convert /proc/swaps to seq_file
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 convert /proc/swaps to seq_file
This patch to 2.5.44 make /proc/swaps use seq_file.
Question: is any locking needed here?
The previous code didn't use any locking.
Any other feedback on it?
Thanks,
~Randy
~~~
fs/proc/proc_misc.c renamed from fs/proc/proc_misc.c.swaps +13 -8
@@ -295,6 +295,18 @@ .release = seq_release, }; +extern struct seq_operations swaps_op; +static int swaps_open (struct inode *inode,struct file *file) +{ +return seq_open (file, &swaps_op); +} +static struct file_operations proc_swaps_operations = { + .open = swaps_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = seq_release, +}; +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES extern struct seq_operations modules_op;static int modules_open (struct inode *inode,struct file *file)
@@ -503,13 +515,6 @@return proc_calc_metrics (page, start, off, count, eof, len); } -static int swaps_read_proc (char *page,char **start,off_t off, -int count,int *eof,void *data) -{ -int len =get_swaparea_info (page); -return proc_calc_metrics (page, start, off, count, eof, len); -} -static int memory_read_proc (char *page,char **start,off_t off,int count,int *eof,void *data) {
@@ -616,7 +621,6 @@ {"rtc", ds1286_read_proc}, #endif {"locks", locks_read_proc}, - {"swaps", swaps_read_proc}, {"iomem", memory_read_proc}, {"execdomains", execdomains_read_proc}, {NULL,}
@@ -632,6 +636,7 @@ entry->proc_fops = &proc_kmsg_operations;create_seq_entry ("cpuinfo" ,0 , &proc_cpuinfo_operations);create_seq_entry ("partitions" ,0 , &proc_partitions_operations); +create_seq_entry ("swaps" ,0 , &proc_swaps_operations);#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_S390 )create_seq_entry ("interrupts" ,0 , &proc_interrupts_operations);#endif
mm/swapfile.c renamed from mm/swapfile.c.swaps +73 -28
124 lines not on this page · raw message