Skip to contentSkip to conversation

2.5.8 final - another data point

DISCUSSION [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages Apr 16, 2002

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Running dbench 128 on ext2 mounted with delalloc and Andrew's patches from http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.8/
was 7.5x faster than 2.5.8 vanilla and 1.5x faster than

Wow, good stuff - I'll have to pull those down

Hmm, I had to run e2fsck -f twice on the filesystem that ran dbench, tiobench, bonnie++ on nfs, and osdb. The filesystem was showing 52% used and is normally 1% used before/after testing. No big files on the fs. The directory where bonnie++ on nfs runs had some temporary directories that were not deletable. A bunch of files/directories were in lost+found after e2fsck. After removing the files, the fs was back to 1% used.

I backed up and did mke2fs in case there was any pre-existing/lingering corruption. So keep your karma up and test on a test box. :)

Signature · 1 line
Randy Hron
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Running dbench 128 on ext2 mounted with delalloc and Andrew's patches from http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.8/
was 7.5x faster than 2.5.8 vanilla and 1.5x faster than

Wow, good stuff - I'll have to pull those down

Quoted 9 lines

Hmm, I had to run e2fsck -f twice on the filesystem that ran dbench, tiobench, bonnie++ on nfs, and osdb. The filesystem was showing 52% used and is normally 1% used before/after testing. No big files on the fs. The directory where bonnie++ on nfs runs had some temporary directories that were not deletable. A bunch of files/directories were in lost+found after e2fsck. After removing the files, the fs was back to 1% used.

ho-hum. Presumably an unreservepage() got lost somewhere in the diff shuffling.

All I'm doing with the delayed-allocation code at present is keeping the diffs up to date. I haven't even compiled that stuff for over a week. All work at present is against
dallocbase-70-writeback. It's probably not a good use of
your time to test anything beyond that. Sorry about that.

I'll leave the later diffs available so anyone who's interested can see the multipage bio assembly stuff, but "dont use".

-