cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: Fix build with CONFIG_ACPI unset
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: Fix build with CONFIG_ACPI unset
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
One of the previous commits introducing hybrid processor support to intel_pstate broke build with CONFIG_ACPI unset.
Fix that and while at it fix up empty stubs of two functions related to ACPI CPPC.
--- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +50 -47
@@ -385,9 +385,14 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_gurante }#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */ -static void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio (int cpu) +static inline void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio (int cpu) { } + +static inline int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed (int cpu) +{ +return -ENOTSUPP ; +}#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */ static void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -470,27 +475,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limitacpi_processor_unregister_performance (policy->cpu); } -#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ -static inline void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ -} - -static inline void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ -} - -static inline bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server (void ) -{ -return false; -} -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ - -#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB -static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed (int cpu) -{ -return -ENOTSUPP ; -} -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */ static bool intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (u32 perf,struct cppc_perf_caps *caps) {
@@ -505,6 +489,20 @@ static bool intel_pstate_cppc_perf_caps( return caps->highest_perf && caps->lowest_perf <= caps->highest_perf; } +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ +static inline void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ +} + +static inline void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ +} + +static inline bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server (void ) +{ +return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (struct cpudata *cpu) {
@@ -530,7 +528,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf*/ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_calibrate (struct cpudata *cpu) { -struct cppc_perf_caps caps;int perf_ctl_max_phys = cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical;int perf_ctl_scaling = cpu->pstate.perf_ctl_scaling;int perf_ctl_turbo = pstate_funcs.get_turbo ();
@@ -548,33 +545,39 @@ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_calipr_debug ("CPU%d: HWP_CAP guaranteed = %d\n" , cpu->cpu, cpu->pstate.max_pstate);pr_debug ("CPU%d: HWP_CAP highest = %d\n" , cpu->cpu, cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate); -if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_caps (cpu, &caps)) { -if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.nominal_perf, &caps)) { -pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC nominal\n" , cpu->cpu); - -/* -* If the CPPC nominal performance is valid, it can be -* assumed to correspond to cpu_khz. -*/ -if (caps.nominal_perf == perf_ctl_max_phys) { -intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); -return ; - } - scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (cpu_khz, caps.nominal_perf); - }else if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.guaranteed_perf, &caps)) { -pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC guaranteed\n" , cpu->cpu); - -/* -* If the CPPC guaranteed performance is valid, it can -* be assumed to correspond to max_freq. -*/ -if (caps.guaranteed_perf == perf_ctl_max) { -intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); -return ; +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB )) { +struct cppc_perf_caps caps; + +if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_caps (cpu, &caps)) { +if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.nominal_perf, &caps)) { +pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC nominal\n" , cpu->cpu); + +/* +* If the CPPC nominal performance is valid, it +* can be assumed to correspond to cpu_khz. +*/ +if (caps.nominal_perf == perf_ctl_max_phys) { +intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); +return ; + } + scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (cpu_khz, caps.nominal_perf); + }else if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.guaranteed_perf, &caps)) { +pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC guaranteed\n" , cpu->cpu); + +/* +* If the CPPC guaranteed performance is valid, +* it can be assumed to correspond to max_freq. +*/ +if (caps.guaranteed_perf == perf_ctl_max) { +intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); +return ; + } + scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (max_freq, caps.guaranteed_perf); } - scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (max_freq, caps.guaranteed_perf); } } +#endif /* * If using the CPPC data to compute the HWP-to-frequency scaling factor * doesn't work, use the HWP_CAP gauranteed perf for this purpose with
Quoted 10 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
One of the previous commits introducing hybrid processor support to
intel_pstatebroke build withCONFIG_ACPIunset.Fix that and while at it fix up empty stubs of two functions related to ACPI CPPC.
Fixes eb3693f0521e ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: CPU-specific scaling factor")Signed-off-by Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Hi Rafael,
I still have this build error:
../drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c: In function ‘show_base_frequency’:../drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:950:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed’; did you mean ‘intel_pstate_get_epp’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ratio = intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(policy->cpu);
BTW: s/guranteed/guaranteed/g
Thanks.
Quoted 148 lines
--- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)Index:
linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +50
-47@@ -385,9 +385,14 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_gurante }#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */ -static void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio (int cpu) +static inline void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio (int cpu) { } + +static inline int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed (int cpu) +{ +return -ENOTSUPP ; +}#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */ static void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy)@@ -470,27 +475,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limitacpi_processor_unregister_performance (policy->cpu); } -#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ -static inline void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ -} - -static inline void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ -} - -static inline bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server (void ) -{ -return false; -} -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ - -#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB -static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed (int cpu) -{ -return -ENOTSUPP ; -} -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */ static bool intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (u32 perf,struct cppc_perf_caps *caps) {@@ -505,6 +489,20 @@ static bool intel_pstate_cppc_perf_caps( return caps->highest_perf && caps->lowest_perf <= caps->highest_perf; } +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ +static inline void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ +} + +static inline void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ +} + +static inline bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server (void ) +{ +return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (struct cpudata *cpu) {@@ -530,7 +528,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf*/ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_calibrate (struct cpudata *cpu) { -struct cppc_perf_caps caps;int perf_ctl_max_phys = cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical;int perf_ctl_scaling = cpu->pstate.perf_ctl_scaling;int perf_ctl_turbo = pstate_funcs.get_turbo ();@@ -548,33 +545,39 @@ static void intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_calipr_debug ("CPU%d: HWP_CAP guaranteed = %d\n" , cpu->cpu, cpu->pstate.max_pstate);pr_debug ("CPU%d: HWP_CAP highest = %d\n" , cpu->cpu, cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate); -if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_caps (cpu, &caps)) { -if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.nominal_perf, &caps)) { -pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC nominal\n" , cpu->cpu); - -/* -* If the CPPC nominal performance is valid, it can be -* assumed to correspond to cpu_khz. -*/ -if (caps.nominal_perf == perf_ctl_max_phys) { -intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); -return ; - } - scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (cpu_khz, caps.nominal_perf); - }else if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.guaranteed_perf, &caps)) { -pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC guaranteed\n" , cpu->cpu); - -/* -* If the CPPC guaranteed performance is valid, it can -* be assumed to correspond to max_freq. -*/ -if (caps.guaranteed_perf == perf_ctl_max) { -intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); -return ; +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB )) { +struct cppc_perf_caps caps; + +if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_caps (cpu, &caps)) { +if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.nominal_perf, &caps)) { +pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC nominal\n" , cpu->cpu); + +/* +* If the CPPC nominal performance is valid, it +* can be assumed to correspond to cpu_khz. +*/ +if (caps.nominal_perf == perf_ctl_max_phys) { +intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); +return ; + } + scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (cpu_khz, caps.nominal_perf); + }else if (intel_pstate_cppc_perf_valid (caps.guaranteed_perf, &caps)) { +pr_debug ("CPU%d: Using CPPC guaranteed\n" , cpu->cpu); + +/* +* If the CPPC guaranteed performance is valid, +* it can be assumed to correspond to max_freq. +*/ +if (caps.guaranteed_perf == perf_ctl_max) { +intel_pstate_hybrid_hwp_perf_ctl_parity (cpu); +return ; + } + scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (max_freq, caps.guaranteed_perf); } - scaling =DIV_ROUND_UP (max_freq, caps.guaranteed_perf); } } +#endif /* * If using the CPPC data to compute the HWP-to-frequency scaling factor * doesn't work, use the HWP_CAP gauranteed perf for this purpose with
Signature · 1 line
~Randy
Rafael J. Wysocki
maintainerQuoted 13 lines · Randy Dunlap
Quoted 10 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
One of the previous commits introducing hybrid processor support to
intel_pstatebroke build withCONFIG_ACPIunset.Fix that and while at it fix up empty stubs of two functions related to ACPI CPPC.
Fixes eb3693f0521e ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: CPU-specific scaling factor")Signed-off-by Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Rafael,
I still have this build error:
../drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c: In function ‘show_base_frequency’:../drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:950:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed’; did you mean ‘intel_pstate_get_epp’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ratio =intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(policy->cpu);
Well, I did too much in this patch, will send an update shortly.
Quoted 1 line
BTW: s/guranteed/guaranteed/g
Right.