pata_at91: fix ata_host_activate() failure handling
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 pata_at91: fix ata_host_activate() failure handling
Add missing clk_put() call to ata_host_activate() failure path.
--- drivers/ata/pata_at91.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/pata_at91.c +6 -5
@@ -407,12 +407,13 @@ static int pata_at91_probe(struct platfo host->private_data = info; -return ata_host_activate (host,gpio_is_valid (irq) ?gpio_to_irq (irq) :0 , -gpio_is_valid (irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt :NULL , - irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht); + ret =ata_host_activate (host,gpio_is_valid (irq) ?gpio_to_irq (irq) :0 , +gpio_is_valid (irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt :NULL , + irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht); +if (ret) + goto err_put; -if (!ret) -return 0 ; +return 0 ; err_put:clk_put (info->mck);
Hello.
Quoted 20 lines · Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Add missing
clk_put()call toata_host_activate()failure path.Cc Andrew Victor <[email protected]>Cc Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>Cc Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>--- drivers/ata/pata_at91.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Index:
b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
===================================================================drivers/ata/pata_at91.c +0
-2@@ -407,12 +407,13 @@ static int pata_at91_probe(struct platfo host->private_data = info; - return ata_host_activate(host, gpio_is_valid(irq) ? gpio_to_irq(irq) : 0, - gpio_is_valid(irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt : NULL,
drivers/ata/pata_at91.c static int pata_at91_probe(struct platfo · line 416
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/ata/pata_at91.c +6
-3- irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht); + ret =ata_host_activate (host,gpio_is_valid (irq) ?gpio_to_irq (irq) :0 , +gpio_is_valid (irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt :NULL , + irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht); +if (ret) + goto err_put; -if (!ret) -return 0 ; +return 0 ;
Hm, I have once fixed that (see that *if* (!ret)) but looks like a later
commit 477c87e90853d136b188c50c0e4a93d01cad872e (ARM: at91/pata: use gpio_is_valid to check the gpio) broke it again. :-( Would be good if the changelog did mention that...
MBR, Sergei
Tejun Heo
AppliedPATCH 1/1 pata_at91: fix ata_host_activate() failure handling
In reply to Bartlomiej ZolnierkiewiczApplied to libata/for-3.15-fixes.
Thanks.
------- 8< -------
Quoted 1 line
From
27aa64b9d1bd0d23fd692c91763a48309b694311Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:51:14 +0200
Add missing clk_put() call to ata_host_activate() failure path.
Sergei says,
"Hm, I have once fixed that (see that *if* (!ret)) but looks like a
later commit 477c87e90853d136b188c50c0e4a93d01cad872e (ARM:
at91/pata: use gpio_is_valid to check the gpio) broke it again. :-( Would be good if the changelog did mention that..."
--- drivers/ata/pata_at91.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/pata_at91.c +6 -5
@@ -407,12 +407,13 @@ static int pata_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) host->private_data = info; -return ata_host_activate (host,gpio_is_valid (irq) ?gpio_to_irq (irq) :0 , -gpio_is_valid (irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt :NULL , - irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht); + ret =ata_host_activate (host,gpio_is_valid (irq) ?gpio_to_irq (irq) :0 , +gpio_is_valid (irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt :NULL , + irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht); +if (ret) + goto err_put; -if (!ret) -return 0 ; +return 0 ; err_put:clk_put (info->mck);
Signature · 1 line
1.9.0