pcibus_to_node() addition to topology infrastructure
PATCH 1/1 pcibus_to_node() addition to topology infrastructure
Linus,
Here's a patch that adds PCI busses to the list of basic topology
elements (incl. CPUs, MemBlks, & Nodes).
pcibus_to_node-2.5.44.patch
This patch adds a new topology macro: pcibus_to_node(). This will be useful to allow I/O bound processes to bind themselves to CPUs/Nodes close to the PCI busses they are communicating over.
1) Adds pcibus_to_node() macro to asm-generic/topology.h
2) Makes small modifications to NUMA-Q PCI code, mostly modifying macros.
3) Uses the macros from #2 to implement pcibus_to_node() in asm-i386/topology.h
[mcd@arrakis patches]$ diffstat api_patches/pcibus_to_node-2.5.44.patch
arch/i386/pci/numa.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------ include/asm-generic/topology.h | 3 +++ include/asm-i386/topology.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Cheers!
-Matt
Whoops! A patch would be nice...
Cheers!
-Matt
Quoted 13 lines · Matthew Dobson
Linus,
Here's a patch that adds PCI busses to the list of basic topology
elements (incl. CPUs, MemBlks, & Nodes).pcibus_to_node-2.5.44.patch
This patch adds a new topology macro:
pcibus_to_node(). This will be useful to allow I/O bound processes to bind themselves to CPUs/Nodes close to the PCI busses they are communicating over.1) Adds
pcibus_to_node()macro toasm-generic/topology.h
2) Makes small modifications to NUMA-Q PCI code, mostly modifying macros.
3) Uses the macros from #2 to implementpcibus_to_node()inasm-i386/topology.h[mcd@arrakis patches]$ diffstat
api_patches/pcibus_to_node-2.5.44.patch
Quoted 9 lines
arch/i386/pci/numa.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------ include/asm-generic/topology.h | 3 +++ include/asm-i386/topology.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)Cheers!
-Matt
arch/i386/pci/numa.c +15 -18
@@ -5,13 +5,10 @@#include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include "pci.h" - -#define BUS2QUAD (global) (mp_bus_id_to_node[global]) -#define BUS2LOCAL (global) (mp_bus_id_to_local[global]) -#define QUADLOCAL2BUS (quad,local) (quad_local_to_mp_bus_id[quad][local]) +#include <asm/topology.h> #define PCI_CONF1_MQ_ADDRESS (bus, dev, fn, reg) \ - (0x80000000 | (BUS2LOCAL(bus) << 16) | (dev << 11) | (fn << 8) | (reg & ~3)) + (0x80000000 | mp_bus_id_to_local[bus] << 16) | (dev << 11) | (fn << 8) | (reg & ~3))static int __pci_conf1_mq_read (int seg,int bus,int dev,int fn,int reg,int len,u32 *value) {
@@ -22,17 +19,17 @@spin_lock_irqsave (&pci_config_lock, flags); -outl_quad (PCI_CONF1_MQ_ADDRESS (bus, dev, fn, reg),0xCF8 ,BUS2QUAD (bus)); +outl_quad (PCI_CONF1_MQ_ADDRESS (bus, dev, fn, reg),0xCF8 ,__pcibus_to_node (bus));switch (len) {case 1 : - *value =inb_quad (0xCFC + (reg &3 ),BUS2QUAD (bus)); + *value =inb_quad (0xCFC + (reg &3 ),__pcibus_to_node (bus));break ;case 2 : - *value =inw_quad (0xCFC + (reg &2 ),BUS2QUAD (bus)); + *value =inw_quad (0xCFC + (reg &2 ),__pcibus_to_node (bus));break ;case 4 : - *value =inl_quad (0xCFC ,BUS2QUAD (bus)); + *value =inl_quad (0xCFC ,__pcibus_to_node (bus));break ; }
@@ -50,17 +47,17 @@spin_lock_irqsave (&pci_config_lock, flags); -outl_quad (PCI_CONF1_MQ_ADDRESS (bus, dev, fn, reg),0xCF8 ,BUS2QUAD (bus)); +outl_quad (PCI_CONF1_MQ_ADDRESS (bus, dev, fn, reg),0xCF8 ,__pcibus_to_node (bus));switch (len) {case 1 : -outb_quad ((u8 )value,0xCFC + (reg &3 ),BUS2QUAD (bus)); +outb_quad ((u8 )value,0xCFC + (reg &3 ),__pcibus_to_node (bus));break ;case 2 : -outw_quad ((u16 )value,0xCFC + (reg &2 ),BUS2QUAD (bus)); +outw_quad ((u16 )value,0xCFC + (reg &2 ),__pcibus_to_node (bus));break ;case 4 : -outl_quad ((u32 )value,0xCFC ,BUS2QUAD (bus)); +outl_quad ((u32 )value,0xCFC ,__pcibus_to_node (bus));break ; }
@@ -96,7 +93,7 @@*/ int pxb, reg;u8 busno, suba, subb; -int quad =BUS2QUAD (d->bus->number); +int quad =__pcibus_to_node (d->bus->number);printk ("PCI: Searching for i450NX host bridges on %s\n" , d->slot_name); reg =0xd0 ;
@@ -106,9 +103,9 @@pci_read_config_byte (d, reg++, &subb);DBG ("i450NX PXB %d: %02x/%02x/%02x\n" , pxb, busno, suba, subb);if (busno) -pci_scan_bus (QUADLOCAL2BUS (quad,busno), pci_root_ops,NULL );/* Bus A */ +pci_scan_bus (quad_local_to_mp_bus_id[quad][busno], pci_root_ops,NULL );/* Bus A */ if (suba < subb) -pci_scan_bus (QUADLOCAL2BUS (quad,suba+1 ), pci_root_ops,NULL );/* Bus B */ +pci_scan_bus (quad_local_to_mp_bus_id[quad][suba+1 ], pci_root_ops,NULL );/* Bus B */ } pcibios_last_bus =-1 ; }
@@ -130,8 +127,8 @@if (clustered_apic_mode && (numnodes >1 )) {for (quad =1 ; quad < numnodes; ++quad) {printk ("Scanning PCI bus %d for quad %d\n" , -QUADLOCAL2BUS (quad,0 ), quad); -pci_scan_bus (QUADLOCAL2BUS (quad,0 ), + quad_local_to_mp_bus_id[quad][0 ], quad); +pci_scan_bus (quad_local_to_mp_bus_id[quad][0 ], pci_root_ops,NULL ); } }
include/asm-generic/topology.h +3 -0
@@ -47,5 +47,8 @@#ifndef __node_to_memblk#define __node_to_memblk (node) (0)#endif +#ifndef __pcibus_to_node +#define __pcibus_to_node (bus) (0) +#endif #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_TOPOLOGY_H */
include/asm-i386/topology.h +3 -0
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@/* Returns the number of the first MemBlk on Node 'node' */ #define __node_to_memblk (node) (node) +/* Returns the number of the node containing PCI bus 'bus' */ +#define __pcibus_to_node (bus) (mp_bus_id_to_node[bus]) +#else /* !CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ */ /* * Other i386 platforms should define their own version of the
This is a nice addition, but just FYI there are SGI systems that have PCI busses attached to more than one node. I guess for now we can just round-robin through the attached nodes for the return value.
Thanks,
Jesse
Quoted 30 lines · Matthew Dobson
Linus,
Here's a patch that adds PCI busses to the list of basic topology
elements (incl. CPUs, MemBlks, & Nodes).pcibus_to_node-2.5.44.patch
This patch adds a new topology macro:
pcibus_to_node(). This will be useful to allow I/O bound processes to bind themselves to CPUs/Nodes close to the PCI busses they are communicating over.1) Adds
pcibus_to_node()macro toasm-generic/topology.h
2) Makes small modifications to NUMA-Q PCI code, mostly modifying macros.
3) Uses the macros from #2 to implementpcibus_to_node()inasm-i386/topology.h[mcd@arrakis patches]$ diffstat
api_patches/pcibus_to_node-2.5.44.patcharch/i386/pci/numa.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------ include/asm-generic/topology.h | 3 +++ include/asm-i386/topology.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)Cheers!
(quoted diff) +0
-2-Matt -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 6 lines · Jesse Barnes
This is a nice addition, but just FYI there are SGI systems that have PCI busses attached to more than one node. I guess for now we can just round-robin through the attached nodes for the return value.
Thanks,
Jesse
Ah, yes... The p-bricks, i-bricks, etc. right?
Yes, I suppose a round-robin return for the SGI version of the macro would work... Certainly not ideal, but it would work. The problem is if you assume that binding several processes to the node PCI bus X is on will ensure that those processes are on the same node. In this case (SGI), it would be a false assumption. I suppose that's what you get for assuming, though? ;)
Cheers!
-Matt
Quoted 1 line · Matthew Dobson
Ah, yes... The p-bricks, i-bricks, etc. right?
Yup.
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, I suppose a round-robin return for the SGI version of the macro would work... Certainly not ideal, but it would work. The problem is
Can you think of any better way to do it? Perhaps make pcibus_to_node return a list of nodes?
Thanks,
Jesse
Quoted 5 lines · Jesse Barnes
Quoted 1 line · Matthew Dobson
Ah, yes... The p-bricks, i-bricks, etc. right?
Quoted 8 lines
Yup.
Quoted 1 line
Yes, I suppose a round-robin return for the SGI version of the macro would work... Certainly not ideal, but it would work. The problem is
Can you think of any better way to do it? Perhaps make
pcibus_to_nodereturn a list of nodes?
Yeah... I was thinking about having it return a bitmask... It makes it a bit of a pain to iterate through the mask, only to find that in most cases there is only one bit set in the mask. :(
It's a bit late in the day... I'll mull this over and see if I can come up with something good.
Cheers!
-Matt