Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...

DISCUSSION Gregory Gulik 4 participants 8 messages Dec 7, 2002 – Dec 9, 2002 6 messages not in the archive ACPI

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I recently got a Toshiba Satellite 1115-S103 laptop which only has ACPI power management. Obviously the drivers in RH 8.0 (kernel version 2.4.18-18.8) don't do anything useful.

I was hoping to try out a newer development driver but I'm not sure if it's best to just try the acpi-20020918 for which 2.4.18 patches are available, or should I not bother with those and go with the latest drivers for 2.4.20, which obviously means upgrading to that kernel???

Signature · 10 lines
Greg Gulik                                 http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org                           http://www.drivingevents.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#2 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Gregory Gulik

I was hoping to try out a newer development driver but I'm not sure if it's best to just try the acpi-20020918 for which 2.4.18 patches are available, or should I not bother with those and go with the latest drivers for 2.4.20, which obviously means upgrading to that kernel???

I'd say upgrade to that kernel. :)

Signature · 8 lines
| Age is a very high price to pay for maturity.
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8  9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
#3 lore raw
In reply to a message not in the archive
Quoted 7 lines · Gregory Gulik

I recently got a Toshiba Satellite 1115-S103 laptop which only has ACPI power management. Obviously the drivers in RH 8.0 (kernel version 2.4.18-18.8) don't do anything useful.

I was hoping to try out a newer development driver but I'm not sure if it's best to just try the acpi-20020918 for which 2.4.18 patches are

This one have know bug. Try a more recent one.

Signature · 10 lines
Ducrot Bruno

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20021209105144.GB26375-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/[email protected]

#5 lore raw

I ended up upgrading my kernel to 2.4.20 and applied the acpi-20021205-2.4.20.diff.

I turned off APM and chose the following ACPI related kernel config options:

# CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI is not set
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_ACPI_BUSMGR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_SYS=m
CONFIG_ACPI_CPU=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_CMBATT=m
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m

For some reason no modules were installed in /lib/modules/2.4.20:

[root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]# find /lib/modules/2.4.20 -name '*acpi*' -print [root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]#

Just to make sure I started over and did it again. Same thing. I'm sure I'm missing just one simple step.

Quoted 2 lines · Ducrot Bruno

This one have know bug. Try a more recent one.

Signature · 10 lines
Greg Gulik                                 http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org                           http://www.drivingevents.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#7 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Gregory Gulik

For some reason no modules were installed in /lib/modules/2.4.20:

did you run `make modules_install'?

Signature · 9 lines
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20021209140714.H20336-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/[email protected]

#9 lore raw

Of course.
I just ran it again just now for about the tenth time and still no go. Here's the relavant part of the output from "make modules_install":

make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/drivers'^M make -C acpi modules_install^M
make[2]: Entering directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.20/drivers/acpi'^M make[2]: Nothing to be done for modules_install'.^M make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/drivers/acpi'^M make -C atm modules_install^M

Yet that directory does seem to contain the files:

[root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]# ls drivers/acpi/

Config.in       battery.c    executer   ospm         resources
Makefile        blacklist.c  fan.c      parser       system.c
ac.c            bus.c        hardware   pci_bind.c   tables
acpi.o          button.c     include    pci_irq.c    tables.c
acpi_bus.h      dispatcher   namespace  pci_link.c   thermal.c
acpi_drivers.h  driver.o     numa.c     pci_root.c   toshiba_acpi.c
acpi_ksyms.c    ec.c         os.o       power.c      utilities
acpi_ksyms.o    events       osl.c      processor.c  utils.c

[root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]#

Maybe I'll just wipe out that directory and start all over with a fresh copy of the kernel sources and acpi patch...

Quoted 2 lines · Matthew Wilcox

did you run `make modules_install'?

Signature · 10 lines
Greg Gulik                                 http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org                           http://www.drivingevents.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#11 lore raw

I did that my starting with a clean 2.4.20 kernel, applied the acpi-20021205-2.4.20.diff patches, reconfigured my kernel, did the correct kernel build procedure. Everything worked without apparent error and I do have files in the acpi driver directory:

[root@toshiba1115 pcmcia-cs-3.2.3]# ls /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/ ac.o battery.o button.o fan.o processor.o thermal.o toshiba_acpi.o

While updating my PCMCIA driver I saw the following errors:

make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.2.3/etc/cis'
-> Updating client scripts in /etc/pcmcia
-> Running depmod...
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/ac.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/button.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/fan.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/processor.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/thermal.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.o make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.2.3/etc' [root@toshiba1115 pcmcia-cs-3.2.3]#

Is this anything to worry about??

Quoted 1 line · Gregory Gulik

Maybe I'll just wipe out that directory and start all over with a fresh copy of the kernel sources and acpi patch...

Signature · 10 lines
Greg Gulik                                 http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org                           http://www.drivingevents.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#13 lore raw

Still no joy...

Even tough everything "seemed" to compile and install I can't load my ACPI modules. Any time I try I get stuff like this:

[root@toshiba1115 root]# insmod battery 2>&1 | more /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_get_handle_R2bfeb410 /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_ut_exit_R4403d3ee /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_os_free_R43b9bbb4 /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_extract_package_R06f4a82a /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_ut_trace_R8d457864 /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_remove_notify_handler_R2bb55d6e /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_ut_value_exit_Rdcbde352 /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_evaluate_object_R39f1a5dc /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_bus_get_status_Redecd2bd /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_ut_debug_print_Rac38b5ca /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol acpi_bus_generate_event_R03047640 ...and so on...

I even logged the output of "make modules" and checked the acpi stuff and there is no sign of any kinds of errors...

Signature · 10 lines
Greg Gulik                                 http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org                           http://www.drivingevents.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf