; }lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d) · line 260
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ process_returns(struct rte_distributor *d)else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 =
RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0d->in_flight_tags[wkr] =0 ; + d->in_flight_bitmask &= ~(1UL << wkr); } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ; }else if (data &RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF ) {@@ -284,14 +302,18 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 287
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1next_value = (((int64_t )(uintptr_t )next_mb) <<RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS );/* -* Set the low bit on the tag, so we can guarantee
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
that
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1-* we never store a tag value of zero. That means
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
we can
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-1-* use the zero-value to indicate that no packet is
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 307
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-1-* being processed by a worker. +* User is advocated to set tag vaue for each +* mbuf before calling rte_distributor_process. +* User defined tags are used to identify flows,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 313
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +4
-2+* or sessions. */ - new_tag = (next_mb->hash.usr |1 ); + new_tag = next_mb->hash.usr; -uint32_t match =0 ; +/* +* Note that if RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS is larger
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
than 64
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-0+* then the size of match has to be expanded. +*/ +uint64_t match =0 ;unsigned i;/* * to scan for a match use "xor" and "not" to get
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
a 0/1
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0@@ -303,9 +325,12 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 325
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0match |= (!(d->in_flight_tags[i] ^
new_tag)Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 328
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0<< i); +/* Only turned-on bits are considered as match */
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor · line 333
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-1+ match &= d->in_flight_bitmask; +if (match) { next_mb =NULL ; -unsigned worker =__builtin_ctz (match); + unsigned worker =
__builtin_ctzl(match);Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor
Quoted 4 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +0
-0if (add_to_backlog (&d->backlog[worker], next_value) <0 ) next_idx--;@@ -322,6 +347,7 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor*d,
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 25 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-0else { d->bufs[wkr].bufptr64 = next_value; d->in_flight_tags[wkr] = new_tag; + d->in_flight_bitmask |= (1UL << wkr); next_mb =NULL ; } oldbuf = data >>RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS ;@@ -379,11 +405,13 @@ rte_distributor_returned_pkts(struct
rte_distributor*d,Quoted 16 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +5
-3static inline unsigned total_outstanding (const struct rte_distributor *d) { -unsigned wkr, total_outstanding =0 ; +unsigned wkr, total_outstanding; + + total_outstanding =__builtin_popcountl (d->in_flight_bitmask);for (wkr =0 ; wkr < d->num_workers; wkr++) - total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count + - !!(d->in_flight_tags[wkr]); + total_outstanding += d->backlog[wkr].count; +return total_outstanding; }Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c rte_distributor_create(const char *name, · line 456
Quoted 8 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +3
-1@@ -423,9 +451,11 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name,/* compilation-time checks */ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((sizeof (*d) &CACHE_LINE_MASK ) !=0 ); -RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_MAX_LCORE &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON ((RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS &7 ) !=0 ); +RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON (RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS > + sizeof(d->in_flight_bitmask) *
CHAR_BIT);Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 7 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +1
-1-if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_MAX_LCORE ) { +if (name ==NULL || num_workers >=RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS ) { rte_errno =EINVAL ;return NULL ; }(quoted diff) +0
-0
b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.hQuoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
Quoted 4 lines
index ec0d74a..cc1d559 100644
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned
socket_id,Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0* packets. The distributor will ensure that no two packets that have
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
the
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-0* same flow id, or tag, in the mbuf will be procesed at the same time.
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 91
Quoted 2 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0* +* The user is advocated to set tag for each mbuf before calling this
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
function.
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned · line 92
Quoted 1 line
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +1
-0+* If user doesn't set the tag, the tag value can be various values depending on
Quoted 3 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +2
-0+* driver implementation and configuration. +* * This is not multi-thread safe and should only be called on a single
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
lcore.
Quoted 5 lines
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h +0
-1* * @param d -- 1.7.1
Thomas Monjalon
Applied2014-11-12 15:51, Bruce Richardson:
Quoted 6 lines · jigsaw
Quoted 3 lines
This patch has little, if any, performance impact. See the perf stat -d for original and patched version of
test_distributor_perf.Thanks for running the test. Results look ok to me. I confirm my previous ack.
Applied
Thanks
Signature · 1 line
Thomas
Hi,
2014-11-10 16:44, Qinglai Xiao:
Quoted 9 lines
With introduction of
in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag can be used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when finding the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers andRTE_MAX_LCOREis now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure theRTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERSis less than or equal to size of double-word.Signed-off-by Qinglai Xiao <[email protected]>
The patch doesn't apply cleanly and fail to compile:lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c:310:27: error: ‘union <anonymous>’ has no member named ‘usr’
Do you have another commit before this one in your tree?
Signature · 1 line
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Do you have another commit before this one in your tree?
Yes this patch relies on this one:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.html
Sorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in rte_mbuf was under same cover letter in v2 of the in_flight_bitmask patch.
Then in_flight_bitmask has a v3 patch, but I didn't include the rte_mbuf in the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed.
thx &
rgds,
-ql
Quoted 22 lines · Thomas Monjalon
Hi,
2014-11-10 16:44, Qinglai Xiao:
Quoted 9 lines
With introduction of
in_flight_bitmask, the whole 32 bits of tag can be used. Further more, this patch fixed the integer overflow when finding the matched tags.
The maximum number workers is now defined as 64, which is length of double-word. The link between number of workers andRTE_MAX_LCOREis now removed. Compile time check is added to ensure theRTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERSis less than or equal to size of double-word.Signed-off-by Qinglai Xiao <[email protected]>The patch doesn't apply cleanly and fail to compile:
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c:310:27: error: ‘union <anonymous>’ has no member named ‘usr’Do you have another commit before this one in your tree?
--
Thomas
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAHVfvh6zLy8pGyuWw5QTKowxoZWgSH2-TpOYEVO-RXqsM9-rdQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw:
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Do you have another commit before this one in your tree?
Yes this patch relies on this one:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.htmlSorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in
rte_mbufwas under same cover letter in v2 of thein_flight_bitmaskpatch.
Thenin_flight_bitmaskhas a v3 patch, but I didn't include therte_mbufin the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed.
OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3 patch in the original thread.
No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now.
Thanks
Signature · 1 line
Thomas
OK thanks. Sorry my bad. -ql
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]
Quoted 26 lines
wrote:
2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw:
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Do you have another commit before this one in your tree?
Yes this patch relies on this one:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.htmlSorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in
rte_mbufwas undersame
Quoted 2 lines
cover letter in v2 of the
in_flight_bitmaskpatch.
Thenin_flight_bitmaskhas a v3 patch, but I didn't include therte_mbufin
Quoted 1 line
the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed.
OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3 patch in
the original thread.No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now.
Thanks
--
Thomas