ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
Subsystems (2)
Alim Akhtar
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE is currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a bigger RAM_DISK can be used with defconfig.
---
Every time I build exynos_defconfig, I need to manually change RAM_SIZE to match my ramdisk image size. I am not sure what is the best ramdisk size might be, but bumping it to 64K might be a reasonable one.
arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig +1 -1
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES=64 CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CRYPTOLOOP=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y -CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=8192 +CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=65536 CONFIG_SCSI=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=y CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=y
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
RFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
Hello Alim,
Quoted 6 lines · Alim Akhtar
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZEis currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a biggerRAM_DISKcan be used with defconfig.Signed-off-by Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>---
I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable to me. So for this patch:
Quoted 4 lines
Every time I build
exynos_defconfig, I need to manually changeRAM_SIZEto match my ramdisk image size. I am not sure what is the best ramdisk size might be, but bumping it to 64K might be a reasonable one.
In case you are interested, I got some stats by doing grep on the ARM defconfigs using this [0]. Of course the sizes depends on the platform but just to have an idea about what sizes are more popular than others.
SIZE COUNT
1024 17
8192 43
10240 1
16384 20
20000 25
32768 36
65536 15
[0]: http://hastebin.com/buqukimede.bash
Best regards,
Signature · 3 lines
Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America
RFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
Quoted 7 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Alim,
Quoted 4 lines · Alim Akhtar
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZEis currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a biggerRAM_DISKcan be used with defconfig.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>---
I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable to me. So for this patch:
It's _not_ 8KiB or 64KiB.
config BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE
int "Default RAM disk size (kbytes)"
It's 8MiB or 64MiB - the value you place here is in units of 1024 bytes.
Signature · 2 lines
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
Alim Akhtar
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
Hi Russell,
Quoted 15 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
Quoted 7 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Alim,
Quoted 4 lines · Alim Akhtar
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZEis currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a biggerRAM_DISKcan be used with defconfig.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>---
I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable to me. So for this patch:
Quoted 7 lines
It's _not_ 8KiB or 64KiB.
config
BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE
int "Default RAM disk size (kbytes)"It's 8MiB or 64MiB - the value you place here is in units of 1024 bytes.
Thanks for correcting, will correct it.
RFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
In reply to Russell King - ARM LinuxHello Russell,
Quoted 15 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
Quoted 7 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Alim,
Quoted 4 lines · Alim Akhtar
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZEis currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a biggerRAM_DISKcan be used with defconfig.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>---
I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable to me. So for this patch:
Quoted 7 lines
It's _not_ 8KiB or 64KiB.
config
BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE
int "Default RAM disk size (kbytes)"It's 8MiB or 64MiB - the value you place here is in units of 1024 bytes.
Err, right. I got confused by the patch's commit message, sorry about that and thanks for the clarification.
Best regards,
Signature · 3 lines
Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America
Alim Akhtar
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
In reply to Javier Martinez CanillasHi Javier,
Quoted 7 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Alim,
Quoted 4 lines · Alim Akhtar
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZEis currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a biggerRAM_DISKcan be used with defconfig.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>---
I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable to me. So for this patch:
Reviewed-by Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
Thanks
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Every time I build
exynos_defconfig, I need to manually changeRAM_SIZEto match my ramdisk image size. I am not sure what is the best ramdisk size might be, but bumping it to 64K might be a reasonable one.In case you are interested, I got some stats by doing grep on the ARM defconfigs using this [0]. Of course the sizes depends on the platform but just to have an idea about what sizes are more popular than others.
Quoted 9 lines
SIZE COUNT
1024 17
8192 43
10240 1
16384 20
20000 25
32768 36
65536 15
This is informative.
Quoted 4 lines
[0]: http://hastebin.com/buqukimede.bash
Best regards,
RFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
In reply to Alim AkhtarQuoted 10 lines · On Monday 19 October 2015 16:18:35 Alim Akhtar wrote:
Spam Status: CRM114
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZEis currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a biggerRAM_DISKcan be used with defconfig.Signed-off-by Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>---
Every time I buildexynos_defconfig, I need to manually changeRAM_SIZEto match my ramdisk image size. I am not sure what is the best ramdisk size might be, but bumping it to 64K might be a reasonable one.
Is there still a reason to use ramdisks these days? If 8MB is not enough to have a useful initrd, that might mean that everyone else uses initramfs and you should just do the same thing?
Then we can also remove this option here.
Arnd
Alim Akhtar
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
Hi Arnd
Quoted 12 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 10 lines · On Monday 19 October 2015 16:18:35 Alim Akhtar wrote:
Spam Status: CRM114
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZEis currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a biggerRAM_DISKcan be used with defconfig.Signed-off-by Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>---
Every time I buildexynos_defconfig, I need to manually changeRAM_SIZEto match my ramdisk image size. I am not sure what is the best ramdisk size might be, but bumping it to 64K might be a reasonable one.
Quoted 4 lines
Is there still a reason to use ramdisks these days? If 8MB is not enough to have a useful initrd, that might mean that everyone else uses initramfs and you should just do the same thing?
There is not specific reason to still use ramdisks, but I feel till we remove this config, lets modify it to be used by few like me. I am ok with either way.
Thanks
Quoted 4 lines
Then we can also remove this option here.
Arnd