Skip to contentSkip to conversation

New tree started ;)

DISCUSSION Michael Cohen 5 participants 5 messages Dec 31, 2001 – Jan 2, 2002

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Howdy.

After hanging out for a while on openprojects.net, I've decided to create a new 2.4 tree. I feel that there's need for a rapidly developing "-ac alike" tree, and so, here we go. Feel free to test it. I've attached patch-2.4.17-mjc1.bz2. New versions can be found at
http://iamnotanimatedtoexplode.com/patches/mjc. Currently the patch includes:

Reverse Mapping patch #9 (Rik van Riel)
Preemptible Kernel Patch (Robert Love)
Lock-Break Patch (Robert Love)
CPU affinity /proc entry (Robert Love)
Netdev-random (Robert Love)
Software Suspend (Gabor Kuti?)
Real Time Scheduler for Linux (?)
IDE updates (Taskfile IO and others) (Andre Hedrick}

Ideally I'd like to have this maintained (possibly using bk) by those at #kernelnewbies.

Linus once said something about having more trees being a good thing. I'll try to keep this as close to the 2.4.x line as possible, though. :)

------
Michael Cohen
OhDarn.net

"Intelligence is the ability to do no work, yet somehow getting the
work done."
-- Linus Torvalds :)

#2 lore raw
In reply to Michael Cohen

Hello Michael,

Thanks for doing this. Could you tell me which criteria you have to
choose patches to go in? I see grsecurity in the to be merged queue
which is not likely to ever go into 2.4.x. It's more likely to be converted to the LSM framework (parts of it if still needed) and then integrated into 2.5.x.

Quoted 2 lines

Linus once said something about having more trees being a good thing. I'll try to keep this as close to the 2.4.x line as possible, though.

Could you maybe out of consideration for AC use the newest 2.4.x kernels, in this case 2.4.18pre1?

Happy New Year 2002 and best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz

#3 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Roberto Nibali

Hello Michael,

Thanks for doing this. Could you tell me which criteria you have to choose patches to go in? I see grsecurity in the to be merged queue which is not likely to ever go into 2.4.x. It's more likely to be converted to the LSM framework (parts of it if still needed) and then integrated into 2.5.x.

AFAICT, the grsecurity patch include the Solar Designer non executable patch. And AFAICT, this one won't be included in the main kernel tree.

My point is that this patch is against previously taken decision. So why would it be included in such a tree ?

[...]

Signature · 2 lines
Yoann Vandoorselaere
http://www.prelude-ids.org
#4 lore raw
In reply to Michael Cohen
Quoted 5 lines · William Lee Irwin III
Quoted 1 line · Michael Cohen

Real Time Scheduler for Linux (?)

George Anziger

George Anzinger

Quoted 8 lines

Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Signature · 3 lines
George           [email protected]
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/