Skip to contentSkip to conversation

100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs

OOPS David Ford 3 participants 5 messages Apr 7, 2003 – Apr 8, 2003

lore
Share & tools
lore

David Ford

author
#0 lore raw

1. Power loss this morning
2. Fixed filesystems (reiserfstools is fscking useless on root filesystems)
3. Now server OOPSes when nfs client tries to stat/read files/dirs

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<00000000>]    Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010202

EIP is at 0x0
eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000006 ecx: c03efb28 edx: c827be94
esi: c83ad014 edi: dfd16e00 ebp: c827beac esp: c827be70
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process nfsd (pid: 1188, threadinfo=c827a000 task=df3c2740)

Stack: c01ce6b8 dfd16e00 c827bea0 c827be94 c01ad070 dfff04f4 00000006 c83ad004
      11270000 00000e07 000008dd 0000004d 0002f4f2 00000e07 01214b98 
c827bef4
      c01ad4c7 dfd16e00 c83ad014 00000006 00000006 c01ad070 dfff04f4 
c83ad004
Call Trace:
[<c01ce6b8>] reiserfs_decode_fh+0xb4/0xc0
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ad4c7>] fh_verify+0x343/0x4f8
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ae694>] nfsd_access+0x28/0xf4
[<c01b4ec9>] nfsd3_proc_access+0xc1/0xd0
[<c01ab4a3>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc3/0x18f
[<c033b5cd>] svc_process+0x3ed/0x67a
[<c01ab200>] nfsd+0x23c/0x41c
[<c01aafc4>] nfsd+0x0/0x41c
[<c0107145>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc


Code:  Bad EIP value.

<1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 00000000

Oops: 0000
CPU:    1
EIP:    0060:[<00000000>]    Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010202

EIP is at 0x0
eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000006 ecx: c03efb28 edx: c8269e94
esi: c83a0014 edi: dfd16e00 ebp: c8269eac esp: c8269e70
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process nfsd (pid: 1189, threadinfo=c8268000 task=df5ba720)

Stack: c01ce6b8 dfd16e00 c8269ea0 c8269e94 c01ad070 dfff04f4 00000006 c83a0004
      11270000 00000e07 000008dd 0000004d 0002f4f2 00000e07 01214b98 
c8269ef4
      c01ad4c7 dfd16e00 c83a0014 00000006 00000006 c01ad070 dfff04f4 
c83a0004
Call Trace:
[<c01ce6b8>] reiserfs_decode_fh+0xb4/0xc0
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ad4c7>] fh_verify+0x343/0x4f8
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ae694>] nfsd_access+0x28/0xf4
[<c01b4ec9>] nfsd3_proc_access+0xc1/0xd0
[<c01ab4a3>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc3/0x18f
[<c033b5cd>] svc_process+0x3ed/0x67a
[<c01ab200>] nfsd+0x23c/0x41c
[<c01aafc4>] nfsd+0x0/0x41c
[<c0107145>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc

(repeats several times)

Server is now useless and needs to be rebooted. I've shutdown my NFS clients in order to run the server minimally, it's a mail/web server.

Assistance would be appreciated.

#1 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · On Tuesday April 8, [email protected] wrote:

1. Power loss this morning
2. Fixed filesystems (reiserfstools is fscking useless on root filesystems)
3. Now server OOPSes when nfs client tries to stat/read files/dirs

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
 printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<00000000>]    Not tainted

Development kernels are like that....

This is a bug in the kernel which is triggered by using nfs-utils 1.0.3

Either upgrade to the latest 2.5 kernel, or downgrade nfs-utils until you can upgrade the kernel.

NeilBrown

author
#2 lore raw

The latest 2.5 kernel being .67?

Yes, dev kernels are like that... but I'm not going to get into my angst over 'release' kernels and NFS ;)

david

Quoted 28 lines · Neil Brown
Quoted 4 lines · On Tuesday April 8, [email protected] wrote:

1. Power loss this morning
2. Fixed filesystems (reiserfstools is fscking useless on root filesystems)
3. Now server OOPSes when nfs client tries to stat/read files/dirs

Quoted 9 lines
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<00000000>]    Not tainted

Development kernels are like that....

This is a bug in the kernel which is triggered by using nfs-utils 1.0.3

Either upgrade to the latest 2.5 kernel, or downgrade nfs-utils until you can upgrade the kernel.

NeilBrown

#4 lore raw

Yes, it's fixed.

Thank you,
david

Quoted 11 lines · Neil Brown
Quoted 3 lines · On Tuesday April 8, [email protected] wrote:

The latest 2.5 kernel being .67?

Yep, .67 is recent enough.

NeilBrown