powerpc/mm/slice: improve slice speed and stack use
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerv2 cover powerpc/mm/slice: improve slice speed and stack use
Overall on POWER8, this series increases vfork+exec+exit microbenchmark rate by 15.6%, and mmap+munmap rate by 81%. Slice code/data size is reduced by 1kB, and max stack overhead through slice_get_unmapped_area call goes rom 992 to 448 bytes. The cost is 288 bytes added to the mm_context_t per mm for the slice masks on Book3S.
Since v1:
- Fixed a couple of bugs and compile errors on 8xx.
- Accounted for all Christophe's review feedback hopefully.
- Got rid of unrelated "cleanup" hunks, and split one to its own patch.
- Dropped patch to dynamically limit bitmap operations. This may be revisited after Aneesh's 4TB patches.
Thanks,
Nick
Nicholas Piggin (10):
powerpc/mm/slice: Simplify and optimise slice context initialisation powerpc/mm/slice: tidy lpsizes and hpsizes update loops powerpc/mm/slice: pass pointers to struct slice_mask where possible powerpc/mm/slice: implement a slice mask cache powerpc/mm/slice: implement slice_check_range_fits powerpc/mm/slice: Switch to 3-operand slice bitops helpers powerpc/mm/slice: remove dead code
powerpc/mm/slice: Use const pointers to cached slice masks where
possible
powerpc/mm/slice: remove radix calls to the slice code powerpc/mm/slice: use the dynamic high slice size to limit bitmap
operations
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h | 18 ++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 7 +- arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-8xx.h | 10 + arch/powerpc/include/asm/slice.h | 8 +- arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 6 +- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c | 9 +- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c | 5 +- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 461 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 8 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 247 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 1/10 powerpc/mm/slice: Simplify and optimise slice context initialisation
The slice state of an mm gets zeroed then initialised upon exec. This is the only caller of slice_set_user_psize now, so that can be removed and instead implement a faster and simplified approach that requires no locking or checking existing state.
This speeds up vfork+exec+exit performance on POWER8 by 3%.
--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/slice.h | 8 ++-- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c | 9 +---- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c | 5 +-- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 72 +++++++++------------------------- 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/slice.h +3 -5
@@ -28,15 +28,13 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,unsigned int get_slice_psize (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr); -void slice_set_user_psize (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned int psize);void slice_set_range_psize (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long start,unsigned long len,unsigned int psize); -#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ -#else /* CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES */ +void slice_init_new_context_exec (struct mm_struct *mm); + +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ -#define slice_set_range_psize (mm, start, len, psize) \ - slice_set_user_psize((mm), (psize))#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES */ #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_SLICE_H */
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c +1 -8
@@ -93,13 +93,6 @@ static int hash__init_new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)if (index <0 )return index; -/* -* In the case of exec, use the default limit, -* otherwise inherit it from the mm we are duplicating. -*/ -if (!mm->context.slb_addr_limit) - mm->context.slb_addr_limit =DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW_USER64 ; -/* * The old code would re-promote on fork, we don't do that when using * slices as it could cause problem promoting slices that have been
@@ -115,7 +108,7 @@ static int hash__init_new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)* check against 0 is OK. */ if (mm->context.id ==0 ) -slice_set_user_psize (mm, mmu_virtual_psize); +slice_init_new_context_exec (mm);subpage_prot_init_new_context (mm);
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c +1 -4
@@ -332,9 +332,6 @@ int init_new_context(struct task_struct *t, struct mm_struct *mm)pr_hard ("initing context for mm @%p\n" , mm);#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES -if (!mm->context.slb_addr_limit) - mm->context.slb_addr_limit =DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW ; -/* * We have MMU_NO_CONTEXT set to be ~0. Hence check * explicitly against context.id == 0. This ensures that we properly
@@ -343,7 +340,7 @@ int init_new_context(struct task_struct *t, struct mm_struct *mm)* will have id != 0). */ if (mm->context.id ==0 ) -slice_set_user_psize (mm, mmu_virtual_psize); +slice_init_new_context_exec (mm);#endif mm->context.id =MMU_NO_CONTEXT ; mm->context.active =0 ;
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +18 -54
88 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Re: [v2, 01/10] powerpc/mm/slice: Simplify and optimise slice context initialisation
Quoted 8 lines · Nicholas Piggin
The slice state of an mm gets zeroed then initialised upon exec. This is the only caller of
slice_set_user_psizenow, so that can be removed and instead implement a faster and simplified approach that requires no locking or checking existing state.This speeds up vfork+exec+exit performance on POWER8 by 3%.
Signed-off-by Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Patches 1-9 applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1753dd1830367709144f68f539554d
cheers
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 2/10 powerpc/mm/slice: tidy lpsizes and hpsizes update loops
In reply to Nicholas PigginMake these loops look the same, and change their form so the important part is not wrapped over so many lines.
--- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +12 -10
@@ -232,22 +232,24 @@ static void slice_convert(struct mm_struct *mm, struct slice_mask mask, int psizspin_lock_irqsave (&slice_convert_lock, flags); lpsizes = mm->context.low_slices_psize; -for (i =0 ; i <SLICE_NUM_LOW ; i++) -if (mask.low_slices & (1u << i)) { - mask_index = i &0x1 ; - index = i >>1 ; - lpsizes[index] = (lpsizes[index] & - ~(0xf << (mask_index *4 ))) | +for (i =0 ; i <SLICE_NUM_LOW ; i++) { +if (!(mask.low_slices & (1u << i))) +continue ; + + mask_index = i &0x1 ; + index = i >>1 ; + lpsizes[index] = (lpsizes[index] & ~(0xf << (mask_index *4 ))) | (((unsigned long )psize) << (mask_index *4 )); - } + } hpsizes = mm->context.high_slices_psize;for (i =0 ; i <GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit); i++) { +if (!test_bit (i, mask.high_slices)) +continue ; + mask_index = i &0x1 ; index = i >>1 ; -if (test_bit (i, mask.high_slices)) - hpsizes[index] = (hpsizes[index] & - ~(0xf << (mask_index *4 ))) | + hpsizes[index] = (hpsizes[index] & ~(0xf << (mask_index *4 ))) | (((unsigned long )psize) << (mask_index *4 )); }
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 3/10 powerpc/mm/slice: pass pointers to struct slice_mask where possible
In reply to Nicholas PigginPass around const pointers to struct slice_mask where possible, rather than copies of slice_mask, to reduce stack and call overhead.
checkstack.pl gives, before:0x00000d1c slice_get_unmapped_area [slice.o]: 5920x00001864 is_hugepage_only_range [slice.o]: 4480x00000754 slice_find_area_topdown [slice.o]: 4000x00000484 slice_find_area_bottomup.isra.1 [slice.o]: 2720x000017b4 slice_set_range_psize [slice.o]: 2240x00000a4c slice_find_area [slice.o]: 1280x00000160 slice_check_fit [slice.o]: 112
after:0x00000ad0 slice_get_unmapped_area [slice.o]: 4480x00001464 is_hugepage_only_range [slice.o]: 2880x000006c0 slice_find_area [slice.o]: 1440x0000016c slice_check_fit [slice.o]: 1280x00000528 slice_find_area_bottomup.isra.2 [slice.o]: 1280x000013e4 slice_set_range_psize [slice.o]: 128
This increases vfork+exec+exit performance by 1.5%.
Reduces time to mmap+munmap a 64kB page by 17%.
--- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +45 -39
@@ -50,19 +50,21 @@ struct slice_mask {#ifdef DEBUG int _slice_debug =1 ; -static void slice_print_mask (const char *label,struct slice_mask mask) +static void slice_print_mask (const char *label,const struct slice_mask *mask) {if (!_slice_debug)return ; -pr_devel ("%s low_slice: %*pbl\n" , label, (int )SLICE_NUM_LOW , &mask.low_slices); -pr_devel ("%s high_slice: %*pbl\n" , label, (int )SLICE_NUM_HIGH , mask.high_slices); +pr_devel ("%s low_slice: %*pbl\n" , label, + (int )SLICE_NUM_LOW , &mask->low_slices); +pr_devel ("%s high_slice: %*pbl\n" , label, + (int )SLICE_NUM_HIGH , mask->high_slices); } #define slice_dbg(fmt...) do { if (_slice_debug) pr_devel(fmt); } while (0)#else -static void slice_print_mask (const char *label,struct slice_mask mask) {} +static void slice_print_mask (const char *label,const struct slice_mask *mask) {} #define slice_dbg(fmt...)#endif
@@ -179,7 +181,8 @@ static void slice_mask_for_size(struct mm_struct *mm, int psize, struct slice_ma }static int slice_check_fit (struct mm_struct *mm, -struct slice_mask mask,struct slice_mask available) +const struct slice_mask *mask, +const struct slice_mask *available) {DECLARE_BITMAP (result,SLICE_NUM_HIGH );/*
@@ -189,14 +192,14 @@ static int slice_check_fit(struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long slice_count =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit);if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH ) -return (mask.low_slices & available.low_slices) == - mask.low_slices; +return (mask->low_slices & available->low_slices) == + mask->low_slices; -bitmap_and (result, mask.high_slices, - available.high_slices, slice_count); +bitmap_and (result, mask->high_slices, + available->high_slices, slice_count); -return (mask.low_slices & available.low_slices) == mask.low_slices && -bitmap_equal (result, mask.high_slices, slice_count); +return (mask->low_slices & available->low_slices) == mask->low_slices && +bitmap_equal (result, mask->high_slices, slice_count); }static void slice_flush_segments (void *parm)
@@ -216,7 +219,8 @@ static void slice_flush_segments(void *parm)#endif } -static void slice_convert (struct mm_struct *mm,struct slice_mask mask,int psize) +static void slice_convert (struct mm_struct *mm, +const struct slice_mask *mask,int psize) {int index, mask_index;/* Write the new slice psize bits */
@@ -233,7 +237,7 @@ static void slice_convert(struct mm_struct *mm, struct slice_mask mask, int psiz lpsizes = mm->context.low_slices_psize;for (i =0 ; i <SLICE_NUM_LOW ; i++) { -if (!(mask.low_slices & (1u << i))) +if (!(mask->low_slices & (1u << i)))continue ; mask_index = i &0x1 ;
@@ -244,7 +248,7 @@ static void slice_convert(struct mm_struct *mm, struct slice_mask mask, int psiz hpsizes = mm->context.high_slices_psize;for (i =0 ; i <GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit); i++) { -if (!test_bit (i, mask.high_slices)) +if (!test_bit (i, mask->high_slices))continue ; mask_index = i &0x1 ;
@@ -270,26 +274,25 @@ static void slice_convert(struct mm_struct *mm, struct slice_mask mask, int psiz* 'available' slice_mark. */ static bool slice_scan_available (unsigned long addr, -struct slice_mask available, -int end, -unsigned long *boundary_addr) +const struct slice_mask *available, +int end,unsigned long *boundary_addr) {unsigned long slice;if (addr <SLICE_LOW_TOP ) { slice =GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX (addr); *boundary_addr = (slice + end) <<SLICE_LOW_SHIFT ; -return !!(available.low_slices & (1u << slice)); +return !!(available->low_slices & (1u << slice)); }else { slice =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (addr); *boundary_addr = (slice + end) ? ((slice + end) <<SLICE_HIGH_SHIFT ) :SLICE_LOW_TOP ; -return !!test_bit (slice, available.high_slices); +return !!test_bit (slice, available->high_slices); } }static unsigned long slice_find_area_bottomup (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long len, -struct slice_mask available, +const struct slice_mask *available,int psize,unsigned long high_limit) {int pshift =max_t (int, mmu_psize_defs[psize].shift,PAGE_SHIFT );
@@ -335,7 +338,7 @@ static unsigned long slice_find_area_bottomup(struct mm_struct *mm,static unsigned long slice_find_area_topdown (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long len, -struct slice_mask available, +const struct slice_mask *available,int psize,unsigned long high_limit) {int pshift =max_t (int, mmu_psize_defs[psize].shift,PAGE_SHIFT );
@@ -393,7 +396,7 @@ static unsigned long slice_find_area_topdown(struct mm_struct *mm,static unsigned long slice_find_area (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long len, -struct slice_mask mask,int psize, +const struct slice_mask *mask,int psize,int topdown,unsigned long high_limit) {if (topdown)
@@ -402,7 +405,8 @@ static unsigned long slice_find_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long len,return slice_find_area_bottomup (mm, len, mask, psize, high_limit); } -static inline void slice_or_mask (struct slice_mask *dst,struct slice_mask *src) +static inline void slice_or_mask (struct slice_mask *dst, +const struct slice_mask *src) { dst->low_slices |= src->low_slices;if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH )
@@ -411,7 +415,8 @@ static inline void slice_or_mask(struct slice_mask *dst, struct slice_mask *src) SLICE_NUM_HIGH); } -static inline void slice_andnot_mask (struct slice_mask *dst,struct slice_mask *src) +static inline void slice_andnot_mask (struct slice_mask *dst, +const struct slice_mask *src) { dst->low_slices &= ~src->low_slices;
@@ -501,7 +506,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,* already */ slice_mask_for_size (mm, psize, &good_mask, high_limit); -slice_print_mask (" good_mask" , good_mask); +slice_print_mask (" good_mask" , &good_mask);/* * Here "good" means slices that are already the right page size,
@@ -535,12 +540,12 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,if (addr !=0 || fixed) {/* Build a mask for the requested range */ slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &mask); -slice_print_mask (" mask" , mask); +slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask);/* Check if we fit in the good mask. If we do, we just return, * nothing else to do */ -if (slice_check_fit (mm, mask, good_mask)) { +if (slice_check_fit (mm, &mask, &good_mask)) {slice_dbg (" fits good !\n" );return addr; }
@@ -548,7 +553,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,/* Now let's see if we can find something in the existing * slices for that size */ - newaddr =slice_find_area (mm, len, good_mask, + newaddr =slice_find_area (mm, len, &good_mask, psize, topdown, high_limit);if (newaddr != -ENOMEM ) {/* Found within the good mask, we don't have to setup,
@@ -564,9 +569,10 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,*/ slice_mask_for_free (mm, &potential_mask, high_limit);slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &good_mask); -slice_print_mask (" potential" , potential_mask); +slice_print_mask (" potential" , &potential_mask); -if ((addr !=0 || fixed) &&slice_check_fit (mm, mask, potential_mask)) { +if ((addr !=0 || fixed) && +slice_check_fit (mm, &mask, &potential_mask)) {slice_dbg (" fits potential !\n" ); goto convert; }
@@ -581,7 +587,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,* anywhere in the good area. */ if (addr) { - addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, good_mask, + addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, &good_mask, psize, topdown, high_limit);if (addr != -ENOMEM ) {slice_dbg (" found area at 0x%lx\n" , addr);
@@ -592,14 +598,14 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,/* Now let's see if we can find something in the existing slices * for that size plus free slices */ - addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, potential_mask, + addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, &potential_mask, psize, topdown, high_limit);#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES if (addr == -ENOMEM && psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) {/* retry the search with 4k-page slices included */ slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &compat_mask); - addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, potential_mask, + addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, &potential_mask, psize, topdown, high_limit); }#endif
@@ -609,7 +615,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &mask);slice_dbg (" found potential area at 0x%lx\n" , addr); -slice_print_mask (" mask" , mask); +slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask); convert:slice_andnot_mask (&mask, &good_mask);
@@ -617,7 +623,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,if (mask.low_slices || (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && !bitmap_empty (mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ))) { -slice_convert (mm, mask, psize); +slice_convert (mm, &mask, psize);if (psize >MMU_PAGE_BASE )on_each_cpu (slice_flush_segments, mm,1 ); }
@@ -711,7 +717,7 @@ void slice_set_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,VM_BUG_ON (radix_enabled ());slice_range_to_mask (start, len, &mask); -slice_convert (mm, mask, psize); +slice_convert (mm, &mask, psize); }#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
@@ -758,9 +764,9 @@ int is_hugepage_only_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,#if 0 /* too verbose */ slice_dbg ("is_hugepage_only_range(mm=%p, addr=%lx, len=%lx)\n" , mm, addr, len); -slice_print_mask (" mask" , mask); -slice_print_mask (" available" , available); +slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask); +slice_print_mask (" available" , &available);#endif - return !slice_check_fit(mm, mask, available); + return !slice_check_fit(mm, &mask, &available); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 4/10 powerpc/mm/slice: implement a slice mask cache
In reply to Nicholas PigginCalculating the slice mask can become a signifcant overhead for get_unmapped_area. This patch adds a struct slice_mask for each page size in the mm_context, and keeps these in synch with the slices psize arrays and slb_addr_limit.
On Book3S/64 this adds 288 bytes to the mm_context_t for the slice mask caches.
On POWER8, this increases vfork+exec+exit performance by 9.9% and reduces time to mmap+munmap a 64kB page by 28%.
Reduces time to mmap+munmap by about 10% on 8xx.
--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h | 18 +++++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-8xx.h | 10 +++ arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h +18 -0
@@ -80,6 +80,16 @@ struct spinlock;/* Maximum possible number of NPUs in a system. */ #define NV_MAX_NPUS 8 +/* +* One bit per slice. We have lower slices which cover 256MB segments +* upto 4G range. That gets us 16 low slices. For the rest we track slices +* in 1TB size. +*/ +struct slice_mask { +u64 low_slices; + DECLARE_BITMAP(high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH); +}; + typedef struct { mm_context_id_t id; u16 user_psize; /* page size index */
@@ -95,6 +105,14 @@ typedef struct {unsigned char low_slices_psize[BITS_PER_LONG /BITS_PER_BYTE ];unsigned char high_slices_psize[SLICE_ARRAY_SIZE ];unsigned long slb_addr_limit; +# ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES +struct slice_mask mask_64k; +# endif +struct slice_mask mask_4k; +# ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE +struct slice_mask mask_16m; +struct slice_mask mask_16g; +# endif #else u16 sllp;/* SLB page size encoding */ #endif
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-8xx.h +10 -0
@@ -192,6 +192,11 @@#endif #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ +struct slice_mask { + u64 low_slices; + DECLARE_BITMAP(high_slices, 0); +}; + typedef struct { unsigned int id; unsigned int active;
@@ -201,6 +206,11 @@ typedef struct {unsigned char low_slices_psize[SLICE_ARRAY_SIZE ];unsigned char high_slices_psize[0 ];unsigned long slb_addr_limit; +struct slice_mask mask_base_psize;/* 4k or 16k */ +# ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE +struct slice_mask mask_512k; +struct slice_mask mask_8m; +# endif #endif } mm_context_t;
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +70 -42
195 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 5/10 powerpc/mm/slice: implement slice_check_range_fits
In reply to Nicholas PigginRather than build slice masks from a range then use that to check for fit in a candidate mask, implement slice_check_range_fits that checks if a range fits in a mask directly.
This allows several structures to be removed from stacks, and also we don't expect a huge range in a lot of these cases, so building and comparing a full mask is going to be more expensive than testing just one or two bits of the range.
On POWER8, this increases vfork+exec+exit performance by 0.3% and reduces time to mmap+munmap a 64kB page by 5%.
--- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +34 -28
@@ -174,26 +174,36 @@ static struct slice_mask *slice_mask_for_size(struct mm_struct *mm, int psize)#error "Must define the slice masks for page sizes supported by the platform"#endif -static int slice_check_fit (struct mm_struct *mm, -const struct slice_mask *mask, -const struct slice_mask *available) +static bool slice_check_range_fits (struct mm_struct *mm, +const struct slice_mask *available, +unsigned long start,unsigned long len) { -DECLARE_BITMAP (result,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); -/* -* Make sure we just do bit compare only to the max -* addr limit and not the full bit map size. -*/ -unsigned long slice_count =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit); +unsigned long end = start + len -1 ; +u64 low_slices =0 ; -if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH ) -return (mask->low_slices & available->low_slices) == - mask->low_slices; +if (start <SLICE_LOW_TOP ) { +unsigned long mend =min (end, + (unsigned long )(SLICE_LOW_TOP -1 )); -bitmap_and (result, mask->high_slices, - available->high_slices, slice_count); + low_slices = (1u << (GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX (mend) +1 )) + - (1u <<GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX (start)); + } +if ((low_slices & available->low_slices) != low_slices) +return false; -return (mask->low_slices & available->low_slices) == mask->low_slices && -bitmap_equal (result, mask->high_slices, slice_count); +if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && ((start + len) >SLICE_LOW_TOP )) { +unsigned long start_index =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (start); +unsigned long align_end =ALIGN (end, (1UL <<SLICE_HIGH_SHIFT )); +unsigned long count =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (align_end) - start_index; +unsigned long i; + +for (i = start_index; i < start_index + count; i++) { +if (!test_bit (i, available->high_slices)) +return false; + } + } + +return true; }static void slice_flush_segments (void *parm)
@@ -558,14 +568,10 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,/* First check hint if it's valid or if we have MAP_FIXED */ if (addr !=0 || fixed) { -/* Build a mask for the requested range */ -slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &mask); -slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask); -/* Check if we fit in the good mask. If we do, we just return, * nothing else to do */ -if (slice_check_fit (mm, &mask, &good_mask)) { +if (slice_check_range_fits (mm, &good_mask, addr, len)) {slice_dbg (" fits good !\n" );return addr; }
@@ -591,10 +597,11 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &good_mask);slice_print_mask (" potential" , &potential_mask); -if ((addr !=0 || fixed) && -slice_check_fit (mm, &mask, &potential_mask)) { -slice_dbg (" fits potential !\n" ); - goto convert; +if (addr !=0 || fixed) { +if (slice_check_range_fits (mm, &potential_mask, addr, len)) { +slice_dbg (" fits potential !\n" ); + goto convert; + } }/* If we have MAP_FIXED and failed the above steps, then error out */
@@ -772,13 +779,12 @@ void slice_set_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,int is_hugepage_only_range (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr,unsigned long len) { -struct slice_mask mask, available; +struct slice_mask available;unsigned int psize = mm->context.user_psize;if (radix_enabled ())return 0 ; -slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &mask); available = *slice_mask_for_size (mm, psize);#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES /* We need to account for 4k slices too */
@@ -795,6 +801,6 @@ int is_hugepage_only_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask);slice_print_mask (" available" , &available);#endif - return !slice_check_fit(mm, &mask, &available); + return !slice_check_range_fits(mm, &available, addr, len); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 6/10 powerpc/mm/slice: Switch to 3-operand slice bitops helpers
In reply to Nicholas PigginThis converts the slice_mask bit operation helpers to be the usual 3-operand kind, which allows 2 inputs to set a different output without an extra copy, which is used in the next patch.
Adds slice_copy_mask, which will be used in the next patch.
--- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +23 -15
@@ -429,25 +429,33 @@ static unsigned long slice_find_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long len,return slice_find_area_bottomup (mm, len, mask, psize, high_limit); } -static inline void slice_or_mask (struct slice_mask *dst, +static inline void slice_copy_mask (struct slice_mask *dst,const struct slice_mask *src) { - dst->low_slices |= src->low_slices; + dst->low_slices = src->low_slices;if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH )return ; -bitmap_or (dst->high_slices, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, -SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); +bitmap_copy (dst->high_slices, src->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); } -static inline void slice_andnot_mask (struct slice_mask *dst, -const struct slice_mask *src) +static inline void slice_or_mask (struct slice_mask *dst, +const struct slice_mask *src1, +const struct slice_mask *src2) { - dst->low_slices &= ~src->low_slices; + dst->low_slices = src1->low_slices | src2->low_slices; +if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH ) +return ; +bitmap_or (dst->high_slices, src1->high_slices, src2->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); +} +static inline void slice_andnot_mask (struct slice_mask *dst, +const struct slice_mask *src1, +const struct slice_mask *src2) +{ + dst->low_slices = src1->low_slices & ~src2->low_slices;if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH )return ; -bitmap_andnot (dst->high_slices, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, -SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); +bitmap_andnot (dst->high_slices, src1->high_slices, src2->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); }#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
@@ -562,7 +570,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,if (psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) { compat_mask = *slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K );if (fixed) -slice_or_mask (&good_mask, &compat_mask); +slice_or_mask (&good_mask, &good_mask, &compat_mask); }#endif
@@ -594,7 +602,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,* empty and thus can be converted */ slice_mask_for_free (mm, &potential_mask, high_limit); -slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &good_mask); +slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &good_mask);slice_print_mask (" potential" , &potential_mask);if (addr !=0 || fixed) {
@@ -631,7 +639,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES if (addr == -ENOMEM && psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) {/* retry the search with 4k-page slices included */ -slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &compat_mask); +slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &compat_mask); addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, &potential_mask, psize, topdown, high_limit); }
@@ -645,8 +653,8 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask); convert: -slice_andnot_mask (&mask, &good_mask); -slice_andnot_mask (&mask, &compat_mask); +slice_andnot_mask (&mask, &mask, &good_mask); +slice_andnot_mask (&mask, &mask, &compat_mask);if (mask.low_slices || (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && !bitmap_empty (mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ))) {
@@ -791,7 +799,7 @@ int is_hugepage_only_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,if (psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) {struct slice_mask compat_mask; compat_mask = *slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K ); -slice_or_mask (&available, &compat_mask); +slice_or_mask (&available, &available, &compat_mask); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 7/10 powerpc/mm/slice: remove dead code
In reply to Nicholas PigginThis code is never compiled in, and it gets broken by the next patch, so remove it.
--- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +0 -6
@@ -803,12 +803,6 @@ int is_hugepage_only_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, }#endif -#if 0 /* too verbose */ -slice_dbg ("is_hugepage_only_range(mm=%p, addr=%lx, len=%lx)\n" , - mm, addr, len); -slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask); -slice_print_mask (" available" , &available); -#endif return !slice_check_range_fits (mm, &available, addr, len); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 8/10 powerpc/mm/slice: Use const pointers to cached slice masks where possible
In reply to Nicholas PigginThe slice_mask cache was a basic conversion which copied the slice mask into caller's structures, because that's how the original code worked. In most cases the pointer can be used directly instead, saving a copy and an on-stack structure.
On POWER8, this increases vfork+exec+exit performance by 0.3% and reduces time to mmap+munmap a 64kB page by 2%.
--- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +38 -41
@@ -468,10 +468,10 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, unsigned long flags, unsigned int psize, int topdown) { - struct slice_mask mask; struct slice_mask good_mask;struct slice_mask potential_mask; -struct slice_mask compat_mask; +const struct slice_mask *maskp; +const struct slice_mask *compat_maskp =NULL ;int fixed = (flags &MAP_FIXED );int pshift =max_t (int, mmu_psize_defs[psize].shift,PAGE_SHIFT );unsigned long page_size =1UL << pshift;
@@ -505,22 +505,6 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,on_each_cpu (slice_flush_segments, mm,1 ); } -/* -* init different masks -*/ - mask.low_slices =0 ; - -/* silence stupid warning */ ; - potential_mask.low_slices =0 ; - - compat_mask.low_slices =0 ; - -if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH ) { -bitmap_zero (mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); -bitmap_zero (potential_mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); -bitmap_zero (compat_mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); - } -/* Sanity checks */ BUG_ON (mm->task_size ==0 );BUG_ON (mm->context.slb_addr_limit ==0 );
@@ -543,8 +527,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,/* First make up a "good" mask of slices that have the right size * already */ - good_mask = *slice_mask_for_size (mm, psize); -slice_print_mask (" good_mask" , &good_mask); + maskp =slice_mask_for_size (mm, psize);/* * Here "good" means slices that are already the right page size,
@@ -565,14 +548,24 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,* search in good | compat | free, found => convert free. */ -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES -/* If we support combo pages, we can allow 64k pages in 4k slices */ -if (psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) { - compat_mask = *slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K ); +/* +* If we support combo pages, we can allow 64k pages in 4k slices +* The mask copies could be avoided in most cases here if we had +* a pointer to good mask for the next code to use. +*/ +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES ) && psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) { + compat_maskp =slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K );if (fixed) -slice_or_mask (&good_mask, &good_mask, &compat_mask); +slice_or_mask (&good_mask, maskp, compat_maskp); +else +slice_copy_mask (&good_mask, maskp); + }else { +slice_copy_mask (&good_mask, maskp); } -#endif + +slice_print_mask (" good_mask" , &good_mask); +if (compat_maskp) +slice_print_mask (" compat_mask" , compat_maskp);/* First check hint if it's valid or if we have MAP_FIXED */ if (addr !=0 || fixed) {
@@ -639,7 +632,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES if (addr == -ENOMEM && psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) {/* retry the search with 4k-page slices included */ -slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &compat_mask); +slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, compat_maskp); addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, &potential_mask, psize, topdown, high_limit); }
@@ -648,17 +641,18 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,if (addr == -ENOMEM )return -ENOMEM ; -slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &mask); +slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &potential_mask);slice_dbg (" found potential area at 0x%lx\n" , addr); -slice_print_mask (" mask" , &mask); +slice_print_mask (" mask" , &potential_mask); convert: -slice_andnot_mask (&mask, &mask, &good_mask); -slice_andnot_mask (&mask, &mask, &compat_mask); -if (mask.low_slices || - (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && - !bitmap_empty (mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ))) { -slice_convert (mm, &mask, psize); +slice_andnot_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &good_mask); +if (compat_maskp && !fixed) +slice_andnot_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, compat_maskp); +if (potential_mask.low_slices || + (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && + !bitmap_empty (potential_mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ))) { +slice_convert (mm, &potential_mask, psize);if (psize >MMU_PAGE_BASE )on_each_cpu (slice_flush_segments, mm,1 ); }
@@ -787,22 +781,25 @@ void slice_set_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,int is_hugepage_only_range (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr,unsigned long len) { -struct slice_mask available; +const struct slice_mask *maskp;unsigned int psize = mm->context.user_psize;if (radix_enabled ())return 0 ; - available = *slice_mask_for_size (mm, psize); + maskp =slice_mask_for_size (mm, psize);#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES /* We need to account for 4k slices too */ if (psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) { -struct slice_mask compat_mask; - compat_mask = *slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K ); -slice_or_mask (&available, &available, &compat_mask); +const struct slice_mask *compat_maskp; +struct slice_mask available; + + compat_maskp =slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K ); +slice_or_mask (&available, maskp, compat_maskp); +return !slice_check_range_fits (mm, &available, addr, len); }#endif -return !slice_check_range_fits (mm, &available, addr, len); +return !slice_check_range_fits (mm, maskp, addr, len); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 9/10 powerpc/mm/slice: remove radix calls to the slice code
In reply to Nicholas PigginThis is a tidy up which removes radix MMU calls into the slice code.
--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 7 ++++--- arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 6 ++++-- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 17 ++++------------- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h +4 -3
@@ -90,16 +90,17 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset_and_shift(struct mm_struct *mm,void flush_dcache_icache_hugepage (struct page *page);#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES ) -int is_hugepage_only_range (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr, +int slice_is_hugepage_only_range (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr,unsigned long len); -#else +#endif static inline int is_hugepage_only_range (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr,unsigned long len) { +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES ) && !radix_enabled ()) +return slice_is_hugepage_only_range (mm, addr, len);return 0 ; } -#endif void book3e_hugetlb_preload (struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long ea,pte_t pte);
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c +4 -2
@@ -565,10 +565,12 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,unsigned long vma_mmu_pagesize (struct vm_area_struct *vma) {#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES -unsigned int psize =get_slice_psize (vma->vm_mm, vma->vm_start);/* With radix we don't use slice, so derive it from vma*/ -if (!radix_enabled ()) +if (!radix_enabled ()) { +unsigned int psize =get_slice_psize (vma->vm_mm, vma->vm_start); +return 1UL <<mmu_psize_to_shift (psize); + }#endif if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page (vma))return PAGE_SIZE ;
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +4 -13
@@ -686,16 +686,8 @@ unsigned int get_slice_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)unsigned char *psizes;int index, mask_index; -/* -* Radix doesn't use slice, but can get enabled along with MMU_SLICE -*/ -if (radix_enabled ()) { -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES -return MMU_PAGE_64K ; -#else -return MMU_PAGE_4K ; -#endif - } +VM_BUG_ON (radix_enabled ()); +if (addr <SLICE_LOW_TOP ) { psizes = mm->context.low_slices_psize; index =GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX (addr);
@@ -778,14 +770,13 @@ void slice_set_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,* for now as we only use slices with hugetlbfs enabled. This should * be fixed as the generic code gets fixed. */ -int is_hugepage_only_range (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr, +int slice_is_hugepage_only_range (struct mm_struct *mm,unsigned long addr,unsigned long len) {const struct slice_mask *maskp;unsigned int psize = mm->context.user_psize; -if (radix_enabled ()) -return 0 ; +VM_BUG_ON (radix_enabled ()); maskp =slice_mask_for_size (mm, psize);#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH v2 10/10 powerpc/mm/slice: use the dynamic high slice size to limit bitmap operations
In reply to Nicholas PigginThe number of high slices a process might use now depends on its address space size, and what allocation address it has requested.
This patch uses that limit throughout call chains where possible, rather than use the fixed SLICE_NUM_HIGH for bitmap operations. This saves some cost for processes that don't use very large address spaces.
Perormance numbers aren't changed significantly, this may change with larger address spaces or different mmap access patterns that require more slice mask building.
--- arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +45 -30
@@ -61,14 +61,12 @@ static void slice_print_mask(const char *label, const struct slice_mask *mask) {#endif static void slice_range_to_mask (unsigned long start,unsigned long len, -struct slice_mask *ret) +struct slice_mask *ret, +unsigned long high_slices) {unsigned long end = start + len -1 ; ret->low_slices =0 ; -if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH ) -bitmap_zero (ret->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); -if (start <SLICE_LOW_TOP ) {unsigned long mend =min (end, (unsigned long )(SLICE_LOW_TOP -1 ));
@@ -77,6 +75,11 @@ static void slice_range_to_mask(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, - (1u <<GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX (start)); } +if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH ) +return ; + +#error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? +bitmap_zero (ret->high_slices, high_slices);if ((start + len) >SLICE_LOW_TOP ) {unsigned long start_index =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (start);unsigned long align_end =ALIGN (end, (1UL <<SLICE_HIGH_SHIFT ));
@@ -120,22 +123,20 @@ static int slice_high_has_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long slice) }static void slice_mask_for_free (struct mm_struct *mm,struct slice_mask *ret, -unsigned long high_limit) +unsigned long high_slices) {unsigned long i; ret->low_slices =0 ; -if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH ) -bitmap_zero (ret->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); -for (i =0 ; i <SLICE_NUM_LOW ; i++)if (!slice_low_has_vma (mm, i)) ret->low_slices |=1u << i; -if (high_limit <=SLICE_LOW_TOP ) +if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH || !high_slices)return ; -for (i =0 ; i <GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (high_limit); i++) +bitmap_zero (ret->high_slices, high_slices); +for (i =0 ; i < high_slices; i++)if (!slice_high_has_vma (mm, i))__set_bit (i, ret->high_slices); }
@@ -228,6 +229,7 @@ static void slice_convert(struct mm_struct *mm, {int index, mask_index;/* Write the new slice psize bits */ +unsigned long high_slices;unsigned char *hpsizes, *lpsizes;struct slice_mask *psize_mask, *old_mask;unsigned long i, flags;
@@ -263,7 +265,8 @@ static void slice_convert(struct mm_struct *mm, } hpsizes = mm->context.high_slices_psize; -for (i =0 ; i <GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit); i++) { + high_slices =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit); +for (i =0 ;SLICE_NUM_HIGH && i < high_slices; i++) {if (!test_bit (i, mask->high_slices))continue ;
@@ -430,32 +433,35 @@ static unsigned long slice_find_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long len, }static inline void slice_copy_mask (struct slice_mask *dst, -const struct slice_mask *src) +const struct slice_mask *src, +unsigned long high_slices) { dst->low_slices = src->low_slices;if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH )return ; -bitmap_copy (dst->high_slices, src->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); +bitmap_copy (dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, high_slices); }static inline void slice_or_mask (struct slice_mask *dst,const struct slice_mask *src1, -const struct slice_mask *src2) +const struct slice_mask *src2, +unsigned long high_slices) { dst->low_slices = src1->low_slices | src2->low_slices;if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH )return ; -bitmap_or (dst->high_slices, src1->high_slices, src2->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); +bitmap_or (dst->high_slices, src1->high_slices, src2->high_slices, high_slices); }static inline void slice_andnot_mask (struct slice_mask *dst,const struct slice_mask *src1, -const struct slice_mask *src2) +const struct slice_mask *src2, +unsigned long high_slices) { dst->low_slices = src1->low_slices & ~src2->low_slices;if (!SLICE_NUM_HIGH )return ; -bitmap_andnot (dst->high_slices, src1->high_slices, src2->high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ); +bitmap_andnot (dst->high_slices, src1->high_slices, src2->high_slices, high_slices); }#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
@@ -478,6 +484,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;unsigned long newaddr;unsigned long high_limit; +unsigned long high_slices; high_limit =DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW ;if (addr >= high_limit || (fixed && (addr + len > high_limit)))
@@ -494,6 +501,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,return -ENOMEM ; } + high_slices =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (high_limit);if (high_limit > mm->context.slb_addr_limit) {/* * Increasing the slb_addr_limit does not require
@@ -556,11 +564,11 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES ) && psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) { compat_maskp =slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K );if (fixed) -slice_or_mask (&good_mask, maskp, compat_maskp); +slice_or_mask (&good_mask, maskp, compat_maskp, high_slices);else -slice_copy_mask (&good_mask, maskp); +slice_copy_mask (&good_mask, maskp, high_slices); }else { -slice_copy_mask (&good_mask, maskp); +slice_copy_mask (&good_mask, maskp, high_slices); }slice_print_mask (" good_mask" , &good_mask);
@@ -594,8 +602,8 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,* We don't fit in the good mask, check what other slices are * empty and thus can be converted */ -slice_mask_for_free (mm, &potential_mask, high_limit); -slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &good_mask); +slice_mask_for_free (mm, &potential_mask, high_slices); +slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &good_mask, high_slices);slice_print_mask (" potential" , &potential_mask);if (addr !=0 || fixed) {
@@ -632,7 +640,7 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES if (addr == -ENOMEM && psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) {/* retry the search with 4k-page slices included */ -slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, compat_maskp); +slice_or_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, compat_maskp, high_slices); addr =slice_find_area (mm, len, &potential_mask, psize, topdown, high_limit); }
@@ -641,17 +649,18 @@ unsigned long slice_get_unmapped_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,if (addr == -ENOMEM )return -ENOMEM ; -slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &potential_mask); +slice_range_to_mask (addr, len, &potential_mask, high_slices);slice_dbg (" found potential area at 0x%lx\n" , addr);slice_print_mask (" mask" , &potential_mask); convert: -slice_andnot_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &good_mask); +slice_andnot_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, &good_mask, high_slices);if (compat_maskp && !fixed) -slice_andnot_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, compat_maskp); +slice_andnot_mask (&potential_mask, &potential_mask, compat_maskp, high_slices); +#error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?if (potential_mask.low_slices || (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && - !bitmap_empty (potential_mask.high_slices,SLICE_NUM_HIGH ))) { + !bitmap_empty (potential_mask.high_slices, high_slices))) {slice_convert (mm, &potential_mask, psize);if (psize >MMU_PAGE_BASE )on_each_cpu (slice_flush_segments, mm,1 );
@@ -722,7 +731,9 @@ void slice_init_new_context_exec(struct mm_struct *mm) mm->context.user_psize = psize;/* -* Set all slice psizes to the default. +* Set all slice psizes to the default. High slices could +* be initialised up to slb_addr_limit if we ensure to +* initialise the rest of them as slb_addr_limit is expanded. */ lpsizes = mm->context.low_slices_psize;memset (lpsizes, (psize <<4 ) | psize,SLICE_NUM_LOW >>1 );
@@ -743,10 +754,12 @@ void slice_set_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long len, unsigned int psize) {struct slice_mask mask; +unsigned long high_slices;VM_BUG_ON (radix_enabled ()); -slice_range_to_mask (start, len, &mask); + high_slices =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit); +slice_range_to_mask (start, len, &mask, high_slices);slice_convert (mm, &mask, psize); }
@@ -784,9 +797,11 @@ int slice_is_hugepage_only_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,if (psize ==MMU_PAGE_64K ) {const struct slice_mask *compat_maskp;struct slice_mask available; +unsigned long high_slices; compat_maskp =slice_mask_for_size (mm,MMU_PAGE_4K ); -slice_or_mask (&available, maskp, compat_maskp); + high_slices =GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX (mm->context.slb_addr_limit); +slice_or_mask (&available, maskp, compat_maskp, high_slices);return !slice_check_range_fits (mm, &available, addr, len); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.16.1
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerRe: [PATCH v2 10/10] powerpc/mm/slice: use the dynamic high slice size to limit bitmap operations
Quoted 11 lines · On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:37:18 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
The number of high slices a process might use now depends on its address space size, and what allocation address it has requested.
This patch uses that limit throughout call chains where possible, rather than use the fixed
SLICE_NUM_HIGHfor bitmap operations. This saves some cost for processes that don't use very large address spaces.Perormance numbers aren't changed significantly, this may change with larger address spaces or different mmap access patterns that require more slice mask building.
Ignore this patch in the series. I didn't intend to send it.
Thanks,
Nick
Michael Ellerman
reviewerRe: [PATCH v2 10/10] powerpc/mm/slice: use the dynamic high slice size to limit bitmap operations
Quoted 11 lines · Nicholas Piggin
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:37:18 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
The number of high slices a process might use now depends on its address space size, and what allocation address it has requested.
This patch uses that limit throughout call chains where possible, rather than use the fixed
SLICE_NUM_HIGHfor bitmap operations. This saves some cost for processes that don't use very large address spaces.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Perormance numbers aren't changed significantly, this may change with larger address spaces or different mmap access patterns that require more slice mask building.
Ignore this patch in the series. I didn't intend to send it.
Oops :D
I'll drop it and rebuild.
cheers
kisskb: Failed 206/268
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/82bc47f26969f6ed290cda529b9893941923c0f4/
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_le_defconfig+NO_NUMA/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296349/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_le_defconfig+NO_SPLPAR/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296347/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig+NO_SPLPAR/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296346/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig+NO_SPLPAR/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296345/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pmac32_defconfig+KVM/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296343/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
Failed: powerpc-next/allmodconfig+64K_PAGES/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296342/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/allmodconfig+64K_PAGES/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296341/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/skiroot_defconfig/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296339/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powernv_defconfig+NO_NUMA/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296338/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powernv_defconfig+STRICT_RWX/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296337/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/corenet64_smp_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296332/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/corenet32_smp_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296331/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_HUGETLB/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296322/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_KVM/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296321/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig+NO_MEMORY_HOTPLUG/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296319/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powerpc-randconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296317/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c:168:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_flush_nmi_ipi' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c:166:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_send_nmi_ipi' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_TM/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296316/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig+NO_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296292/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296256/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+UP/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296248/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_ALTIVEC/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296247/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powerpc-allyesconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296246/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powerpc-allmodconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296243/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296239/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/mpc85xx_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296233/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/pasemi_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296230/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ps3_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296229/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/maple_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296228/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/g5_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296227/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/cell_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296225/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296222/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powernv_defconfig/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296221/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_ALTIVEC/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296219/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1611:1: error: label 'out' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-label]
Failed: powerpc-next/corenet64_smp_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296213/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/corenet32_smp_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296212/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig+FA_DUMP/powerpc-5.3 (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296201/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_HUGETLB/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296200/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/allmodconfig+ppc64le/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296199/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig+FA_DUMP/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296198/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64le_defconfig+NO_KVM/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296197/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_KVM/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296196/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_le_defconfig/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296195/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64le_defconfig/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296194/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_TM/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296193/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+UP/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296181/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig+NO_RADIX/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296177/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig+NO_MEMORY_HOTPLUG/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296175/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powernv_defconfig+NO_RADIX/ppc64le (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296173/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/maple_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296170/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296120/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/powerpc-randconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296110/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/mpc85xx_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296105/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h:101:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'slice_is_hugepage_only_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Failed: powerpc-next/powerpc-allyesconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296104/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/powerpc-allmodconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296103/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pasemi_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296101/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ppc64_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296100/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/ps3_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296096/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/g5_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296095/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/cell_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296093/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?
Failed: powerpc-next/pseries_defconfig/powerpc (http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13296091/log/)
/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:1361:2: error: 'emulated' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:2: error: #error XXX: bitmap_zero with non-const size? Good code? /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:660:2: error: #error XXX: are we sure high_slices is > 0 here when SLICE_NUM_HIGH? Perhaps not for 32-bit tasks on 64?