cpu detection fixes for test10-pre4
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
- make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686" family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix which went into
include/asm-i386/bugs.hin test10-pre4)We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
Its questionable if we should include the 'i'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 9 lines · Alan Cox
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
- make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686" family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix which went into
include/asm-i386/bugs.hin test10-pre4)We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
Its questionable if we should include the 'i'
heh, agreed. let's rename 'em all x86 and be done with it. ;-)
Signature · 7 lines
Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - short SIGs! <g> All I need to know I could have learned in Kindergarten ... if I'd just been paying attention. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 10 lines · Alan Cox
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
- make Pentium IV and other post-P6 processors use the "i686" family name (same fix as the system_utsname.machine init fix which went into
include/asm-i386/bugs.hin test10-pre4)We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
Its questionable if we should include the 'i'
True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
-hpa
Signature · 7 lines
<[email protected]> at work, <[email protected]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 1 line · H. Peter Anvin
Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
Its questionable if we should include the 'i'
True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different beasts...
Signature · 8 lines
Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:[email protected] Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 6 lines · Horst von Brand
Quoted 1 line · H. Peter Anvin
Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh.
Its questionable if we should include the 'i'
True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different beasts...
IA32 is a retcon, and is used only by Intel anyway. There are differences between the i686 lines that are significantly bigger than between the i486 and i586, and that doesn't even begin to count non-Intel chips.
However, changing it to "i386" consistently would still work with existing software. Using "x86" or "ia32" or "ix86pc" (what Solaris calls it) would break stuff.
-hpa
Signature · 7 lines
<[email protected]> at work, <[email protected]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different beasts...
ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an actionable matter ..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 8 lines · Alan Cox
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
True enough, personally I prefer "x86".
ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different beasts...
ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an actionable matter ..
Yet another reason to ignore it.
-hpa
Signature · 7 lines
<[email protected]> at work, <[email protected]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
IA-32 (was Re: [PATCH] cpu detection fixes for test10-pre4)
Quoted 1 line · H. Peter Anvin
Alan Cox wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an actionable matter ..
Yet another reason to ignore it.
Speaking of using it for non-Intel products, this is a line from Documentation/Changes in Linux 2.4.0-test10-pre6:
Linux on IA-32 has recently switched from using as86 to using gas for
Should we change that to x86 or something?
-Barry K. Nathan <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: IA-32 (was Re: [PATCH] cpu detection fixes for test10-pre4)
Quoted 11 lines · Barry K. Nathan
Quoted 1 line · H. Peter Anvin
Alan Cox wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines
ia32 is an intel trademark. Using it for non intel products is probably an actionable matter ..
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Yet another reason to ignore it.
Speaking of using it for non-Intel products, this is a line from
Documentation/Changesin Linux 2.4.0-test10-pre6:Linux on IA-32 has recently switched from using as86 to using gas for
Should we change that to x86 or something?
Since Linux generally calls this i386 throughout, I would stick with calling it i386.
-hpa
Signature · 7 lines
<[email protected]> at work, <[email protected]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/