fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus
PATCH 1/1 fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus
Hi there,
please apply the attached patch.
Without this patch lowlevel_init.s is _not_ rebuild when board config file (or other important include files) is changed!
Signature · 5 lines
Steven -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: fix_dep.patch Url: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20050823/aa886b08/attachment.txt
PATCH 1/1 fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus
Review
Quoted 3 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
(quoted diff) +2
-0+* Fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus + Patch by Steven Scholz, 23 Aug 2005
Added, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 4 lines
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love). -- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6
PATCH 1/1 fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus
Quoted 7 lines · Wolfgang Denk
Review
Quoted 2 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
(quoted diff) +2
-0+* Fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus + Patch by Steven Scholz, 23 Aug 2005Added, thanks.
Thanks.
Sorry I did not create it git format-patch. I am still not sure how to use it. Maybe you could add a few lines in your Wiki.
BTW: Was it ok to change the CHANGELOG? You asked for it in your mail "U-Boot Developer's Information":
"Make sure to update the CHANGELOG file appropriately."
But I think unless you apply patches immediatly patching CHANGLOG will always fail. So maybe it's better to have a CHANGELOG entry in the email body instead of the attached patch ...
--
Steven
PATCH 1/1 fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus
Quoted 3 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
Sorry I did not create it git format-patch. I am still not sure how to use it. Maybe you could add a few lines in your Wiki.
This was OK.
Quoted 1 line
BTW: Was it ok to change the CHANGELOG? You asked for it in your mail
Yes.
Quoted 3 lines
But I think unless you apply patches immediatly patching CHANGLOG will always fail. So maybe it's better to have a CHANGELOG entry in the email body instead of the attached patch ...
I'm still experimenting with both ways. Yes, having the CHANGELOG modified by the patch will usually cause merge conflicts, but then I have all information in one file and don't need to jump between the mailer window and my vi session.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 3 lines
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de Half of the people in the world are below average.