sd driver
Hello All,
Hello All,
I'm trying to attach one proprietary SCSI driver for optical disk on kernel 2.6.
I noted that if sd attach the same device before, my driver will never be called in the probe function. How can I by-pass this situation ? If anyone can help me I appreciate very much.
Aldo
Signature · 4 lines
Aldo Gavioli Product Manager NetStorage Software s.r.l Viale Europa,74 - 20090 Cusago (Milan) Italy - Web: www.netstorage.it
Quoted 8 lines · Aldo Gavioli
Hello All,
Hello All,
I'm trying to attach one proprietary SCSI driver for optical disk on kernel 2.6.
I noted that if sd attach the same device before, my driver will never be called in the probe function. How can I by-pass this situation ? If anyone can help me I appreciate very much.
ignoring the previous answer and posting your question three times isn't going to get your question answered faster.
Quoted 4 lines · Arjan van de Ven
ignoring the previous answer and posting your question three times isn't going to get your question answered faster.
Just out of mild curiosity, when one composes a question after much research, and posts it to a mailing list, but gets no response after...almost 2-3 weeks, is it considered impolite to re-post or otherwise "bump" the question again? :)
--Kumba
Signature · 1 line
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond
On Mon, 23 May 2005 20:49:57 -0400 Kumba wrote:
| Arjan van de Ven wrote: | > | > ignoring the previous answer and posting your question three times isn't | > going to get your question answered faster. | > | | Just out of mild curiosity, when one composes a question after much research, | and posts it to a mailing list, but gets no response after...almost 2-3 weeks, | is it considered impolite to re-post or otherwise "bump" the question again? :)
No, that's OK, but that's not what happened in this case. We saw 2 or 3 emails from Aldo in the space of 1-2 days.
---
~Randy
Quoted 3 lines · randy_dunlap
No, that's OK, but that's not what happened in this case. We saw 2 or 3 emails from Aldo in the space of 1-2 days.
I was being somewhat sarcastic in my response, specifically because while I considered my question [1] (more like a descriptive problem) lengthy, and decently researched, I got no response for the rough length of time mentioned in my preceeding response. Yet, a person who writes a 6-8 line email and provides virtually no information about their issue, or environment the issue is occuring in, gets a response rather quickly.
As I often like to say, "Go Figure", but that's just the cynic in me tonight. I blame C strings.
[1]: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=111474736920566&w=2
--Kumba
Signature · 1 line
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond
On Mon, 23 May 2005 23:26:56 -0400 Kumba wrote:
| randy_dunlap wrote: | > | > No, that's OK, but that's not what happened in this case. | > We saw 2 or 3 emails from Aldo in the space of 1-2 days. | | I was being somewhat sarcastic in my response,
Yes, I detected that, but I chose to ignore it.
| specifically because while I | considered my question [1] (more like a descriptive problem) lengthy, and | decently researched, I got no response for the rough length of time mentioned in | my preceeding response. Yet, a person who writes a 6-8 line email and provides | virtually no information about their issue, or environment the issue is occuring | in, gets a response rather quickly. | | As I often like to say, "Go Figure", but that's just the cynic in me tonight. I | blame C strings.
Surely. :)
| [1]: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=111474736920566&w=2
Good luck. I can't help with that one.
---
~Randy