NFSv3 not supported ?

DISCUSSION Thanos Chatziathanassiou 2 participants 2 messages Sep 1, 2002

Subsystems (2)

NFS client NFS server

lore

Share & tools

lore

Thanos Chatziathanassiou

author

2002-09-01 18:01 UTC #0 lore raw

Hi list, lots of head-banging on this one:
Some time ago, I asked what this message meant:
``NFS: NFSv3 not supported warning: mount version older than kernel'' since my mount was most certainly up-to-date.

Trond answered that I did not specify ``include NFSv3 client support'' when compiling the kernel.

Last night, I decide to upgrade to kernel 2.4.19, when I specifically remembered to include NFSv3 support, when asked. However, on the next reboot, upon mount, the same message appeared.

As I figured out just now, the message will appear (although I'm not sure if it really means what it says) if NFS support is compiled inside the kernel, but won't appear, if NFS support is compiled as a module (again, I don't really know if it is indeed NFSv3, but it says it is).

Can anyone explain this ? Is NFSv3 meant to be only compiled as a module ?

Regards,
Thanos Chatziathanassiou

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

Trond Myklebust

2002-09-01 19:30 UTC #1 lore raw

Quoted 1 line

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
" " == Thanos Chatziathanassiou <[email protected]> writes:

> Can anyone explain this ? Is NFSv3 meant to be only compiled as > a module ?

No. Looks like you've screwed up somewhere when you did the compilation. Did you for edit .config by hand? If so, did you remember to do 'make oldconfig' before compiling?

Cheers,
Trond