mdadm problems with partitioned md devices
Hi,
[please CC: me]
while trying to use md to overcome limitations of dm, I stumbled upon the following problem: It is impossible to have more than 4 partitioned md devices since mdadm will create the 5th device with major:minor 255:0, which is bogus.
Way to reproduce the problem:
linux:~ # mdadm --stop --scan
linux:~ # rm /dev/md_d*
linux:~ # sync
linux:~ # mdadm -B /dev/md_d0 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb5
mdadm: array /dev/md_d0 built and started.
linux:~ # mdadm -B /dev/md_d1 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb6
mdadm: array /dev/md_d1 built and started.
linux:~ # mdadm -B /dev/md_d2 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb7
mdadm: array /dev/md_d2 built and started.
linux:~ # mdadm -B /dev/md_d3 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb8
mdadm: array /dev/md_d3 built and started.
linux:~ # mdadm -B /dev/md_d4 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb9
mdadm: error opening /dev/md_d4: No such device or address
linux:~ # mdadm --version
mdadm - v1.8.1 - 05 November 2004
linux:~ # uname -a
Linux linux 2.6.10-rc2suseconfig #5 Tue Nov 23 14:12:13 CET 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux linux:~ #
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
Signature · 1 line
http://www.hailfinger.org/
Quoted 8 lines · On Tuesday November 23, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
[please CC: me]
while trying to use md to overcome limitations of dm, I stumbled upon the following problem: It is impossible to have more than 4 partitioned md devices since mdadm will create the 5th device with major:minor 255:0, which is bogus.
You need user-space (libc in particular) that supports the new 32bit device numbers in 2.6. I don't know which version of glibc that would be, or which distributions support it. debian/unstable (which I use) doesn't support it yet :-(
You could test your distribution with
mknod /tmp/test b 253 1024
ls -l /tmp/test
rm /tmp/test
and see if the major/minor is reported as "253, 1024" or "253, 0". If the later, you need new glibc.
If the former, your userspace is up-to-date but there must be a bug in mdadm.
If this is the case, let me know and I will look into it.
NeilBrown
Quoted 12 lines · Neil Brown
Quoted 8 lines · Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Hi,
[please CC: me]
while trying to use md to overcome limitations of dm, I stumbled upon the following problem: It is impossible to have more than 4 partitioned md devices since mdadm will create the 5th device with major:minor 255:0, which is bogus.
Quoted 4 lines
You need user-space (libc in particular) that supports the new 32bit device numbers in 2.6. I don't know which version of glibc that would be, or which distributions support it. debian/unstable (which I use) doesn't support it yet :-(
Use SUSE. They support it even in older distributions like 9.1 which is freely downloadable by now. At least the glibc-2.3.3 shipped with SUSE 9.1 already supports a large dev_t.
Quoted 10 lines
You could test your distribution with
mknod/tmp/testb 253 1024
ls -l/tmp/test
rm/tmp/testand see if the major/minor is reported as "253, 1024" or "253, 0". If the later, you need new glibc.
If the former, your userspace is up-to-date but there must be a bug in mdadm.
If this is the case, let me know and I will look into it.
I fear there is a bug in mdadm or in the headers it includes:
linux:~ # mknod /tmp/test b 253 1024
linux:~ # ls -l /tmp/test
brw-r--r-- 1 root root 253, 1024 Nov 24 00:59 /tmp/test
linux:~ # rm /tmp/test
linux:~ # strace mknod /tmp/test b 253 1024 2>&1|grep ^mknod mknod("/tmp/test", S_IFBLK|0666, makedev(253, 1024)) = 0
linux:~ # rm /dev/md_d*
linux:~ # strace -o out.md0 mdadm -B /dev/md_d0 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb5
mdadm: array /dev/md_d0 built and started.
linux:~ # strace -o out.md1 mdadm -B /dev/md_d1 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb6
mdadm: array /dev/md_d1 built and started.
linux:~ # strace -o out.md2 mdadm -B /dev/md_d2 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb7
mdadm: array /dev/md_d2 built and started.
linux:~ # strace -o out.md3 mdadm -B /dev/md_d3 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb8
mdadm: array /dev/md_d3 built and started.
linux:~ # strace -o out.md4 mdadm -B /dev/md_d4 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb9
mdadm: error opening /dev/md_d4: No such device or address
linux:~ # grep mknod out.md*|grep -v _p
out.md0:mknod("/dev/md_d0", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 0)) = 0
out.md1:mknod("/dev/md_d1", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 64)) = 0
out.md2:mknod("/dev/md_d2", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 128)) = 0
out.md3:mknod("/dev/md_d3", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 192)) = 0
out.md4:mknod("/dev/md_d4", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(255, 0)) = 0linux:~ #
Doing a more thorough analysis, it seems the MAJOR and MINOR macros used by mdadm via includes can only handle the small dev_t.
Oh well... I just fixed it. Basically you have to replace all occurences of MKDEV(X) with makedev(x), MAJOR(x) with major(x) and MINOR(x) with minor(x) and it will work just fine. I have attached a patch but I don't want to just mindlessly do a search/replace operation without checking for issues with tools I didn't test, so please test if it works for you.
Proof that it works for me:
linux:~ # strace -o out.md4 mdadm -B /dev/md_d4 -f -l linear -n 1 -ap63 /dev/hdb9
mdadm: array /dev/md_d4 built and started.
linux:~ # grep ^mknod out.md*|grep -v _p
out.md0:mknod("/dev/md_d0", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 0)) = 0
out.md1:mknod("/dev/md_d1", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 64)) = 0
out.md2:mknod("/dev/md_d2", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 128)) = 0
out.md3:mknod("/dev/md_d3", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 192)) = 0
out.md4:mknod("/dev/md_d4", S_IFBLK|0600, makedev(254, 256)) = 0linux:~ #
[after some more experimenting]
linux:~ # ls -l /dev/md_d255
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 254, 16320 Nov 24 03:03 /dev/md_d255 linux:~ #
However, it seems I have run into the 256 md devices limit ;-)
But I stumbled on another bug: It is possible to specify numbers >63 for the -ap parameter. Since the kernel always assumes 64 minors per partitioned md device, this will cause mdadm to create devices which overlap in minor ranges. Please introduce a limit for that parameter to avoid nasty surprises.
And a feature request: Would it be possible to allow naming like /dev/d0/dev/d0p1/dev/d0p2
etc. ? Right now, an unserscore character is enforced after a digit and this prevents me from emulating some traditional device names.
Expert question: Since the only thing I do with md is abuse it for supporting 63 partitions on generic block devices, is there a tool instead of mdadm which fits my purposes better?
And another bug, this time in the kernel: Partitions for md devices don't disappear from sysfs after deletion of the underlying md device until the deleted device is opened again. Please fix that (if it seems to difficult, my "partitioned loop device" patch could serve as a starting point).
Thanks for reading this far.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
Signature · 1 line
http://www.hailfinger.org/
Assemble.c +4 -4
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@/* prepare useful information in info structures */ struct stat stb2;fstat (mdfd, &stb2); - info.array.md_minor =MINOR (stb2.st_rdev); + info.array.md_minor =minor (stb2.st_rdev); st->ss->update_super (&info, super, update, devname, verbose);
@@ -291,8 +291,8 @@fprintf (stderr, Name": %s is identified as a member of %s, slot %d.\n" , devname, mddev, info.disk.raid_disk); devices[devcnt].devname = devname; - devices[devcnt].major =MAJOR (stb.st_rdev); - devices[devcnt].minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + devices[devcnt].major =major (stb.st_rdev); + devices[devcnt].minor =minor (stb.st_rdev); devices[devcnt].oldmajor = info.disk.major; devices[devcnt].oldminor = info.disk.minor; devices[devcnt].events = info.events;
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@* so we can just start the array */ unsigned long dev; - dev =MKDEV (devices[chosen_drive].major, + dev =makedev (devices[chosen_drive].major, devices[chosen_drive].minor);if (ioctl (mdfd,START_ARRAY , dev)) { fprintf(stderr, Name ": Cannot start array: %s\n",
Build.c +3 -3
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ array.raid_disks = raiddisks; array.md_minor =0 ;if (fstat (mdfd, &stb)==0 ) - array.md_minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + array.md_minor =minor (stb.st_rdev); array.not_persistent =1 ; array.state =0 ;/* not clean, but no errors */ if (assume_clean)
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ disk.number = i; disk.raid_disk = i; disk.state =6 ; - disk.major =MAJOR (stb.st_rdev); - disk.minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + disk.major =major (stb.st_rdev); + disk.minor =minor (stb.st_rdev);if (ioctl (mdfd,ADD_NEW_DISK , &disk)) {fprintf (stderr, Name": ADD_NEW_DISK failed for %s: %s\n" , dv->devname,strerror (errno));
Create.c +3 -3
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@*/ array.md_minor =0 ;if (fstat (mdfd, &stb)==0 ) - array.md_minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + array.md_minor =minor (stb.st_rdev); array.not_persistent =0 ;/*** FIX: Need to do something about RAID-6 here ***/ if ( ( (level == 5) &&
@@ -391,8 +391,8 @@return 1 ; }fstat (fd, &stb); - disk.major =MAJOR (stb.st_rdev); - disk.minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + disk.major =major (stb.st_rdev); + disk.minor =minor (stb.st_rdev);close (fd); }if (disk.state !=1 )
Detail.c +3 -3
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@struct mdstat_ent *ms =mdstat_read (0 );struct mdstat_ent *e;int devnum = array.md_minor; -if (MAJOR (stb.st_rdev) !=MD_MAJOR ) +if (major (stb.st_rdev) !=MD_MAJOR ) devnum =-1 - devnum;for (e=ms; e; e=e->next)
@@ -251,8 +251,8 @@* device from the array, and then put it back. * If this fails, we are rebuilding */ -int err =ioctl (fd,HOT_REMOVE_DISK ,MKDEV (disk.major, disk.minor)); -if (err ==0 )ioctl (fd,HOT_ADD_DISK ,MKDEV (disk.major, disk.minor)); +int err =ioctl (fd,HOT_REMOVE_DISK ,makedev (disk.major, disk.minor)); +if (err ==0 )ioctl (fd,HOT_ADD_DISK ,makedev (disk.major, disk.minor));if (err && errno ==EBUSY )printf (" rebuilding" ); }
Grow.c +4 -4
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@*/ info.disk.number = d; - info.disk.major =MAJOR (stb.st_rdev); - info.disk.minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + info.disk.major =major (stb.st_rdev); + info.disk.minor =minor (stb.st_rdev); info.disk.raid_disk = d; info.disk.state = (1 <<MD_DISK_SYNC ) | (1 <<MD_DISK_ACTIVE ); st->ss->update_super (&info, super,"grow" , newdev,0 );
@@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ info.array.active_disks = nd+1 ; info.array.working_disks = nd+1 ; info.disk.number = nd; - info.disk.major =MAJOR (stb.st_rdev); - info.disk.minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + info.disk.major =major (stb.st_rdev); + info.disk.minor =minor (stb.st_rdev); info.disk.raid_disk = nd; info.disk.state = (1 <<MD_DISK_SYNC ) | (1 <<MD_DISK_ACTIVE ); st->ss->update_super (&info, super,"grow" , dv,0 );
Manage.c +2 -2
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ disc.number =j; disc.raid_disk = j; disc.state =0 ; - disc.major =MAJOR (stb.st_rdev); - disc.minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + disc.major =major (stb.st_rdev); + disc.minor =minor (stb.st_rdev);if (ioctl (fd,ADD_NEW_DISK , &disc)) {fprintf (stderr, Name": add new device failed for %s: %s\n" , dv->devname,strerror (errno));
mdadm.c +1 -1
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@if ((int )ident.super_minor ==-2 ) {struct stat stb;fstat (mdfd, &stb); - ident.super_minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + ident.super_minor =minor (stb.st_rdev); } }
mdopen.c +6 -6
@@ -49,21 +49,21 @@return ;if (!S_ISBLK (stb.st_mode))return ; - major =MAJOR (stb.st_rdev); - minor =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); + major =major (stb.st_rdev); + minor =minor (stb.st_rdev);for (i=1 ; i <= cnt ; i++) {struct stat stb2;sprintf (name,"%s%s%d" , dev, dig?"_p" :"" , i);if (stat (name, &stb2)==0 ) {if (!S_ISBLK (stb2.st_mode))continue ; -if (stb2.st_rdev ==MKDEV (major, minor+i)) +if (stb2.st_rdev ==makedev (major, minor+i))continue ;unlink (name); }else { stb2 = stb; } -mknod (name,S_IFBLK |0600 ,MKDEV (major, minor+i)); +mknod (name,S_IFBLK |0600 ,makedev (major, minor+i));chown (name, stb2.st_uid, stb2.st_gid);chmod (name, stb2.st_mode &07777 ); }
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@/* check major number is correct */ if (autof>0 ) major =get_mdp_major (); -if (stb.st_mode &&MAJOR (stb.st_rdev) != major) +if (stb.st_mode &&major (stb.st_rdev) != major) must_remove =1 ;if (stb.st_mode && !must_remove) {mdu_array_info_t array;
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@unlink (dev); } -if (mknod (dev,S_IFBLK |0600 ,MKDEV (major, minor))!=0 ) { +if (mknod (dev,S_IFBLK |0600 ,makedev (major, minor))!=0 ) {fprintf (stderr, Name": failed to create %s\n" , dev);return -1 ; }
Monitor.c +5 -5
@@ -246,10 +246,10 @@struct stat stb;if (fstat (fd, &stb) ==0 && (S_IFMT &stb.st_mode)==S_IFBLK ) { -if (MAJOR (stb.st_rdev) ==MD_MAJOR ) - st->devnum =MINOR (stb.st_rdev); +if (major (stb.st_rdev) ==MD_MAJOR ) + st->devnum =minor (stb.st_rdev);else - st->devnum =-1 - (MINOR (stb.st_rdev)>>6 ); + st->devnum =-1 - (minor (stb.st_rdev)>>6 ); } }
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@alert ("Fail" , dev, dv, mailaddr, alert_cmd); else if (i >= (unsigned)array.raid_disks && (disc.major || disc.minor) && - st->devid[i] == MKDEV(disc.major, disc.minor) && + st->devid[i] == makedev(disc.major, disc.minor) && ((newstate&change)&(1<<MD_DISK_FAULTY)) ) alert("FailSpare", dev, dv, mailaddr, alert_cmd);
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@alert ("SpareActive" , dev, dv, mailaddr, alert_cmd); } st->devstate[i] = disc.state; - st->devid[i] =MKDEV (disc.major, disc.minor); + st->devid[i] =makedev (disc.major, disc.minor); }close (fd); st->active = array.active_disks;
Query.c +1 -1
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@if (md_get_version (fd) >=9000 &&ioctl (fd,GET_ARRAY_INFO , &array)>=0 ) {if (ioctl (fd,GET_DISK_INFO , &disc) >=0 && -MKDEV ((unsigned )disc.major,(unsigned )disc.minor) == stb.st_rdev) +makedev ((unsigned )disc.major,(unsigned )disc.minor) == stb.st_rdev) activity ="active" ;else activity ="mismatch" ;
util.c +6 -6
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@return (vers.major*10000 ) + (vers.minor*100 ) + vers.patchlevel;if (errno ==EACCES )return -1 ; -if (MAJOR (stb.st_rdev) ==MD_MAJOR ) +if (major (stb.st_rdev) ==MD_MAJOR )return (3600 );return -1 ; }
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@char *n =strdup (name);struct devmap *dm =malloc (sizeof (*dm));if (dm) { - dm->major =MAJOR (stb->st_rdev); - dm->minor =MINOR (stb->st_rdev); + dm->major =major (stb->st_rdev); + dm->minor =minor (stb->st_rdev); dm->name = n; dm->next = devlist; devlist = dm;
@@ -478,14 +478,14 @@if (dev <0 ) {int mdp =get_mdp_major ();if (mdp <0 )return NULL ; - rdev =MKDEV (mdp, (-1 -dev)<<6 ); + rdev =makedev (mdp, (-1 -dev)<<6 );sprintf (devname,"/dev/md/d%d" ,-1 -dev);if (stat (devname, &stb) ==0 && (S_IFMT &stb.st_mode) ==S_IFBLK && (stb.st_rdev == rdev))return devname; }else { - rdev =MKDEV (MD_MAJOR , dev); + rdev =makedev (MD_MAJOR , dev);sprintf (devname,"/dev/md%d" , dev);if (stat (devname, &stb) ==0 && (S_IFMT&stb.st_mode) == S_IFBLK
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ && (stb.st_rdev == rdev))return devname; } - dn =map_dev (MAJOR (rdev),MINOR (rdev)); + dn =map_dev (major (rdev),minor (rdev));if (dn)return dn;sprintf (devname,"/dev/.tmp.md%d" , dev);