fsck.gfs2: Detect, fix and clone duplicate block refs within a dinode
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
PATCH 1/1 fsck.gfs2: Detect, fix and clone duplicate block refs within a dinode
Hi,
Prior to this patch, fsck.gfs2 was unable to detect and fix duplicate block references within the same file. This patch detects when data blocks are duplicated within a dinode, then tries to clone the data to a new block.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
---
gfs2/fsck/fs_recovery.c +2 -1
@@ -668,7 +668,8 @@ static int rangecheck_jmeta(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, }static int rangecheck_jdata (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr) {return rangecheck_jblock (ip, block); }
gfs2/fsck/fsck.h +2 -0
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct dir_status { };#define DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND 1/* Has the original reference been found? */ +#define DUPFLAG_REF1_IS_DUPL 2/* The original reference is also where we +determined there was a duplicate. */ struct duptree {struct osi_node node;
gfs2/fsck/metawalk.c +6 -3
@@ -1449,7 +1449,8 @@ static int check_data(struct gfs2_inode *ip, struct metawalk_fxns *pass,would defeat the rangecheck_block related functions in pass1. Therefore the individual check_data functions should do a range check. */ - rc = pass->check_data (ip, metablock, block, pass->private); + rc = pass->check_data (ip, metablock, block, pass->private, + bh, ptr);if (rc && (!error || (rc < error))) {log_info ("\n" );if (rc <0 ) {
@@ -1787,7 +1788,8 @@ int delete_leaf(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, void *private) }int delete_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private,struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh, +uint64_t *ptr) {return delete_block_if_notdup (ip, block,NULL ,_ ("data" ),NULL , private);
@@ -1915,7 +1917,8 @@ static int alloc_metalist(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, }static int alloc_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr) {uint8_t q;const char *desc = (const char *)private;
gfs2/fsck/metawalk.h +4 -2
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ extern int delete_metadata(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, int *was_duplicate, void *private);extern int delete_leaf (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t block,void *private);extern int delete_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private); +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr);extern int delete_eattr_indir (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t block,uint64_t parent,struct gfs2_buffer_head **bh,void *private); extern int delete_eattr_leaf(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, uint64_t parent,
@@ -117,7 +118,8 @@ struct metawalk_fxns { int *is_valid, int *was_duplicate, void *private);int (*check_data) (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private); +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr);int (*check_eattr_indir) (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t block,uint64_t parent,struct gfs2_buffer_head **bh,void *private);
gfs2/fsck/pass1.c +10 -5
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ static int check_metalist(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,static int undo_check_metalist (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t block,int h,void *private);static int check_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private); +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr);static int undo_check_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t block,void *private); static int check_eattr_indir(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t indirect,
@@ -72,7 +73,8 @@ static int invalidate_metadata(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,static int invalidate_leaf (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t block,void *private);static int invalidate_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private); +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr); static int invalidate_eattr_indir(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, uint64_t parent, struct gfs2_buffer_head **bh,
@@ -441,7 +443,8 @@ out: }static int check_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bbh,uint64_t *ptr) {uint8_t q;struct block_count *bc = (struct block_count *) private;
@@ -969,7 +972,8 @@ static int invalidate_leaf(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, }static int invalidate_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr) {return mark_block_invalid (ip, block, ref_as_data,_ ("data" ),NULL ,NULL );
@@ -1069,7 +1073,8 @@ static int rangecheck_leaf(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, }static int rangecheck_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr) {return rangecheck_block (ip, block,NULL , btype_data, private); }
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +120 -1
145 lines not on this page · raw message
gfs2/fsck/pass2.c +2 -1
@@ -1580,7 +1580,8 @@ static int check_metalist_qc(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, }static int check_data_qc (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bbh,uint64_t *ptr) {struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh;
gfs2/fsck/util.c +4 -3
@@ -339,15 +339,16 @@ int add_duplicate_ref(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,resolve it. The first reference can't be the second reference. */ if (id && first && !(dt->dup_flags &DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND )) {log_info (_ ("Original reference to block %llu (0x%llx) was " -"previously found to be bad and deleted.\n" ), +"either found to be bad and deleted, or else " +"a duplicate within the same inode.\n" ), (unsigned long long )block, (unsigned long long )block);log_info (_ ("I'll consider the reference from inode %llu " "(0x%llx) the first reference.\n" ), (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr); - dt->dup_flags |=DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND ; -return meta_is_good; + dt->dup_flags |=DUPFLAG_REF1_IS_DUPL ; + dt->refs++; }/* The first time this is called from pass1 is actually the second
PATCH 1/1 fsck.gfs2: Detect, fix and clone duplicate block refs within a dinode
Hi Bob,
A couple of comments in line, otherwise both patches look good to me.
Quoted 13 lines · Bob Peterson
Hi,
Prior to this patch, fsck.gfs2 was unable to detect and fix duplicate block references within the same file. This patch detects when data blocks are duplicated within a dinode, then tries to clone the data to a new block.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Signed-off-by Bob Peterson <[email protected]>---
<snip>
Quoted 17 lines
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +5
-0@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ struct dup_handler {int ref_count; }; +struct clone_target { +uint64_t dup_block; +int first; +}; +static void log_inode_reference (struct duptree *dt,osi_list_t *tmp,int inval) {char reftypestring[32 ];
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c static void revise_dup_handler(uint64_t dup_blk, struct dup_handler *dh) · line 263
Quoted 10 lines
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +7
-0@@ -249,6 +254,116 @@ static void revise_dup_handler(uint64_t dup_blk, struct dup_handler *dh) } } +static int clone_check_meta (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t block, +struct gfs2_buffer_head **bh,int h, +int *is_valid,int *was_duplicate,void *private) +{ + *was_duplicate =0 ; + *is_valid =1 ; + *bh =bread (ip->i_sbd, block);
Does this need a NULL check, or does check_metatree handle that?
Quoted 92 lines
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +92
-0+return 0 ; +} + +/* clone_data - clone a duplicate reference +* +* This function remembers the first reference to the specified block, and +* clones all subsequent references to it (with permission). +*/ +static int clone_data (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr) +{ +struct clone_target *clonet = (struct clone_target *)private; +struct gfs2_buffer_head *clone_bh; +uint64_t cloneblock; +int error; + +if (block != clonet->dup_block) +return 0 ; + +if (clonet->first) { +log_debug (_ ("Inode %lld (0x%llx)'s first reference to " +"block %lld (0x%llx) is targeted for cloning.\n" ), + (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, + (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, + (unsigned long long )block, + (unsigned long long )block); + clonet->first =0 ; +return 0 ; + } +log_err (_ ("Error: Inode %lld (0x%llx)'s subsequent reference to " +"block %lld (0x%llx) is an error.\n" ), + (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, + (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, + (unsigned long long )block, (unsigned long long )block); +if (query (_ ("Okay to clone the duplicated reference? (y/n) " ))) { + error =lgfs2_meta_alloc (ip, &cloneblock); +if (!error) { + clone_bh =bread (ip->i_sbd, clonet->dup_block); +if (clone_bh) { +fsck_blockmap_set (ip, cloneblock,_ ("data" ), +GFS2_BLKST_USED ); + clone_bh->b_blocknr = cloneblock; +bmodified (clone_bh); +brelse (clone_bh); +/* Now fix the reference: */ + *ptr =cpu_to_be64 (cloneblock); +bmodified (bh); +log_err (_ ("Duplicate reference to block %lld " +"(0x%llx) was cloned to block %lld " +"(0x%llx).\n" ), + (unsigned long long )block, + (unsigned long long )block, + (unsigned long long )cloneblock, + (unsigned long long )cloneblock); +return 0 ; + } + } +log_err (_ ("Error: Unable to allocate a new data block.\n" )); +if (!query ("Should I zero the reference instead? (y/n)" )) { +log_err (_ ("Duplicate reference to block %lld " +"(0x%llx) was not fixed.\n" ), + (unsigned long long )block, + (unsigned long long )block); +return 0 ; + } + *ptr =0 ; +bmodified (bh); +log_err (_ ("Duplicate reference to block %lld (0x%llx) was " +"zeroed.\n" ), + (unsigned long long )block, + (unsigned long long )block); + }else { +log_err (_ ("Duplicate reference to block %lld (0x%llx) " +"was not fixed.\n" ), (unsigned long long )block, + (unsigned long long )block); + } +return 0 ; +} + +/* clone_dup_ref_in_inode - clone a duplicate reference within a single inode +* +* This function traverses the metadata tree of an inode, cloning all +* but the first reference to a duplicate block reference. +*/ +static void clone_dup_ref_in_inode (struct gfs2_inode *ip,struct duptree *dt) +{ +int error; +struct clone_target clonet = {.dup_block = dt->block, .first =1 }; +struct metawalk_fxns pass1b_fxns_clone = { + .private = &clonet, + .check_metalist = clone_check_meta,
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c static void revise_dup_handler(uint64_t dup_blk, struct dup_handler *dh) · line 365
Quoted 10 lines
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +10
-0+ .check_data = clone_data, + }; + + error =check_metatree (ip, &pass1b_fxns_clone); +if (error) { +log_err (_ ("Error cloning duplicate reference(s) to block %lld " +"(0x%llx).\n" ), (unsigned long long )dt->block, + (unsigned long long )dt->block); + } +}
Void functions with error paths always ring alarm bells in my head, should this one return the error value?
Andy
Quoted 63 lines
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +6
-1+/* handle_dup_blk - handle a duplicate block reference. * * This function should resolve and delete the duplicate block reference given, @@ -389,6 +504,9 @@ static int handle_dup_blk(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct duptree *dt) (unsigned long long)id->block_no); ip =fsck_load_inode (sdp, id->block_no); +if (dt->dup_flags &DUPFLAG_REF1_IS_DUPL ) +clone_dup_ref_in_inode (ip, dt); + q =block_type (id->block_no);if (q ==GFS2_BLKST_UNLINKED ) { log_debug( _("The remaining reference inode %lld "@@ -468,7 +586,8 @@ static int check_metalist_refs(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, }static int check_data_refs (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh,uint64_t *ptr) {return add_duplicate_ref (ip, block, ref_as_data,1 ,INODE_VALID ); }gfs2/fsck/pass2.c +2
-1@@ -1580,7 +1580,8 @@ static int check_metalist_qc(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block, }static int check_data_qc (struct gfs2_inode *ip,uint64_t metablock, -uint64_t block,void *private) +uint64_t block,void *private, +struct gfs2_buffer_head *bbh,uint64_t *ptr) {struct gfs2_buffer_head *bh;gfs2/fsck/util.c +4
-3@@ -339,15 +339,16 @@ int add_duplicate_ref(struct gfs2_inode *ip, uint64_t block,resolve it. The first reference can't be the second reference. */ if (id && first && !(dt->dup_flags &DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND )) {log_info (_ ("Original reference to block %llu (0x%llx) was " -"previously found to be bad and deleted.\n" ), +"either found to be bad and deleted, or else " +"a duplicate within the same inode.\n" ), (unsigned long long )block, (unsigned long long )block);log_info (_ ("I'll consider the reference from inode %llu " "(0x%llx) the first reference.\n" ), (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr, (unsigned long long )ip->i_di.di_num.no_addr); - dt->dup_flags |=DUPFLAG_REF1_FOUND ; -return meta_is_good; + dt->dup_flags |=DUPFLAG_REF1_IS_DUPL ; + dt->refs++; }/* The first time this is called from pass1 is actually the second
PATCH 1/1 fsck.gfs2: Detect, fix and clone duplicate block refs within a dinode
----- Original Message -----
Quoted 3 lines
Hi Bob,
A couple of comments in line, otherwise both patches look good to me.
(snip)
Quoted 3 lines
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c static void revise_dup_handler(uint64_t dup_blk, struct dup_handler *dh) · line 263
Quoted 1 line
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +1
-0+ *bh =bread (ip->i_sbd, block);Does this need a NULL check, or does
check_metatreehandle that?
This doesn't need a NULL check. It's handled properly in function build_and_check_metalist, which, by design, plans on either getting or not getting a proper bh pointer.
(snip)
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 8 lines
+static void
clone_dup_ref_in_inode(struct gfs2_inode *ip, struct duptree *dt)gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +6
-0+{ +int error; +struct clone_target clonet = {.dup_block = dt->block, .first =1 }; +struct metawalk_fxns pass1b_fxns_clone = { + .private = &clonet, + .check_metalist = clone_check_meta,gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c static void revise_dup_handler(uint64_t dup_blk, struct dup_handler *dh) · line 365
Quoted 10 lines
gfs2/fsck/pass1b.c +10
-0+ .check_data = clone_data, + }; + + error =check_metatree (ip, &pass1b_fxns_clone); +if (error) { +log_err (_ ("Error cloning duplicate reference(s) to block %lld " +"(0x%llx).\n" ), (unsigned long long )dt->block, + (unsigned long long )dt->block); + } +}Void functions with error paths always ring alarm bells in my head, should this one return the error value?
Quoted 1 line
Andy
You've got a good point, and maybe we should add some error checking, but to be honest, there's not much we can do about an error at this point.
First of all, in this code path, errors seem unlikely because
(a) clone_check_meta always returns 0, and,
(b) function clone_data takes errors in the data blocks into account and if it can't fix them, will zero out the reference to them.
So any errors from function check_metatree() would be due to some kind of strange unforeseen problem, such as metadata corruption. Since this function is in pass1b, all metadata should have been validated in pass1 at the point where this function runs. In that case, there's not much to be done but log it (which it does) and move on.
When it returns from function clone_dup_ref_in_inode(), it sets the block_map appropriately for the duplicated block, so it's done about all it can about the situation, and certainly more than it did prior to the patch.
I've run this patch against more than 200 metadata sets with varying degrees of brokenness, and it seems pretty robust. We can always amend the code in the future if we find something that warrants it.
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems