lk 2.5.49 module frustration
Hopefully others are having more success with the new module loader than I am. My system is basically RH8.0 with the new module-init-tools (version 0.7) loaded and the recent 2.5.49 kernel.
During system load there is noise (failure?) on calls to modprobe since the new command doesn't support the same switches as the old. [harmless?]
My lsmod looks like this:
# lsmod Module Size Used by scsi_debug 29423 0 [unsafe] ohci1394 21561 0 ieee1394 41773 1 ohci1394 [unsafe] parport_pc 18883 0 [unsafe] parport 30228 1 parport_pc [unsafe] ehci_hcd 32801 0 usbcore 90237 3 ehci_hcd
Those "unsafe" dependencies wedge in a module, making it hard to remove them. In the case of scsi_debug about 30 seconds after it is loaded I get this on my console:
# Module scsi_debug cannot be unloaded due to unsafe
# usage in fs/proc/inode.c:204 That is procfs calling __MOD_INC_USE_COUNT. Is that our problem (i.e. shouldn't RR fix that before he lets this stuff loose on us)?
Are all the MODULE_* macros now dead? I can no longer get any load time options/parameters through to the scsi_debug. Nothing useful comes out of modinfo.
Where is the ..... documentation?
$ ls -l modules.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 1046 101 9441 Feb 17 2001 modules.txt
Doug Gilbert
Quoted 8 lines · Douglas Gilbert
Hopefully others are having more success with the new module loader than I am. My system is basically RH8.0 with the new module-init-tools (version 0.7) loaded and the recent 2.5.49 kernel.
During system load there is noise (failure?) on calls to modprobe since the new command doesn't support the same switches as the old. [harmless?]
It doesn't yet. It's intended to.
Quoted 11 lines
My lsmod looks like this:
# lsmod Module Size Used by scsi_debug 29423 0 [unsafe] ohci1394 21561 0 ieee1394 41773 1 ohci1394 [unsafe] parport_pc 18883 0 [unsafe] parport 30228 1 parport_pc [unsafe] ehci_hcd 32801 0 usbcore 90237 3 ehci_hcd
Quoted 8 lines
Those "unsafe" dependencies wedge in a module, making it hard to remove them. In the case of
scsi_debugabout 30 seconds after it is loaded I get this on my console:
# Modulescsi_debugcannot be unloaded due to unsafe# usage in fs/proc/inode.c:204 That is procfs calling __MOD_INC_USE_COUNT. Is that our problem (i.e. shouldn't RR fix that before he lets this stuff loose on us)?
I posted a patch for this almost a week back. It didn't get picked up, so I put this particular fix into my tree that I uploaded and announced today.
Quoted 3 lines
Are all the MODULE_* macros now dead? I can no longer get any load time options/parameters through to the
scsi_debug. Nothing useful comes out of modinfo.
Yes, it's very much a work in process, not a completed change over. Rusty has publically stated that he thinks he bit off more than he can chew and I know he's taken a lot of flak over this change. However, there *are* positive parts to Rusty's work and it does in fact solve the races he says it solves (at least once you convert things like fs/proc/inode.c to know about the fact that getting a module *can* fail) and as soon as you get the remaining parts of the kernel to properly grab module references when calling into a module. Myself and Cristoph already did that basic job for the SCSI layer.
Quoted 3 lines
Where is the ..... documentation?
$ ls -l modules.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 1046 101 9441 Feb 17 2001 modules.txt
Yes, that's another thing that isn't complete.
Signature · 4 lines
Doug Ledford <[email protected]> 919-754-3700 x44233 Red Hat, Inc. 1801 Varsity Dr. Raleigh, NC 27606
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Doug Ledford wrote:
| I posted a patch for this almost a week back. It didn't get picked up, so | I put this particular fix into my tree that I uploaded and announced | today.
announced where?
Signature · 1 line
~Randy
Quoted 39 lines · Doug Ledford
Quoted 8 lines · Douglas Gilbert
Hopefully others are having more success with the new module loader than I am. My system is basically RH8.0 with the new module-init-tools (version 0.7) loaded and the recent 2.5.49 kernel.
During system load there is noise (failure?) on calls to modprobe since the new command doesn't support the same switches as the old. [harmless?]
It doesn't yet. It's intended to.
Quoted 11 lines
My lsmod looks like this:
# lsmod Module Size Used by scsi_debug 29423 0 [unsafe] ohci1394 21561 0 ieee1394 41773 1 ohci1394 [unsafe] parport_pc 18883 0 [unsafe] parport 30228 1 parport_pc [unsafe] ehci_hcd 32801 0 usbcore 90237 3 ehci_hcdQuoted 8 lines
Those "unsafe" dependencies wedge in a module, making it hard to remove them. In the case of
scsi_debugabout 30 seconds after it is loaded I get this on my console:
# Modulescsi_debugcannot be unloaded due to unsafe# usage in fs/proc/inode.c:204 That is procfs calling __MOD_INC_USE_COUNT. Is that our problem (i.e. shouldn't RR fix that before he lets this stuff loose on us)?I posted a patch for this almost a week back. It didn't get picked up, so I put this particular fix into my tree that I uploaded and announced today.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Are all the MODULE_* macros now dead? I can no longer get any load time options/parameters through to the
scsi_debug. Nothing useful comes out of modinfo.Yes, it's very much a work in process, not a completed change over. Rusty has publically stated that he thinks he bit off more than he can chew and I know he's taken a lot of flak over this change. However, there *are* positive parts to Rusty's work and it does in fact solve the races he says it solves (at least once you convert things like
fs/proc/inode.cto know about the fact that getting a module *can* fail) and as soon as you get the remaining parts of the kernel to properly grab module references when calling into a module. Myself and Cristoph already did that basic job for the SCSI layer.
BTW I meant (but didn't spell out) MODULE_PARM, MODULE_LICENSE et cetera.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Where is the ..... documentation?
$ ls -l modules.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 1046 101 9441 Feb 17 2001 modules.txtYes, that's another thing that isn't complete.
Doug,
Thanks for the reply. Seems as though developers who relied on the flexibility of modules may need to find alternate techniques for the next little while.
Doug Gilbert