Patch for SystemACE without CONFIG_XILINX_OCP

hI,

I passed around the attached patch in hopes that it could be integrated into the linuxppc-2.4 bitkeeper tree, assuming that is the best place to maintain linux 2.4 for PPC. But I don't see it showing up in the repository.

Actually, I noticed that there were no changes to the tree in a little while. Is everybody off working on 2.6? Should I be there too?
- --

Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Stephen Williams wrote:

|
|
|
| hI,
|
| I passed around the attached patch in hopes that it could be
| integrated into the linuxppc-2.4 bitkeeper tree, assuming that
| is the best place to maintain linux 2.4 for PPC. But I don't
| see it showing up in the repository.

And of course I forgot to attach the patch. This time, it really is attached.

- --

Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
#   2004/06/10 18:45:08-07:00 [email protected]
#   Condition Xilinx on-chip processor config with
#   CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO
#
# arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c
#   2004/06/10 18:45:06-07:00 [email protected] +1 -1
#   Condition Xilinx on-chip processor support with
#   CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO
#
# arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile
#   2004/06/10 18:45:06-07:00 [email protected] +1 -1
#   Condition Xilinx on-chip processor support with
#   CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO
#
# BitKeeper/etc/ignore
#   2004/06/10 18:45:06-07:00 [email protected] +4 -0
#   Added arch/ppc/boot/images/uImage arch/ppc/boot/images/vmlinux.UBoot arch/ppc/boot/images/vmlinux.gz arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_defs.h to the ignore list
#
diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile	2004-06-10 19:57:40 -07:00
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile	2004-06-10 19:57:40 -07:00
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_OCP)		+= ocp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_40x)		+= ppc4xx_setup.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_4xx)		+= todc_time.o idle_4xx.o
-ifeq ($(CONFIG_XILINX_OCP),y)
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_XILINX_OCP)$(CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO),yy)
 obj-$(CONFIG_40x)		+= xilinx_pic.o
 else
 obj-$(CONFIG_40x)		+= ppc4xx_pic.o
diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c
--- a/arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c	2004-06-10 19:57:40 -07:00
+++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c	2004-06-10 19:57:40 -07:00
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
 	setup_indirect_pci(hose_a, PPC405_PCI_CONFIG_ADDR,
 			   PPC405_PCI_CONFIG_DATA);

-#ifdef CONFIG_XILINX_OCP
+#if defined(CONFIG_XILINX_OCP) && defined(CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO)
/* Eliminate "unused variable" warning for pcip. Optimizer removes. */ pcip = NULL;
new_pmm_min = PPC405_PCI_LOWER_MEM;

Looks like it went into linuxppc-2.4 back on June 17th to me:
http://ppc.bkbits.net:8080/linuxppc-2.4/[email protected]?nav=index.html|src/|src/arch|src/arch/ppc|src/arch/ppc/kernel|related/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile|[email protected]

Scott

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Scott Anderson wrote:

|
| Stephen Williams wrote:
|
|> I passed around the attached patch in hopes that it could be
|> integrated into the linuxppc-2.4 bitkeeper tree, assuming that
|> is the best place to maintain linux 2.4 for PPC. But I don't
|> see it showing up in the repository.
|
|
| Looks like it went into linuxppc-2.4 back on June 17th to me:

I see it has indeed. My mistake, thanks.

- --

Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

So what happens to this list at the end of this month? Has a new home been found?

--Tom

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

[ Tom Curran writes: ]

Yes, haven't you been reading the News & Notes?

--
Dave Wolfe
LinuxPPC mail lists owner

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/