HD DMA disabled in 2.4.21-rc2, works fine in 2.4.20
Please read the entire thread.
I am the person who started the thread and yes, I have # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
Then again, I also do not have a VIA chipset, Jeffrey had the same problem and he has the VIA chipset, that's where the confusion comes from.
From the same post:
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801BA PCI (rev 03) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801BAM ISA Bridge (ICH2) (rev 03) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801BAM IDE U100 (rev 03)
It seems to me that I'm missing something very obvious.
Anyway, as there seems to be no solution at hand for me, so I'm back to 2.4.20 for the time being until I have time have a look at the source myself.
-- Lars
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The person who posted their DMESG had it unset.
Here's an archive of the post:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0305.2/0440.html
And the line:
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
From: Lars ([email protected])
Date: Sun May 18 2003 - 22:03:16 EST
--eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey W. Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 5:01 PM
To: Tomas Szepe; [email protected]
Subject: Re: HD DMA disabled in 2.4.21-rc2, works fine in 2.4.20
Quoted 5 lines · Tomas Szepe
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines · Jeffrey W. Baker
I was using Via IDE chipset and, yes, I had configured the kernel for VIA support. That's why it worked in 2.4.20. But it stopped working
in
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
2.4.21-rc.
VIA IDE should be working reliably, my main test box is an EPIA series VIA system so the VIA IDE does get a fair beating
This person is running with
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXXunset.
No, this person is not.
-jwb