Neighbour table overflow
Hi,
I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working.
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth5
brctl stp br0 on
I check on my system's /var/log/syslog file. It shows something strange messages as below: -
Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes) Jan 2 10:44:32 fw01 last message repeated 11 times Jan 2 12:27:08 fw01 kernel: Neighbour table overflow. Jan 2 12:27:11 fw01 last message repeated 9 times Jan 2 12:27:13 fw01 kernel: NET: 10 messages suppressed.
I unplug the network cable connected to the eth5 and run a ping to my router...the network is up again...I am able to ping my router.
Then, I plug the network cable to the eth5 interface again...I run the ping to my router and suddenly I can't ping my router. The same error messages pops out in the /var/log/syslog file.
How can I solve this issue?
Regards,
ro0ot
we've had similar issues on a large scanning machine. nothing like trying to keep 100,000 entries in your arp cache.
try the following (at least under redhat w/ 2.4 kernels):
echo 100000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/default/gc_thresh3
this will increase the max size of the neighbor table to 100000
-c
--
Christopher E. Cramer, Ph.D.
Information Technology Security Officer Duke University, Office of Information Technology
Quoted 42 lines · WL Siew
Hi,
I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working.
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth5brctl stp br0 on
I check on my system's
/var/log/syslogfile. It shows something strange messages as below: -Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes) Jan 2 10:44:32 fw01 last message repeated 11 times Jan 2 12:27:08 fw01 kernel: Neighbour table overflow. Jan 2 12:27:11 fw01 last message repeated 9 times Jan 2 12:27:13 fw01 kernel: NET: 10 messages suppressed.I unplug the network cable connected to the eth5 and run a ping to my router...the network is up again...I am able to ping my router.
Then, I plug the network cable to the eth5 interface again...I run the ping to my router and suddenly I can't ping my router. The same error messages pops out in the
/var/log/syslogfile.How can I solve this issue?
Regards,
ro0ot_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
Op wo, 05-01-2005 te 01:39 +0800, schreef WL Siew:
Quoted 8 lines
Hi,
I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working.
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0
Quoted 6 lines
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth5brctl stp br0 on
From the information you give, it seems that you assigned the IP address 0.0.0.0 to your bridge ports and you didn't to start the bridge itself. Your box therefore has no IP address and will therefore not respond to icmp messages.
Try
# ifconfig br0 $IP_ADDRESS A ping to $IP_ADDRESS from another host should then work (after you start the bridge it can take a few seconds before the bridge responds).
Quoted 8 lines
I check on my system's
/var/log/syslogfile. It shows something strange messages as below: -Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes) Jan 2 10:44:32 fw01 last message repeated 11 times Jan 2 12:27:08 fw01 kernel: Neighbour table overflow. Jan 2 12:27:11 fw01 last message repeated 9 times Jan 2 12:27:13 fw01 kernel: NET: 10 messages suppressed.
Perhaps these are triggered by the fact that your network devices enter promiscuous mode.
Quoted 2 lines
I unplug the network cable connected to the eth5 and run a ping to my router...the network is up again...I am able to ping my router.
I'm assuming you are talking about the bridge box when you are talking about the router? The bridge ports of a bridge are by default not separately pingable. Only the IP address of the bridge (br0) device itself is pingable.
You can change that behaviour by making a brouter. You can then assign IP addresses to the bridge ports and use them.
cheers,
Bart
I had this line for the br0 IP address: -
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
Regards,
ro0ot
Quoted 64 lines · Bart De Schuymer
Op wo, 05-01-2005 te 01:39 +0800, schreef WL Siew:
Quoted 9 lines
Hi,
I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working.
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0brctl addbr br0
Quoted 8 lines
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth5brctl stp br0 on
From the information you give, it seems that you assigned the IP address
0.0.0.0 to your bridge ports and you didn't to start the bridge itself. Your box therefore has no IP address and will therefore not respond to icmp messages.
Try
# ifconfig br0 $IP_ADDRESS A ping to $IP_ADDRESS from another host should then work (after you start the bridge it can take a few seconds before the bridge responds).Quoted 9 lines
I check on my system's
/var/log/syslogfile. It shows something strange messages as below: -Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes) Jan 2 10:44:32 fw01 last message repeated 11 times Jan 2 12:27:08 fw01 kernel: Neighbour table overflow. Jan 2 12:27:11 fw01 last message repeated 9 times Jan 2 12:27:13 fw01 kernel: NET: 10 messages suppressed.Perhaps these are triggered by the fact that your network devices enter promiscuous mode.
Quoted 3 lines
I unplug the network cable connected to the eth5 and run a ping to my router...the network is up again...I am able to ping my router.
I'm assuming you are talking about the bridge box when you are talking about the router? The bridge ports of a bridge are by default not separately pingable. Only the IP address of the bridge (br0) device itself is pingable.
You can change that behaviour by making a brouter. You can then assign IP addresses to the bridge ports and use them.cheers,
Bart
Based on the result of the command "brctl showstp br0" below, what is the "designated bridge" means?
Something strange on this line "designated bridge 8000.000e6ae78720", this is because this is the MAC address of my 3Com 4400 switch which I have VLAN running and bridge too...
Will this cause the problem?
root@fw01:~# brctl showstp br0 br0 bridge id 8000.000c4120c1a6 designated root 8000.000bac2851c0 root port 2 path cost 136 max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00 hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00 forward delay 15.00 bridge forward delay 15.00 ageing time 300.00 hello timer 0.00 tcn timer 0.00 topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 0.90 flags
eth0 (1)
port id 8001 state forwarding designated root 8000.000bac2851c0 path cost 100 designated bridge 8000.000c4120c1a6 message age timer 0.00 designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 136 hold timer 0.00
flags
eth5 (2)
port id 8002 state forwarding designated root 8000.000bac2851c0 path cost 100 designated bridge 8000.000e6ae78720 message age timer 3.08 designated port 800d forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 36 hold timer 0.00
flags
Quoted 83 lines · ro0ot wrote:
I had this line for the br0 IP address: -
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
Regards,
ro0otQuoted 58 lines · Bart De Schuymer
Op wo, 05-01-2005 te 01:39 +0800, schreef WL Siew:
Quoted 9 lines
Hi,
I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working.
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0brctl addbr br0
Quoted 8 lines
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth5brctl stp br0 on
From the information you give, it seems that you assigned the IP address
0.0.0.0 to your bridge ports and you didn't to start the bridge itself. Your box therefore has no IP address and will therefore not respond to icmp messages.
Try
# ifconfig br0 $IP_ADDRESS A ping to $IP_ADDRESS from another host should then work (after you start the bridge it can take a few seconds before the bridge responds).Quoted 8 lines
I check on my system's
/var/log/syslogfile. It shows something strange messages as below: -Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes) Jan 2 10:44:32 fw01 last message repeated 11 times Jan 2 12:27:08 fw01 kernel: Neighbour table overflow. Jan 2 12:27:11 fw01 last message repeated 9 times Jan 2 12:27:13 fw01 kernel: NET: 10 messages suppressed.Perhaps these are triggered by the fact that your network devices enter promiscuous mode.
Quoted 2 lines
I unplug the network cable connected to the eth5 and run a ping to my router...the network is up again...I am able to ping my router.
I'm assuming you are talking about the bridge box when you are talking about the router? The bridge ports of a bridge are by default not separately pingable. Only the IP address of the bridge (br0) device itself is pingable.
You can change that behaviour by making a brouter. You can then assign IP addresses to the bridge ports and use them.Quoted 7 lines
cheers,
Bart_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:10:48 +0800 ro0ot <[email protected]> wrote:
Based on the result of the command "brctl showstp br0" below, what is the "designated bridge" means?
It means the the next step up the hierarchal spanning tree from this bridge. I.e where to send frames that aren't in the bridge forwarding table
Quoted 4 lines
Something strange on this line "designated bridge 8000.000e6ae78720", this is because this is the MAC address of my 3Com 4400 switch which I have VLAN running and bridge too...
Many switches use the same spanning tree protocol because they are really just bridges. The issue is they assume that any other bridge also sees all the traffic (and is not just on the VLAN).
You could try turning off STP but it might not help.
Quoted 142 lines
Will this cause the problem?
root@fw01:~# brctl showstp br0 br0 bridge id 8000.000c4120c1a6 designated root 8000.000bac2851c0 root port 2 path cost 136 max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00 hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00 forward delay 15.00 bridge forward delay 15.00 ageing time 300.00 hello timer 0.00 tcn timer 0.00 topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 0.90 flagseth0 (1)
port id 8001 state
forwardingdesignated root 8000.000bac2851c0 path cost 100 designated bridge 8000.000c4120c1a6 message agetimer 0.00
designated port 8001 forward delay
timer 0.00
designated cost 136 hold
timer 0.00
flagseth5 (2)
port id 8002 state
forwardingdesignated root 8000.000bac2851c0 path cost 100 designated bridge 8000.000e6ae78720 message agetimer 3.08
designated port 800d forward delay
timer 0.00
designated cost 36 hold
timer 0.00
flagsQuoted 82 lines · ro0ot wrote:
I had this line for the br0 IP address: -
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
Regards,
ro0otQuoted 62 lines · Bart De Schuymer
Op wo, 05-01-2005 te 01:39 +0800, schreef WL Siew:
Quoted 13 lines
Hi,
I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working.
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth5Quoted 6 lines
brctl stp br0 on
From the information you give, it seems that you assigned the IP address
0.0.0.0 to your bridge ports and you didn't to start the bridge itself. Your box therefore has no IP address and will therefore not respond to icmp messages.
Try
# ifconfig br0 $IP_ADDRESS A ping to $IP_ADDRESS from another host should then work (after you start the bridge it can take a few seconds before the bridge responds).Quoted 9 lines
I check on my system's
/var/log/syslogfile. It shows something strange messages as below: -Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes) Jan 2 10:44:32 fw01 last message repeated 11 times Jan 2 12:27:08 fw01 kernel: Neighbour table overflow. Jan 2 12:27:11 fw01 last message repeated 9 times Jan 2 12:27:13 fw01 kernel: NET: 10 messages suppressed.Perhaps these are triggered by the fact that your network devices enter promiscuous mode.
Quoted 3 lines
I unplug the network cable connected to the eth5 and run a ping to my router...the network is up again...I am able to ping my router.
I'm assuming you are talking about the bridge box when you are talking about the router? The bridge ports of a bridge are by default not separately pingable. Only the IP address of the bridge (br0) device itself is pingable.
You can change that behaviour by making a brouter. You can then assign IP addresses to the bridge ports and use them.Quoted 7 lines
cheers,
BartQuoted 5 lines
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge