ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Change RTC_DRV_HYM8563 to builtin
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Change RTC_DRV_HYM8563 to builtin
Apart from providing an RTC the hym8563 chip on some rockchip boards (e.g. rock2 square and firefly) also provide the 32khz clock used by the SoCs thermal sensors.
Switch the driver from a module to builtin such that the thermal protection can work even if modules aren't used/loaded.
---
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +1 -1
@@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ CONFIG_EDAC_HIGHBANK_L2=y CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AS3722=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=y -CONFIG_RTC_DRV_HYM8563=m +CONFIG_RTC_DRV_HYM8563=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX8907=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX8997=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX77686=y
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0.rc3
Heiko Stuebner
maintainerPATCH 1/1 ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Change RTC_DRV_HYM8563 to builtin
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 20:28:02 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
Quoted 8 lines
Apart from providing an RTC the hym8563 chip on some rockchip boards (e.g. rock2 square and firefly) also provide the 32khz clock used by the SoCs thermal sensors.
Switch the driver from a module to builtin such that the thermal protection can work even if modules aren't used/loaded.
Signed-off-by Sjoerd Simons <[email protected]>
Personally I'm ok with the reasoning for requiring rtc to be build in, but I guess others might disagree. Nevertheless
and we'll let armsoc-people decide ;-) .
Ideally we would do the same for the rk808 rtc as well - as it is exactly the same argument / case.
Heiko
Heiko Stuebner
maintainerPATCH 1/1 ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Change RTC_DRV_HYM8563 to builtin
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 20:33:51 schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
Quoted 13 lines
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 20:28:02 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
Quoted 8 lines
Apart from providing an RTC the hym8563 chip on some rockchip boards (e.g. rock2 square and firefly) also provide the 32khz clock used by the SoCs thermal sensors.
Switch the driver from a module to builtin such that the thermal protection can work even if modules aren't used/loaded.
Signed-off-by Sjoerd Simons <[email protected]>Personally I'm ok with the reasoning for requiring rtc to be build in, but I guess others might disagree. Nevertheless
Quoted 7 lines
Acked-by Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>and we'll let armsoc-people decide ;-) .
Ideally we would do the same for the rk808 rtc as well - as it is exactly the same argument / case.
just so nobody gets the wrong idea, on the rk808, the needed clkout is separate in CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_RK808, not in the rtc. Still currently build as module, so depending on if we can build-in the hym8563, we should change the rk808-clkout accordingly.